Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

CSR Ratings and Contradiction of Real and Communicated Aims of Media Organization: The Case of News Corporation

Author : Jan Kreft

Published in: Eurasian Business Perspectives

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The article aims at the critical analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ratings in accordance with reports presented by the largest organization which evaluates corporate social responsibility—the CSRHUB. The analysis refers to media corporations, such as News Corporations, and it aims at providing an answer to the question how the crisis of social trust towards media which belong to a media corporation affects their CSR ratings. In the article, there have been two hypotheses formulated: (1) the complex character of social, political and market aims pursued by media corporations is not clearly reflected by CSR ratings; (2) the comprehensiveness of CSR ratings does not contribute to the identification of key threats which result from the lack of social responsibility in a media corporation. The analysis indicates that—in their scope which is difficult to verify—CSR ratings of media corporations take into consideration the following elements: media specificity, and lobbying nature of some organizations (e.g. News Corporation). Their complexity and aggregated character makes it difficult to identify the sources of the problem. Furthermore, image disasters of particular entities within corporations insignificantly affect their CSR ratings.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRef Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRef
go back to reference Arsenault, A. H., & Castells, M. (2008). The structure and dynamics of global multi-media business networks. International Journal of Communication, 2, 707–748. Arsenault, A. H., & Castells, M. (2008). The structure and dynamics of global multi-media business networks. International Journal of Communication, 2, 707–748.
go back to reference Batko, R., & Kreft, J. (2017). The superfluousness of CSR in media organizations: Conclusions from public radio research in Poland. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(1), 91–105.CrossRef Batko, R., & Kreft, J. (2017). The superfluousness of CSR in media organizations: Conclusions from public radio research in Poland. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(1), 91–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.CrossRef Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. (1976). Social impact disclosure and corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1(1), 11–21.CrossRef Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. (1976). Social impact disclosure and corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1(1), 11–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlson, M., & Berkowitz, D. (2014). ‘The emperor lost his clothes’: Rupert Murdoch, News of the World and journalistic boundary work in the UK and USA. Journalism, 15(4), 389–406.CrossRef Carlson, M., & Berkowitz, D. (2014). ‘The emperor lost his clothes’: Rupert Murdoch, News of the World and journalistic boundary work in the UK and USA. Journalism, 15(4), 389–406.CrossRef
go back to reference Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRef Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRef
go back to reference Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.CrossRef Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.CrossRef
go back to reference Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRef Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRef
go back to reference Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRef Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Eells, R. S. F. (1960). The meaning of modern business. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef Eells, R. S. F. (1960). The meaning of modern business. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Flew, T., & Gilmour, C. J. (2003). A tale of two synergies: An institutional analysis of the expansionary strategies of News Corporation and AOL-Time Warner. Managing Communication for Diversity, Australia and New Zealand Communications Association Conference, Brisbane, 9–11 July 2003 Flew, T., & Gilmour, C. J. (2003). A tale of two synergies: An institutional analysis of the expansionary strategies of News Corporation and AOL-Time Warner. Managing Communication for Diversity, Australia and New Zealand Communications Association Conference, Brisbane, 9–11 July 2003
go back to reference Grayson, D. (2010). Corporate responsibility and the media. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 5(3), 160–193. Grayson, D. (2010). Corporate responsibility and the media. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 5(3), 160–193.
go back to reference Gulyás, Á. (2011). Demons into angels? Corporate social responsibility and media organizations. Critical Survey, 23(2), 56–74.CrossRef Gulyás, Á. (2011). Demons into angels? Corporate social responsibility and media organizations. Critical Survey, 23(2), 56–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Han, E.-K., Lee, D.-H., & Khang, H. (2008). Influential factors of the social responsibility of newspaper corporations in South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 667–680.CrossRef Han, E.-K., Lee, D.-H., & Khang, H. (2008). Influential factors of the social responsibility of newspaper corporations in South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 667–680.CrossRef
go back to reference Hendriques, A. (2011). Corporate truth: The limits to transparency. London: Earthscan. Hendriques, A. (2011). Corporate truth: The limits to transparency. London: Earthscan.
go back to reference Hou, J., & Reber, B. H. (2011). Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 166–168.CrossRef Hou, J., & Reber, B. H. (2011). Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 166–168.CrossRef
go back to reference Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, M. (2012). Media governance and corporate social responsibility of media organizations: An international comparison. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(2), 154–167.CrossRef Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, M. (2012). Media governance and corporate social responsibility of media organizations: An international comparison. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(2), 154–167.CrossRef
go back to reference Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2010). Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance information: A study of two global clothing and sports retail companies. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 131–148.CrossRef Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2010). Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance information: A study of two global clothing and sports retail companies. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 131–148.CrossRef
go back to reference Kesavan, R., Bernacchi, M. D., & Mascarenhas, O. A. (2013). Word of mouse: CSR communication and the social media. International Management Review, 9(1), 59–67. Kesavan, R., Bernacchi, M. D., & Mascarenhas, O. A. (2013). Word of mouse: CSR communication and the social media. International Management Review, 9(1), 59–67.
go back to reference Lee, S. Y., & Carroll, C. E. (2011). The emergence, variation, and evolution of corporate social responsibility in the public sphere, 1980–2004: The exposure of firms to public debate. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 115–131.CrossRef Lee, S. Y., & Carroll, C. E. (2011). The emergence, variation, and evolution of corporate social responsibility in the public sphere, 1980–2004: The exposure of firms to public debate. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 115–131.CrossRef
go back to reference Louw, E. (2001). The media and cultural production. London: Sage. Louw, E. (2001). The media and cultural production. London: Sage.
go back to reference Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRef Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Maak, T. (2008). Undivided corporate responsibility: Towards a theory of corporate integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 353–368.CrossRef Maak, T. (2008). Undivided corporate responsibility: Towards a theory of corporate integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 353–368.CrossRef
go back to reference Marjoribanks, T. (2000). News corporation, technology and the workplace: Global strategies, local change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Marjoribanks, T. (2000). News corporation, technology and the workplace: Global strategies, local change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRef Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRef
go back to reference McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. London: Sage. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. London: Sage.
go back to reference Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(2), 16–22.CrossRef Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(2), 16–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 183–213.CrossRef Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 183–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Owen, D. (2005). CSR after Enron: A role for the academic accounting profession? The European Accounting Review, 14(2), 395–404.CrossRef Owen, D. (2005). CSR after Enron: A role for the academic accounting profession? The European Accounting Review, 14(2), 395–404.CrossRef
go back to reference Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.CrossRef Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.CrossRef
go back to reference Pellicano, M., Vesci, M., Troisi, O., Cosimato, S., & Tuccillo, C. (2014). Stakeholder engagement for sustainable development in banking industry. An Italian case study (pp. 1–17). 13th EBES Conference, Istanbul, Turkey. Pellicano, M., Vesci, M., Troisi, O., Cosimato, S., & Tuccillo, C. (2014). Stakeholder engagement for sustainable development in banking industry. An Italian case study (pp. 1–17). 13th EBES Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
go back to reference Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (Eds.). (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (Eds.). (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Sandoval, M. (2013). Corporate social (ir)responsibility in media and communication industries. Javnost-The Public, 20(3), 39–57.CrossRef Sandoval, M. (2013). Corporate social (ir)responsibility in media and communication industries. Javnost-The Public, 20(3), 39–57.CrossRef
go back to reference Sandoval, M. (2014). From corporate to social media: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in media and communication industries. New York: Routledge.CrossRef Sandoval, M. (2014). From corporate to social media: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in media and communication industries. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Schejter, A. M., & Davidson, R. (2008). “... and money is answer for all things”: The News Corp.–Dow Jones Merger and the Separation of Editorial and Business Practices. International Journal of Communication, 2, 515–542. Schejter, A. M., & Davidson, R. (2008). “... and money is answer for all things”: The News Corp.–Dow Jones Merger and the Separation of Editorial and Business Practices. International Journal of Communication, 2, 515–542.
go back to reference Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRef Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson, J. B. (2013). Merchants of culture: The publishing business in the twenty-first century. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Thompson, J. B. (2013). Merchants of culture: The publishing business in the twenty-first century. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
go back to reference Vogel, D. (2007). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Vogel, D. (2007). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
go back to reference Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
Metadata
Title
CSR Ratings and Contradiction of Real and Communicated Aims of Media Organization: The Case of News Corporation
Author
Jan Kreft
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11872-3_9