Top

Published in:

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Consulting the British Public in the Digital Age: Emerging Synergies and Tensions in the Government 2.0 Landscape

Author : Shefali Virkar

Published in: Government e-Strategic Planning and Management

Publisher: Springer New York

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Over the last two decades, public confidence and trust in government has declined visibly in several Western liberal democracies owing to a distinct lack of opportunities for citizen participation in political processes, and has given way instead to disillusionment with current political institutions, actors and practices. The rise of the Internet as a global communications medium has opened up huge opportunities and raised new challenges for government, with digital technology creating new forms of community, empowering citizens and reforming existing power structures in a way that has rendered obsolete or inappropriate many of the tools and processes of traditional democratic politics. Through an analysis of the No. 10 Downing Street ePetitions Initiative based in the United Kingdom, this chapter seeks to engage with issues related to the innovative use of network technology by government to involve citizens in policy processes within existing democratic frameworks in order to improve administration, reform democratic processes and renew citizen trust in institutions of governance.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter e-Strategy and Legislatures: A Longitudinal Analysis of Southern Europe’s Parliaments

next chapter Implementing e-Services in Spanish Regional Government: A Case Study

Otherwise called Electronic Governance, this term refers to the use of technology to enhance the structural (institutional and legal) frameworks and processes of governance. Based on discussions in earlier sections of this paper, the notion of e-Governance may be conceptually divided into e-Government (which is concerned with electronic public service delivery) and e-Democracy (where technology is used to impact the quality and nature of democratic processes).

UK Citizens Online Democracy was a project which began life by setting up a website to discuss the Freedom of Information Act proposed by the Blair Administration in 1999/2000.

Archibugi, D. & D. Held (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy: an Agenda for a New World Order, Polity Press: Cambridge.

Atkinson, J.W. & D. Birch (1970). The Dynamics of Action, Wiley Press: New York.

Bicking, M., & Wimmer, M. A. (2010). Tools and technologies in eParticipation: insights from project evaluation. In F. De Cindio, A. Machintosh, & C. Peraboni (Eds.), Online deliberation, proceedings of the fourth international conference, OD2010 (pp. 75–86), June 2010.

Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: Populism, community and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133–160f.CrossRef

Bishop, P., & Anderson, L. (2004). E-government to E-democracy: ‘High-tech’ solutions to ‘no tech’ problems. Paper presented to the Australian Electronic Governance Conference, University of Melbourne, April 2004.

Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity Journal, 15(1–2), 1–9.

Coleman, S. (2011). The wisdom of which crowd? on the pathology of a listening government. The Political Quarterly, 82(3), 355–364.

Coleman, S., & Gotze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. London: Hansard Society and BT.

Cruickshank, P., Edelmann, N., & Smith, C. (2010). Signing an e-Petition as a transition from lurking to participation. Electronic Government and Electronic Participation 1, 275–282.

di Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. H. (2006). The internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 299–313.CrossRef

Downs, A. (1964). Inside Bureaucracy, Little Brown: Boston.

Dutton, W. H., & Peltu, M. (2007). Reconfiguring government public engagements: Enhancing the communicative power of citizens. Oxford Internet Institute, Forum Discussion Paper No. 9, April 2007.

Eggers, W. D. (2005). Government 2.0: Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock and enhance democracy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

Ferguson, R. (2006). Digital dialogues: Interim report, December 2005–August 2006. The Hansard Society.

Fishkin, J. S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New York: Yale University Press.

Geoghegan, T. (2007). The petition, the ‘prat’ and the political ideal. BBC News – Magazine: February 13, 2007, Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6354735.stm

Habermas, J. (1985). ‘Modernity – An Incomplete Project’, in Hal Foster (ed.) Postmodern Culture , Pluto Press: London, pp. 3 – 15.

Harrison, S. & M. Mort (1998). ‘Which Champions, Which People? Public and User Involvement in Health Care as a Technology of Legitimation’, Social Policy Administration , 1 (32), pp. 60 – 70.

Hartley, J. (2005). Case study research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research (pp. 323–333). London: Sage Publications.

H.M. Government. (2002). In the service of democracy – A consultation paper on a policy for electronic democracy. London: Office of the e-Envoy, Cabinet Office.

Hiller, J.S., & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. The PriceWaterHouseCoopers E-Government Series, January 2001.

Irani, Z., Elliman, T., & Jackson, P. (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the UK: Research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 327–335.CrossRef

Kies R., & Wojcik, S. (2010). European web-deliberation: Lessons from the European citizens consultation. In F. De Cindio, A. Machintosh, & C. Peraboni (Eds.), Online deliberation, proceedings of the fourth international conference, OD2010, (pp. 198–211), June 2010.

Kooiman, J., & van Vliet, M. (1993). Governance and public management. In K. A. Eliassen & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Managing public organisations (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (2002). The transformation of political mobilisation and communication in the European public spheres: A research outline. Report to the European Commission dated 18^th February 2002.

Lindner, R., & Riehm, U. (2009). Electronic petitions and institutional modernisation. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 1(1), 1–11.

Macintosh, A., Malina A., & Farrell, S. (2002). Digital democracy through electronic petitioning. In W. J. McIver Jr., & A. K. Elmagarmid (Eds.), Advances in digital government: Technology, human factors and policy, 2(1), (pp. 137–162). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

Margetts, H., John, P., Escher, T. & S. Reissfelder (2012). ‘Social Information and Political Participation on the Internet: An Experiment’, European Political Science Review, 1(3), pp.1–24

Margolis, M. (2007). E-government and democratic politics. In P. G. Nixon, & V. N. Koutrakou (Eds.), E-government in Europe: rebooting the state¸ (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.

Newman, J. (2005). Remaking governance: Peoples politics and the public sphere. Bristol: The Policy Press.

OECD. (2001). Citizens as partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policymaking. Paris: OECD Press.

OECD. (2003). Promise and problems of E-democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. Paris: OECD Press.

Peters, B., Sifft, S., Bruggmann, M., & Konigslow, K. (2005). National and transnational public spheres: The case of the EU. In S. Liebfried & M. Zurn (Eds.), Transformations of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pleace, N. (2007). E-government in the United Kingdom. In P. G. Nixon, & V. N. Koutrakou (Eds.), E-government in Europe: Rebooting the state, (pp. 61–74). London: Routledge.

Rash, W. (1997). Politics on the Nets: Wiring the Political Process, W.H. Freeman & Co.: New York.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667.CrossRef

Rosen, T. (2001). E-democracy in practice: Swedish experience of new political tool. Available at www.svenkom.se/skvad/e-democracy-en.pdf

Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Sclove, R. (1995). Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford Press.

Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.CrossRef

The Electoral Commission. (2005). Election 2005: Engaging the public in Great Britain – an analysis of campaigns and media coverage. London: The Electoral Commission.

Thomassen, J., & Schmitt, H. (1999). Introduction: Political representation and legitimacy in the European union. In H. Schmitt, & J. Thomassen (Eds.), Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union, (pp. 3–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Virkar, S. (2007). (Dis) Connected citizenship? Exploring barriers to eConsultation in Europe. Report to the European Commission for the Breaking Barriers to eGovernment: Overcoming Obstacles to Improving European Public Services Project.

Virkar, S. (2011). The politics of implementing e-Government for development: The ecology of games shaping property tax administration in bangalore city. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Oxford.

Virkar, S. (2013a). Designing and implementing e-government projects: Actors, influences, and fields of play. In S. Saeed, & C. G. Reddick (Eds.), Human-centered design for electronic government. IGI Global: Hershey, P.A..

Virkar, S. (forthcoming, 2013b). What’s in a game? The politics of shaping property tax administration in Bangalore, India. In J. Bishop & A. M. G. Solo (Eds.), Politics in the information age. Springer. IGI Global: Hershey, P.A.

Virkar, S. (2013c). Re-engaging the public in the digital age: e-Consultation initiatives in the government 2.0 landscape. Encyclopedia of information science and technology (3rd Edn.), IGI Global: Hershey, P.A.

Ward, S., Gibson, R. & W. Lusoli (2003). ‘Online Participation and Mobilisation in Britain: Hype, Hope, and Reality’, Parliamentary Affairs, 56, pp. 652–668.

Whyte, A., & Macintosh, A. (2003). Analysis and evaluation of E-Consultations. e-Service Journal, 2(1), 9–34.

Title: Consulting the British Public in the Digital Age: Emerging Synergies and Tensions in the Government 2.0 Landscape
Author: Shefali Virkar
Publisher: Springer New York
Book: Government e-Strategic Planning and Management
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8461-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4614-8462-2

Copyright Year: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8462-2_10