Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Conclusion: Utopianism and State Primacy in International Law

Author : Deepak Mawar

Published in: States Undermining International Law

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A brief overview of the findings of the previous chapters is provided, highlighting not only the significant role utopianism can play in the development of international law but also why State primacy in the international legal system is problematic. Analysing the League of Nations and the United Nations helps to support the argument that when the protection of all individuals and groups is prioritised during the development of international law, some of the most positive advancements in the international legal system have been realised. Yet, the analysis of these international organisations also provides a strong reminder of the problematic nature of State primacy in international law as some of the greatest failures on the international stage have been a result of States prioritising their domestic duties above the overall interests of the international community.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See P. Weil, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ (1983) 77.3 The American Journal of International Law 413; A.V. Verdross, ‘On the Concept of International Law’, (1949) 43.3 American Journal of International Law 435; L. Oppenheim, ‘The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method’, (1908) 2.2 American Journal of International Law 313.
 
2
P. Allott, The Health of Nations: The Society and Law Beyond the State, (2002), at 387, para 18.30.
 
3
D. Kennedy, ‘The Move to Institutions’, (1987) 8.8 Cardozo Law Review 841, at 841–842.
 
4
R. Wolfrum, ‘International Law of Cooperation’, (2005) 2 EPIL 1242, 1242–1247.
 
5
M. Lachs, ‘Legal Framework of an International Community’, (1992) 6 Emory International Law Review 329, 329–337.
 
6
See C. Schmitt, Concept of the Political, (2007); M. Foucault, Society Must be Defended (2003).
 
7
H. Kelsen, Das Problem der Souveränität, (1960).
 
8
H. Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law, (1992), at 134–139.
 
9
T. Franck, Fairness in International Law and Institutions, (1995), at 7.
 
10
Ibid., at 7.
 
11
A. Chayes & A.H. Chayes, The New Sovereign, (1995), at 1–28.
 
12
F.P. Walters, The History of the League of Nations, (1969), at 678.
 
13
J. Goldsmith & E. Posner, The Limits of International Law, (2005), at 170.
 
14
‘Attorney General’s Advice on the Iraq War Iraq: Resolution 1441’ (2005) 54.3 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 767.
 
15
M. Koskenniemi, ‘The Place of Law in Collective Security’, (1996) 17.2 Michigan Journal of International Law 455, at 460–461.
 
Metadata
Title
Conclusion: Utopianism and State Primacy in International Law
Author
Deepak Mawar
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64789-6_6