Skip to main content
Top
Published in: NanoEthics 3/2019

02-12-2019 | Original Research Paper

Chinese Public and Nanoresearchers’ Perceptions of Benefits and Risks of Nanotechnology

Authors: Jing Zhang, Guoyu Wang

Published in: NanoEthics | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Public and experts’ perceptions of benefits and risks of nanotechnology constitute an important element of nanoethics studies. On the one hand, compared with traditional ethics, nanoethics is a future-oriented ethics. The construction of ethical norms requires public participation. On the other hand, nanotechnology is characterized by uncertainty. Our previous research showed the Chinese public’s support for nanotechnology was associated more with beliefs, including views of technology and the weighing of benefits and risks of nanotechnology, and less with knowledge about nanotechnology; the support was high but might change over time. Meanwhile, Chinese researchers have been actively conducting studies on nanotechnology while being highly aware of nanosafety issues. In this context, we further examined in the present study Chinese nanoresearchers’ perceptions of specific benefits and risks of nanotechnology, compared them with those of the Chinese public, and examined the Chinese nanoresearchers’ perceptions of risks of specific nanoapplications. Initial cross-regional comparisons were made with results from equivalent US and European surveys. Results showed Chinese nanoresearchers perceived a higher level of overall nanobenefits than the public and an almost equal level of overall nanorisks with the public. Four nanorisks were perceived by a higher proportion of experts than public; the experts likely relied on technical expertise while the public, possessing little knowledge about nanotechnology, might have exercised caution based on experiences and observations of other technologies. Of 23 nanoapplications, Chinese nanoresearchers regarded food using nanomaterials as the most risky and displays using nanomaterials as the least risky. Similarities and differences were observed in comparisons of Chinese with US and European survey results. In our age of technology and economic globalization, this research is of significance both for China’s formulation of nanotechnology development strategies and for the further study on nanoethics and good governance of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology worldwide.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Kuzma J, VerHage P (2006) Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production: anticipated applications. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington DC Kuzma J, VerHage P (2006) Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production: anticipated applications. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington DC
15.
go back to reference Qiu J (2012) Nano-safety studies urged in China. Nature 489(7416):350–350CrossRef Qiu J (2012) Nano-safety studies urged in China. Nature 489(7416):350–350CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang G, Zhao Y (eds) (2015) Respectful and prudent of the small: research on safety and ethical issues of nanotechnology. Science Press, Beijing Wang G, Zhao Y (eds) (2015) Respectful and prudent of the small: research on safety and ethical issues of nanotechnology. Science Press, Beijing
Metadata
Title
Chinese Public and Nanoresearchers’ Perceptions of Benefits and Risks of Nanotechnology
Authors
Jing Zhang
Guoyu Wang
Publication date
02-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
NanoEthics / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Electronic ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00354-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

NanoEthics 3/2019 Go to the issue

Art-Science Interaction

Two Worlds