Advertisement
Published in:
25-10-2017 | Author Correction
Correction to: The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters
Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 4/2018
Log inActivate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Excerpt
The original version of this article contains a labelling mistake. Table 3 reports the quality score by ABA Rating. The order of the labels under “Weak ranking” in Table 3 is incorrect. The correction strengthens the claim in the article that the study participants were more likely to assign higher likability score to candidates with objectively better ABA ratings. The corrected Table 3 is given below.
Table 3
Candidate ABA ratings
|
ABA rating
|
Quality score
|
|---|---|
|
Strong ranking
|
|
|
Well qualified
|
4.84
|
|
Well qualified (substantial majority)/qualified (minority)
|
4.73
|
|
Well qualified (majority)/qualified (minority)
|
4.78
|
|
Qualified
|
4.69
|
|
Weak ranking
|
|
|
Qualified (substantial majority)/not qualified (minority)
|
4.22
|
|
Qualified (majority)/not qualified (minority)
|
4.20
|
|
Qualified (minority)/not qualified (majority)
|
4.10
|
|
Qualified (minority)/not qualified (substantial majority)
|
4.11
|
|
Not qualified
|
3.92
|