Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Critical Decisions

Author : Richard M. Adler

Published in: Bending the Law of Unintended Consequences

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Bending the Law of Unintended Consequences explores the problem of improving critical decisions and their outcomes. This chapter sets the stage for this inquiry by defining criticality and explaining why it is so difficult to make critical decisions effectively. Section 2.1 explains criticality by proposing four defining criteria and then providing illustrative examples. Section 2.2 explains how these four defining criteria complicate the lives of critical decision-makers. Section 2.3 argues that decision-making should be viewed as a process rather than an event, and it presents a reference model for that core business process. Section 2.4 argues that existing approaches for making critical decisions are ineffective at protecting businesses from the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Hogarth [16] terms them “future-choice” decisions.
 
2
Porter [27].
 
3
Critical decisions are largely irreversible: you can’t simply unwind them and try again. They expend both resources (e.g., time and capital) and intangible assets like trust and good will (e.g., with partners, customers, or employees) that can’t be reconstituted if they don’t turn out well. Rosenzweig [28].
 
4
Although this book focuses on businesses, most of this discussion applies with minor adjustments to critical decisions made by governments and other non-commercial organizations as well.
 
5
eSteel and ChemMatch were two pioneering net markets, supporting B2B trading for steel and steel products and bulk chemicals, respectively. Chapter 11 discusses the details of decisions facing net market entrepreneurs and their would-be customers (buyers and sellers of materials and products)
 
6
These tectonic disruptions largely failed to materialize. Virtually all net markets failed during the dot-com bust (see Chap. 11).
 
7
Other methods are generally simpler (and effective) for personal life and bounded operational business decisions. That said, the test drive method can be applied to everyday decisions in an informal way, without dragging out the “heavy artillery” of computer-based simulations (see Chaps. 8 and 9).
 
8
Large “serial” acquirers are common in technology, health care, and finance (e.g., Microsoft, Oracle, Anthem, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sanofi Genzyme). General Electric was previously well-known for its acquisition acumen. Ashkenas et al. [1].
 
9
Similarly, medical “centers of excellence” that perform large numbers of transplants or other complex operations produce superior patient outcomes. https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pmc/​articles/​PMC5516836/​.
 
10
Portfolio theory aims to maximize the expected return on investment (ROI) of a set of financial assets for a given amount of risk. https://​faculty.​washington.​edu/​ezivot/​econ424/​introductionPort​folioTheory.​pdf. But most critical decisions involve more than two factors (e.g., ROI, risk) and often factors that are difficult to quantify precisely, making them harder to model mathematically and determine optimal solutions.
 
11
It must also be noted that Eisenhower placed great store on the planning process itself as a vital preparation for action, observing that while “plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.”
 
12
Chapter 8 describes game theory, a branch of decision sciences that developed expressly to model the dynamic interactions of decision-making parties with competing or overlapping interests.
 
13
Chapter 4 discusses “stability” biases that encourage inertia and the preservation of status quo despite emerging opportunities and impending threats from competitors or changing market tastes.
 
14
See http://​news.​bbc.​co.​uk/​2/​hi/​business/​7239220.​stm and https://​qz.​com/​741056/​the-stunning-collapse-of-yahoos-valuation/​. The bulk of Yahoo’s residual value lay in Yahoo’s 40% stake in Alibaba, a Chinese e-commerce company.
 
15
Garvin and Roberto [10].
 
16
See, for example, Russo and Schoemaker [29], Davenport [6], and Choo [3].
 
17
Das and Teng [5].
 
18
Day and Schoemaker [7].
 
19
Christensen [4] describes the dynamics of innovative companies to maintain their leadership. See also Collins [41].
 
20
See, for example, Gilad [11] and Fuld [9].
 
21
See, for example, Snowden [34], Snowden and Boone [35], Weick [38], and Choo [3].
 
22
Reconstructing a reliable history is deceptively challenging. Experience is a cryptic oracle at best, given our predispositions towards vivid narratives and positing clear causality retroactively. Watts [42].
 
23
Russo and Schoemaker [29] p. 6, and Nutt [24].
 
24
Keeney [18].
 
25
Strong framing ensures that the team properly identifies and agrees to both the questions to be asked and the decisions to be made as a (business) strategy is developed. Bradley et al. [40].
 
27
Nuseibeh and Easterbrook [22].
 
28
Keeney’s book responds to this problem by recommending a decision theory technique called utility theory (cf. Sect. 7.​3).
 
29
The US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 offers a tragic example. Framed as a military operation to topple the regime of Saddam Hussein, the invasion was a stunning success. But framed as an action to produce a stable and friendly democratic government that would help stabilize the Middle East, the intervention was an unmitigated failure that spawned a host of costly and tragic unintended consequences.
 
30
Lovallo and Sibony [20]. Dye et al. [8], a prior McKinsey study, produced similar findings.
 
31
Nutt [25]. See also Nutt [23, 24] for studies of specific decision-making problems.
 
32
The decisions in Nutt’s study included many operational as well as critical decisions. That said, the undisciplined decision-making practices of senior managers uncovered by Nutt would certainly drive bad outcomes for the critical decisions in which they would have participated as well.
 
33
Prominent examples include the turnover in industries such as transportation (e.g., railroads, automobiles, airplanes), energy, and computers (e.g., in the transitions from mainframes to minicomputers to workstations to personal computers).
 
34
Stock indexes are only rough proxy indicators, since mergers and acquisitions (M&A) can signal market attractiveness as well as outright failure. That said, many companies stumble out the top tier because they make poor critical decisions or otherwise fall behind in performance in their markets.
 
35
Pascale et al. [26].
 
36
Hagel and Brown [13].
 
37
Handscomb et al. [14].
 
38
See, for example, Silver [32]. He writes “But as was the case in other fields, like earthquake forecasting during the period (1970s and 1980s), improved technology did not cover for the lack of theoretical understanding about the economy; it only gave economists faster and more elaborate ways to mistake noise for a signal”.
 
39
Hillier et al. [15].
 
40
Simon [33]. OR enthusiasts will no doubt object, but such protests evoke Maslow’s famous observation: “If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.” True, OR models can be constructed for a great many problems, but this often requires numerous simplifying assumptions. The salient question is whether they idealize or abstract the problem to such a degree that solutions become implausible or unrealistic.
 
41
Klein [19], Betsch [2], Zsambok and Klein [39], and Gladwell [12].
 
42
Kahneman [17], Schrage [30], Stewart and Lusk [36] and Sibony and Lovallo [31]. Critical decisions are too extended, multi-faceted, and often ambiguous to allow abundant, unequivocal performance feedback, a key prerequisite for forming reliable expert intuitions
 
43
Surowiecki [37], Mannix, et al. [21].
 
44
Sibony and Lovallo [31], Kahneman [17].
 
45
Accessed all URLs 05 Jul 2019.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ashkenas, Ronald N., Lawrence J. DeMonaco, and Suzanne Francis. 1998. Making the Deal Real: How GE Capital Integrates Acquisitions. Harvard Business Review. 76 (1): 165-178. Ashkenas, Ronald N., Lawrence J. DeMonaco, and Suzanne Francis. 1998. Making the Deal Real: How GE Capital Integrates Acquisitions. Harvard Business Review. 76 (1): 165-178.
2.
go back to reference Betsch, Tilmann. 2008. The Nature of Intuition and Its Neglect in Research on Judgment and Decision-making. In: Henning Plessner, Cornelia Betsch, and Tilmann Betsch (Eds), Intuition in Judgment and Decision-Making (pp. 3-22). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Betsch, Tilmann. 2008. The Nature of Intuition and Its Neglect in Research on Judgment and Decision-making. In: Henning Plessner, Cornelia Betsch, and Tilmann Betsch (Eds), Intuition in Judgment and Decision-Making (pp. 3-22). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
go back to reference Choo, Chun Wei. 2006. The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press. Choo, Chun Wei. 2006. The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
go back to reference Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
go back to reference Das, T.K., & Bing-Sheng Teng. 1999. Cognitive biases and strategic decision processes: An integrative perspective. Journal of Management Studies. 36(6): 757-778. Das, T.K., & Bing-Sheng Teng. 1999. Cognitive biases and strategic decision processes: An integrative perspective. Journal of Management Studies. 36(6): 757-778.
6.
go back to reference Davenport, Thomas H. 2009. Make Better Decisions. Harvard Business Review. 87(11):117-123. Davenport, Thomas H. 2009. Make Better Decisions. Harvard Business Review. 87(11):117-123.
7.
go back to reference Day, George S., and Paul J. H. Schoemaker. 2006. Peripheral Vision: Detecting the Weak Signals that Will Make or Break Your Company. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Day, George S., and Paul J. H. Schoemaker. 2006. Peripheral Vision: Detecting the Weak Signals that Will Make or Break Your Company. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
go back to reference Fuld, Leonard M. 2006. The Secret Language of Competitive Intelligence: How to See Through and Stay Ahead of Business Disruptions, Distortions, Rumors and Smoke Screens. New York: Crown Business. Fuld, Leonard M. 2006. The Secret Language of Competitive Intelligence: How to See Through and Stay Ahead of Business Disruptions, Distortions, Rumors and Smoke Screens. New York: Crown Business.
10.
go back to reference Garvin, David A. and Michael A. Roberto. 2001. What You Don’t Know About Making Decisions. Harvard Business Review. 79 (9): 108-116. Garvin, David A. and Michael A. Roberto. 2001. What You Don’t Know About Making Decisions. Harvard Business Review. 79 (9): 108-116.
11.
go back to reference Gilad, Benjamin. 2009. Business War Games: How Large, Small, and New Companies Can Vastly Improve Their Strategies and Outmaneuver the Competition. Franklin Lakes NJ: Career Press. Gilad, Benjamin. 2009. Business War Games: How Large, Small, and New Companies Can Vastly Improve Their Strategies and Outmaneuver the Competition. Franklin Lakes NJ: Career Press.
12.
go back to reference Gladwell, Malcolm. 2005. Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York: Little, Brown, and Company. Gladwell, Malcolm. 2005. Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.
13.
go back to reference Hagel, John and John Seely Brown. 2005. The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends On Productive Friction And Dynamic Specialization, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Hagel, John and John Seely Brown. 2005. The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends On Productive Friction And Dynamic Specialization, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
15.
go back to reference Hillier, Robert, Gerald J. Lieberman, Bodhibrata Nag, and Preetam Basu. (2017) Introduction to Operations Research. 10th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill. Hillier, Robert, Gerald J. Lieberman, Bodhibrata Nag, and Preetam Basu. (2017) Introduction to Operations Research. 10th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
16.
go back to reference Hogarth, Robin M. 2010. Subways, Coconuts, and Foggy MineFields: An Approach to Studying Future-Choice Decisions. In: Michel-Ikerkan, Erwann, and Paul Slovic (Eds). The Irrational Economist: Making Decisions in a Dangerous World (pp. 21-29). New York: Perseus Books Group. Hogarth, Robin M. 2010. Subways, Coconuts, and Foggy MineFields: An Approach to Studying Future-Choice Decisions. In: Michel-Ikerkan, Erwann, and Paul Slovic (Eds). The Irrational Economist: Making Decisions in a Dangerous World (pp. 21-29). New York: Perseus Books Group.
17.
go back to reference Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
18.
go back to reference Keeney, Ralph L. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Keeney, Ralph L. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
go back to reference Klein, Gary A. 1998. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Klein, Gary A. 1998. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
go back to reference Lovallo, Dan P. and Oliver Sibony. 2010. The case for behavioral strategy. McKinsey Quarterly. (2): 30-40. Lovallo, Dan P. and Oliver Sibony. 2010. The case for behavioral strategy. McKinsey Quarterly. (2): 30-40.
21.
go back to reference Mannix, Elizabeth A., Margaret A. Neale, Jack A Goncalo, (Eds). 2009. Creativity in Groups. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. Mannix, Elizabeth A., Margaret A. Neale, Jack A Goncalo, (Eds). 2009. Creativity in Groups. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
23.
go back to reference Nutt, Paul. 1993. The Identification of Solution ideas during Organizational Decision-making. Management Science 39(9): 1071-85. Nutt, Paul. 1993. The Identification of Solution ideas during Organizational Decision-making. Management Science 39(9): 1071-85.
24.
go back to reference ___.1998. Framing Strategic Decisions. Organization Science 9(2): 195-216. ___.1998. Framing Strategic Decisions. Organization Science 9(2): 195-216.
25.
go back to reference ___.1999. Surprising but True: Half the Decisions in Organizations Fail. The Academy of Management Executive 13(4): 75-90. ___.1999. Surprising but True: Half the Decisions in Organizations Fail. The Academy of Management Executive 13(4): 75-90.
26.
go back to reference Pascale, Richard T., Mark Millemann, and Linda Gioja. 2000. Surfing at the Edge of Chaos: The Laws of Nature and the New Laws of Business. New York: Random House. Pascale, Richard T., Mark Millemann, and Linda Gioja. 2000. Surfing at the Edge of Chaos: The Laws of Nature and the New Laws of Business. New York: Random House.
27.
go back to reference Porter, Michael E. 1996. What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review 76(6): 61-77. Porter, Michael E. 1996. What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review 76(6): 61-77.
29.
go back to reference Russo, J. Edward, and Paul J.H. Schoemaker. 2001. Winning Decisions: Getting It Right the First Time. New York. Doubleday Currency. Russo, J. Edward, and Paul J.H. Schoemaker. 2001. Winning Decisions: Getting It Right the First Time. New York. Doubleday Currency.
32.
go back to reference Silver, Nate. 2012. The Signal and The Noise: why so many predictions fail – but some don’t. New York: Penguin Books. Silver, Nate. 2012. The Signal and The Noise: why so many predictions fail – but some don’t. New York: Penguin Books.
33.
go back to reference Simon, Herbert A. 1998. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press. Simon, Herbert A. 1998. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
35.
go back to reference Snowden, David J. and Boone, Mary E. 2007. A Leader’s Framework for Decision-making. Harvard Business Review 85(11): 68-76. Snowden, David J. and Boone, Mary E. 2007. A Leader’s Framework for Decision-making. Harvard Business Review 85(11): 68-76.
36.
go back to reference Stewart, Thomas R., and Cynthia M. Lusk. 1994. Seven Components of Judgmental Forecasting Skill: Implications for Research and the Improvement of forecasts. Journal of Forecasting. 13: 579-599. Stewart, Thomas R., and Cynthia M. Lusk. 1994. Seven Components of Judgmental Forecasting Skill: Implications for Research and the Improvement of forecasts. Journal of Forecasting. 13: 579-599.
37.
go back to reference Surowiecki, James. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Random House. Surowiecki, James. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Random House.
38.
go back to reference Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
39.
go back to reference Zsambok, Caroline E. and Gary Klein (Eds). 1997. Naturalistic Decision Making. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc. Zsambok, Caroline E. and Gary Klein (Eds). 1997. Naturalistic Decision Making. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc.
40.
go back to reference Bradley, Chris, Angus Dawson, and Sven Smit. 2013. The strategic yardstick you can’t afford to ignore. McKinsey Quarterly. (4):24-35. Bradley, Chris, Angus Dawson, and Sven Smit. 2013. The strategic yardstick you can’t afford to ignore. McKinsey Quarterly. (4):24-35.
41.
go back to reference Collins, Jim. 2009. How the Mighty Fail and Why Some Companies Never Give In. New York: HarperCollins. Collins, Jim. 2009. How the Mighty Fail and Why Some Companies Never Give In. New York: HarperCollins.
42.
go back to reference Watts, Duncan J. 2011. Everything is Obvious (Once You Know The Answer: How Common Sense Fails Us. New York: Random House. Watts, Duncan J. 2011. Everything is Obvious (Once You Know The Answer: How Common Sense Fails Us. New York: Random House.
Metadata
Title
Critical Decisions
Author
Richard M. Adler
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32714-9_2