Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Common Developments and Deficiencies of the Domestic Approach to Participatory Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The comparative analysis of the developments that have occurred in Italy and Brazil in order to enhance participatory safeguards for private parties in criminal proceedings highlights various common lines. As noted, the Brazilian 1941 code was largely inspired by the Italian codification of 1930. The subsequent history of both criminal justice systems was the constant (albeit not always linear) attempt to depart from this starting point and therefore from the strong inquisitorial tradition that had long characterised the Italian and Brazilian criminal procedural law. Yet Brazil is still governed by the old 1941 codification, whereas in 1988 Italy enacted a new code of criminal procedure, after the failed attempt to launch a new codification in the 1970s.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Cf. Chapter 2, respectively, F.II.1. and F.III.2.
 
2
Chapter 2, J.III.1.
 
3
Chapter 3, B.
 
4
On both issues see extensively Chapter 16.
 
5
Chapter 2, G.II.2.
 
6
Chapter 3, D.II.
 
7
Giacomolli (2014), p. 12ff. As to Italian criminal justice, see the fundamental contribution of Conso (1969).
 
8
Chapter 3, B.
 
9
Chapter 2, A.
 
10
Chapter 2, B.I.
 
11
Chapter 2, B.II.2.
 
12
Chapter 3, B.
 
13
Ibid.
 
14
Chapter 2, B.II.1.
 
15
Chapter 3, B.
 
16
Chapter 2, E.I.
 
17
Chapter 3, C.
 
18
Chapter 2, C.I.
 
19
Chapter 3, B.
 
20
Chapter 2, B.II.2.
 
21
Chapter 3, B.
 
22
Chapter 2, C.I.
 
23
Chapter 2, C.II.
 
24
Chapter 2, C.I.
 
25
Chapter 3, B.
 
26
Chapter 3, C.
 
27
Chapter 2, H.II.2.
 
28
Chapter 2, C.II.
 
29
Ibid.
 
30
Chapter 3, C.
 
31
Chapter 2, C.II.
 
32
Chapter 3, C.
 
33
Chapter 2, D.I.
 
34
Ibid.
 
35
Of a different opinion Tourinho Filho (2010), I vol., p. 163.
 
36
Chapter 3, D.I.
 
37
Chapter 3, D.I.
 
38
Art. 412 CCP-Italy.
 
39
Chapter 3, D.I.
 
40
Chapter 3, D.I.
 
41
Art. 411 CCP-Italy.
 
42
Chapter 2, D.I.
 
43
Lopes Jr (2017), p. 726.
 
44
Art. 396 CCP-Brazil.
 
45
Lopes Jr (2017), p. 727f.
 
46
Chapter 2, E.II.3.
 
47
CConst, 131/1995.
 
48
Arts. 178(b) and 179 CCP-Italy.
 
49
Chapter 2, D.II.1.
 
50
Ibid.
 
51
Ibid.
 
52
Art. 17 CCP-Brazil.
 
53
Chapter 3, D.II.
 
54
Ibid.
 
55
Art. 28 CCP-Brazil.
 
56
Chapter 2, D.II.1.
 
57
Art. 397 CCP-Brazil.
 
58
Lopes Jr (2017), p. 733f.
 
59
Art. 400 CCP-Brazil.
 
60
Art. 425 CCP-Italy.
 
61
Art. 422 CCP-Italy.
 
62
For some criticism on this mechanism see Cordero (2012), p. 914f.
 
63
Arts. 421(2) and 422(4) CCP-Italy.
 
64
Chapter 3, E.I.
 
65
Ibid.
 
66
Chapter 2, E.I.
 
67
Chapter 3, E.I.
 
68
Chapter 2, E.I.
 
69
Chapter 2, E.III.
 
70
Chapter 3, E.I.
 
71
Art. 335 CCP-Italy.
 
72
Chapter 2, E.II.1.
 
73
Ibid.
 
74
Chapter 16, D.III.1.a.bb.
 
75
Chapter 2, E.II.2.
 
76
Chapter 2, E.II.1.
 
77
Chapter 3, E.I.
 
78
Chapter 3, C.
 
79
Chapter 2, E.II.2.
 
80
Chapter 3, E.I.
 
81
Chapter 2, E.II.3.
 
82
Chapter 2, F.II.1.
 
83
Chapter 2, F.II.2.
 
84
Chapter 3, E.II.
 
85
Ibid.
 
86
Art. 260 CCP-Brazil.
 
87
Art. 490 CCP-Italy.
 
88
Chapter 2, F.II.1.
 
89
Chapter 16, D.II.1.a.
 
90
Chapter 3, F.
 
91
Chapter 2, F.II.2.
 
92
Chapter 3, F.
 
93
Ibid.
 
94
Ibid.
 
95
Chapter 2, F.II.2.
 
96
Chapter 2, G.II.1.
 
97
Ibid.
 
98
Ibid.
 
99
Chapter 3, G.I.
 
100
Chapter 2, G.I.
 
101
Chapter 3, G.I.
 
102
Chapter 2, G.II.1.
 
103
Art. 60(1) CCP-Italy.
 
104
Chapter 2, G.II.1.
 
105
Ibid.
 
106
Chapter 2, G.II.2.
 
107
Art. 7(XXI) Law 8.906/94.
 
108
Art. 7(11) Law 8.906/94.
 
109
Chapter 2, G.II.1.
 
110
Chapter 2, G.II.2.
 
111
Ibid.
 
112
Chapter 16, D.IV.1.
 
113
Chapter 3, G.I.
 
114
Ibid.
 
115
Chapter 3, G.II.
 
116
Chapter 2, I.II.4.
 
117
Art. 513 CCP-Italy (1988 version).
 
118
Art. 513(1-2) CCP-Italy (1997 version).
 
119
Chapter 2, G.II.3.
 
120
Chapter 3, G.II.
 
121
Ibid.
 
122
Art. 503(2) CCP-Italy.
 
123
Chapter 2, G.III.
 
124
Chapter 3, G.II.
 
125
Chapter 2, H.I.
 
126
Chapter 3, H.I.
 
127
Chapter 2, H.III.1.
 
128
Art. 500(1) CCP-Italy.
 
129
Art. 507 CCP-Italy.
 
130
Art. 506 CCP-Italy.
 
131
CCass, Martin.
 
132
CConst, 111/1993.
 
133
CCass, Joint Sections, Greco.
 
134
Chapter 3, H.I.
 
135
CConst, 73/2010.
 
136
See Chiavario (2015), p. 531.
 
137
Chapter 2, H.III.3.
 
138
Ibid.
 
139
Chapter 3, H.III.
 
140
Art. 238 CCP-Italy.
 
141
Chapter 2, H.III.3.
 
142
Chapter 3, H.III.
 
143
Chapter 2, H.III.3.
 
144
Chapter 2, H.III.2.
 
145
Chapter 3, H.II.
 
146
Ibid.
 
147
Ibid.
 
148
Chapter 2, H.III.2.
 
149
Ibid.
 
150
Chapter 3, H.II.
 
151
Chapter 2, H.III.2.
 
152
Ibid.
 
153
Chapter 3, I.
 
154
Siracusano (1973), p. 167ff.
 
155
Ibid.
 
156
Chapter 2, I.I.
 
157
Chapter 3, I.
 
158
Chapter 2, I.I.
 
159
Ibid.
 
160
Chapter 3, I.
 
161
Art. 526(1-bis) CCP-Italy.
 
162
Chapter 16, D.V.2.a.
 
163
Chapter 3, I.
 
164
Ferrua (2012), p. 142ff.
 
165
See among others Conti (2001), p. 637.
 
166
See particularly Article 442(1-bis) CCP-Italy, which was introduced by Law 479/1999.
 
167
Chapter 2, I.III.3.
 
168
CConst, 184/2007.
 
169
For a comparative analysis of hidden criminal investigations see Hauck (2014).
 
170
Art. 391(1) CCP-Italy (1988 version).
 
171
Art. 391(3) CCP-Italy (1988 version).
 
172
The police could not exercise their general power to question the suspect, laid down in Article 350 CCP-Italy, where the person was arrested.
 
173
Art. 388 CCP-Italy.
 
174
See Art. 391 CCP-Italy, as amended by the Legislative Decree 12/1991.
 
175
Art. 386 CCP-Italy.
 
176
Art. 388(2) CCP-Italy.
 
177
Art. 391(5)(first period) CCP-Italy.
 
178
Art. 391(5)(second period) CCP-Italy.
 
179
Art. 391(6) CCP-Italy.
 
180
Chapter 3, J.II.2.
 
181
Ibid.
 
182
Ibid.
 
183
Art. 384 CCP-Italy.
 
184
Chapter 3, J.II.3.
 
185
Chapter 2, J.III.1.
 
186
Ibid.
 
187
Chapter 3, J.II.1.
 
188
Ibid.
 
189
Chapter 16, E.II.4.
 
190
Chapter 3, J.II.1.
 
191
Ibid.
 
192
Ibid.
 
193
Ibid.
 
194
Ibid.
 
195
Art. 282-bis CCP-Italy, introduced by Law 154/2001. More than 10 years later, Law-Decree 93/2013, converted into Law 119/2013, enabled the police to remove the suspects from their family home in urgent cases. See Article 384-bis CCP-Italy.
 
196
Art. 282-bis(6) CCP-Italy, as amended by Law 172/2012 and later by Law-Decree 93/2013, converted into Law 119/2013.
 
197
Art. 282-ter CCP-Italy, introduced by Law-Decree 11/2009, converted into Law 38/2009.
 
198
Chapter 3, J.IV.1.
 
199
Chapter 2, J.III.2.
 
200
Chapter 3, J.IV.1.
 
201
Chapter 2, J.III.2.
 
202
Ibid.
 
203
Chapter 3, J.IV.1.
 
204
Chapter 2, J.III.2.
 
Literature
go back to reference Chiavario M (2015) Diritto processuale penale, 6th edn. Utet, Torino Chiavario M (2015) Diritto processuale penale, 6th edn. Utet, Torino
go back to reference Conso G (1969) Costituzione e processo penale. Giuffrè, Milano Conso G (1969) Costituzione e processo penale. Giuffrè, Milano
go back to reference Conti C (2001) Giusto processo (diritto processuale penale). In: Enciclopedia del diritto, vol V Agg. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 627–649 Conti C (2001) Giusto processo (diritto processuale penale). In: Enciclopedia del diritto, vol V Agg. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 627–649
go back to reference Cordero F (2012) Procedura penale, 9th edn. Giuffrè, Milano Cordero F (2012) Procedura penale, 9th edn. Giuffrè, Milano
go back to reference Ferrua P (2012) Il ‘giusto processo’, 3rd edn. Zanichelli, Bologna Ferrua P (2012) Il ‘giusto processo’, 3rd edn. Zanichelli, Bologna
go back to reference Giacomolli NJ (2014) O devido processo penal. Abordagem conforme a Constituição Federal e o Pacto de São José da Costa Rica. Atlas S.A., São Paulo Giacomolli NJ (2014) O devido processo penal. Abordagem conforme a Constituição Federal e o Pacto de São José da Costa Rica. Atlas S.A., São Paulo
go back to reference Hauck P (2014) Heimliche Strafverfolgung und Schutz der Privatheit. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen Hauck P (2014) Heimliche Strafverfolgung und Schutz der Privatheit. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
go back to reference Lopes A Jr (2017) Direito Processual Penal, 14th edn. Saraiva, São Paulo Lopes A Jr (2017) Direito Processual Penal, 14th edn. Saraiva, São Paulo
go back to reference Siracusano D (1973) Istruzione del processo penale. In: Enciclopedia del diritto, vol XXIII. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 166–204 Siracusano D (1973) Istruzione del processo penale. In: Enciclopedia del diritto, vol XXIII. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 166–204
go back to reference Tourinho Filho F da Costa (2010) Código de Processo Penal Comentado, vol I–II, 10th edn. Saraiva, São Paulo Tourinho Filho F da Costa (2010) Código de Processo Penal Comentado, vol I–II, 10th edn. Saraiva, São Paulo
Metadata
Title
Common Developments and Deficiencies of the Domestic Approach to Participatory Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings
Author
Stefano Ruggeri
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54573-8_6