Top

Environmental Management

Published in:

06-11-2021

Connections among Puget Sound Residents’ Psychological Restoration from Natural Environments, Place Attachment, and Beliefs about Environmental Governance

Authors: Whitney Fleming, Mark Needham, Kelly Biedenweg

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 2/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Psychological restoration and place attachment may be related to beliefs about environmental governance, with place attachment a likely mediator. We analyze data from a public survey in the Puget Sound area of Washington state (n = 2323) regarding beliefs about environmental governance, place attachment to the Puget Sound area, and psychological restoration related to this area. On average, individuals felt neutral in their beliefs about environmental governance, had high place attachment, and had high frequency of psychological restoration in natural environments. Structural equation modeling indicated that those who more frequently experienced psychological restoration from natural environments had stronger place attachment and more positive beliefs about environmental governance. Place attachment was significantly associated with governance perceptions, but explained only a small portion of variance (R² = 0.02), while psychological restoration was significantly associated with place attachment and explained a moderate portion of its variance (R² = 0.37). Place attachment fully mediated the effects of frequency of psychological restoration on beliefs about governance. Promoting psychological restoration and place attachment without attending to the process factors associated with good governance would not likely be a viable strategy for environmental managers to substantially increase positive beliefs about environmental governance.

previous article Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services

next article Combining Stakeholder- and Social Network- Analysis to Improve Regional Nature Conservation: A Case Study from Osnabrück, Germany

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Principal components exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation of all variables used in this article produced separate factors reflecting identical factors as the CFA with minimal cross-loadings, and all loadings were ≥0.40. In addition, a single EFA without rotation with the number of factors fixed to one showed the factor explained less than 50% of the variance (35%). These approaches coupled with the CFA findings presented in this article represent Harman single factor tests (Podsakoff et al. 2003) and suggest that common method variance or bias was generally absent.

Two items from the Place attachment index (“I am mostly attached to parts of Puget Sound that are nearest to me,” and “I could be satisfied living in other places outside the Puget Sound”) and one item from the governance beliefs index (“I have the freedom to make personal decisions about how natural resources are managed on my property”) were removed due to low factor loadings.

Ansell C, Gash A (2018) Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. J Public Adm Res Theory 28(1):16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030CrossRef

Bagstad K, Villa F, Batker D, Harrison-Cox J, Voigt B, Johnson G(2014) From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol Soc 19(2):64. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06523-190264CrossRef

Baniamin HM (2021) Linking trust, performance, and governance quality: What can explain the incongruity? Commonw Comp Politics 59(2):128–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2020.1863018CrossRef

Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173CrossRef

Bennett NJ, Franco AD, Calò A, Nethery E, Niccolini F, Milazzo M, Guidetti P (2019) Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness. Conserv Lett 12(4):e12640. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12640CrossRef

Berg AEVD, Hartig T, Staats H (2007) Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. J Soc Issues 63(1):79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.xCrossRef

Biedenweg K (2017) A comparative study of human well-being indicators across three puget sound regions. Soc Nat Resour 30(3):362–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1209606CrossRef

Biedenweg K, Hanein A, Nelson K, Stiles K, Wellman K, Horowitz J, Vynne S (2014) Developing human wellbeing indicators in the Puget Sound: focusing on the watershed scale. Coast Manage 42:374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2014.923136CrossRef

Biedenweg K, Harguth H, Stiles K (2017) The science and politics of human well-being: a case study in cocreating indicators for Puget Sound restoration. Ecol Soc 22(3):11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09424-220311CrossRef

Biedenweg K, Stiles K, Wellman K (2016) A holistic framework for identifying human wellbeing indicators for marine policy. Mar Policy 64:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.002CrossRef

Blicharska M, Isaksson K, Richardson T, Wu C-J (2011) Context dependency and stakeholder involvement in EIA: the decisive role of practitioners. J Environ Plan Manag 54(3):337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.506077CrossRef

Bollen KA, Long JS (1993) Testing Structural Equation Models. SAGE

Bouckaert G, van de Walle S (2003) Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘Good Governance’: difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. Int Rev Adm Sci 69(3):329–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693003CrossRef

Bovaird T, Löffler E (2003) Evaluating the quality of public governance: indicators, models and methodologies. Int Rev Adm Sci 69(3):313–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693002CrossRef

Bow V, Buys E (2003) Sense of community and place attachment: the natural environment plays a vital role in developing a sense of community. In Buys L, Lyddon J, Bradley R (eds) Social change in the 21st century 2003 conference refereed proceedings. Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services QUT, pp. 1–18. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/115/

Browne MW, Cudeck R (1992) Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociol Methods Res 21(2):230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005CrossRef

Buttimer A, Seamon D (2015) The human experience of space and place. Routledge

Byrne BM (1994) Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/WINDOWS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. SAGE

Carrus G, Bonaiuto M, Bonnes M (2005) Environmental concern, regional identity, and support for protected areas in Italy. Environ Behav 37(2):237–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269644CrossRef

Clarke D, Murphy C, Lorenzoni I (2018) Place attachment, disruption and transformative adaptation. J Environ Psychol 55:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.006CrossRef

Dahlstrand U, Biel A (1997) Pro-environmental habits: propensity levels in behavioral change. J Appl Soc Psychol 27(7):588–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00650.xCrossRef

Davenport MA, Anderson DH (2005) Getting from sense of place to place-based management: an interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Soc Nat Resour 18(7):625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590959613CrossRef

Debnath RM, Shankar R (2014) Does good governance enhance happiness: a cross nation study. Soc Indic Res 116(1):235–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0275-1CrossRef

Dellmuth LM, Tallberg J (2015) The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Rev Int Stud 41(3):451–475CrossRef

Dellmuth L, Schlipphak B (2020) Legitimacy beliefs towards global governance institutions: a research agenda. J Eur Public Policy 27(6):931–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1604788CrossRef

Delmas MA, Young OR (2009) Governance for the environment: new perspectives. Cambridge University Press

Devine-Wright P (2009) Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 19(6):426–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1004CrossRef

Devine-Wright P, Howes Y (2010) Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. J Environ Psychol 30(3):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008CrossRef

Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons

Doherty D, Wolak J (2012) When do the ends justify the means? Evaluating procedural fairness. Political Behav 34(2):301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9166-9CrossRef

Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers

Edge S, McAllister ML (2009) Place-based local governance and sustainable communities: lessons from Canadian biosphere reserves. J Environ Plan Manag 52(3):279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560802703058CrossRef

Esaiasson P, Persson M, Gilljam M, Lindholm T (2019) Reconsidering the role of procedures for decision acceptance. Br J Political Sci 49(1):291–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000508CrossRef

Fleming W, Kehoe-Thommen H, Katz B, Hart J, Biedenweg K (2020) Vital signs survey summary 2020: a report on subjective human wellbeing prepared for the puget sound partnership (No. 2). Puget Sound Partnership

Foo K, Martin D, Polsky C, Wool C, Ziemer M (2015) Social well-being and environmental governance in urban neighbourhoods in Boston, MA. Geographical J 181(2):138–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12108CrossRef

Forrer J, Edwin Kee J, Boyer E (2014) Governing cross-sector collaboration. Jossey-Bay

Georgiadis N (2015) Ranking the greatest threats to Puget Sound: a summary of the 2014 Puget Sound Pressures Assessment. Encyclopedia of Puget Sound. https://www.eopugetsound.org/articles/ranking-greatest-threats-puget-sound-summary-2014-puget-sound-pressures-assessment

Gifford R, Nilsson A (2014) Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int J Psychol 49(3):141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034CrossRef

Gosling E, Williams KJH (2010) Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: testing connectedness theory among farmers. J Environ Psychol 30(3):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.005CrossRef

Grimmelikhuijsen S (2012) Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: an experiment. Int Rev Adm Sci 78(1):50–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429667CrossRef

Gross-Camp ND, Martin A, McGuire S, Kebede B, Munyarukaza J (2012) Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness. Oryx 46(1):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605311001372CrossRef

Hagger MS, Cameron LD, Hamilton K, Hankonen N, Lintunen T (2020). The handbook of behavior change. Cambridge University Press

Harrell F et al. (2019) AregImpute function | R Documentation (4.2-0) [R]. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/Hmisc/versions/4.2-0/topics/aregImpute

Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Strumse E (2007) Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behaviour. Environ Conserv 34(4):291–299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907004250CrossRef

Hartig T, Staats H (2006) The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. J Environ Psychol 26(3):215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.007CrossRef

Hayduk LA (1987) Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances (pp. xvii, 405). Johns Hopkins University Press

Ingram H (2013) No universal remedies: design for contexts. Water Int 38(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2012.739076CrossRef

Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. CUP Archive

Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15(3):169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2CrossRef

Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2009) Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996-2008. The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team

Kil N, Holland SM, Stein TV, Ko YJ (2012) Place attachment as a mediator of the relationship between nature-based recreation benefits and future visit intentions. J Sustain Tour 20(4):603–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.610508CrossRef

Kjær A (2008) Governance and the urban bureaucracy. In Davies JS, Imbroscio DL (eds) Theories of urban politics. SAGE

Koontz TM, Thomas CW (2006) What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Adm Rev 66:111–121. JSTORCrossRef

Korpela KM (1989) Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. J Environ Psychol 9(3):241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80038-6CrossRef

Korpela K, Hartig T (1996) Restorative qualities of favorite places. J Environ Psychol 16(3):221–233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018CrossRef

Korpela KM, Ylén M, Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H (2009) Stability of self-reported favourite places and place attachment over a 10-month period. J Environ Psychol 29(1):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.008CrossRef

Langbein L, Knack S (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: Six, one, or none? J Dev Stud 46(2):350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902952399CrossRef

Lankford B, Pringle C, Lewis F, Chhotray V, Mander M, Goulden M, Nxele Z, Quayle L (2010) The impacts of ecosystem services and environmental governance on human well-being in the Pongola region, South Africa | Ecosystems Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA). http://inr.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/The-impacts-of-ecosystem-services-and-environmental-governance-on-human-well-being-in-the-Pongola-region-South-Africa.pdf

Lewicka M (2011) Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? J Environ Psychol 31(3):207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001CrossRef

Lockwood M, Davidson J, Curtis A, Stratford E, Griffith R (2010) Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 23(10):986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214CrossRef

Manfredo MJ, Teel TL, Sullivan L, Dietsch AM (2017) Values, trust, and cultural backlash in conservation governance: the case of wildlife management in the United States. Biol Conserv 214:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.032CrossRef

Maruyama GM (1998) Basics of structural equation modeling (pp. xvi, 311). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345109

Masterson VA, Stedman RC, Enqvist J, Tengö M, Giusti M, Wahl D, Svedin U (2017) The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecol Soc 22(1):49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270120

Mehnen N, Mose I, Strijker D (2013) Governance and sense of place: half a century of a German Nature Park. Environ Policy Gov 23(1):46–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1592CrossRef

Natural Resource Governance Framework (2016) IUCN. https://www.iucn.org/commissions/commission-environmental-economic-and-social-policy/our-work/knowledge-baskets/natural-resource-governance

Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM (2011) Underestimating nearby nature: affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Sci 22(9):1101–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418527CrossRef

OECD (2017) “Governance and well-being”, in How’s Life? 2017: measuring Well-being. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/how-s-life-2017_how_life-2017-en

Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422.CrossRef

Payton MA, Fulton DC, Anderson DH (2005) Influence of place attachment and trust on civic action: a study at sherburne national wildlife refuge. Soc Nat Resour 18(6):511–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590947940CrossRef

Pierre J (ed) (2000) Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford University Press

Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRef

Pretty PJ, Peacock J, Hine R, Sellens M, South N, Griffin M (2007) Green exercise in the UK countryside: effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. J Environ Plan Manag 50(2):211–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560601156466CrossRef

Proshansky HM, Fabian AK, Kaminoff R (1983) Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. J Environ Psychol 3(1):57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8CrossRef

Puget Sound Partnership (2018) The 2018-2022 action agenda for the Puget Sound Partnership. https://psp.wa.gov/action_agenda_center.php

Quinn T, Lorenzoni I, Adger W (2015) Place attachment, identity, and adaptation. In: O’Brien K & Selboe E (Eds.), The adaptive challenge of climate change (pp. 160–170). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139149389.010

Raymond CM, Brown G, Robinson GM (2011) The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: a test of two behavioural models. J Environ Psychol 31(4):323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.006CrossRef

Raymond CM, Brown G, Weber D (2010) The measurement of place attachment: personal, community, and environmental connections. J Environ Psychol 30(4):422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002CrossRef

Reed MS, Vella S, Challies E, Vente J, de, Frewer L, Hohenwallner‐Ries D, Huber T, Neumann RK, Oughton EA, Ceno JSdel, Delden Hvan (2018) A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restor Ecol 26(S1):S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541CrossRef

Relph EC (1976) Place and placelessness. Pion Limited

Rhodes RAW (2007) Understanding governance: ten years on. Organ Stud 28(8):1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586CrossRef

Ruckelshaus MH, McClure MM (2007) Sound science: synthesizing ecological and socioeconomic information about the Puget Sound ecosystem. U.S. Department of Commerce, National & Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NMFS), Northwest Fisheries Science Center. https://www.eopugetsound.org/articles/sound-science-2007

Safford TG, Norman KC, Henly M, Mills KE, Levin PS (2014) Environmental awareness and public support for protecting and restoring Puget Sound. Environ Manag 53(4):757–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0236-8CrossRef

Sarbin TR (1983) Place identity as a component of self: an addendum. J Environ Psychol 3(4):337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80036-XCrossRef

Scannell L, Gifford R (2010) Defining place attachment: a tripartite organizing framework. J Environ Psychol 30(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006CrossRef

Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychological Res 8(2):23–74

Stedman RC (2002) Toward a social psychology of place: predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environ Behav 34(5):561–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001CrossRef

Stedman RC (2003) Sense of place and forest science: toward a program of quantitative research. For Sci 49(6):822–829. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/49.6.822CrossRef

Stinchfield H, Koontz L, Sexton NR (2009) Social and economic considerations for coastal and watershed restoration in the Puget Sound, Washington: a Llterature review. USGS

Stringer LC, Twyman C, Thomas DSG (2007) Combating land degradation through participatory means: the case of Swaziland. Ambio 36(5):387–393. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[387:CLDTPM]2.0.CO;2CrossRef

Takayama N, Fujiwara A, Saito H, Horiuchi M (2017) Management effectiveness of a secondary coniferous forest for landscape appreciation and psychological restoration. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(7):800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070800CrossRef

Trimbach DJ, Fleming W, Biedenweg K(2020) Whose Puget Sound?: Examining Place Attachment, Residency, and Stewardship in the Puget Sound Region. Geogr Rev 0(0):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2020.1798763CrossRef

Tuan Y (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press

Turner RA, Addison J, Arias A, Bergseth BJ, Marshall NA, Morrison TH, Tobin RC (2016) Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance. Ecol Soc 21(3):18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269961

Van Den Berg AE, Hartig T, Staats H (2007) Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. J Soc Issues 63(1):79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.xCrossRef

Van Marissing E, Bolt G, Van Kempen R (2006) Urban governance and social cohesion: effects of urban restructuring policies in two Dutch cities. Cities 23(4):279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.11.001CrossRef

Vaske JJ (2019) Survey research and analysis, 2nd edn. In: Sagamore-Venture. Sagamore-Venture

Vaske JJ, Donnelly M (1999) A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Soc Nat Resour 12(6):523–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419299279425CrossRef

Verhaegen S, Scholte JA, Tallberg J (2021) Explaining elite perceptions of legitimacy in global governance. Eur J Int Relat 27(2):622–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066121994320CrossRef

Wakefield SEL, Elliott SJ, Cole DC, Eyles JD (2001) Environmental risk and (re)action: air quality, health, and civic involvement in an urban industrial neighbourhood. Health Place 7(3):163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00006-5CrossRef

Weng P-Y, Chiang Y-C (2014) Psychological restoration through indoor and outdoor leisure activities. J Leis Res 46(2):203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950320CrossRef

Williams DR, Vaske JJ (2003) The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. For Sci 49(6):830–840. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/49.6.830CrossRef

World Bank (2005) Public services delivery. World Bank Publications

Wyles KJ, White MP, Hattam C, Pahl S, King H, Austen M (2019) Are some natural environments more psychologically beneficial than others? The importance of type and quality on connectedness to nature and psychological restoration. Environ Behav 51(2):111–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517738312CrossRef

Title: Connections among Puget Sound Residents’ Psychological Restoration from Natural Environments, Place Attachment, and Beliefs about Environmental Governance
Authors: Whitney Fleming
Mark Needham
Kelly Biedenweg
Publication date: 06-11-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Environmental Management / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01556-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Identifying and Aligning Ecosystem Services and Beneficiaries Associated with Best Management Practices in Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Evaluation of Water Provision Ecosystem Services Associated with Land Use/Cover and Climate Variability in the Winike Watershed, Omo Gibe Basin of Ethiopia

Identification of Areas Highly Vulnerable to Land Conversion: A Case Study From Southern Thailand

Participatory Causal Loop Mapping of the Adoption of Organic Farming in Nigeria

Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services

Investigating Changes Driving Cumulative Impacts on Native Vegetation in Mining Regions in the Northeastern Brazilian Amazon