Top

Published in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Community-based Sustainability Initiatives as Learning Systems

Author : Andrew Mitchell

Published in: Second-order Learning in Developmental Evaluation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

By means of an extended case study community-based sustainability initiative, Mitchell introduces original empirical research into how the project practitioners shifted from being a first-order learning project to a second-order learning project. Drawing on concepts from enactive cognitive science to augment the practice of developmental evaluation as an approach to support practitioners utilise their experiential learning as an asset under conditions of complexity, Mitchell describes the thematic analysis of the case study initiative in becoming self-aware as a learning project, and the process of using orthogonal interactions during action research meetings to help introduce a disruption to habituated practices of observation. From these sites of rupture, new insights were generated about learning how to learn under uncertain and dynamic conditions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Second-order Learning Systems

next chapter Concluding Remarks

In Bateson’s (1972, 1979) terminology, this would align with what he termed ‘deutero-learning’.

Albeit, these are certainly not unproblematic, as discussed at length in Chapter 2.

https://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/global-content/programmes/england/communities-living-sustainably. Accessed 3 April 2016.

Kanani, Big Lottery Fund England Director, in the press release of the fund’s announcement, September 3, 2012. On-line http://www.communitieslivingsustainably.org.uk/news/12m-lifeline-for-vulnerable-facing-fuel-and-food-poverty. Accessed 17 December 2013.

See http://www.pluggingtheleaks.org/downloads/plm/plm_the_money_trail.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2015.

This role is, from the perspective of Developmental Evaluation, played by the embedded evaluator.

Horton’s rule is say what you mean, and mean what you say. From Dr. Seuss “Horton hatches the egg”. http://seuss.wikia.com/wiki/Horton_Hatches_the_Egg. Accessed 16 November 2016.

Anderson, H. (2005). Myths about “not-knowing”. Family Process, 44(4), 497–504.CrossRef

Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00371.x.CrossRef

Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1994). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 25–39). London: Sage.

Ashby, W. R. (1957). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam.

Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2010). Triple task method: Systemic, reflective action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(6), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9171-7.CrossRef

Big Lottery Fund. (2012). £12 m lifeline for vulnerable facing fuel and food poverty. Big Lottery Fund: News and Events. Available at: https://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/global-content/press-releases/england/archive/12m-lifeline-for-vulnerable-facing-fuel-and-food-poverty. Accessed 3 Apr 2016.

Blackmore, C. (2005). Learning to appreciate learning systems for environmental decision making: A “work-in-progress” perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 22(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.697.CrossRef

Boisot, M. H. (1999). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRef

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Burns, D. (2010). Systematic action research: A strategy for whole system change. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Burns, D., & Worsley, S. (2015). Navigating complexity in international development: Facilitating sustainable change at scale. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.CrossRef

Carman, J. G. (2007). Evaluation practice among community-based organizations: Research into the reality. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006296245.CrossRef

Clarke, B. (2014). Neocybernetics and narrative. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRef

Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005, April). The “Most Significant Change” (MSC) technique. Change, 1–104. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.159269.CrossRef

Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279810249369.CrossRef

Dervin, B. (2003). Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (B. Dervin & L. Foreman-Wernet, Ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Dunkley, R. A., & Franklin, A. (2017). Failing better: The stochastic art of evaluating community-led environmental action programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 60, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.11.005.CrossRef

Efran, J. S., Lukens, M. D., & Lukens, R. J. (1990). Language structure, and change: Frameworks of meaning in psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton.

Eksvärd, K., & Rydberg, T. (2010). Integrating participatory learning and action research and systems ecology: A potential for sustainable agriculture transitions. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(6), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9172-6.CrossRef

Flood, R. L. (2010). The relationship of “systems thinking” to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9169-1.CrossRef

Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 1, 3–10.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.CrossRef

Helmfrid, H., Haden, A., & Ljung, M. (2007). The role of Action Research (AR) in environmental research: Learning from a local organic food and farming research project. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(2), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-007-9088-y.CrossRef

Hobson, K., Hamilton, J., & Mayne, R. (2014). Monitoring and evaluation in UK low-carbon community groups: Benefits, barriers and the politics of the local. Local Environment, 21(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.928814.CrossRef

Hobson, K., Mayne, R., & Hamilton, J. (2016). Monitoring and evaluating eco-localisation: Lessons from UK low carbon community groups. Environment and Planning A (Forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x16640531.CrossRef

Ika, L. A., & Donnelly, J., (2017). Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 44–63.CrossRef

Ison, R., & Blackmore, C. (2014). Designing and developing a reflexive learning system for managing systemic change. Systems, 2(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems2020119.CrossRef

Ison, R., Blackmore, C., Collins, K., & Furniss, P. (2007). Systemic environmental decision making: Designing learning systems. Kybernetes, 36(9/10), 1340–1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920710827346.CrossRef

Keeney, H., Keeney, B., & Chenail, R. (2015). Recursive frame analysis: A qualitative research method for mapping change-oriented discourse. Fort Lauderdale, FL: The Qualitative Report. Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr_books/1.

Koskinen, K. U. (2010). Autopoietic knowledge systems in project-based companies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Letcher, R., Roberts, S., & Redgrove, Z. (2007). Mobilising individual behavioural change through community initiatives: Lessons for tackling climate change. The Energy Review Study [on-line]. https://www.cse.org.uk/downloads/reports-and-publications/community-energy/behaviour-change/mobilising-individual-behavioural-change-through-community-summary.pdf. Bristol.

Magalhães, R., & Sanchez, R. (2009). Autopoiesis theory and organization: An overview. In R. Magalhães & R. Sanchez (Eds.), Autopoiesis in organization theory and practice (pp. 3–25). Bingley: Emerald Group.

Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In G. A. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.

Maturana, H. R. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 25–82.CrossRef

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.CrossRef

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (Rev. ed.). Boston: Shambhala.

Maturana, H., Mpodozis, J., & Letelier, J. C. (1995). Brain, language and the origin of human mental functions. Biological Research, 28, 15–26.

Maula, M. (2006). Organizations as learning systems: ‘Living composition’ as an enabling infrastructure. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Mendez, C. L., Coddou, F., & Maturana, H. R. (1988). The bringing forth of pathology. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 144–172.CrossRef

Patton, M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311–319.CrossRef

Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: The Guildford Press.

Ramalingam, B. (2013). Aid on the edge of chaos: Rethinking international development in a complex world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richardson, K., & Cilliers, P. (2001). What is complexity science? A view from different directions. Emergence, 3(1), 5–23.CrossRef

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemnas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRef

Scriven, M. (2010). Rethinking evaluation methodology. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(13), 6–7.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.

Spencer-Brown, G. (1973). Laws of form. New York: Bantam.

Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. London: Routledge.

Stephens, J., Barton, J., & Haslett, T. (2009). Action research: Its history and relationship to scientific methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(6), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9147-7.CrossRef

von Glaserfeld, E. (1980). Adaptation and viability. American Psychologist, 35, 970–974.

Vorhauser-Smith, S. (2011). Integrate neuroscience into work-based learning programs: Designing programs based on scientific theory. Development and Learning in Organizations, 25(5), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777281111159384.CrossRef

Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.) (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Yeo, R. K. (2005). Revisiting the roots of learning organization. The Learning Organization, 12(4), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470510599145.CrossRef

Title: Community-based Sustainability Initiatives as Learning Systems
Author: Andrew Mitchell
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Second-order Learning in Developmental Evaluation
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99370-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-99371-3

Copyright Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99371-3_4