Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
When international organizations expand and proliferate, why do they fail to spread more evenly in their policy sphere? To answer this question, this article builds on organizational ecology theory, which was recently introduced into the study of international organizations. However, rather than studying each population separately, as previous studies have done, this article investigates how distinct populations with overlapping niches shape each other’s evolution. It argues that when inter-population competition occurs, the first population to occupy its niche at a high density limits the long-term development of other populations. This is the case even if emerging populations may temporarily enjoy a higher growth rate. The argument is illustrated by a study of the relations between four populations of technical assistance providers in the field of intellectual property. By doing so, the article brings for the first time inter-population relations in the study of international organizations and provides an explanation for the persistent concentration of international organizations in specific areas of the governance space.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F., & Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–277. CrossRef
Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39–75. CrossRef
Bhutta, Z. A., Sommerfeld, J., Lassi, Z. S., Salam, R. A., & Das, J. K. (2014). Global burden, distribution, and interventions for infectious diseases of poverty. Infectious Diseases of Poverty Journal, 3, 21. CrossRef
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., BÃ¤ckstrand, K., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Duffy, R., Kolk, A., Hoffmann, M., Levy, D., Newell, P., Milledge, T., Paterson, M., Pattberg, P., & VanDeveer, S. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 30(4), 591–612. CrossRef
Carroll, G. (1984). Organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 71–93. CrossRef
Clarke, W. (2018). Institutional density reconsidered: States, international organisations, and the governance space. Journal of International Relations and Development.
Deere, C. (2008). The implementation game: The TRIPS agreement and the global politics of intellectual property reform in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Deere Birkbeck, C., & Marchant, R. (2011). Implementation of the technical assistance principles of the WIPO development agenda. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 14(2), 103–132. CrossRef
Deere Birkbeck, C., & Roca, S. (2011). Independent external review of WIPO technical assistance in the area of cooperation for development. Geneva: WIPO.
Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B.G. (2002). The internationalization of palace wars: Lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. University of Chicago Press.
Dobusch, L., & Quack, S. (2013). Framing standards, mobilizing users: Copyright versus fair use in transnational regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 20(1), 52–88. CrossRef
Drahos, P. (2010). The Global Governance of Knowledge: Patent Offices and their Clients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, J. H., & Audia, P. G. (2006). Community ecology and the sociology of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 145–169. CrossRef
Frey, B. S. (2008). Outside and inside competition for international organizations—From analysis to innovations. The Review of International Organizations, 3(4), 335–350. CrossRef
Gehring, T., & Faude, B. (2013). The dynamics of regime complexes: Microfoundations and systemic effects. Global Governance, 19(1), 119–130.
Gehring, T., & Faude, B. (2014). A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 471–498. CrossRef
Hannan, M., & Carroll, G. (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. CrossRef
Helfer, L. (2004). Regime shifting: The TRIPs agreement and new dynamics of international intellectual property lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law, 29(1), 1–83.
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57. CrossRef
Johnson, T. (2016). Cooperation, co-optation, competition, conflict: International bureaucracies and non-governmental organizations in an interdependent world. Review of International Political Economy, 23(5), 737–767. CrossRef
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. CrossRef
Matthews, D. (2005). TRIPS flexibilities and access to medicines in developing countries: The problem with technical assistance and free trade agreements. European Intellectual Property Review, 420–427.
Matthews, D., & Munoz-Tellez, V. (2006). Bilateral technical assistance and TRIPS: The United States, Japan and the European communities in comparative perspective. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9(6), 629–653. CrossRef
May, C. (2004). Capacity building and the (re) production of intellectual property rights. Third World Quarterly, 25(5), 821–837. CrossRef
May, C. (2006). World intellectual property organization: Resurgence and the development agenda. Abingdon: Routledge.
Morin, J.-F. (2014). Paradigm shift in the global IP regime: The agency of academics. Review of International Political Economy, 21(2), 275–309. CrossRef
Morin, J.-F., & Gold, R. (2014). An integrated model for legal transplantation: The diffusion of intellectual property law in developing countries. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 781–792. CrossRef
Muzaka, V. (2011). Linkages, contests and overlaps in the global intellectual property rights regime. European Journal of International Relations, 17(4), 755–776. CrossRef
Nemeth, S. (2014). The effect of competition on terrorist group operations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(2), 336–362. CrossRef
Pengelly, T. (2005). Technical assistance for the formulation and implementation of intellectual property policy in developing countries and transition economies. Geneva: ICTSD. CrossRef
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
Raustiala, K. (2012). Institutional proliferation and the international legal order. In J.L. Dunoff & M.A. Pollack, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309. CrossRef
Sell, S. (2003). Private power, public law: The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Sell, S. K., & Prakash, A. (2004). Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 143–175. CrossRef
Singh, J. V., & Lumsden, C. J. (1990). Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 161–195. CrossRef
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In Handbook of Organizations, ed. J. G. March, pp. 153–93. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(1), 65–85. CrossRef
USPTP. (2016). The global intellectual property academy. Alexandria: USPTO.
Vaubel, R. (2008). A history of thought on institutional competition. In A. Bergh & R. Höijer: Institutional Competition (pp. 29-66). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Vivas-Eugui, D., & Bellmann, C. (2004). Towards development oriented technical assistance in intellectual property policymaking. Geneva: ICTSD.
WIPO (2007). WIPO Development Agenda. Geneva: WIPO.
WIPO (1999). Delegates review WIPO assistance to developing countries, press update UPD/1999/62, June 10.
WIPO. (2016). The WIPO academy education and training programs portfolio. Geneva: WIPO.
- Concentration despite competition: The organizational ecology of technical assistance providers
- Publication date
- Springer US
The Review of International Organizations
Print ISSN: 1559-7431
Electronic ISSN: 1559-744X
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta