Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Concluding Thoughts

Authors : Elisabeth Wilson-Evered, John Zeleznikow

Published in: Online Family Dispute Resolution

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This book has presented the case for the value of integrating technologies into the family law arena particularly within Australian contexts but with clear implications for family dispute resolution (FDR) services worldwide. Online dispute resolution (ODR) has already experienced success across a wide range of other conflicts, with preliminary evidence in the growing field of online family dispute resolution (OFDR) showing favourable outcomes for separating parents. The research presented in this book supports arguments that OFDR increases access to quality FDR services which in turn facilitates child-centered decision-making. This chapter will summarise the lessons learned to-date to inform recommendations for future OFDR program design and improvement. Both ODR and OFDR are relatively young developments in Australia, so the potential of these advanced technologies and their capabilities is yet unknown. Continued rigorous research into existing and future OFDR programs will further improve the field and the outcomes for families, an endeavour that will take the collaboration of many different stakeholders and a commitment to ongoing learning and future-focused change.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 10F.
 
Literature
go back to reference Ainsworth N, Zeleznikow L, Zeleznikow J (2019) Readiness for online family dispute resolution. Int J Online Disp Resol 6:243–263CrossRef Ainsworth N, Zeleznikow L, Zeleznikow J (2019) Readiness for online family dispute resolution. Int J Online Disp Resol 6:243–263CrossRef
go back to reference Araszkiewicz M, Łopatkiewicz A, Zienkiewicz A (2013) Parent Plan Support System – context, functions and knowledge base. Paper presented at The International Conference on Business Information Systems Heidelberg, Berlin, Springer, 19-20 June 2013 Araszkiewicz M, Łopatkiewicz A, Zienkiewicz A (2013) Parent Plan Support System – context, functions and knowledge base. Paper presented at The International Conference on Business Information Systems Heidelberg, Berlin, Springer, 19-20 June 2013
go back to reference Augar N, Zeleznikow J (2014) Developing online support and counseling to enhance family dispute resolution in Australia. Group Decis Negot 23:515–532CrossRef Augar N, Zeleznikow J (2014) Developing online support and counseling to enhance family dispute resolution in Australia. Group Decis Negot 23:515–532CrossRef
go back to reference Barsky AE (2016) The ethics of app-assisted family mediation. Conflict Resol Q 34:31–42CrossRef Barsky AE (2016) The ethics of app-assisted family mediation. Conflict Resol Q 34:31–42CrossRef
go back to reference Bellucci E (2008) AssetDivider: a new mediation tool in Australian family law. In: Proceedings of the First International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 8-9 December 2008 Bellucci E (2008) AssetDivider: a new mediation tool in Australian family law. In: Proceedings of the First International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 8-9 December 2008
go back to reference Bellucci E, Lodder AR, Zeleznikow J (2004) Integrating artificial intelligence, argumentation and game theory to develop an online dispute resolution environment. Paper presented at the 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Boca Raton, Florida, 15-17 November Bellucci E, Lodder AR, Zeleznikow J (2004) Integrating artificial intelligence, argumentation and game theory to develop an online dispute resolution environment. Paper presented at the 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Boca Raton, Florida, 15-17 November
go back to reference Bowers JR, Mitchell ET, Hardesty JL, Hughes R Jr (2011) A review of online divorce education programs. Family Court Rev 49:776–787CrossRef Bowers JR, Mitchell ET, Hardesty JL, Hughes R Jr (2011) A review of online divorce education programs. Family Court Rev 49:776–787CrossRef
go back to reference Conley Tyler M, Bretheron D (2003) Developing an online mediation culture: The fourth generation of online ADR. Paper presented at the 2nd Asia-Pacific Mediation Forum, Singapore, 19-22 November Conley Tyler M, Bretheron D (2003) Developing an online mediation culture: The fourth generation of online ADR. Paper presented at the 2nd Asia-Pacific Mediation Forum, Singapore, 19-22 November
go back to reference Cullen R (2001) Addressing the digital divide. Online Info Rev 25:311–320CrossRef Cullen R (2001) Addressing the digital divide. Online Info Rev 25:311–320CrossRef
go back to reference Dickson G, Green K (2001) The external researcher in participatory action research. Educ Action Res 9:243–260CrossRef Dickson G, Green K (2001) The external researcher in participatory action research. Educ Action Res 9:243–260CrossRef
go back to reference Ebner N, Zeleznikow J (2016) No sheriff in town: governance for the ODR field. Negot J 32:297–323CrossRef Ebner N, Zeleznikow J (2016) No sheriff in town: governance for the ODR field. Negot J 32:297–323CrossRef
go back to reference Field R (1998) Mediation and the art of power (im)balancing. QUT Law J 12:264–273 Field R (1998) Mediation and the art of power (im)balancing. QUT Law J 12:264–273
go back to reference Flynn D (2005) The social worker as family mediator: Balancing power in cases involving family violence. Aust Soc Work 58:407–418CrossRef Flynn D (2005) The social worker as family mediator: Balancing power in cases involving family violence. Aust Soc Work 58:407–418CrossRef
go back to reference González Martín N (2015) International parental child abduction and mediation. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 15:353–412CrossRef González Martín N (2015) International parental child abduction and mediation. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 15:353–412CrossRef
go back to reference Grillo T (1991) The mediation alternative: process dangers for women. Yale Law J 100:1545–1610CrossRef Grillo T (1991) The mediation alternative: process dangers for women. Yale Law J 100:1545–1610CrossRef
go back to reference Hughes SH (1995) Elizabeth’s story: exploring power imbalances in divorce mediation. Georgetown J Leg Ethics 8:553–596 Hughes SH (1995) Elizabeth’s story: exploring power imbalances in divorce mediation. Georgetown J Leg Ethics 8:553–596
go back to reference Jani S (2012) Mediating from a distance: suggested practice guidelines for family mediators, 2nd edn. MediateBC, Vancouver Jani S (2012) Mediating from a distance: suggested practice guidelines for family mediators, 2nd edn. MediateBC, Vancouver
go back to reference Katsh E, Rifkin J (2001) Introducing the fourth party: the critical role of technology. In: Online dispute resolution: resolving conflicts in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 93–116 Katsh E, Rifkin J (2001) Introducing the fourth party: the critical role of technology. In: Online dispute resolution: resolving conflicts in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 93–116
go back to reference LaMarca J (2012) Virtually possible - using the internet to facilitate custody and parenting beyond relocation. Rutgers Comput Technol Law J 38:146–172 LaMarca J (2012) Virtually possible - using the internet to facilitate custody and parenting beyond relocation. Rutgers Comput Technol Law J 38:146–172
go back to reference Larson DA (2003) Online dispute resolution: do you know where your children are? Negot J 19:199–205CrossRef Larson DA (2003) Online dispute resolution: do you know where your children are? Negot J 19:199–205CrossRef
go back to reference Lavi D (2014) No more click-click in here: e-mediation in divorce disputes-the reality and the desirable. Cardozo J Conflict Resol 16:479–541 Lavi D (2014) No more click-click in here: e-mediation in divorce disputes-the reality and the desirable. Cardozo J Conflict Resol 16:479–541
go back to reference Lodder AR, Zeleznikow J (2012) Artificial intelligence and online dispute resolution. In: Wahab M, Katsh E, Rainey D (eds) Online dispute resolution: theory and practice. Eleven International Publishers, Ten Haag, Netherlands, pp 61–82 Lodder AR, Zeleznikow J (2012) Artificial intelligence and online dispute resolution. In: Wahab M, Katsh E, Rainey D (eds) Online dispute resolution: theory and practice. Eleven International Publishers, Ten Haag, Netherlands, pp 61–82
go back to reference Markham SK (1998) A longitudinal examination of how champions influence others to support their projects. J Prod Innov Manage 15:490–504CrossRef Markham SK (1998) A longitudinal examination of how champions influence others to support their projects. J Prod Innov Manage 15:490–504CrossRef
go back to reference Nicholson A, Harrison M (2000) Family law and the family court of Australia: experiences of the first 25 years. Melbourne Univ Law Rev 24:757–783 Nicholson A, Harrison M (2000) Family law and the family court of Australia: experiences of the first 25 years. Melbourne Univ Law Rev 24:757–783
go back to reference Parkinson P (2013) The idea of family relationship centres in Australia. Family Court Rev 51:195–213CrossRef Parkinson P (2013) The idea of family relationship centres in Australia. Family Court Rev 51:195–213CrossRef
go back to reference Pearlstein A, Hanson B, Ebner N (2012) ODR in North America. In: Abdel Wahab MS, Katsh E, Rainey D (eds) Online dispute resolution: theory and practice. Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, pp 431–452 Pearlstein A, Hanson B, Ebner N (2012) ODR in North America. In: Abdel Wahab MS, Katsh E, Rainey D (eds) Online dispute resolution: theory and practice. Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, pp 431–452
go back to reference Rainey D (2012) ODR and culture. In: Abdel Wahab MS, Katsh E, Rainey D (eds) Online dispute resolution: theory and practice. Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, pp 185–201 Rainey D (2012) ODR and culture. In: Abdel Wahab MS, Katsh E, Rainey D (eds) Online dispute resolution: theory and practice. Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, pp 185–201
go back to reference Rao S (2004) The cultural vacuum in online dispute resolution. Paper presented at the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution Rao S (2004) The cultural vacuum in online dispute resolution. Paper presented at the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution
go back to reference Rimelspach RL (2001) Mediating family disputes in a world with domestic violence: how to devise a safe and effective court-connected mediation program. Ohio State J Disp Resol 17:95–112 Rimelspach RL (2001) Mediating family disputes in a world with domestic violence: how to devise a safe and effective court-connected mediation program. Ohio State J Disp Resol 17:95–112
go back to reference Rossi FS, Holtzworth-Munroe A, Applegate AG, Beck CJ, Adams JM, Hale DF (2017) Shuttle and online mediation: a review of available re-search and implications for separating couples reporting intimate partner violence or abuse. Family Court Rev 55:390–403CrossRef Rossi FS, Holtzworth-Munroe A, Applegate AG, Beck CJ, Adams JM, Hale DF (2017) Shuttle and online mediation: a review of available re-search and implications for separating couples reporting intimate partner violence or abuse. Family Court Rev 55:390–403CrossRef
go back to reference Schmitz AJ (2019) Expanding access to remedies through E-court initiatives. Buffalo Law Rev 67:89–163 Schmitz AJ (2019) Expanding access to remedies through E-court initiatives. Buffalo Law Rev 67:89–163
go back to reference Schmitz AJ, Wing L (2020) Beneficial and ethical ODR for family issues. Fam Court Rev. Forthcoming Schmitz AJ, Wing L (2020) Beneficial and ethical ODR for family issues. Fam Court Rev. Forthcoming
go back to reference Schramm DG, McCaulley G (2012) Divorce education for parents: a comparison of online and in-person delivery methods. J Divorce Remarriage 53:602–617CrossRef Schramm DG, McCaulley G (2012) Divorce education for parents: a comparison of online and in-person delivery methods. J Divorce Remarriage 53:602–617CrossRef
go back to reference Sela A (2017) The effect of online technologies on dispute resolution system design: antecedents, current trends, and future directions. Lewis Clark Law Rev 21:635–683 Sela A (2017) The effect of online technologies on dispute resolution system design: antecedents, current trends, and future directions. Lewis Clark Law Rev 21:635–683
go back to reference Sela A (2019) e-Nudging justice: the role of digital choice architecture in online courts. J Disp Resol 2:128–163 Sela A (2019) e-Nudging justice: the role of digital choice architecture in online courts. J Disp Resol 2:128–163
go back to reference Sourdin T, Zeleznikow J (2020) Courts, mediation and COVID-19. Aust Bus Law Rev 48(2):138–158 Sourdin T, Zeleznikow J (2020) Courts, mediation and COVID-19. Aust Bus Law Rev 48(2):138–158
go back to reference Thomson M (2009) Annual report of the telephone dispute resolution service to the attorney general. Relationships Australia, Queensland Thomson M (2009) Annual report of the telephone dispute resolution service to the attorney general. Relationships Australia, Queensland
go back to reference Ver Steegh N (2003) Yes, no, and maybe: informed decision making about divorce mediation in the presence of domestic violence. William Mary J Woman Law 9:145–206 Ver Steegh N (2003) Yes, no, and maybe: informed decision making about divorce mediation in the presence of domestic violence. William Mary J Woman Law 9:145–206
go back to reference Woodlock D (2016) The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women 23:584–602CrossRef Woodlock D (2016) The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women 23:584–602CrossRef
go back to reference Zeleznikow J (2004) The split-up project: induction, context and knowledge discovery in law. Law. Probab Risk 3:147–168CrossRef Zeleznikow J (2004) The split-up project: induction, context and knowledge discovery in law. Law. Probab Risk 3:147–168CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Concluding Thoughts
Authors
Elisabeth Wilson-Evered
John Zeleznikow
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5_6

Premium Partner