Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Communication Between Scientific Units and Companies in the Context of Their Cooperation

Authors : Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk, Sławomir Milczarek

Published in: Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry 4.0

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the article, the problem of the communication of the Polish scientific units in the context of cooperation with companies is discussed. The main objective is to identify the companies’ expectations towards scientific units in this area. The research based on a method of indirect communication with respondents with the use of the questionnaire technique was conducted in 2018 among 135 companies representing smart specialisations in Lodz Region. The results show that the model of interpersonal communication with a scientist is the most expected form in business–science contacts. The best channel to provide the information to companies is electronic media, such as the web site of the scientific unit or e-mail. On the web sites of scientific units, companies’ representatives usually look for an offer for business. The most important information received from scientific units is an offer of cooperation and a sales offer addressed directly to companies’ representatives. The most important feature of the offer of scientific units is its market applicability.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRef Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bauer, W., Schlund, S., Hornung, T., Schuler, S.: Digitalization of industrial value chains—a review and evaluation of existing use cases of Industry 40 in Germany. LogForum 14(3), 331–340 (2018)CrossRef Bauer, W., Schlund, S., Hornung, T., Schuler, S.: Digitalization of industrial value chains—a review and evaluation of existing use cases of Industry 40 in Germany. LogForum 14(3), 331–340 (2018)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bellucci, A., Pennacchio, L.: University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. J. Technol. Transf. 41, 730–752 (2016)CrossRef Bellucci, A., Pennacchio, L.: University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. J. Technol. Transf. 41, 730–752 (2016)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Burgos, A., Ribeiro, D., Martínez, M.: Dystopia deconstructed: applying the triple helix model to a failed utopia. J. Bus. Res. 69(5), 1845–1850 (2016)CrossRef Burgos, A., Ribeiro, D., Martínez, M.: Dystopia deconstructed: applying the triple helix model to a failed utopia. J. Bus. Res. 69(5), 1845–1850 (2016)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Drath, R., Horch, A.: Industrie 4.0—hit or hype? IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 8(2), 56–58 (2014)CrossRef Drath, R., Horch, A.: Industrie 4.0—hit or hype? IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 8(2), 56–58 (2014)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Feldy, M.: Czynniki powodzenia w procesach komercjalizacji wiedzy - aspekt komunikacyjny i relacyjny. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych 4(14), 4–26 (2014) Feldy, M.: Czynniki powodzenia w procesach komercjalizacji wiedzy - aspekt komunikacyjny i relacyjny. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych 4(14), 4–26 (2014)
10.
go back to reference Goldstein, H., Bergman, E., Maier, G.: University mission creep? Comparing EU and US faculty views of university involvement in regional economic development and commercialization. Ann. Reg. Sci. 50, 453–477 (2013)CrossRef Goldstein, H., Bergman, E., Maier, G.: University mission creep? Comparing EU and US faculty views of university involvement in regional economic development and commercialization. Ann. Reg. Sci. 50, 453–477 (2013)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hakansson, H.: Nauka, technologia i biznes—rynek czy interaktywna koordynacja. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych 1(11), 3–19 (2014) Hakansson, H.: Nauka, technologia i biznes—rynek czy interaktywna koordynacja. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych 1(11), 3–19 (2014)
12.
go back to reference Hayter, C.: Constraining entrepreneurial development: a knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 45(2), 475–490 (2016)CrossRef Hayter, C.: Constraining entrepreneurial development: a knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 45(2), 475–490 (2016)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khaitan, S.K., McCalley, J.D.: Design techniques and applications of cyberphysical systems: a survey. IEEE Syst. J. 9(2), 350–365 (2015)CrossRef Khaitan, S.K., McCalley, J.D.: Design techniques and applications of cyberphysical systems: a survey. IEEE Syst. J. 9(2), 350–365 (2015)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kleiber, M.: Społeczeństwo wiedzy w Polsce. In: Okoń-Horodyńska, E. (ed.): Rola polskiej nauki we wzroście innowacyjności gospodarki, pp. 37–45. PTE, Warszawa (2004) Kleiber, M.: Społeczeństwo wiedzy w Polsce. In: Okoń-Horodyńska, E. (ed.): Rola polskiej nauki we wzroście innowacyjności gospodarki, pp. 37–45. PTE, Warszawa (2004)
17.
go back to reference Marszałek, A.: Rola uczelni w regionie. Difin, Warszawa (2010) Marszałek, A.: Rola uczelni w regionie. Difin, Warszawa (2010)
18.
go back to reference Mikosik, P.: Czynniki warunkujące efektywną współpracę przedsiębiorstw z jednostkami naukowo-badawczymi. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych 2(24), 59–80 (2017) Mikosik, P.: Czynniki warunkujące efektywną współpracę przedsiębiorstw z jednostkami naukowo-badawczymi. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych 2(24), 59–80 (2017)
19.
go back to reference Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego: Bariery współpracy przedsiębiorców i ośrodków naukowych. Departament Wdrożeń i Innowacji, Warszawa (2006) Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego: Bariery współpracy przedsiębiorców i ośrodków naukowych. Departament Wdrożeń i Innowacji, Warszawa (2006)
20.
go back to reference Mohamed, M.: Challenges and benefits of Industry 4.0: an overview. Int. J. Supply Oper. Manage. 5(3), 256–265 (2018) Mohamed, M.: Challenges and benefits of Industry 4.0: an overview. Int. J. Supply Oper. Manage. 5(3), 256–265 (2018)
21.
go back to reference Pereira, A.C., Romero, F.: A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manuf. 13, 1206–1214 (2017)CrossRef Pereira, A.C., Romero, F.: A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manuf. 13, 1206–1214 (2017)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Różański, J. (ed.): Współpraca nauki i biznesu jako czynnik wzmacniający innowacyjność regionu łódzkiego. Ed. Biblioteka, Lodz (2013) Różański, J. (ed.): Współpraca nauki i biznesu jako czynnik wzmacniający innowacyjność regionu łódzkiego. Ed. Biblioteka, Lodz (2013)
23.
go back to reference Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting R.-C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., Jozinović, P.: Industry 4.0—Potentials for Creating Smart Products: Empirical Research Results. Springer, Germany (2015) Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting R.-C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., Jozinović, P.: Industry 4.0—Potentials for Creating Smart Products: Empirical Research Results. Springer, Germany (2015)
24.
go back to reference Saurabh, V., Prashant, A., Santosh, B.: Industry 4.0—a glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 20, 233–238 (2018)CrossRef Saurabh, V., Prashant, A., Santosh, B.: Industry 4.0—a glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 20, 233–238 (2018)CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Steinmo, M., Rasmussen, E.: How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. J. Bus. Res. 69(3), 1250–1259 (2016)CrossRef Steinmo, M., Rasmussen, E.: How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. J. Bus. Res. 69(3), 1250–1259 (2016)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Communication Between Scientific Units and Companies in the Context of Their Cooperation
Authors
Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk
Sławomir Milczarek
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30549-9_10