Skip to main content
Top

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Corporate Governance in Italian Listed Companies

Authors : Giuseppe D’Onza, Giulio Greco, Silvia Ferramosca

Published in: Corporate Governance

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the past few decades a growing number of research studies have investigated the effect that insider ownership has on other corporate governance variables like the risk of expropriation for the minor shareholders, the demand for outside directors, etc. An increasing number of studies have analyzed the relationship between insider ownership and corporate performance in Anglo-Saxon countries, Continental Europe and emerging economies.
Regarding Italy, previous studies on corporate governance have highlighted that a listed company featured by concentrated ownership is likely to have a high incidence of insider shareholders representation on the board. This context might enhance an agency conflicts between large controlling shareholders and other stakeholders like minority shareholders and other outside investors. In this case the presence of an adequate number of non executive and independent directors as well as a functioning board’s committees appear to be fundamental to counterbalancing the power exercised by owner-managers (or by managers-owner) and reduce the risks of private benefits exploitation. The recent changes in Italian normative requirements goes in this direction and recommend the introduction of mechanisms like the presence of independent directors, the CEO duality, the audit and remuneration committee that are not in line with the traditional corporate governance systems of Italian company but might reinforce the level of protection for outside stakeholders.
Basing on the aforementioned considerations, the researchers intend to analyze if and how Italian listed companies have changed their governance model to incorporate the new corporate governance rules. A specific focus regards the interaction of insider owners and outsider directors that seem to be a critical factor for the effectiveness of the corporate governance system in Italian context where lots of listed companies are controlled by a family/individual.
The theoretical part of the research analyzes the institutional context in which Italian listed companies operate and how it has changed in the last decade and the main research streams that have investigated the interaction between the inside ownership and the outsider directors.
The empirical part of the research is based on the analysis of the data collected through an empirical survey of companies listed to Milan Stock Exchange. A total of 145 corporate governance reports (corresponding to about 60 % of the total non-financial listed companies) issued in the period 2006–2010 has been investigated.
Some features observed like ownership structure, insider ownership remained the same over the period analyzed while other variables like the percentage of outside shareholders (like hedge funds), the proportion of independent directors, the number of the audit committee meetings changed noticeable.
Overall, the results show that the increasing of monitoring mechanism (like a high proportion of independent directors) during the period observed could contribute to reduce the risk of insider opportunistic behaviour.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
A research carried out by Consob (1999) shows that largest shareholders own on average 60 % of the company shares. See for details Bianchi and Enriques (2001).
 
2
The main legislative acts we refer to are the Draghi reform (1998), the reform of company law (2003), the so-called “Law of Saving” (2005) and the Legislative Decree n. 12/2010 for the enactment of the European Shareholder Rights Directive.
 
3
Before the 1st January 2004, joint stock companies could only adopted the dualistic horizontal models so that today this model is called “traditional” model.
 
4
The dualistic vertical model features by a supervisory board elected by the shareholders and a management board elected by the supervisory board.
 
5
The monistic model is frequently named one-tier system due to the presence of a single body: the board of directors.
 
6
The law recognizes the possibility to listed companied to define a threshold lower than 5 % of common share could be introduced by the company-by-law.
 
7
Furthermore regarding the board of statutory auditors the law imposes that the Chairman must be chosen among the members elected by the minority shareholders.
 
8
We did not consider financial, banking and insurance companies, because of different governance requirements and specific monitoring activity delivered by Authorities (i.e. Bankitalia, ISVAP).
 
9
As mentioned below, we also collected the 2009 data to perform a robustness check.
 
10
These directors were nominated in the so-called “majority list”, the list of presented by the controlling shareholders.
 
11
Allegrini and Greco (2011) provide an international comparison among the board of directors featured in Italy, Spain, UK, Australia and US.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit Committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing, 23(1), 69–87.CrossRef Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit Committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing, 23(1), 69–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.
go back to reference Assonime. (2011). La Corporate Governance in Italia: autodisciplina e operazioni con parti correlate. Assonime. (2011). La Corporate Governance in Italia: autodisciplina e operazioni con parti correlate.
go back to reference Atanason, V., Black, B., & Ciccotello, C. (2011). Law and tunnelling. Journal of Corporation Law, 37, 1–49. Atanason, V., Black, B., & Ciccotello, C. (2011). Law and tunnelling. Journal of Corporation Law, 37, 1–49.
go back to reference Barca, F. (1994). Imprese in cerca di padrone: propietā e controllo nel capitalismo italiano. Roma: Laterza & Figli. Barca, F. (1994). Imprese in cerca di padrone: propietā e controllo nel capitalismo italiano. Roma: Laterza & Figli.
go back to reference Bathala, T., & Rao, R. P. (1995). The determinants of board composition: An agency theory perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16, 59–69.CrossRef Bathala, T., & Rao, R. P. (1995). The determinants of board composition: An agency theory perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16, 59–69.CrossRef
go back to reference Bebchuk, L. A., & Hamdani, A. (2009). The elusive quest for global governance standards. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157(5), 1263–1317. Bebchuk, L. A., & Hamdani, A. (2009). The elusive quest for global governance standards. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157(5), 1263–1317.
go back to reference Bianchi, M., & L. Enriques. (2001). Corporate governance in Italy after the 1998 reform: what role for institutional investors? In SSRN. Bianchi, M., & L. Enriques. (2001). Corporate governance in Italy after the 1998 reform: what role for institutional investors? In SSRN.
go back to reference Bianchi, M., Ciavarella, A., Novembre, V., & Signoretti, R. (2011). Comply or explain? Investor protection through corporate governance codes. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(1), 107–121.CrossRef Bianchi, M., Ciavarella, A., Novembre, V., & Signoretti, R. (2011). Comply or explain? Investor protection through corporate governance codes. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(1), 107–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Bradbury, M., Mak, Y., & Tan, S. (2006). Board characteristics audit committee characteristics, and abnormal accruals. Pacific Accounting Review, 18, 47–68.CrossRef Bradbury, M., Mak, Y., & Tan, S. (2006). Board characteristics audit committee characteristics, and abnormal accruals. Pacific Accounting Review, 18, 47–68.CrossRef
go back to reference Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384.CrossRef Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41, 262–289.CrossRef Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41, 262–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Chouchene, I. (2010). The determinant of the presence of independent directors in Board of French companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 144. Chouchene, I. (2010). The determinant of the presence of independent directors in Board of French companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 144.
go back to reference Cornett, M., Marcus, A., & Tehranian, H. (2008). Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 357–373.CrossRef Cornett, M., Marcus, A., & Tehranian, H. (2008). Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 357–373.CrossRef
go back to reference CONSOB. (1999). Relazione annuale per l’anno 1998. Roma: Dati e analisi. CONSOB. (1999). Relazione annuale per l’anno 1998. Roma: Dati e analisi.
go back to reference DeZoort, T. F., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial-reporting and audit knowledge on Audit Committee Members’ Judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 31–47.CrossRef DeZoort, T. F., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial-reporting and audit knowledge on Audit Committee Members’ Judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 31–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Di Pietra, R., Grambovas, C. A., Raonic, I., & Riccaboni, A. (2008). The effects of board size and ‘busy’ directors on the market value of Italian companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 12(1), 73–91.CrossRef Di Pietra, R., Grambovas, C. A., Raonic, I., & Riccaboni, A. (2008). The effects of board size and ‘busy’ directors on the market value of Italian companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 12(1), 73–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Dyck, A., & Zingales, A. (2004). Private benefits of control: An international comparison. The Journal of Finance, LIX(2), 537–600.CrossRef Dyck, A., & Zingales, A. (2004). Private benefits of control: An international comparison. The Journal of Finance, LIX(2), 537–600.CrossRef
go back to reference Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345.CrossRef Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRef Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRef
go back to reference Fernandez Mendez, C., & Arrondo Garcia, R. (2007). The effects of ownership structure and board composition on the audit committee meeting frequency: Spanish evidence. Corporate Governance, 15(5), 909–922.CrossRef Fernandez Mendez, C., & Arrondo Garcia, R. (2007). The effects of ownership structure and board composition on the audit committee meeting frequency: Spanish evidence. Corporate Governance, 15(5), 909–922.CrossRef
go back to reference Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57, 275–305.CrossRef Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57, 275–305.CrossRef
go back to reference Gordon, J.N. (2003). Governance failures of the Enron board and the new information order of Sarbanes-Oxley. Working paper, Columbia Law School. Available at: http://www.ssrn.com Gordon, J.N. (2003). Governance failures of the Enron board and the new information order of Sarbanes-Oxley. Working paper, Columbia Law School. Available at: http://​www.​ssrn.​com
go back to reference Greco, G. (2011). Determinants of board and audit committee meeting frequency. Evidence from Italian listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(3), 208–229.CrossRef Greco, G. (2011). Determinants of board and audit committee meeting frequency. Evidence from Italian listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(3), 208–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education. Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
go back to reference Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Hopt, K. J. (2011). Comparative corporate governance: The state of the art and international regulation. American Journal of Comparative Law, 59(1), 1–73.CrossRef Hopt, K. J. (2011). Comparative corporate governance: The state of the art and international regulation. American Journal of Comparative Law, 59(1), 1–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRef Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRef
go back to reference Koh, P.-S. (2003). On the association between institutional ownership and aggressive corporate earnings management in Australia. The British Accounting Review, 35(2), 105–128.CrossRef Koh, P.-S. (2003). On the association between institutional ownership and aggressive corporate earnings management in Australia. The British Accounting Review, 35(2), 105–128.CrossRef
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 3–27.CrossRef La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 3–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182.CrossRef Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182.CrossRef
go back to reference Leftwich, R. W., Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1981). Voluntary corporate disclosure: The case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(Suppl), 50–77.CrossRef Leftwich, R. W., Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1981). Voluntary corporate disclosure: The case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(Suppl), 50–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, J. (1994). Ownership structure and board composition: A multi-country test of agency theory prediction. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(4), 359–368.CrossRef Li, J. (1994). Ownership structure and board composition: A multi-country test of agency theory prediction. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(4), 359–368.CrossRef
go back to reference Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555–583.CrossRef Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555–583.CrossRef
go back to reference Lorsh, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston: Harvard University Press. Lorsh, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Melis, A. (2000). Corporate governance in Italy, corporate governance. An International Review, 8(4), 347–355. Melis, A. (2000). Corporate governance in Italy, corporate governance. An International Review, 8(4), 347–355.
go back to reference Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(2), 121–139.CrossRef Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(2), 121–139.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Sullivan, N. (2000). The determinants of non-executive representation on the boards of large UK companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(4), 283–297.CrossRef O’Sullivan, N. (2000). The determinants of non-executive representation on the boards of large UK companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(4), 283–297.CrossRef
go back to reference Park, Y. W., & Shin, H. H. (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3), 431–457.CrossRef Park, Y. W., & Shin, H. H. (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3), 431–457.CrossRef
go back to reference Parbonetti, A., & Cerbioni, F. (2007). Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791–826.CrossRef Parbonetti, A., & Cerbioni, F. (2007). Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791–826.CrossRef
go back to reference Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. (2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors’ influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 32, 1311–1346.CrossRef Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. (2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors’ influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 32, 1311–1346.CrossRef
go back to reference Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence form a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 245–263.CrossRef Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence form a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 245–263.CrossRef
go back to reference Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, LIV 5, 1829–1853.CrossRef Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, LIV 5, 1829–1853.CrossRef
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, LII 2, 737–783.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, LII 2, 737–783.CrossRef
go back to reference Vafeas, N. (1999). The Nature of Board Nominating Committees and their role in corporate governance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(1), 199–225.CrossRef Vafeas, N. (1999). The Nature of Board Nominating Committees and their role in corporate governance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(1), 199–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Wallace, T. D., & Silver, J. L. (1988). Econometrics: An introduction. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Wallace, T. D., & Silver, J. L. (1988). Econometrics: An introduction. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
go back to reference White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRef White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRef
go back to reference Zingales, L. (1994). The value of the voting right: A study of the Milan stock exchange experience. The Review of Financial Studies, 7(1), 125–148.CrossRef Zingales, L. (1994). The value of the voting right: A study of the Milan stock exchange experience. The Review of Financial Studies, 7(1), 125–148.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Corporate Governance in Italian Listed Companies
Authors
Giuseppe D’Onza
Giulio Greco
Silvia Ferramosca
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45167-6_5