Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. Designing Powerful Environments to Examine and Support Teacher Competencies for Models and Modelling

Original Text – Chapter 8

Authors : Dr. Cheryl Eames, Dr Corey Brady, Dr. Hyunyi Jung, Aran Glancy, Dr. Richard Lesh

Published in: Lehrerkompetenzen zum Unterrichten mathematischer Modellierung

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to highlight how work focusing on student‐level modelling and idea development can also serve as a powerful context to investigate parallel and interacting modelling processes at the teacher level. We assert that expertise in teaching is partly reflected in how teachers interpret and respond to classroom situations—in what they see and recognize, as well as in what they do. To establish a setting for extended studies of teacher‐level modelling, different research groups have found it desirable to move beyond single‐activity implementations in one of several ways. We begin our description of this work by identifying several values or beliefs about the nature of mathematical thinking and learning and corresponding instructional practices, which comprise key teacher competencies for the teaching and learning of modelling that have been emphasized by these projects. Then, we describe three different extensions from previous reports of our ongoing research, each aimed at examining and supporting students’ and teachers’ models and modelling over long time‐scales, such as the level of an entire course. Our results suggest that, in course‐sized studies of student development, significant powerful changes can also occur in teacher‐level competencies for the teaching and learning of modelling. One reason for this teacher‐level development is that in our student‐level modelling activities, students naturally express important aspects of their thinking in forms that can be observed directly by both teachers and researchers. Insights about the nature of students’ thinking have proven to be a powerful impetus to encourage important aspects of teacher development. Furthermore, course‐sized research sites enable us to directly observe significant teacher competencies that cannot be seen in studies focusing on single modelling activities.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In S. J. Cho (Eds.), The proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Intellectual and attitudinal Changes (p. 73–96). New York: Springer. Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In S. J. Cho (Eds.), The proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Intellectual and attitudinal Changes (p. 73–96). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Brady, C., & Lesh, R. (2015). A models and modelling approach to risk and uncertainty. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1), 184–202. Brady, C., & Lesh, R. (2015). A models and modelling approach to risk and uncertainty. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1), 184–202.
go back to reference Brady, C., Eames, C. L., & Lesh, R. (2015). Connecting real-world and in-school problem-solving experiences. Quadrante, 24(2), 5–38. Brady, C., Eames, C. L., & Lesh, R. (2015). Connecting real-world and in-school problem-solving experiences. Quadrante, 24(2), 5–38.
go back to reference Brady, C., Dominguez, A., Glancy, A., Jung, H., McLean, J. & Middleton, J. (in press). Models and modelling working group. Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. Brady, C., Dominguez, A., Glancy, A., Jung, H., McLean, J. & Middleton, J. (in press). Models and modelling working group. Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
go back to reference Brady, C., Eames, C. L., & Lesh, R. (2018). The student experience of model development activities: Going beyond correctness to meet the needs of a client. In W. Blum & S. Schukajlow (Eds.), Evaluierte Lernumgebungen zum Modellieren (pp. 73–92). Springer. Brady, C., Eames, C. L., & Lesh, R. (2018). The student experience of model development activities: Going beyond correctness to meet the needs of a client. In W. Blum & S. Schukajlow (Eds.), Evaluierte Lernumgebungen zum Modellieren (pp. 73–92). Springer.
go back to reference Chamberlin, M. T. (2005). Teachers’ discussions of students’ thinking: meeting the challenge of attending to students’ thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 141–170. CrossRef Chamberlin, M. T. (2005). Teachers’ discussions of students’ thinking: meeting the challenge of attending to students’ thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 141–170. CrossRef
go back to reference Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24. CrossRef Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24. CrossRef
go back to reference Diefes-Dux, H., Follman, D., Imbrie, P. K., Zawojewski, J., Capobianco, B., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2004a). Model eliciting activities: an in-class approach to improving interest and persistence of women in engineering. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City. Bd. 1994. Diefes-Dux, H., Follman, D., Imbrie, P. K., Zawojewski, J., Capobianco, B., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2004a). Model eliciting activities: an in-class approach to improving interest and persistence of women in engineering. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City. Bd. 1994.
go back to reference Doerr, H. M., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modelling perspective on teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (p. 125–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. MATH Doerr, H. M., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modelling perspective on teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (p. 125–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. MATH
go back to reference English, L. D., Jones, G., Bussi, M., Tirosh, D., Lesh, R., & Sriraman, B. (2008). Moving forward in international mathematics education research. MATH English, L. D., Jones, G., Bussi, M., Tirosh, D., Lesh, R., & Sriraman, B. (2008). Moving forward in international mathematics education research. MATH
go back to reference Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American educational research journal, 38(3), 653–689. CrossRef Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American educational research journal, 38(3), 653–689. CrossRef
go back to reference Guzey, S., Moore, T., & Morse, G. (2016). Student interest in engineering design-based science. School Science and Mathematics, 116(8), 411–419 Guzey, S., Moore, T., & Morse, G. (2016). Student interest in engineering design-based science. School Science and Mathematics, 116(8), 411–419
go back to reference Hjalmarson, M. A., & Lesh, R. (2008). Design research: engineering, systems, products, and processes for innovation. Handbook of international research in mathematics education, Bd. 2. Hjalmarson, M. A., & Lesh, R. (2008). Design research: engineering, systems, products, and processes for innovation. Handbook of international research in mathematics education, Bd. 2.
go back to reference Jung, H. (2015). Strategies to support students’ model development. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 21(1), 42–48. CrossRef Jung, H. (2015). Strategies to support students’ model development. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 21(1), 42–48. CrossRef
go back to reference Jung, H., & Brady, C. (2015). Roles of a teacher and researcher during in situ professional development around the implementation of mathematical modelling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 1–19. Jung, H., & Brady, C. (2015). Roles of a teacher and researcher during in situ professional development around the implementation of mathematical modelling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 1–19.
go back to reference Katims, N., & Lesh, R. (1994). PACKETS: a guidebook for inservice mathematics teacher development. Lexington: DC Heath. Katims, N., & Lesh, R. (1994). PACKETS: a guidebook for inservice mathematics teacher development. Lexington: DC Heath.
go back to reference Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. MATH Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. MATH
go back to reference Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R., & Baec, J. Y. (2008). Handbook of innovative design research in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R., & Baec, J. Y. (2008). Handbook of innovative design research in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
go back to reference Kuntze, S. (2011). In-service and prospective teachers’ views about modelling tasks in the mathematics classroom—Results of a quantitative empirical study. In Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 279–288). Dordrecht: Springer. Kuntze, S. (2011). In-service and prospective teachers’ views about modelling tasks in the mathematics classroom—Results of a quantitative empirical study. In Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 279–288). Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference Kuntze, S., Silelr, H.-S., & Vogl, C. (2013). Teachers’ self-perceptions of their pedagogical content knowledge related to modelling – an empirical study with Austrian teachers. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: connecting to research and practice (p. 317–326). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef Kuntze, S., Silelr, H.-S., & Vogl, C. (2013). Teachers’ self-perceptions of their pedagogical content knowledge related to modelling – an empirical study with Austrian teachers. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: connecting to research and practice (p. 317–326). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef
go back to reference Lesh, R. (2003). Models & modeling in mathematics education. Monograph for International Journal for Mathematical Thinking & Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lesh, R. (2003). Models & modeling in mathematics education. Monograph for International Journal for Mathematical Thinking & Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). In what ways does a models and modelling perspective move beyond constructivism? In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (p. 519–556). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. CrossRef Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). In what ways does a models and modelling perspective move beyond constructivism? In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (p. 519–556). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. CrossRef
go back to reference Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modelling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 157–189. CrossRef Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modelling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 157–189. CrossRef
go back to reference Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (p. 197–230). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. MATH Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (p. 197–230). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. MATH
go back to reference Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and modelling perspectives on the development of students and teachers. Mathematical thinking and learning, 5(2–3), 109–129. CrossRef Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and modelling perspectives on the development of students and teachers. Mathematical thinking and learning, 5(2–3), 109–129. CrossRef
go back to reference Lesh, R., & Sriraman, B. (2005). Mathematics education as a design science. ZDM, 37(6), 490–505. Lesh, R., & Sriraman, B. (2005). Mathematics education as a design science. ZDM, 37(6), 490–505.
go back to reference Lesh, R., Amit, M., & Schorr, R. (1997). Using “real-life” problems to prompt students to construct conceptual models for statistical reasoning. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 65–83). Amsterdam: IOS Press. Lesh, R., Amit, M., & Schorr, R. (1997). Using “real-life” problems to prompt students to construct conceptual models for statistical reasoning. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 65–83). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
go back to reference Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (p. 35–58). Mahwah: Erlbaum. CrossRef Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (p. 35–58). Mahwah: Erlbaum. CrossRef
go back to reference Lesh, R., Carmona, L., & Moore, T. (2009). Six sigma learning gains and long-term retention of understanding and attitudes related to models and modelling. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education: An International Journal, 9(1), 19–54. Lesh, R., Carmona, L., & Moore, T. (2009). Six sigma learning gains and long-term retention of understanding and attitudes related to models and modelling. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education: An International Journal, 9(1), 19–54.
go back to reference Lesh, R., Haines, Galbraith, & Hurford (2010). International conference on the teaching of mathematical modelling and applications. In R. Lesh (Eds.), Modelling students’ mathematical modelling competencies. New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef Lesh, R., Haines, Galbraith, & Hurford (2010). International conference on the teaching of mathematical modelling and applications. In R. Lesh (Eds.), Modelling students’ mathematical modelling competencies. New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef
go back to reference Moore, T. J. (2008). Model-eliciting activities: a case-based approach for getting students interested in materials science and engineering. Journal of Materials Education, 30(5–6), 295–310. Moore, T. J. (2008). Model-eliciting activities: a case-based approach for getting students interested in materials science and engineering. Journal of Materials Education, 30(5–6), 295–310.
go back to reference Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2013). Modelling in engineering: the role of representational fluency in students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 141–178. CrossRef Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2013). Modelling in engineering: the role of representational fluency in students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 141–178. CrossRef
go back to reference Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational researcher, 29(1), 4–15. CrossRef Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational researcher, 29(1), 4–15. CrossRef
go back to reference Schorr, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modelling approach for providing teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (p. 141–158). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Schorr, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modelling approach for providing teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (p. 141–158). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Schorr, R. Y., & Koellner-Clark, K. (2003). Using modelling approach to analyze the ways in which teachers consider new ways to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 191–210. CrossRef Schorr, R. Y., & Koellner-Clark, K. (2003). Using modelling approach to analyze the ways in which teachers consider new ways to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 191–210. CrossRef
go back to reference Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2. edn.). Alexandra: ASCD. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2. edn.). Alexandra: ASCD.
go back to reference Yildirim, T. P., Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2010). Model-eliciting activities: assessing engineering student problem solving and skill integration processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 831–845. Yildirim, T. P., Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2010). Model-eliciting activities: assessing engineering student problem solving and skill integration processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 831–845.
Metadata
Title
Designing Powerful Environments to Examine and Support Teacher Competencies for Models and Modelling
Authors
Dr. Cheryl Eames
Dr Corey Brady
Dr. Hyunyi Jung
Aran Glancy
Dr. Richard Lesh
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22616-9_11

Premium Partner