Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

13. Democracy, Inclusive Governance and Social Accountability in South Asia

Author : Subhash C. Kashyap

Published in: Inclusive Governance in South Asia

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

During the last few decades, democracy, as the most preferred form of government, has been repeatedly revisited. Considerable literature has grown up round the concepts of inclusive governance and social responsibility as essential elements of democracy. Besides the learned scholars, some international organizations such as the World Bank, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Development Programme have become involved in this discussion. In the so-called developing world of South Asia and Africa, the fruits of freedom, rule of law and economic growth have been cornered by the few and not shared by all. The worst sufferers have been the most deprived and marginalized sections: women, tribals, people with disabilities, ethnic, religious or other minorities, the aged, social outcasts and the poor and least developed. For the debate on inclusive government and socially accountable democracy to be meaningful to ordinary citizens, the first categorical imperative is to shear it of much of its jargon. Democracy today is believed to be a system under which the people govern themselves, through the representatives they elect, under a system they choose. Yet representative democracy must graduate to participatory democracy, where the people are conscious of their rights and obligations, assume responsibilities and partake in decision-making processes. Furthermore, democracy has to be inclusive of the interests of all, equally and without discrimination. Special attention has to be paid to the disadvantaged and deprived. Good governance has to be democratic, citizen-friendly, clean and free of corruption. All the state functionaries, at all times, must be answerable and accountable to the ultimate masters in democracy: the people. Inclusive governance requires decentralization of power, equal participation of the people, equality of all before law and real empowerment of the people, with a bottom-up approach.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Behera, M. (2011). Globalization and Good Governance. South Asia Politics, 9(10). Behera, M. (2011). Globalization and Good Governance. South Asia Politics, 9(10).
go back to reference Government of India. (2002). Report of the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution in India. New Delhi: Government of India. Government of India. (2002). Report of the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution in India. New Delhi: Government of India.
go back to reference IDEA (International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance). (2009). Democracy in South Asia. Stockholm: IDEA. IDEA (International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance). (2009). Democracy in South Asia. Stockholm: IDEA.
go back to reference Kashyap, S. (1996). Reinventing Parliamentary Polity. In UNDP (Ed.), Renewing Governance – Issues and Options. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing. Kashyap, S. (1996). Reinventing Parliamentary Polity. In UNDP (Ed.), Renewing Governance – Issues and Options. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing.
go back to reference Kashyap, S. (Ed.). (1997). Crime and Corruption to Good Governance. New Delhi: Uppal. Kashyap, S. (Ed.). (1997). Crime and Corruption to Good Governance. New Delhi: Uppal.
go back to reference Kashyap, S. (2003). Concept of Good Governance and Kautilya’s Arthashastra. New Delhi: Indian Council of Social Science Research. Kashyap, S. (2003). Concept of Good Governance and Kautilya’s Arthashastra. New Delhi: Indian Council of Social Science Research.
go back to reference Kashyap, S. (2010). Indian Constitution: Conflicts and Controversies. New Delhi: Universal. Kashyap, S. (2010). Indian Constitution: Conflicts and Controversies. New Delhi: Universal.
go back to reference UNDP. (2013). Reflections on Social Accountability: Catalyzing Democratic Governance to Accelerate Progress Towards the Millennium Development Goals. New York: UNDP. UNDP. (2013). Reflections on Social Accountability: Catalyzing Democratic Governance to Accelerate Progress Towards the Millennium Development Goals. New York: UNDP.
Metadata
Title
Democracy, Inclusive Governance and Social Accountability in South Asia
Author
Subhash C. Kashyap
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60904-1_13