Skip to main content
Top

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

27. Cognitive Ergonomics Perspective to Boost Human-centered Innovations in Industry 4.0

Authors : Juan Antonio Torrecilla-García, María Carmen Pardo-Ferreira, Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero

Published in: Industry 4.0: The Power of Data

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper aims to comprehend the human-centered innovations opportunities that might emerge from the Cognitive Ergonomics scope within Industry 4.0. The present work can be considered an exploratory study, starting with a literature review to identify the guiding principles and concepts of Industry 4.0 in order to develop a technological mapping of potential innovations areas and analyze the potential implementation challenges. Industry 4.0 networked approach rethinks persons’ working environments and daily work processes. Persons in the smart factory: workers on the level of operators and managers face in this automatized and digitalized system, a variety of challenges. The Cognitive Ergonomics seems to be the next leading paradigm in safety management of Industry 4.0, closely related to the embedded technologies use and workforce well-being to ensure optimal levels of productivity and efficiency.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Macit I (2017) Industry 4.0 benefits of enterprise resource planning: proposal a framework model. Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi 2(1):50–60 or KURUMSAL kaynak planlamasinin endüstri 4.0 kazanimlari: bir yapisal çati modeli önerisi. Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi 2(1):50–60 Macit I (2017) Industry 4.0 benefits of enterprise resource planning: proposal a framework model. Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi 2(1):50–60 or KURUMSAL kaynak planlamasinin endüstri 4.0 kazanimlari: bir yapisal çati modeli önerisi. Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi 2(1):50–60
2.
go back to reference Jerman A, Bach MP, Aleksic A (2020) Transformation towards smart factory system: examining new job profiles and competencies. Syst Res Behav Sci 37(2):388–402CrossRef Jerman A, Bach MP, Aleksic A (2020) Transformation towards smart factory system: examining new job profiles and competencies. Syst Res Behav Sci 37(2):388–402CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Liao Y, Deschamps F, de Freitas Rocha Loures E, Ramos LFP (2017) Past, present and future of industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int J Prod Res 55(12):3609–3629 Liao Y, Deschamps F, de Freitas Rocha Loures E, Ramos LFP (2017) Past, present and future of industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int J Prod Res 55(12):3609–3629
4.
go back to reference Reinhardt IC, Oliveira JC, Ring DT (2020) Current perspectives on the development of industry 4.0 in the pharmaceutical sector. J Ind Inform Integr 18:100131 Reinhardt IC, Oliveira JC, Ring DT (2020) Current perspectives on the development of industry 4.0 in the pharmaceutical sector. J Ind Inform Integr 18:100131
5.
go back to reference Ganzarain J, Errasti N (2016) Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0. J Ind Eng Manage (JIEM) 9(5):1119–1128 Ganzarain J, Errasti N (2016) Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0. J Ind Eng Manage (JIEM) 9(5):1119–1128
6.
go back to reference Haleem A, Javaid M (2019) Additive manufacturing applications in industry 4.0: a review. J Ind Integr Manage 4(4):1930001–1930024 Haleem A, Javaid M (2019) Additive manufacturing applications in industry 4.0: a review. J Ind Integr Manage 4(4):1930001–1930024
7.
go back to reference Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Ind Sci Eng 8(1):37–44 Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Ind Sci Eng 8(1):37–44
8.
go back to reference Birkel HS, Veile JW, Müller JM, Hartmann E, Voigt K-I (2019) Development of a risk framework for industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability for established manufacturers. Sustainability 11(2):384–411 Birkel HS, Veile JW, Müller JM, Hartmann E, Voigt K-I (2019) Development of a risk framework for industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability for established manufacturers. Sustainability 11(2):384–411
9.
go back to reference Moktadir MA, Ali SM, Kusi-Sarpong S, Shaikh MAA (2018) Assessing challenges for implementing industry 4.0: implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:730–741 Moktadir MA, Ali SM, Kusi-Sarpong S, Shaikh MAA (2018) Assessing challenges for implementing industry 4.0: implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:730–741
10.
go back to reference Ivanov LA, Kapustin IA, Borisova ON, Plsarenko ZV (2020) Nanotechnologies: a review of inventions and utility models. Part II. Nanotechnol Constr Sci Internet-J 12(2):71–76 Ivanov LA, Kapustin IA, Borisova ON, Plsarenko ZV (2020) Nanotechnologies: a review of inventions and utility models. Part II. Nanotechnol Constr Sci Internet-J 12(2):71–76
11.
go back to reference Türkeș MC, Oncioiu I, Aslam HD, Marin-Pantelescu A, Topor DI, Căpușneanu S (2019) Drivers and barriers in using industry 4.0: a perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes 7(3):153–173 Türkeș MC, Oncioiu I, Aslam HD, Marin-Pantelescu A, Topor DI, Căpușneanu S (2019) Drivers and barriers in using industry 4.0: a perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes 7(3):153–173
12.
go back to reference Thames L, Schaefer D (2016) Software-defined cloud manufacturing for industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 52:12–17 Thames L, Schaefer D (2016) Software-defined cloud manufacturing for industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 52:12–17
13.
go back to reference Xu LD, Duan L (2019) Big data for cyber physical systems in industry 4.0: a survey. Enterp Inf Syst 13(2):148–169 Xu LD, Duan L (2019) Big data for cyber physical systems in industry 4.0: a survey. Enterp Inf Syst 13(2):148–169
14.
go back to reference Badri A, Boudreau-Trudel B, Souissi AS (2018) Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: a cause for major concern? Saf Sci 109:403–411 Badri A, Boudreau-Trudel B, Souissi AS (2018) Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: a cause for major concern? Saf Sci 109:403–411
15.
go back to reference Kocaay F (2019) Possible effects of industry 4.0 to work life, occupational health and safety. Int Refereed Acad J Sports Health Med Sci 31:71–83 Kocaay F (2019) Possible effects of industry 4.0 to work life, occupational health and safety. Int Refereed Acad J Sports Health Med Sci 31:71–83
16.
go back to reference Christy V, Duraisamy S (2020) Ergonomics and employee psychological well being. Int J Manage 11(3):435–438 Christy V, Duraisamy S (2020) Ergonomics and employee psychological well being. Int J Manage 11(3):435–438
17.
go back to reference Burgess-Limerick R (2018) Participatory ergonomics: evidence and implementation lessons. Appl Ergon 68:289–293CrossRef Burgess-Limerick R (2018) Participatory ergonomics: evidence and implementation lessons. Appl Ergon 68:289–293CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sun S, Zheng X, Gong B, Paredes JG, Ordieres-Meré J (2020) Healthy operator 4.0: a human cyber–physical system architecture for smart workplaces. Sensors 20(7):1–21 Sun S, Zheng X, Gong B, Paredes JG, Ordieres-Meré J (2020) Healthy operator 4.0: a human cyber–physical system architecture for smart workplaces. Sensors 20(7):1–21
19.
go back to reference Planke LJ, Lim Y, Gardi A, Sabatini R, Kistan T, Ezer N (2020) A cyber-physical-human system for one-to-many UAS operations: cognitive load analysis. Sensors 20(19):5467CrossRef Planke LJ, Lim Y, Gardi A, Sabatini R, Kistan T, Ezer N (2020) A cyber-physical-human system for one-to-many UAS operations: cognitive load analysis. Sensors 20(19):5467CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jiao J, Zhou F, Gebraeel NZ, Duffy V (2020) Towards augmenting cyber-physical-human collaborative cognition for human-automation interaction in complex manufacturing and operational environments. Int J Prod Res 58(16):5089–5111CrossRef Jiao J, Zhou F, Gebraeel NZ, Duffy V (2020) Towards augmenting cyber-physical-human collaborative cognition for human-automation interaction in complex manufacturing and operational environments. Int J Prod Res 58(16):5089–5111CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fantini P, Pinzone M, Taisch M (2020) Placing the operator at the centre of industry 4.0 design: modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. Comput Ind Eng 139:105058 Fantini P, Pinzone M, Taisch M (2020) Placing the operator at the centre of industry 4.0 design: modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. Comput Ind Eng 139:105058
23.
go back to reference Jones AT, Romero D, Wuest T (2018) Modeling agents as joint cognitive systems in smart manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 17:6–8CrossRef Jones AT, Romero D, Wuest T (2018) Modeling agents as joint cognitive systems in smart manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 17:6–8CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A (2017) Smart operators in industry 4.0: a human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Comput Ind Eng 113:144–159 Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A (2017) Smart operators in industry 4.0: a human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Comput Ind Eng 113:144–159
25.
go back to reference Kadir BA, Broberg O (2021) Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0. Appl Ergon 92:103334 Kadir BA, Broberg O (2021) Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0. Appl Ergon 92:103334
26.
go back to reference Romero D, Stahre J, Taisch M (2020) The operator 4.0: towards socially sustainable factories of the future. Comput Ind Eng 139:2–5 Romero D, Stahre J, Taisch M (2020) The operator 4.0: towards socially sustainable factories of the future. Comput Ind Eng 139:2–5
27.
go back to reference Gorecky D, Schmitt M, Loskyll M, Zühlke D (2014) Human-machine interaction in the industry 4.0 era. In: 2014 12th IEEE International conference on industrial informatics (INDIN). IEEE, pp 289–294 Gorecky D, Schmitt M, Loskyll M, Zühlke D (2014) Human-machine interaction in the industry 4.0 era. In: 2014 12th IEEE International conference on industrial informatics (INDIN). IEEE, pp 289–294
28.
go back to reference Papcun P, Kajáti E, Koziorek J (2018) Human machine interface in concept of industry 4.0. In: 2018 World symposium on digital intelligence for systems and machines (DISA). IEEE, pp 289–296 Papcun P, Kajáti E, Koziorek J (2018) Human machine interface in concept of industry 4.0. In: 2018 World symposium on digital intelligence for systems and machines (DISA). IEEE, pp 289–296
29.
go back to reference Wittenberg C (2016) Human-CPS interaction—requirements and human-machine interaction methods for the industry 4.0. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19):420–425 Wittenberg C (2016) Human-CPS interaction—requirements and human-machine interaction methods for the industry 4.0. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19):420–425
30.
go back to reference Kaasinen E, Schmalfuß F, Özturk C, Aromaa S, Boubekeur M, Heilala J, Walter T et al (2020) Empowering and engaging industrial workers with operator 4.0 solutions. Comput Ind Eng 139:105678 Kaasinen E, Schmalfuß F, Özturk C, Aromaa S, Boubekeur M, Heilala J, Walter T et al (2020) Empowering and engaging industrial workers with operator 4.0 solutions. Comput Ind Eng 139:105678
31.
go back to reference Romero D, Bernus P, Noran O, Stahre J, Fast-Berglund Å (201) The operator 4.0: human cyber-physical systems & adaptive automation towards human-automation symbiosis work systems. In: Advances in production management systems. Initiatives for a sustainable world. APMS 2016. IFIP Advances in information and communication technology, vol 488. Springer, Cham, pp 677–686 Romero D, Bernus P, Noran O, Stahre J, Fast-Berglund Å (201) The operator 4.0: human cyber-physical systems & adaptive automation towards human-automation symbiosis work systems. In: Advances in production management systems. Initiatives for a sustainable world. APMS 2016. IFIP Advances in information and communication technology, vol 488. Springer, Cham, pp 677–686
32.
go back to reference Pascual DG, Daponte P, Kumar U (2019) “Operator 4.0” handbook of industry 4.0 and smart systems, pp 239–285 Pascual DG, Daponte P, Kumar U (2019) “Operator 4.0” handbook of industry 4.0 and smart systems, pp 239–285
33.
go back to reference Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12(2):257–285CrossRef Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12(2):257–285CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Gevins A, Smith ME (2003) Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human–computer interaction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 4(1–2):113–131CrossRef Gevins A, Smith ME (2003) Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human–computer interaction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 4(1–2):113–131CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Illankoon P, Tretten P, Kumar U (2018) Identifying significance of human cognition in future maintenance operations. In: Intelligent human systems integration. IHSI 2018. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 722. Springer, Cham, pp 550–556 Illankoon P, Tretten P, Kumar U (2018) Identifying significance of human cognition in future maintenance operations. In: Intelligent human systems integration. IHSI 2018. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 722. Springer, Cham, pp 550–556
36.
go back to reference Pesante JA, Williges RC, Woldstad JC (2001) The effects of multitasking on quality inspection in advanced manufacturing systems. Human Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 11(4):287–298CrossRef Pesante JA, Williges RC, Woldstad JC (2001) The effects of multitasking on quality inspection in advanced manufacturing systems. Human Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 11(4):287–298CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bommer SC, Fendley M (2018) A theoretical framework for evaluating mental workload resources in human systems design for manufacturing operations. Int J Ind Ergon 63:7–17CrossRef Bommer SC, Fendley M (2018) A theoretical framework for evaluating mental workload resources in human systems design for manufacturing operations. Int J Ind Ergon 63:7–17CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Pacaux-Lemoine M-P, Berdal Q, Guérin C, Rauffet P, Chauvin C, Trentesaux D (2022) Designing human–system cooperation in industry 4.0 with cognitive work analysis: a first evaluation. Cogn Technol Work 24:93–111 Pacaux-Lemoine M-P, Berdal Q, Guérin C, Rauffet P, Chauvin C, Trentesaux D (2022) Designing human–system cooperation in industry 4.0 with cognitive work analysis: a first evaluation. Cogn Technol Work 24:93–111
39.
go back to reference Colombi JM, Miller ME, Schneider M, McGrogan MJ, Long CDS, Plaga J (2012) Predictive mental workload modeling for semiautonomous system design: implications for systems of systems. Syst Eng 15(4):448–460CrossRef Colombi JM, Miller ME, Schneider M, McGrogan MJ, Long CDS, Plaga J (2012) Predictive mental workload modeling for semiautonomous system design: implications for systems of systems. Syst Eng 15(4):448–460CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Wu X, Feng C, Wanyan X, Liu S, Ding L, Miao C, Wang Y, He X () How shared screen affected team collaboration task, a case study of ergonomics experiment on team situation awareness. In: Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. EPCE 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10906. Springer, Cham, pp 241–249 Wu X, Feng C, Wanyan X, Liu S, Ding L, Miao C, Wang Y, He X () How shared screen affected team collaboration task, a case study of ergonomics experiment on team situation awareness. In: Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. EPCE 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10906. Springer, Cham, pp 241–249
41.
go back to reference Hertzum M, Holmegaard KD (2013) Perceived time as a measure of mental workload: effects of time constraints and task success. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 29(1):26–39CrossRef Hertzum M, Holmegaard KD (2013) Perceived time as a measure of mental workload: effects of time constraints and task success. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 29(1):26–39CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informet 11(4):959–975CrossRef Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informet 11(4):959–975CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Verbeke J, Pak B (2013) Knowing by designing. KU Leuven, Leuven Verbeke J, Pak B (2013) Knowing by designing. KU Leuven, Leuven
44.
go back to reference Zimmerman J, Stolterman E, Forlizzi J (2010) An analysis and critique of research through design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In: DIS’10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, Aarhus, Denmark, pp 310–319 Zimmerman J, Stolterman E, Forlizzi J (2010) An analysis and critique of research through design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In: DIS’10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, Aarhus, Denmark, pp 310–319
45.
go back to reference Grand S, Jonas W (2012) Mapping design research. Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland Grand S, Jonas W (2012) Mapping design research. Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland
46.
go back to reference Stappers PJ, Giaccardi E (2017) Research through design. In: The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. The Interaction Design Foundation, Denmark, pp 1–94 Stappers PJ, Giaccardi E (2017) Research through design. In: The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. The Interaction Design Foundation, Denmark, pp 1–94
47.
go back to reference Lanzotti A, Vanacore A, Tarallo A, Nathan-Roberts D, Coccorese D, Minopoli V, Papa S et al (2020) Interactive tools for safety 4.0: virtual ergonomics and serious games in real working contexts. Ergonomics 63(3):324–333 Lanzotti A, Vanacore A, Tarallo A, Nathan-Roberts D, Coccorese D, Minopoli V, Papa S et al (2020) Interactive tools for safety 4.0: virtual ergonomics and serious games in real working contexts. Ergonomics 63(3):324–333
48.
go back to reference IBM Corporation (2017) Cognitive manufacturing: an overview and four applications that are transforming manufacturing today. IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA IBM Corporation (2017) Cognitive manufacturing: an overview and four applications that are transforming manufacturing today. IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA
49.
go back to reference Thorvald P, Lindblom J, Andreasson R (2019) On the development of a method for cognitive load assessment in manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 59:252–266CrossRef Thorvald P, Lindblom J, Andreasson R (2019) On the development of a method for cognitive load assessment in manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 59:252–266CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cognitive Ergonomics Perspective to Boost Human-centered Innovations in Industry 4.0
Authors
Juan Antonio Torrecilla-García
María Carmen Pardo-Ferreira
Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero
Copyright Year
2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29382-5_27

Premium Partners