Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Published in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 8/2012

01-08-2012 | Symposium: Fatigue & Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

Corrosion-Fatigue Behavior of Aluminum Alloy 5083-H131 Sensitized at 448 K (175 °C)

Authors: Ronald L. Holtz, Peter S. Pao, Robert A. Bayles, Thomas M. Longazel, Ramasis Goswami

Published in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A | Issue 8/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The fatigue crack growth behavior of aluminum alloy 5083-H131 has been systematically studied as a function of degree of sensitization for aging at 448 K (175 °C). Fatigue crack growth rates were measured at load ratios of 0.1 and 0.85, in vacuum, air, and a corrosive aqueous environment containing 1 pct NaCl with dilute inhibitor. Sensitization does not affect the fatigue crack growth behavior of Al 5083-H131 significantly in vacuum or air, at low- or high-load ratio. For high-load ratio, in the 1 pct NaCl+inhibitor solution, the threshold drops by nearly 50 pct during the first 200 hours of aging, then it degrades more slowly for longer aging times up to 2000 hours. The change in aging behavior at approximately 200 hours seems to be correlated with the transition from partial coverage of the grain boundaries by β Al3Mg2 phase, to continuous full β coverage. ASTM G-67 mass loss levels below approximately 30 mg/cm2 do not exhibit degraded corrosion-fatigue properties for R = 0.85, but degradation of the threshold is rapid for higher mass loss levels.
previous article Constituent Particle Clustering and Pitting Corrosion
next article Effect of Temperature on the Loss of Ductility of S-135 Grade Drill Pipe Steel and Characterization of Corrosion Products in CO2 Containing Environments

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
E.L. Huskins, B. Cao, K.T. Ramesh: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, vol. 527, pp. 1292-98.CrossRef
2.
3.
W.G. Babcock and E.J. Czyryca: AMPTIAC Quart., 2003, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 31-36.
4.
G.C. Blaze: Alcoa Green Letter: The 5000 Series Alloys Suitable for Welded Structural Applications, Aluminum Corporation of America, New Kensington, PA, 1972.
5.
E.H. Dix, W.A. Anderson, and M.B. Shumaker: Corrosion, 1959, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 19-26.
6.
J.L. Searles, P.I. Gouma, and R.G. Buchheit: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, vol. 32A, pp. 2859-67.CrossRef
7.
R.H. Jones, D.R. Bauer, M.J. Danielson, and J.S. Vetrano: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, vol. 32A, pp. 1699-1711.CrossRef
8.
F.S. Bovard: Corrosion in Marine and Saltwater Environments II, Eds. D.A. Shifler, T. Tsuru, P.M. Natishan, and S. Ito, vols. 2004–2014, Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 2005, pp. 232–243.
9.
C.R. Wong, G.P. Mercier, and J.J. Deloach: SeaFrame, 2007, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 18-20.
10.
N. Birbilis and R.G. Buchheit: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, vol. 152, pp. B140-51.CrossRef
11.
R.H. Jones: J. Met., 2003, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 42–46.
12.
M. Fellerkniepmeier, K. Detert, and L. Thomas: Z. Metallkunde, 1964, vol. 55, pp. 83-87.
13.
14.
L.I. Kaygorodova, B.N. Balandin, and N.N. Buynov: Phys. Met. Metall., 1985, vol. 59, pp. 126-30.
15.
T. Sato and A. Kamio: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1991, vol. A146, pp. 161-80.
16.
H. Inagaki: Z. Metallkunde, 2005, vol. 96, pp. 45-53.
17.
A.J. Davenport, Y. Yuan, R. Ambat, B.J. Connolly, M. Strangwood, A. Afseth, and G. Scamans: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2006, vols. 519-521, pp. 641-46.CrossRef
18.
M.F. Komarova, N.N. Buinov, and L.I. Kaganovi: Phys. Met. Metall., 1973, vol. 36, pp. 358-64.
19.
S. Osaki: Technology Reports of the Yamaguchi University, 1974, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 347-48.
20.
J.R. Pickens, J.R. Gordon, and J.A.S. Green: Metall. Trans. A, 1983, vol. 14A, pp. 925-30.
21.
M. Popovic and E. Romhanji: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2002, vols. 125–126, pp. 275–80.
22.
R.H. Jones, J.S. Vetrano, and C.F. Windisch: Corrosion, 2004, vol. 60, pp. 1144-54.CrossRef
23.
I.N.A. Oguocha, O.J. Adigun, and S. Yannacopoulos: J. Mater. Sci., 2008, vol. 43, pp. 4208-14.CrossRef
24.
25.
J. Gao and D.J. Quesnel: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 356-64.CrossRef
26.
C.B. Crane and R. Gangloff: DoD Corrosion Conf. Proc., NACE International, Houston, TX, Paper 20175, 2011, in press.
27.
J.K. Brosi and J.J. Lewandowski: Scripta Mater., 2010, vol. 63, pp. 799-802.CrossRef
28.
C. Menzemer and T.S. Srivatsan: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, vol. A271, pp. 188-95.
29.
K. Van Kranenburg, T. Riemslag, J. Zuidema, S. Benedictus-de Vries, and F. Veer: Mater. Sci., 2001, vol. 37, pp. 970-74.CrossRef
30.
F. Ford: Corrosion, 1979, vol. 35, pp. 281-87.
31.
J.K. Donald: Fracture Mechanics Characterization of Aluminum Alloys for Marine Structural Applications, SSC-448, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC, 2007.
32.
P.S. Pao, R. Goswami, R.A. Bayles, T.M. Longazel, and R.L. Holtz: Fatigue of Materials—Advances and Emergences of Understanding, Eds. T.S. Srivatsan and M.A. Imam, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010, pp. 85–92.
33.
J.S. Montgomery and E.S. Chin: AMPTIAC Quart., 2004, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 15-20.
34.
R.L. Holtz, P.S. Pao, R.A. Bayles, T.M. Longazel, and R. Goswami: DoD Corrosion Conference Proceedings, NACE International, Houston, TX, Paper 20421, 2011, in press.
35.
R. Goswami, G. Spanos, P.S. Pao, and R.L. Holtz: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 348-55.CrossRef
36.
R. Goswami, G. Spanos, P.S. Pao, and R.L. Holtz: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, vol. 527, pp. 1089-95.CrossRef
37.
ASTM E647-05, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, 2005.
38.
D.O. Sprowls, M.B. Shumaker, J.D. Walsh, and J.W. Coursen: “Evaluation of Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility using Fracture Mechanics Techniques,” Final Report, Contract Number NAS 8-21487, May 1973, Alcoa Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA.
39.
M. Liu, P. Schmutz, S. Zanna, A. Seyeux, H. Ardelean, G. Song, A. Atrens, and P. Marcus: Corros. Sci., 2010, vol. 52, pp. 562-78.CrossRef
40.
Z. Xing, S. Yujui, and T. Mingjing: Int. J. Fatigue, 1991, vol. 13, pp. 69-72.CrossRef
41.
C.J. van der Wekken and M. Jassen: J. Electrochem. Soc., 1991, vol. 138, pp. 2891-96.CrossRef
42.
S. Suresh: Fatigue of Materials, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 245-47.
43.
Z.M. Gasem and R.P. Gangloff: Chemistry and Electrochemistry of Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Cracking: A Symposium Honoring the Contributions of R.W. Steahle, Ed. R.H. Jones, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2001, pp. 501–21.
44.
J.S. Warner, S. Kim, and R.P. Gangloff: Int. J. Fatigue, 2009, vol. 31, pp. 1952-65.CrossRef
45.
R.H. Jones, V.Y. Gertsman, J.S. Vetrano, and C.F. Windisch: Scripta Mater., 2004, vol. 50, pp.1355-59.CrossRef
46.
ASTM E 1681-03, “Standard Test Method for Determining Threshold Stress Intensity Factor for Environment-Assisted Cracking of Metallic Materials,” 2003.
47.
F.S. Bovard: Alcoa Center, PA, Private communication, 2010.
48.
S. Suresh: Fatigue of Materials, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 380-82.
49.
L. Hagn: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1988, vol. A103, pp.193-205.
50.
51.
52.
53.
K. Sadananda and A.K. Vasudevan: Int. J. Fatigue, 2004, vol. 26, pp. 39-47.CrossRef
54.
K. Sadananda, A.K. Vasudevan, and R.L. Holtz: Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, vol. 23, pp. S277-86.CrossRef
55.
K. Sadananda, A.K. Vasudevan, and I.W. Kang: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 3399-3414.CrossRef
56.
K. Sadananda and A.K. Vasudevan: Int. J. Fatigue, 2005, vol. 27, pp. 1255-66.CrossRef
57.
K. Sadananda and A.K. Vasudevan: Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, vol. 26, pp. 835-45.CrossRef
58.
ASTM G-67-04, “Standard Test Method for Determining the Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys by Mass Loss After Exposure to Nitric Acid (NAMLT Test),” 2004.
Metadata
Title
Corrosion-Fatigue Behavior of Aluminum Alloy 5083-H131 Sensitized at 448 K (175 °C)
Authors
Ronald L. Holtz
Peter S. Pao
Robert A. Bayles
Thomas M. Longazel
Ramasis Goswami
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A / Issue 8/2012
Print ISSN: 1073-5623
Electronic ISSN: 1543-1940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0866-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2012

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 8/2012 Go to the issue

Communication

Modeling of Incommensurate ω Structure in the Zr-Nb Alloys

Symposium: Fatigue & Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

A Positron Annihilation Study of Corrosion of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloy by NaOH

Communication

Effect of Sn Grain Orientation on the Cu6Sn5 Formation in a Sn-Based Solder Under Current Stressing

Symposium: Bulk Metallic Glasses VIII

Effects of Composition Changes on Strength, Bend Ductility, Toughness, and Flex-Bending Fatigue of Iron-Based Metallic Glass Ribbons

Symposium: Fatigue & Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

Effect of Proximity and Dimension of Two Artificial Pitting Holes on the Fatigue Endurance of Aluminum Alloy AISI 6061-T6 Under Rotating Bending Fatigue Tests

Symposium: Fatigue and Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

Foreword: Fatigue and Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

Premium Partners

    Image Credits