Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
Communicated by V. Loia.
A short version of the paper appeared in the proceedings of GECCO 2013 (as poster).
Detecting structural breaks is an essential task for the statistical analysis of time series, for example, for fitting parametric models to it. In short, structural breaks are points in time at which the behaviour of the time series substantially changes. Typically, no solid background knowledge of the time series under consideration is available. Therefore, a black-box optimization approach is our method of choice for detecting structural breaks. We describe a genetic algorithm framework which easily adapts to a large number of statistical settings. To evaluate the usefulness of different crossover and mutation operations for this problem, we conduct extensive experiments to determine good choices for the parameters and operators of the genetic algorithm. One surprising observation is that use of uniform and one-point crossover together gave significantly better results than using either crossover operator alone. Moreover, we present a specific fitness function which exploits the sparse structure of the break points and which can be evaluated particularly efficiently. The experiments on artificial and real-world time series show that the resulting algorithm detects break points with high precision and is computationally very efficient. A reference implementation with the data used in this paper is available as an applet at the following address: http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~pafi/TSX/. It has also been implemented as package SBRect for the statistics language R.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Bäck T, Fogel DB, Michalewicz Z (eds) (1997) Handbook of Evolutionary Computation, 1st edn. IOP Publishing Ltd., Bristol MATH
de Berg M, van Krefeld M, Overmars M, Schwarzkopf O (2000) Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer
De Grauwe P, Ji Y (2012) Mispricing of sovereign risk and multiple equilibria in the eurozone. Centre for European Policy Working Paper 361
Deb K, Mohan M, Mishra S (2005) Evaluating the domination based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of pareto-optimal solutions. Evol Comput J 13(4):501–525 CrossRef
Fischer P, Hilbert A (2014) Fast detection of structural breaks. In: Proceedings of 21th International Conference on Computational Statistics 2014, pp 9–16
Hillebrand E, Medeiros MC (2014) Nonlinearity, breaks, and long-range dependence in time-series models. J Bus Econ Stat (just-accepted):00–00
Jansen T, Zarges C (2011) Analysis of evolutionary algorithms: From computational complexity analysis to algorithm engineering. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGEVO Workshop on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (FOGA 2011), ACM Press, pp 1–14
Jong K, Marchiori E, van der Vaart A, Ylstra B, Weiss M, Meijer G (2003) Chromosomal breakpoint detection in human cancer. In: Proceedings Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshop 2003: EvoBIO, EvoCOP, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoROB, and EvoSTIM, Essex, UK, April 14-16, 2003, pp 54–65. doi: 10.1007/3-540-36605-9_6
Kanpur_Genetic_Algorithms_Laboratory (2005-2015) Kangal. Website, http://www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/codes.shtml
Knuth D (1969) The Art of Computer Programming, vol II. Addison-Wesley
Morales L, Gassie E (2011) Structural breaks and financial volatility: Lessons from bric countries. Leibniz-Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa (IAMO), Halle (Saale), no. 13 in IAMO Forum 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50791
Rapach DE, Wohar ME (eds) (2008) Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, vol 3, Forecasting in the Presence of Structural Breaks and Model Uncertainty. Emerald
- Detecting structural breaks in time series via genetic algorithms
- Publication date
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA