Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Data

Authors : Marko Sarstedt, Erik Mooi

Published in: A Concise Guide to Market Research

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In market research, data is critical. Testing, measuring, improving, or creating new goods and services are difficult, or even impossible, without product and customer data. We discuss the different types of data, how they are constructed, and their attributes. We subsequently discuss the advantages and disadvantages of primary and secondary data and what each type allows you to do. We show you how to assess data’s validity and reliability, and discuss the implications that measurement errors can have for your data’s quality. We conclude with a discussion of important concepts, such as population, probability and non-probability sampling, and the relevance of sample size for market research.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–403.CrossRef Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–403.CrossRef
go back to reference Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Haws, K. L. (2011). Handbook of marketing scales. Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Haws, K. L. (2011). Handbook of marketing scales. Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634.CrossRef Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634.CrossRef
go back to reference Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 581–596.CrossRef Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 581–596.CrossRef
go back to reference DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Diamantopoulos, A. (2006). The error term in formative measurement models: Interpretation and modeling implications. Journal of Modelling in Management, 1(1), 7–17.CrossRef Diamantopoulos, A. (2006). The error term in formative measurement models: Interpretation and modeling implications. Journal of Modelling in Management, 1(1), 7–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218.CrossRef Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218.CrossRef
go back to reference Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449.CrossRef Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449.CrossRef
go back to reference Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191–198.CrossRef Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191–198.CrossRef
go back to reference Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(3), 223–248.CrossRef Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(3), 223–248.CrossRef
go back to reference Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.CrossRef Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: San Francisco, CA: Chandler. Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
go back to reference Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability. The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891.CrossRef Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability. The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuppelwieser, V., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Confusion about the dimensionality and measurement specification of the future time perspective scale. International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 113–136.CrossRef Kuppelwieser, V., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Confusion about the dimensionality and measurement specification of the future time perspective scale. International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 113–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of populations: Methods and applications (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of populations: Methods and applications (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
go back to reference Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53.CrossRef Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2013). Research design explained (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2013). Research design explained (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
go back to reference Moser, C. A., & Stuart, A. (1953). An experimental study of quota sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A General, 116(4), 349–405.CrossRef Moser, C. A., & Stuart, A. (1953). An experimental study of quota sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A General, 116(4), 349–405.CrossRef
go back to reference Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55. Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55.
go back to reference Sarstedt, M., & Schloderer, M. P. (2010). Developing a measurement approach for reputation of nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 15(3), 276–299. Sarstedt, M., & Schloderer, M. P. (2010). Developing a measurement approach for reputation of nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 15(3), 276–299.
go back to reference Sarstedt, M., Diamantopoulos, A., Salzberger, T., & Baumgartner, P. (2016a). Selecting single items to measure doubly-concrete constructs: A cautionary tale. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3159–3167.CrossRef Sarstedt, M., Diamantopoulos, A., Salzberger, T., & Baumgartner, P. (2016a). Selecting single items to measure doubly-concrete constructs: A cautionary tale. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3159–3167.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarstedt, M., Diamantopoulos, A., & Salzberger, T. (2016b). Should we use single items? Better not. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3199–3203.CrossRef Sarstedt, M., Diamantopoulos, A., & Salzberger, T. (2016b). Should we use single items? Better not. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3199–3203.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016c). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010.CrossRef Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016c). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarstedt, M., Bengart, P., Shaltoni, A. M., & Lehmann, S. (2018). The use of sampling methods in advertising research: A gap between theory and practice. International Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 650–663.CrossRef Sarstedt, M., Bengart, P., Shaltoni, A. M., & Lehmann, S. (2018). The use of sampling methods in advertising research: A gap between theory and practice. International Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 650–663.CrossRef
go back to reference Stephenson, C. B. (1979). Probability sampling with quotas: An experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(4), 477–496.CrossRef Stephenson, C. B. (1979). Probability sampling with quotas: An experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(4), 477–496.CrossRef
go back to reference Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures for marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.CrossRef Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures for marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
go back to reference Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.CrossRef Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.CrossRef
go back to reference DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2013). Research design explained (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2013). Research design explained (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
go back to reference Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference Paas, L.J., & Morren, M. (2018). Please do not answer if you are reading this: Respondent attention in online panels. Marketing Letters, 29(1), 13–21.CrossRef Paas, L.J., & Morren, M. (2018). Please do not answer if you are reading this: Respondent attention in online panels. Marketing Letters, 29(1), 13–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Revilla, M., & Ochoa, C. (2018). Alternative methods for selecting web survey samples. International Journal of Maret Research, 60(4), 352-265. Revilla, M., & Ochoa, C. (2018). Alternative methods for selecting web survey samples. International Journal of Maret Research, 60(4), 352-265.
Metadata
Title
Data
Authors
Marko Sarstedt
Erik Mooi
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56707-4_3