Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Abdominal Imaging in Clinical Applications: Computer Aided Diagnosis Approaches Read chapter Read first chapter

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Comparison of CAD Systems for Three Class Breast Tissue Density Classification Using Mammographic Images

Authors : Kriti, Jitendra Virmani

Published in: Medical Imaging in Clinical Applications

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

It is well known that the changes in the breast tissue density are strongly correlated with the risk of breast cancer development and therefore classifying the breast tissue density as fatty, fatty–glandular and dense–glandular has become clinically significant. It is believed that the changes in the tissue density can be captured by computing the texture descriptors. Accordingly, the present work has been carried out with an aim to explore the potential of Laws’ mask texture descriptors for description of variations in breast tissue density using mammographic images. The work has been carried out on the 322 mammograms taken from the MIAS dataset. The dataset consists of 106 fatty, 104 fatty–glandular and 112 dense–glandular images. The ROIs of size 200 × 200 pixels are extracted from the center of the breast tissue, ignoring the pectoral muscle. For the design of a computer aided diagnostic system for three class breast tissue density classification, Laws’ texture descriptors have been computed using Laws’ masks of different resolutions. Five statistical features i.e. mean, skewness, standard deviation, entropy and kurtosis have been computed from all the Laws’ texture energy images generated from each ROI. The feature space dimensionality reduction has been carried out by using principal component analysis. For the classification task kNN, PNN and SVM classifiers have been used. After carrying out exhaustive experimentation, it has been observed that PCA–SVM based CAD system design yields the highest overall classification accuracy of 87.5 %, with individual class accuracy values of 84.9, 84.6 and 92.8 % for fatty, fatty–glandular and dense–glandular image classes respectively. These results indicate the usefulness of the proposed CAD system for breast tissue density classification.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on Hybrid Clustering Techniques Using Multi-views of MRI
next chapter Ensemble Classifiers Construction Using Diversity Measures and Random Subspace Algorithm Combination: Application to Glaucoma Diagnosis
Literature
1.
2.
Jain, A., Singh, S., Bhateja, V.: A robust approach for denoising and enhancement of mammographic breast masses. Int. J. Converg. Comput. 1(1), 38–49 (2013)CrossRef
3.
Bhateja, V., Misra, M., Urooj, S., Lay-Ekuakille, A.: A robust polynomial filtering framework for mammographic image enhancement from biomedical sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 13(11), 4147–4156 (2013)CrossRef
4.
5.
Hassanien, A.E., Moftah, H.M., Azar, A.T., Shoman, M.: MRI breast cancer diagnosis hybrid approach using adaptive ant-based segmentation and multilayer perceptron neural networks classifier. Appl. Softw. Comput. 14, 62–71 (2014)
6.
Hassanien, A.E.: Classification and feature selection of breast cancer data based on decision tree algorithm. Stud Inf. Control 12(1), 33–40 (2003)MathSciNet
7.
Wolfe, J.N.: Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5), 2486–2492 (1976)CrossRef
8.
Boyd, N.F., Martin, L.J., Yaffe, M.J., Minkin, S.: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res. 13(6), 223–235 (2011)CrossRef
9.
Boyd, N.F., Martin, L.J., Chavez, S., Gunasekara, A., Salleh, A., Melnichouk, O., Yaffe, M., Friedenreich, C., Minkin, S., Bronskill, M.: Breast tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross sectional study. Lancet Oncol. 10(6), 569–580 (2009)CrossRef
10.
Boyd, N.F., Rommens, J.M., Vogt, K., Lee, V., Hopper, J.L., Yaffe, M.J., Pater–son, A.D.: Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 6(10), 798–808 (2005)CrossRef
11.
Vachon, C.M., Gils, C.H., Sellers, T.A., Ghosh, K., Pruthi, S., Brandt, K.R., Pankratz, V.S.: Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 9(6), 217–225 (2007)CrossRef
12.
Boyd, N.F., Guo, H., Martin, L.J., Sun, L., Stone, J., Fishell, E., Jong, R.A., Hislop, G., Chiarelli, A., Minkin, S., Yaffe, M.J.: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 356(3), 227–236 (2007)CrossRef
13.
Warren, R.: Hormones and mammographic breast density. Maturitas 49(1), 67–78 (2004)CrossRef
14.
Boyd, N.F., Lockwood, G.A., Byng, J.W., Tritchler, D.L., Yaffe, M.J.: Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prev. 7(12), 1133–1144 (1998)
15.
Al Mousa, D.S., Brennan, P.C., Ryan, E.A., Lee, W.B., Tan, J., Mello-Thomas, C.: How mammographic breast density affects radiologists visual search patterns. Acad. Radiol. 21(11), 1386–1393 (2014)CrossRef
16.
Papaevangelou, A., Chatzistergos, S., Nikita, K.S., Zografos, G.: Breast density: computerized analysis on digitized mammograms. Hellenic J. Surg. 83(3), 133–138 (2011)CrossRef
17.
Colin, C., Prince, V., Valette, P.J.: Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer? Eur. J. Radiol. 82(3), 404–411 (2013)CrossRef
18.
Heine, J.J., Carton, M.J., Scott, C.G.: An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17(11), 3090–3097 (2008)CrossRef
19.
Zhou, C., Chan, H.P., Petrick, N., Helvie, M.A., Goodsitt, M.M., Sahiner, B., Hadjiiski, L.M.: Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. Med. Phys. 28, 1056–1069 (2001)CrossRef
20.
Jagannath, H.S., Virmani, J., Kumar, V.: Morphological enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. B (India), 93(3), 163–172 (2012)
21.
Huo, Z., Giger, M.L., Vyborny, C.J.: Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(12), 1285–1292 (2001)CrossRef
22.
Yaghjyan, L., Pinney, S.M., Mahoney, M.C., Morton, A.R., Buckholz, J.: Mammographic breast density assessment: a methods study. Atlas J. Med. Biological Sci. 1(1), 8–14 (2011)CrossRef
23.
Bhateja, V., Urooj, S., Misra, M.: technical advancements to mobile mammography using non-linear polynomial filters and IEEE 21451–1 NCAP information model. IEEE Sens. J. 15(5), 2559–2566 (2015)CrossRef
24.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V.: Quantitative evaluation of image enhancement techniques. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Assistive Technology (BEATS), pp. 1–8. IEEE Press, New York (2010)
25.
Miller, P., Astley, A.: Classification of breast tissue by texture analysis. Image Vis. Comput. 10(5), 277–282 (1992)CrossRef
26.
Karssemeijer, N.: Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys. Med. Biol. 43(2), 365–378 (1998)CrossRef
27.
Blot, L., Zwiggelaar, R.: Background texture extraction for the classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. In: Proceedings of Conference on Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, pp. 145–148 (2001)
28.
Bovis, K., Singh, S.: Classification of mammographic breast density using a combined classifier paradigm. In: 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 1–4 (2002)
29.
Wang, X.H., Good, W.F., Chapman, B.E., Chang, Y.H., Poller, W.R., Chang, T.S., Hardesty, L.A.: Automated assessment of the composition of breast tissue revealed on tissue–thickness–corrected mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 180(1), 257–262 (2003)CrossRef
30.
Petroudi, S., Kadir T., Brady, M.: Automatic classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns: a statistical approach. In: Proceedings of 25th Annual International Conference of IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 798–801. IEEE Press, New York (2003)
31.
Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Bosch, A., Raba, D., Zwiggelaar, R.: Automatic classification of breast tissue. In: Maeques, J.S., et al. (eds.) Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. LNCS, vol. 3523, pp. 431–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRef
32.
Bosch, A., Munoz, X., Oliver, A., Marti, J.: Modelling and classifying breast tissue density in mammograms. in: computer vision and pattern recognition. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference, vol. 2, pp. 1552–1558. IEEE Press, New York (2006)
33.
Muhimmah, I., Zwiggelaar, R.: Mammographic density classification using multiresolution histogram information. In: Proceedings of 5th International IEEE Special Topic Conference on Information Technology in Biomedicine (ITAB), pp. 1–6. IEEE Press, New York (2006)
34.
Castella, C., Kinkel, K., Eckstein, M.P., Sottas, P.E., Verdun, F.R., Bochud, F.: Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features. Acad. Radiol. 14(12), 1486–1499 (2007)CrossRef
35.
Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Marti, R., Pont, J., Perez, E., Denton, E.R.E., Zwiggelaar, R.: A Novel breast tissue density classification methodology. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 12, 55–65 (2008)CrossRef
36.
Subashini, T.S., Ramalingam, V., Palanivel, S.: Automated assessment of breast tissue density in digital mammograms. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 114(1), 33–43 (2010)CrossRef
37.
Tzikopoulos, S.D., Mavroforakis, M.E., Georgiou, H.V., Dimitropoulos, N., Theodoridis, S.: A fully automated scheme for mammographic segmentation and classification based on breast density and asymmetry. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 102(1), 47–63 (2011)CrossRef
38.
Li, J.B.: Mammographic image based breast tissue classification with kernel self-optimized fisher discriminant for breast cancer diagnosis. J. Med. Syst. 36(4), 2235–2244 (2012)CrossRef
39.
Mustra, M., Grgic, M., Delac, K.: Breast density classification using multiple feature selection. Auotomatika 53(4), 362–372 (2012)
40.
Silva, W.R., Menotti, D.: Classification of mammograms by the breast composition. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Image Processing, Computer Vision, and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–6 (2012)
41.
Sharma, V., Singh, S.: CFS–SMO based classification of breast density using multiple texture models. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 52(6), 521–529 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRef
42.
Sharma, V., Singh, S.: Automated classification of fatty and dense mammograms. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. 5(3, 7), 520–526 (2015)
43.
Kriti., Virmani, J., Dey, N., Kumar, V.: PCA–PNN and PCA–SVM based cad systems for breast density classification. In: Hassanien, A.E., et al. (eds.) Applications of Intelligent Optimization in Biology and Medicine. vol. 96, pp. 159–180. Springer (2015)
44.
Virmani, J., Kriti.: Breast tissue density classification using wavelet–based texture descriptors. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies (IC3T–2015), vol. 3, pp. 539–546 (2015)
45.
Kriti., Virmani, J.: Breast density classification using laws’ mask texture features. Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Technol. 19(3), 279–302 (2015)
46.
Kumar, I., Bhadauria, H.S., Virmani, J.: Wavelet packet texture descriptors based four-class BI-RADS breast tissue density classification. Procedia Comput. Sci. 70, 76–84 (2015)CrossRef
47.
Li, H., Giger, M.L., Huo, Z., Olopade, O.I., Lan, L., Weber, B.L., Bonta, I.: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med. Phys. 31(3), 549–555 (2004)CrossRef
48.
Laws, K.I.: Rapid texture identification. Proc. SPIE Image Process. Missile Guidance 238, 376–380 (1980)CrossRef
49.
Mougiakakou, S.G., Golimati, S., Gousias, I., Nicolaides, A.N., Nikita, K.S.: Computer-Aided diagnosis of carotid atherosclerosis based on ultrasound image statistics, laws’ texture and neural networks. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 26–36 (2007)CrossRef
50.
Polakowski, W.E., Cournoyer, D.A., Rogers, S.K., DeSimio, M.P., Ruck, D.W., Hoffmeister, J.W., Raines, R.A.: Computer-Aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(6), 811–819 (1997)CrossRef
51.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: Prediction of cirrhosis from liver ultrasound b–mode images based on laws’ mask analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Information Processing, (ICIIP–2011), pp. 1–5. IEEE Press, New York (2011)
52.
Rachidi, M., Marchadier, A., Gadois, C., Lespessailles, E., Chappard, C., Benhamou, C.L.: laws’ masks descriptors applied to bone texture analysis: an innovative and discriminant tool in osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol. 37(6), 541–548 (2008)CrossRef
53.
Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D.R., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C.R.M., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S.L., Taylor, P., Betal, D., Savage, J.: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Gale, A.G., et al. (eds.) Digital Mammography. LNCS, vol. 1069, pp. 375–378. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
54.
Doi, K.: Computer-Aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status, and future potential. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 31(4–5), 198–211 (2007)CrossRef
55.
Doi, K., MacMahon, H., Katsuragawa, S., Nishikawa, R.M., Jiang, Y.: Computer-Aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur. J. Radiol. 31(2), 97–109 (1997)CrossRef
56.
Tang, J., Rangayyan, R.M., Xu, J., El Naqa, I., Yang, Y.: Computer-Aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. IEEE Trans. Inf Technol. Biomed. 13(2), 236–251 (2009)CrossRef
57.
Tagliafico, A., Tagliafico, G., Tosto, S., Chiesa, F., Martinoli, C., Derechi, L.E., Calabrese, M.: Mammographic density estimation: comparison among bi–rads categories, semi-automated software and a fully automated one. Breast 18(1), 35–40 (2009)CrossRef
58.
Giger, M.L., Doi, K., MacMahon, H., Nishikawa, R.M., Hoffmann, K.R., Vyborny, C.J., Schmidt, R.A., Jia, H., Abe, K., Chen, X., Kano, A., Katsuragawa, S., Yin, F.F., Alperin, N., Metz, C.E., Behlen, F.M., Sluis, D.: An intelligent workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. Radiographics 13(3), 647–656 (1993)CrossRef
59.
Li, H., Giger, M.L., Olopade, O.I., Margolis, A., Lan, L., Bonta, I.: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Int. Congr. Ser. 1268, 878–881 (2004)CrossRef
60.
Tourassi, G.D.: Journey toward computer aided diagnosis: role of image texture analysis. Radiology 213(2), 317–320 (1999)CrossRef
61.
Kumar, I., Virmani, J., Bhadauria, H.S.: A review of breast density classification methods. In: Proceedings of 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development, (IndiaCom–2015), pp. 1960–1967. IEEE Press, New York (2015)
62.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: Neural network ensemble based CAD system for focal liver lesions from B-Mode ultrasound. J. Digit. Imaging 27(4), 520–537 (2014)CrossRef
63.
Zhang, G., Wang, W., Moon, J., Pack, J.K., Jean, S.: A review of breast tissue classification in mammograms. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Research in Applied Computation, pp. 232–237 (2011)
64.
Chan, H.P., Doi, K., Vybrony, C.J., Schmidt, R.A., Metz, C., Lam, K.L., Ogura, T., Wu, Y., MacMahon, H.: Improvement in radiologists’ detection of clustered micro-calcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Instigat. Radiol. 25(10), 1102–1110 (1990)CrossRef
65.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: Prediction of liver cirrhosis based on multiresolution texture descriptors from B-Mode ultrasound. Int. J. Converg. Comput. 1(1), 19–37 (2013)CrossRef
66.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: A rapid approach for prediction of liver cirrhosis based on first order statistics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies, pp. 212–215. IEEE Press, New York (2011)
67.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: Prediction of cirrhosis based on singular value decomposition of gray level co–occurrence matrix and a neural network classifier. In: Proceedings of Development in e–systems Engineering (DESE–2011), pp. 146–151 (2011)
68.
Vince, D.G., Dixon, K.J., Cothren, R.M., Cornhill, J.F.: Comparison of texture analysis methods for the characterization of coronary plaques in intravascular ultrasound images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 24(4), 221–229 (2000)CrossRef
69.
Seng, G.H., Chai, Y., Swee, T.T.: Research on laws’ mask texture analysis system reliability. Reasearch J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 7(19), 4002–4007 (2014)
70.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: Characterization of primary and secondary malignant liver lesions from B-Mode ultrasound. J. Digit. Imaging 26(6), 1058–1070 (2013)CrossRef
71.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: A comparative study of computer–aided classification systems for focal hepatic lesions from B–mode ultrasound. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 37(44), 292–306 (2013)CrossRef
72.
Romano, R., Acernese, F., Canonico, R., Giordano, G., Barone, F.: A principal components algorithm for spectra normalisation. Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Technol. 13(4), 357–369 (2013)CrossRef
73.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: PCA–SVM based CAD system for focal liver lesions using B–mode ultrasound images. Def. Sci. J. 63(5), 478–486 (2013)CrossRef
74.
Kumar, I., Bhadauria, H.S., Virmani, J., Rawat, J.: Reduction of speckle noise from medical images using principal component analysis image fusion. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, pp. 1–6. IEEE Press, New York (2014)
75.
Yazdani, A., Ebrahimi, T., Hoffmann, U.: Classification of EEG signals using dempster shafer theory and a k–nearest neighbor classifier. In: Proceedings of 4th International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, pp. 327–330 (2009)
76.
Amendolia, S.R., Cossu, G., Ganadu, M.L., Galois, B., Masala, G.L., Mura, G.M.: A comparative study of k–Nearest neighbor, support vector machine and multi-layer perceptron for thalassemia screening. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 69(1–2), 13–20 (2003)CrossRef
77.
Wu, Y., Ianakiev, K., Govindaraju, V.: Improved kNN classification. Pattern Recogn. 35(10), 2311–2318 (2002)CrossRefMATH
78.
Specht, D.F.: Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Netw. 1, 109–118 (1990)CrossRef
79.
Specht, D.F., Romsdahl, H.: Experience with adaptive probabilistic neural network and adaptive general regression neural network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1203–1208. IEEE Press, New York (1994)
80.
Georgiou, V.L., Pavlidis, N.G., Parsopoulos, K.E., Vrahatis, M.N.: Optimizing the performance of probabilistic neural networks in a bioinformatics task. In: Proceedings of the EUNITE 2004 Conference, pp. 34–40 (2004)
81.
Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM, a library of support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2(3), 27–65 (2011)CrossRef
82.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: SVM–based characterization of liver cirrhosis by singular value decomposition of GLCM matrix. Inter. J. Artif. Intell. Soft Comput. 3(3), 276–296 (2013)CrossRef
83.
Hassanien, A.E., Bendary, N.E., Kudelka, M., Snasel, V.: Breast cancer detection and classification using support vector machines and pulse coupled neural network. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI 2011), pp. 269–279 (2011)
84.
Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N., Khandelwal, N.: SVM–Based characterization of liver ultrasound images using wavelet packet texture descriptors. J. Digit. Imaging 26(3), 530–543 (2013)CrossRef
85.
Azar, A.T., El–Said, S.A.: Performance analysis of support vector machine classifiers in breast cancer mammography recognition. Neural Comput. Appl. 24, 1163–1177 (2014)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of CAD Systems for Three Class Breast Tissue Density Classification Using Mammographic Images
Authors
Kriti
Jitendra Virmani
Copyright Year
2016
Book
Medical Imaging in Clinical Applications

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33791-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-33793-7

Copyright Year: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33793-7_5

Premium Partner

    Image Credits