Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
An Overview of Supply Chain Dynamics from a Behavioral Operations Perspective Read chapter Read first chapter

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Classification of Factors Associated with a Closed-Loop Supply Chain System, Their Modelling Methods and Strategies

Authors : Hridayjit Kalita, Kaushik Kumar, J. Paulo Davim

Published in: Supply Chain Intelligence

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Environmental impact of the industries has been one of the primary concerns of the society today due to increased carbon emission and non-sustainability in their open-end supply chain systems. Closed-loop supply chain system (CLSC) is an improved system often suggested by researchers to enhance sustainability and lower environmental degradation by closing the loop of the product lifecycle and encouraging product returns and other green activities. The concept was strengthened by the introduction of various policies and regulations by the government for the sake of maintaining the health of the environment. In this paper, a thorough investigation of the CLSC system and categories/groups of factors influencing the optimal parameters of a CLSC system have been reported. Modelling of CLSC strategies involves different uncertainty problems which are required to be solved using different mathematical models. These uncertainty problems are governed by the varying numbers assigned to the uncertainty factors. This paper gives an account of various modelling methods and solution strategies commonly used in the research of CLSC systems for solving the uncertainty problems and analyze different aspects of the practical system for an optimized supply chain system.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter An Overview of Supply Chain Dynamics from a Behavioral Operations Perspective
next chapter Project-Based Supply Chain Intelligence and Digital Fabrication for a Sustainable Film Industry
Literature
Atasu, A., & Subramanian, R. (2012). Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Production and Operations Management, 21, 1042–1059.CrossRef
Atasu, A., Toktay, L. B., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). How collection cost structure drives a manufacturer’s reverse channel choice. Production and Operations Management, 22, 1089–1102.
Azadeh, A., Zarrin, M., & Salehi, N. (2016). Supplier selection in closed loop supply chain by an integrated simulation-Taguchi-DEA approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
Besiou, M., & Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Closed-loop supply chains for photovoltaic panels: A case-based approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20, 929–937.CrossRef
Bhattacharya, R., & Kaur, A. (2015). Allocation of external returns of different quality grades to multiple stages of a closed loop supply chain. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 692–702.
Bottani, E., Montanari, R., Rinaldi, M., & Vignali, G. (2015). Modeling and multi-objective optimization of closed loop supply chains. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 328–342.CrossRef
Cai, X., Feng, Y., Li, Y., & Shi, D. (2013). Optimal pricing policy for a deteriorating product by dynamic tracking control. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 2491–2504.CrossRef
Chang, H.-J., Hung, C.-H., & Dye, C.-Y. (2001). An inventory model for deteriorating items with linear trend demand under the condition of permissible delay in payments. Production Planning & Control, 12, 274–282.CrossRef
Chen, Y.-W., Wang, L.-C., Wang, A., & Chen, T.-L. (2017). A particle swarm approach for optimizing a multi-stage closed loop supply chain for the solar cell industry. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 43, 111–123.
De Giovanni, P. (2014). Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract. Annals of Operations Research, 220, 135–157.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
De Giovanni, P., & Zaccour, G. (2014). A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 232, 22–40.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
De Giovanni, P., Reddy, P. V., & Zaccour, G. (2016). Incentive strategies for an optimal recovery program in a closed loop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 605–617.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Dobos, I., Gobsch, B., Pakhomova, N., Pishchulov, G., & Richter, K. (2013). Design of contract parameters in a closed-loop supply chain. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 21, 713–727.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Esmaeili, M., Allameh, G., & Tajvidi, T. (2016). Using game theory for analysing pricing models in closed-loop supply chain from short- and long-term perspectives. International Journal of Production Research, 54, 2152–2169.CrossRef
Ferguson, M. E., & Toktay, L. B. (2006). The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production and Operations Management, 15, 351–368.CrossRef
Friedman, M. F. (1984). Balancing stocks and backlogs with stochastic lead times: A special case. Computers & Operations Research, 11, 233–239.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Goyal, S. K. (2007). Optimal ordering policies for a retailer in a supply chain with up-stream and down-stream trade credits. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1252–1255.CrossRef
Guide, V. D. R., Jr., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). OR FORUM—The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Operations Research, 57, 10–18.MATHCrossRef
Guo, S., Shen, B., Choi, T.-M., & Jung, S. (2017). A review on supply chain contracts in reverse logistics: Supply chain structures and channel leaderships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 387–402.CrossRef
Han, X., Wu, H., Yang, Q., & Shang, J. (2016). Reverse channel selection under remanufacturing risks: Balancing profitability and robustness. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 63–72.CrossRef
Han, X., Wu, H., Yang, Q., & Shang, J. (2017). Collection channel and production decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing cost disruption. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 1147–1167.CrossRef
He, Y. (2017). Supply risk sharing in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 39–52.CrossRef
He, R., Xiong, Y., & Lin, Z. (2016). Carbon emissions in a dual channel closed loop supply chain: The impact of consumer free riding behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 384–394.CrossRef
Homrich, A. S., Galvao, G., Abadia, L. G., & Carvalho, M. M. (2018). The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 525–543.CrossRef
Hong, X., Xu, L., Du, P., & Wang, W. (2015). Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 12–22.CrossRef
Hong, X., Govindan, K., Xu, L., & Du, P. (2017). Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing. European Journal of Operational Research, 256, 820–829.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Hu, D., Xiao, C., & Chen, X. (2016). Carbon quotas, subsidies and engineering machinery remanufacturing. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 3, 50–58.CrossRef
Huang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017a). Closed-loop supply chain models with product take-back and hybrid remanufacturing under technology licensing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3917–3927.CrossRef
Huang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017b). Dual-recycling channel decision in a closed-loop supply chain with cost disruptions. Sustainability, 9, 2004–2031.CrossRef
Huang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018). Demand disruptions, pricing and production decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 248–260.CrossRef
Huang, X. Y., Yan, N. N., & Qiu, R. Z. (2009). Dynamic models of closed-loop supply chain and robust H∞ control strategies. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 47, 2279–2300.MATH
Ilic, A., Ng, J. W. P., Bowman, P., & Staake, T. (2009). The value of RFID for RTI management. Electronic Markets, 19, 125–135.CrossRef
Jacobs, B. W., & Subramanian, R. (2012). Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 21, 85–100.CrossRef
Jena, S. K., Sarmah, S., & Sarin, S. C. (2017). Joint-advertising for collection of returned products in a closed-loop supply chain under uncertain environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 305–322.CrossRef
Johnson, J. P. (2013). Targeted advertising and advertising avoidance. The Rand Journal of Economics, 44, 128–144.CrossRef
Kaushal, R. K., & Nema, A. K. (2013). Strategic analysis of computer waste management options: Game-theoretic approach. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 139, 241–249.CrossRef
Kong, L., Liu, Z., Pan, Y., Xie, J., & Yang, G. (2017). Pricing and service decision of dual-channel operations in an O2O closed-loop supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117, 1567–1588.CrossRef
Lehr, C. B., Thun, J. H., & Milling, P. M. (2013). From waste to value—A system dynamics model for strategic decision-making in closed-loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 4105–4116.CrossRef
Li, J., Du, W., Yang, F., & Hua, G. (2014). The carbon subsidy analysis in remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain. Sustainability, 6, 3861–3877.CrossRef
Li, H., Wang, C., Shang, M., & Ou, W. (2017). Pricing, carbon emission reduction, low-carbon promotion and returning decision in a closed-loop supply chain under vertical and horizontal cooperation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1332–1357.CrossRef
Liao, H., Deng, Q., Wang, Y., Guo, S., & Ren, Q. (2018). An environmental benefits and costs assessment model for remanufacturing process under quality uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 45–58.CrossRef
Liao, H., Deng, Q., & Shen, N. (2019a). Optimal remanufacture-up-to strategy with uncertainties in acquisition quality, quantity, and market demand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 987–1003.CrossRef
Liao, H., Shi, Y., Liu, X., Shen, N., & Deng, Q. (2019b). A non-probabilistic model of carbon footprints in remanufacture under multiple uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1127–1140.CrossRef
Liu, B. (2002). Uncertain programming: Optimization theory in uncertain environments. In IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems FUZZ-IEEE.
Liu, Y. K. (2006). Convergent results about the use of fuzzy simulation in fuzzy optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14, 295–304.CrossRef
Liu, H., Lei, M., Huang, T., & Leong, G. K. (2018). Refurbishing authorization strategy in the secondary market for electrical and electronic products. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 198–209.CrossRef
Ma, Z.-J., Hu, S., Dai, Y., & Ye, Y.-S. (2018). Pay-as-you-throw versus recycling fund system in closed-loop supply chains with alliance recycling. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25, 1811–1829.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722.CrossRef
Miao, Z., Fu, K., Xia, Z., & Wang, Y. (2017). Models for closed-loop supply chain with trade-ins. Omega, 66, 308–326.CrossRef
Modak, N. M., Modak, N., Panda, S., & Sana, S. S. (2018). Analyzing structure of two-echelon closed-loop supply chain for pricing, quality and recycling management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 512–528.CrossRef
Moghaddam, K. S. (2015). Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 6237–6254.CrossRef
Özceylan, E., Paksoy, T., & Bektaş, T. (2014). Modeling and optimizing the integrated problem of closed-loop supply chain network design and disassembly line balancing. Transportation Research Part E, 61, 142–164.CrossRef
Pokharel, S., & Mutha, A. (2009). Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(175), 182.
Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605–615.CrossRef
Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. S. (1999). Going backwards: Reverse logistics trends and practices. Pittsburgh, PA: Reverse Logistics Executive Council.
Ruimin, M. A., Yao, L., Jin, M., Ren, P., & Zhihan, L. V. (2016). Robust environmental closed-loop supply chain design under uncertainty. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 89, 195–202.MATHCrossRef
Sabharwal, S., & Garg, S. (2013). Determining cost effectiveness index of remanufacturing: A graph theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 144, 521–532.CrossRef
Samuel, C. N., Venkatadri, U., Diallo, C., & Khatab, A. (2020). Robust closed loop supply chain design with presorting, return quality and carbon emission considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Schultmann, F., Engels, B., & Rentz, O. (2003). Closed-loop supply chains for spent batteries. Interfaces, 33, 57–71.
Shevtshenko, E., & Wang, Y. (2009). Decision support under uncertainties based on robust Bayesian networks in reverse logistics management. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 36, 247–258.CrossRef
Shi, W., & Min, K. J. (2013). A study of product weight and collection rate in closed-loop supply chains with recycling. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60, 409–423.CrossRef
Shi, Z., Wang, N., Jia, T., & Chen, H. (2016). Reverse revenue sharing contract versus two-part tariff contract under a closed-loop supply chain system. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, 1–15.MathSciNetMATH
Shu, T., Huang, C., Chen, S., Wang, S., & Lai, K. (2018). Trade-old-for-remanufactured closed-loop supply chains with carbon tax and government subsidies. Sustainability, 10, 3935–3959.CrossRef
Soleimani, H., Govindan, K., Saghafi, H., & Jafari, H. (2017). Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109, 191–203.CrossRef
Souza, G. C. (2013). Closed-loop supply chains: A critical review, and future research. Decision Sciences, 44, 7–38.CrossRef
Sphicas, G. P. (1982). On the solution of an inventory model with variable lead times. Operations Research, 30, 404–410.MATHCrossRef
Sun, L., Zhang, L., & Li, Y. (2018). Sustainable decisions on product upgrade confrontations with remanufacturing operations. Sustainability, 10, 4090–4105.CrossRef
Tsao, Y.-C., Linh, V.-T., Lu, J.-C., & Yu, V. (2017). A supply chain network with product remanufacturing and carbon emission considerations: A two-phase design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–13.
Velte, C. J., & Steinhilper, R. (2016). Complexity in a circular economy: A need for rethinking complexity management strategies.
Wan, N. (2018). The impacts of low carbon subsidy, collection mode, and power structure on a closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 10(065904), 1–24.
Wilhite, A., Burns, L., Patnayakuni, R., & Tseng, F. (2014). Military supply chains and closed-loop systems: Resource allocation and incentives in supply sourcing and supply chain design. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 1926–1939.CrossRef
Wu, C.-H. (2012). Price and service competition between new and remanufactured products in a two-echelon supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 496–507.CrossRef
Wu, C.-H. (2013). OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product. Omega, 41, 287–298.CrossRef
Wu, C.-H., & Kao, Y.-J. (2018). Cooperation regarding technology development in a closed-loop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 267, 523–539.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Xiong, Y., Zhao, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Manufacturer-remanufacturing vs supplier-remanufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 21–28.CrossRef
Xu, X., Liu, J., Li, Y., & Zhou, X. (2016). Pricing strategy of closed-loop supply chain under disruptions. Filomat, 30, 4059–4072.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Xu, Z., Pokharel, S., Elomri, A., & Mutlu, F. (2017). Emission policies and their analysis for the design of hybrid and dedicated closed-loop supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4152–4168.
Yan, W., Xiong, Y., Xiong, Z., & Guo, N. (2015). Bricks vs. clicks: Which is better for marketing remanufactured products? European Journal of Operational Research, 242, 434–444.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Yan, W., Li, H., Chai, J., Qian, Z., & Chen, H. (2018). Owning or outsourcing? Strategic choice on take-back operations for third-party remanufacturing. Sustainability, 10, 151–168.CrossRef
Yenipazarli, A. (2016). Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 117–130.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zhang, C.-T., & Ren, M.-L. (2016). Closed-loop supply chain coordination strategy for the remanufacture of patented products under competitive demand. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40, 6243–6255.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zhang, P., Xiong, Y., Xiong, Z., & Yan, W. (2014). Designing contracts for a closed-loop supply chain under information asymmetry. Operations Research Letters, 42, 150–155.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zhang, Z.-Z., Wang, Z.-J., & Liu, L.-W. (2015). Retail services and pricing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Sustainability, 7, 2373–2396.CrossRef
Zhang, D., Zhang, X., Shi, B., Cao, J., & Zhou, G. (2018a). Collection and remanufacturing of waste products under patent protection and government regulation. Sustainability, 10, 1402–1423.CrossRef
Zhang, X., Su, Y., & Yuan, X. (2018b). Government reward-penalty mechanism in closed-loop supply chain based on dynamics game theory. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018, 1–10.MATH
Zhou, W., Zheng, Y., & Huang, W. (2017). Competitive advantage of qualified WEEE recyclers through EPR legislation. European Journal of Operational Research, 257, 641–655.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zhu, X., & Yu, L. (2018). Differential pricing decision and coordination of green electronic products from the perspective of service heterogeneity. Applied Sciences, 8, 1207–1225.CrossRef
Zikopoulos, C., & Tagaras, G. (2008). On the attractiveness of sorting before disassembly in remanufacturing. IIE Transactions, 40, 313–323.
Zou, Z.-B., Wang, J.-J., Deng, G.-S., & Chen, H. (2016). Third-party remanufacturing mode selection: Outsourcing or authorization? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 87, 1–19.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Classification of Factors Associated with a Closed-Loop Supply Chain System, Their Modelling Methods and Strategies
Authors
Hridayjit Kalita
Kaushik Kumar
J. Paulo Davim
Copyright Year
2020
Book
Supply Chain Intelligence

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46424-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-46425-7

Copyright Year: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46425-7_2

Premium Partners

    Image Credits