The utilization of resources in multiple cascade stages can improve the resource efficiency of product systems. This paper discusses a method by which a comparison of cascaded utilizations can be achieved despite the multi-functionality of such systems. Based on a comparison of the cascaded utilization with an equivalence system, potential reductions in impact indicators can be identified. In a case study, four scenarios for the cascaded utilization of a rotor blade are developed on the basis of a literature review. Potential reductions in the impact indicators Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) and Cumulative Raw Material Demand (CRD) are calculated. The main results of a review of the method are twofold: (i) The selection of the equivalence systems has a decisive influence on the result of the study and (ii) the approach requires a high data diversity and availability.
Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
- Comparison of Cascaded Utilization with Life Cycle Assessment – a Case Study of Wind Turbine Blades
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Sequence number