Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Cooperation and the Role of Autonomy in Automated Driving

Authors : Gina Wessel, Eugen Altendorf, Constanze Schreck, Yigiterkut Canpolat, Frank Flemisch

Published in: Control Strategies for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving Functions

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While automation in human–machine systems can increase safety and comfort, the 2016 lethal crash of an automated vehicle demonstrates that automation is not without its risk. Indeed, accidents from the air traffic domain also demonstrate that cooperation between human and machine is crucial and interaction design must be devoted great care. Therefore, the present paper aims at developing design recommendations to reduce the risks of lethal crashes with automated vehicles. To this end, the concepts of cooperation and autonomy are closely investigated. These two terms are central to research on human machine cooperation; however, the present definition of cooperation and the role of autonomy might be further specified for the domain of automated driving. Therefore, selected perspectives from different scientific fields (e.g., sociology and psychology) will be presented in order to develop a differentially inspired working definition of cooperation, which is tailored to the automated driving domain. Another goal of this approach is to investigate different views on the concept of autonomy, which is often entailed in work on cooperation. This can help clarify the role of autonomy in automated driving in particular. Moreover, insights from the presented theories and findings on cooperation can be transferred to the interaction design of automated vehicles. Accordingly, recommendations for interaction design will be presented. Finally, an example for the implementation of the working definition and the design recommendations will be presented by describing a prototype for automated driving—the H-mode prototype.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
next chapter Robust Real-World Emissions by Integrated ADF and Powertrain Control Development
Literature
1.
AAIC: REPORT on the investigation into the crash of A310-308, registration F-OGQS, on 22 March 1994 near the city of Mezhdurechensk. aviation-safety.net (1994)
2.
3.
Altendorf, E., Baltzer, M., Heesen, M., Kienle, M., Weißgerber, T., Flemisch, F.: H-mode. In: H. Winner, S. Hakuli, F. Lotz, C. Singer (eds.) Handbook of Driver Assistance Systems: Basic Information, Components and Systems for Active Safety and Comfort, pp. 1499–1518. Springer, Cham (2016). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-12352-3_​60
4.
Altendorf, E., Weßel, G., Baltzer, M., Canpolat, Y., Flemisch, F.: Joint decision making and cooperative driver-vehicle interaction during critical driving situations. i-com 15(3), 265–281 (2016)
5.
Altendorf, E., Wessel, G., Baltzer, M., Canpolat, Y., Flemisch, F.: Joint decision making and cooperative driver-vehicle interaction during critical driving situations. i-com J. Interact Media (2017)
6.
road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee, O., et al.: Sae j3016: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International
7.
Axelrod, R.M.: The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books (1984)
8.
Babiceanu, R.F., Chen, F.: Development and applications of holonic manufacturing systems: a survey. J Intell. Manuf. 17, 111–131 (2006)CrossRef
9.
Bahner, J.: Übersteigertes Vertrauen in Automation: Der Einfluss von Fehlererfahrungen auf Complacency und Automation Bias. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universitt Berlin, Fakultt V - Verkehrs- und Maschinensysteme (2008)
10.
Barringer, K.L.: Code Bound and down-a long way to go and a short time to get there: autonomous vehicle legislation in Illinois. S. Ill. ULJ 38, 121 (2013)
11.
BEA: Final Report On the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro - Paris; Bureau dEnqutes et dAnalyses. www.​skybrary.​aero (2012)
12.
Boca, R., Boca, M., Dlhan, L., Falk, K., Fuess, H., Haase, W., Jarošciak, R., Papankova, B., Renz, F., Vrbova, M., et al.: Strong cooperativeness in the mononuclear iron (ii) derivative exhibiting an abrupt spin transition above 400 k. Inorg. Chem. 40(13), 3025–3033 (2001)CrossRef
13.
Butler, R.W., Miller, S.P., Potts, J.N., Carreno, V.A.: A formal methods approach to the analysis of mode confusion. In: Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1998. Proceedings., 17th DASC. The AIAA/IEEE/SAE, vol. 1, pp. C41–1. IEEE (1998)
14.
Christensen, J.H.: Holonic manufacturing systems: initial architecture and standards directions. Proceedings of 1st Euro Workshop on Holonic Manufacturing Systems (1994)
15.
Christman, J.: Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves. Philos. Stud. 117(1), 143–164 (2004)CrossRef
16.
Dietrich, E.: Thinking computers and virtual persons: essays on the intentionality of machines. Academic Press, Cambridge (2014)
17.
Endsley, M.R.: Designing for situation awareness: an approach to user-centered design. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)
18.
Fiehler, R.: Kommunikation und Kooperation. Theoretische und empirische Untersuchungen zur kommunikativen Organisation kooperativer Prozesse. Linguistik Band 4. Einhorn-Verlag, Berlin (1980)
19.
Flemisch, F., Abbink, D., Itoh, M., Pacaux-Lemoine, M.P., Weßel, G.: Shared control is the sharp end of cooperation: Towards a common framework of joint action, shared control and human machine cooperation. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19), 72–77 (2016)CrossRef
20.
Flemisch, F., Altendorf, E., Canpolat, Y., Weßel, G., Baltzer, M., López, D., Herzberger, N., Voß, G., Schwalm, M., Schutte, P.: Uncanny and unsafe valley of assistance and automation: First sketch and application to vehicle automation. In: Schlick C.M., Duckwitz S., Flemisch F., Frenz M., Kuz S., Mertens A., Mütze-Niewöhner S. (eds.) Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes., Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of GfA. Springer, Berlin (2016)
21.
Flemisch, F., Baltzer, M., Altendorf, E., López, D., Rudolph, C.: Kooperativität und Arbitrierung versus Autonomie: Grundsätzliche Überlegungen zur kooperativen Automation mit anschaulichen Beispielen. 57. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der DGLR: Kooperation und kooperative Systeme in der Fahrzeug-und Prozessfhrung (2016)
22.
23.
Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Kelsch, J., Schindler, J., Preusche, C., Dittrich, J.: Shared and cooperative movement control of intelligent technical systems: Sketch of the design space of haptic-multimodal coupling between operator, co-automation, base system and environment. IFAC Proc. Volumes 43(13), 304–309 (2010)CrossRef
24.
Flemisch, F.O., Adams, C.A., Conway, S.R., Goodrich, K.H., Palmer, M.T., Schutte, M.C.: The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction. Report No. NASA/TM-2003-212672. Tech. rep., Hampton, NASA Research Center (2003)
25.
Flemisch, F.O., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., Bruder, R.: Towards a cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-mode and conduct-by-wire. Ergonomics 57(3), 343–360 (2014)CrossRef
26.
Flemisch, F.O., Kelsch, J., Löper, C., Schieben, A., Schindler, J.: Automation spectrum, inner/outer compatibility and other potentially useful human factors concepts for assistance and automation. In: de Waard D., Flemisch F.O., Lorenz B., Oberheid H., Brookhuis K.A. (eds.) (2008), Human Factors for assistance and automation, pp. 1–16. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Shaker Publishing (2008)
27.
Friedman, B.: Moral responsibility and computer technology. (1990)
28.
Friedman, B.: It’s the computer’s fault?: reasoning about computers as moral agents. In: Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 226–227. ACM (1995)
29.
Gasser, T.M., Arzt, C., Ayoubi, M., Bartels, A., Brkle, L., Eier, J., Flemisch, F., H"acker, D., Hesse, T., Huber, W., Lotz, C., Maurer, M., Ruth-Schumacher, S., Schwarz, J., Vogt, W.: Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung - Gemeinsamer Schlussbericht der Projektgruppe. Fahrzeugtechnik F 83, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) (2012)
30.
Haberfellner, R., de Weck, O., Fricke, E., Vössner, S.: Systems Engineering-Principles and Application. Orell Füssli, Systems Engineering-Grundlagen und Anwendung. Zürich (2012)
31.
Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance 16(2), 250–279 (1976)CrossRef
32.
33.
Hasegawa, T., Seki, T., Tamura, S.: Environment for developing Holonic manufacturing system applications-HMS shell. Intell. Auton. Syst. 6, 379 (2000)
34.
Heesen, M., Kelsch, J., Lper, C., Flemisch, F.: Haptisch-multimodale Interaktion fr hochautomatisierte, kooperative Fahrzeugfhrung bei Fahrstreifenwechsel-, Brems- und Ausweichmanvern. In: 11. Braunschweiger Symposium Automatisierungs-, Assistenzsysteme und eingebettete Systeme fr Transportmittel (AAET) (2010)
35.
Hoc, J.M.: From human - machine interaction to human - machine cooperation. Ergonomics 43(7), 833–843 (2000)CrossRef
36.
Hoc, J.M., Mars, F., Milleville-Pennel, I., Jolly, É., Netto, M., Blosseville, J.M.: Human-machine cooperation in car driving for lateral safety: delegation and mutual control. Le travail humain 69(2), 153–182 (2006)CrossRef
37.
Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D.: Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)CrossRef
38.
Holzmann, F.: Adaptive cooperation between driver and assistant system. In: Adaptive Cooperation between Driver and Assistant System, pp. 11–19. Springer, Berlin (2008)
39.
Hughes, D., Dornheim, M.: Automated cockpits: whos in charge. Aviation Week & Space Technology (1995)
40.
Johnson, D.G.: Computer systems: moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics Inf. Technol. 8(4), 195–204 (2006)CrossRef
41.
Kaber, D.B.: All that automation is... and all that autonomy should not be. Presentation given at TNO Symposium on Human Factors in Automated Systems, Soesterberg, The Netherlands (2016)
42.
Kim, T., Hinds, P.: Who should I blame? Effects of autonomy and transparency on attributions in human-robot interaction. In: ROMAN 2006-The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 80–85. IEEE (2006)
43.
Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., Gibson, C.B.: The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad. Manage. J. 47(2), 175–192 (2004)
44.
Koestler, A.: The Act of Creation. Penguin Books, New York (1964)
45.
Löper, C., Flemisch, F.O.: Ein Baustein für hochautomatisiertes Fahren: Kooperative, manöverbasierte Automation in den Projekten H-Mode und HAVEit. In: 6. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme, pp. 136–146. Freundeskreis Mess-und Regelungstechnik Karlsruhe eV (2009)
46.
NHTSA: Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Washington, DC pp. 1–14 (2013)
47.
NTSB: National Transportation Safety Board: Aviation Accident Report NTSB-AAR-73-14. Tech. rep., NTSB (1973)
48.
49.
Pacaux-Lemoine, M.P., Debernard, S.: Common work space for human - machine cooperation in air traffic control. Control Eng. Pract. 10(5), 571–576 (2002)CrossRef
50.
Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., Singh, I.L.: Performance consequences of automation-induced’complacency. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(1), 1–23 (1993)CrossRef
51.
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 30(3), 286–297 (2000)CrossRef
52.
Pollard, E., Morignot, P., Nashashibi, F.: An ontology-based model to determine the automation level of an automated vehicle for co-driving. In: Information Fusion (FUSION), 2013 16th International Conference on, pp. 596–603. IEEE (2013)
53.
Probst, G.J., Ulrich, H.: Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln. Haupt, Bern (1988)
54.
Rammert, W.: Technik in Aktion: verteiltes Handeln in soziotechnischen Konstellationen. (TUTS- Working Papers 2-2003) (2003)
55.
Rammert, W.: Technik als verteilte Aktion: Wie technisches Wirken als Agentur in hybriden Aktionszusammenhängen gedeutet werden kann. TechnikHandelnWissen: Zu einer pragmatistischen Technik-und Sozialtheorie pp. 79–89 (2007)
56.
Rammert, W.: Technik und Handeln: Wenn soziales Handeln sich auf menschliches Verhalten und technische Abläufe verteilt. TechnikHandelnWissen: Zu einer pragmatistischen Technik-und Sozialtheorie pp. 91–123 (2007)
57.
Rammert, W., Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Technik und Handeln-Wenn soziales Handeln sich auf menschliches Verhalten und technische Artefakte verteilt. (TUTS - Working Papers 4-2002) (2002)
58.
Rasmussen, J.: Skills, rules and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3(3), 257–266 (1983)CrossRef
59.
Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Tscheligi, M.: Towards autonomous cars: the effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 1–8. ACM (2014)
60.
Salas, E., Burke, C.S., Bowers, C.A., Wilson, K.A.: Team training in the skies: does crew resource management (crm) training work? Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 43(4), 641–674 (2001)CrossRef
61.
Sanyal, B.S.: Cooperative autonomy: The dialectic of State-NGOs relationship in developing countries. International Institute for Labour Studies, (1994)
62.
Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D.: How in the world did we ever get into that mode? mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum. Factors 37(1), 5–19 (1995)CrossRef
63.
Savage, I.: Comparing the fatality risks in United States transportation across modes and over time. Res. Transp. Econ. 43(1), 9–22 (2013)CrossRef
64.
Schilcher, C., Schmiede, R., Will-Zocholl, M., Ziegler, M.: Vertrauen und Kooperationen in einer sich wandelnden Arbeitswelt–eine Einführung. In: Vertrauen und Kooperation in der Arbeitswelt, pp. 11–19. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRef
65.
Shladover, S.E.: Cooperative (rather than autonomous) vehicle-highway automation systems. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 1(1), 10–19 (2009)CrossRef
66.
Snyder, C.R., Lassegard, M., Ford, C.E.: Distancing after group success and failure: basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(2), 382 (1986)CrossRef
67.
Spinda, J.S.: The development of Basking in Reflected Glory BIRGing) and Cutting off Reflected Failure (CORFing) measures. J. Sport Behav. 34(4), 392 (2011)
68.
United Nations, E., Council, S.: Report of the sixty-eighth session of the working party on road traffic safety. In: Economic Commission for Europe, Inland Transport Committee, Working Party on Road Traffic Safety (2014)
69.
Vanderhaegen, F.: Autonomy control of human-machine systems. IFAC Proc. Volumes 43(13), 398–403 (2010)CrossRef
70.
Wann, D.L., Hamlet, M.A., Wilson, T.M., Hodges, J.A.: Basking in reflected glory, cutting off reflected failure, and cutting off future failure: the importance of group identification. Soc. Behav. Pers.: Int. J. 23(4), 377–388 (1995)CrossRef
71.
Wiener, E.: Complacency: Is the term useful for air safety. In: Proceedings of the 26th Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar, vol. 117 (1981)
72.
Wiener, E.L., Kanki, B.G., Helmreich, R.L.: Crew resource management. Academic Press, Cambridge (2010)
Metadata
Title
Cooperation and the Role of Autonomy in Automated Driving
Authors
Gina Wessel
Eugen Altendorf
Constanze Schreck
Yigiterkut Canpolat
Frank Flemisch
Copyright Year
2019
Book
Control Strategies for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving Functions

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91568-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91569-2

Copyright Year: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91569-2_1