Top

Review of Managerial Science

Published in:

28-03-2022 | Original Paper

Corporate social (ir)responsibility towards employees and financial performance: using time to solve the chicken-egg problem

Author: Raja Abid

Published in: Review of Managerial Science | Issue 2/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In a context where companies are increasingly paying attention to their financial performance, but also to their social responsibility towards employees (e.g. work-family balance, diversity management, employee retention practices), we attempt to answer the following question: is it the financial performance that determines the level of corporate social responsibility towards employees undertaken within a firm or is it the other way around? Analyzing a sample of 28,932 firm-year observations between 1991 and 2015, this paper explores the bidirectional relationship between corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility towards employees (CSRE/CSIRE) and financial performance, and the way this relationship unfolds over time. Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view, as well as the slack-resources hypothesis constitute the theoretical foundation of this relationship. These theories model CSRE as an investment that needs resources but that also has financial benefits. Using a vector autoregressive model for panel data, we show that there is a bidirectional relationship between CSRE/CSIRE and financial performance. However, contrary to what we expected, both CSRE and CSIRE are negatively related to financial performance. Additionally, we find that financial performance increases CSIRE, which means that firms adopting practices harming employees are not necessarily doing so because of financial constraints. Our findings also show that the impact of CSRE/CSIRE on financial performance is more spread over time than the relationship in the reverse direction. In order to see the benefits of CSRE (if any), managers should not only be patient but should also adopt practices that are aligned with the company’s needs.

previous article The influence of CEO compensation on employee engagement

next article Inter-organizational social capital of firms in developing economies and industry 4.0 readiness: the role of innovative capability and absorptive capacity

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Abriata D, Delautre G (2020) What drives CSR? an empirical analysis on the labour dimensions of CSR. Working paper 7. International Labour Organization

Abrigo MR, Love I (2016) Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata. Stand Genomic Sci 16(3):778–804

Agarwal MK, Berens G (2009) How corporate social performance influences financial performance: Cash flow and cost of capital. MSI reports, working paper series

Allouche J, Laroche P (2005) A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue De Gestion Des Ressources Humaines 57:18–41

Ambapour S, Massamba C (2005). Croissance économique et consommation d’énergie: une analyse en termes de causalité. Document de Travail DT 12/2005, Bureau d’application des méthodes statistiques et informatiques, Brazzaville

André JM, Husser J, Barbat G, Lespinet-Najib V (2011) Le rapport de développement durable des entreprises françaises: quelles perspectives pour les parties prenantes? Manag Avenir 8:37–56

Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

Barrena-Martínez J, López-Fernández M, Romero-Fernández PM (2019) Towards a configuration of socially responsible human resource management policies and practices: findings from an academic consensus. Int J Hum Resour Manag 30(17):2544–2580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1332669CrossRef

Bauer R, Derwall J, Hann D (2009) Employee relations and credit risk, disponible à SSRN 1483112

Benlemlih M, Bitar M (2018) Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. J Bus Ethics 148(3):647–671CrossRef

Bird R, Casavecchia L, Reggiani F (2006) CSR and corporate performance: where to begin. University of Technology, Sydney Bocconi University, Milan

Blasi S, Caporin M, Fontini F (2018) A multidimensional analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firms’ economic performance. Ecol Econ 147:218–229CrossRef

Bouslah K, Kryzanowski L, M’Zali B (2013) The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. J Bank Finance 37(4):1258–1273CrossRef

Busch T, Friede G (2018) The robustness of the corporate social and financial performance relation: a second-order meta-analysis. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25(4):583–608CrossRef

Chang YK, Oh W-Y, Messersmith JG (2013) Translating CSR into financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of high-performance work practices. Int J Hum Resour Manag 24(19):3738–3756CrossRef

Chollet P, Sandwidi BW (2018) CSR engagement and financial risk: A virtuous circle? International evidence. Glob Financ J 38:65–81CrossRef

Cruz JM, Wakolbinger T (2008) Multiperiod effects of corporate social responsibility on supply chain networks, transaction costs, emissions, and risk. Int J Prod Econ 116(1):61–74CrossRef

Cui J, Jo H, Na H (2018) Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? J Bus Ethics 148(3):549–572CrossRef

Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91CrossRef

Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing Inc., Marshfield, Boston

Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Galema R, Plantinga A, Scholtens B (2008) The stocks at stake: return and risk in socially responsible investment. J Bank Finance 32:2646–2654CrossRef

Gallagher VC, Hrivnak MW, Valcea S, Mahoney CB, LaWong D (2018) A comprehensive three dimensional sustainability measure: The ‘missing P’of ‘people’—a vital stakeholder in sustainable development. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25(5):772–787CrossRef

Girerd-Potin I, Jimenez-Garcès S, Louvet P (2014) Which dimensions of social responsibility concern financial investors? J Bus Ethics 121(4):559–576CrossRef

Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438CrossRef

Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus Soc 39(3):254–280CrossRef

Hannon JM, Milkovich GT (1996) The effect of human resource reputation signals on share prices: an event study. Hum Resour Manage 35(3):405–424CrossRef

Hansen BE (2017) Econometrics. University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, pp 1–417

Harjoto MA, Jo H (2011) Corporate governance and CSR nexus. J Bus Ethics 100(1):45–67CrossRef

Haynes M, Thompson S, Wright M (2003) The determinants of corporate divestment: evidence from UK firms. J Econ Behav Organ 52(1):147–166CrossRef

Jo H, Harjoto MA (2011) Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 103(3):351–383CrossRef

Kang C, Germann F, Grewal R (2016) Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance. J Mark 80(2):59–79CrossRef

Kotchen M, Moon JJ (2012) Corporate social responsibility for irresponsibility. BE J Econ Anal Policy 12(1):1–23

Krüger P (2015) Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. J Financ Econ 115(2):304–329CrossRef

Liao PC, Shih YN, Wu CL, Zhang XL, Wang Y (2018) Does corporate social performance pay back quickly? A longitudinal content analysis on international contractors. J Clean Prod 170:1328–1337CrossRef

Lin-Hi N, Müller K (2013) The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. J Bus Res 66(10):1928–1936CrossRef

Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm Sci Q 48(2):268–305CrossRef

Margolis JD, Elfenbein HA, Walsh JP (2007) Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor 1001:1–79

Mavrotas G, Kelly R (2001) Old wine in new bottles: Testing causality between savings and growth. Manch Sch 69(1):97–105CrossRef

Meyer M (2009) Innovations en GRH pour une double performance : le cas des entreprises d’insertion par l’économique. Innovations 1:87–102CrossRef

Muller A, Kolk A (2010) Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance. J Manag Stud 47(1):1–26CrossRef

Nekhili M, Boukadhaba A, Nagati H, Chtioui T (2019) ESG performance and market value: the moderating role of employee board representation. Int J Hum Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1629989CrossRef

Nelling E, Webb E (2009) CSR and financial performance: the “virtuous circle” revisited. Rev Quant Financ Acc 32(2):197–209CrossRef

Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1989) Applied regression models. Irwin, Homewood

Oikonomou I, Brooks C, Pavelin S (2012) The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: a longitudinal analysis. Financ Manag 41(2):483–515CrossRef

Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441CrossRef

Pätäri S, Arminen H, Tuppura A, Jantunen A (2014) Competitive and responsible? The relationship between corporate social and financial performance in the energy sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 37:142–154CrossRef

Price JM, Sun W (2017) Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance. J Bus Res 80:82–97CrossRef

Quéré BP, Nouyrigat G, Baker CR (2018) A bi-directional examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility ratings and company financial performance in the European context. J Bus Ethics 148(3):527–544CrossRef

Reverte C (2009) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J Bus Ethics 88(2):351–366CrossRef

Rizza R (2008) Néo-institutionnalisme sociologique et nouvelle sociologie économique : quelles relations? Revue Interventions économiques. Pap Polit Econ 38:1–20

Scholtens B (2008) A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecol Econ 68(1):46–55CrossRef

Shen J, Benson J (2016) When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible HRM affects employee work behavior. J Manag 42(6):1723–1746

Shen J, Zhang H (2019) Socially responsible human resource management and employee support for external CSR: roles of organizational CSR climate and perceived CSR directed toward employees. J Bus Ethics 156(3):875–888CrossRef

Staw BM, Epstein LD (2000) What bandwagons bring: effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Adm Sci Q 45(3):523–556CrossRef

Verwijmeren P, Derwall J (2010) Employee well-being, firm leverage, and bankruptcy risk. J Bank Finance 34(5):956–964CrossRef

Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18:303–319CrossRef

Wang Q, Dou J, Jia S (2016) A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: the moderating effect of contextual factors. Bus Soc 55(8):1083–1121CrossRef

Windsor D (2013) Corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility: a positive theory approach. J Bus Res 66(10):1937–1944CrossRef

Wu ML (2006) Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: a meta-analysis. J Am Acad Bus 8(1):163–171

Wu J (2014) The antecedents of corporate social and environmental irresponsibility. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 21(5):286–300CrossRef

Youn H, Hua N, Lee S (2015) Does size matter? Corporate social responsibility and firm performance in the restaurant industry. Int J Hosp Manag 51:127–134CrossRef

Title: Corporate social (ir)responsibility towards employees and financial performance: using time to solve the chicken-egg problem
Author: Raja Abid
Publication date: 28-03-2022
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Review of Managerial Science / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00541-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Leader self-deprecating humor and employee creativity at workplace: a longitudinal study

Senior entrepreneurship: how subjective age affects seniors’ entrepreneurial intentions

Family firm ownership and its impact on performance: evidence from an emerging market

Inter-organizational social capital of firms in developing economies and industry 4.0 readiness: the role of innovative capability and absorptive capacity Author-1

Financial managers and organizational ambidexterity in the German Mittelstand: the moderating role of strategy involvement

Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice