Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 6/2020

19-06-2020 | Technical Note

Comparison of Reduced Modified Proctor vs Modified Proctor

Authors: H. S. Shaivan, A. Sridharan

Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | Issue 6/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The compaction characteristics between reduced modified Proctor and modified Proctor tests have been compared. The results show that maximum dry unit weight values are comparable for both the tests but optimum moisture content values differ slightly more. For both the tests: optimum moisture content was found to correlate best with liquid limit, and the relationship for maximum dry unit weight with optimum moisture content was found to be almost the same. Since reduced modified Proctor requires less time and 40% less compaction energy as compared to modified Proctor test, it can be considered as a suitable alternative to the modified Proctor test.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference ASTM (2012a) D698–12: Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA ASTM (2012a) D698–12: Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
go back to reference ASTM (2012b) D1557–12: standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA ASTM (2012b) D1557–12: standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
go back to reference Sharma B, Gogoi B, Sridharan A (2019) Static Compaction Characteristics of Coarse and Fine Grained Soils. In: Hossain Z, Zhang J, Chen C (ed) Solving Pavement and Construction Materials Problems with Innovative and Cutting-edge Technologies, GeoChina 2018, Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95792-0_4. Sharma B, Gogoi B, Sridharan A (2019) Static Compaction Characteristics of Coarse and Fine Grained Soils. In: Hossain Z, Zhang J, Chen C (ed) Solving Pavement and Construction Materials Problems with Innovative and Cutting-edge Technologies, GeoChina 2018, Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-95792-0_​4.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Reduced Modified Proctor vs Modified Proctor
Authors
H. S. Shaivan
A. Sridharan
Publication date
19-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-3182
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01405-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 6/2020 Go to the issue