Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Measurement Techniques 7/2021

01-12-2021 | ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS

Determination of the Hydrophone Phase-Frequency Response by its Amplitude-Frequency Response

Authors: A. E. Isaev, B. I. Khatamtaev

Published in: Measurement Techniques | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

Investigating the reliability of the hydrophone model proposed in VNIIFTRI, consisting of an advance line and a minimum-phase part, including sound diffraction effect and resonance properties of the active element, is one of the COOMET 786/RU/19 pilot comparisons' responsibilities. This model allows for inverse operation, and the employment of the Hilbert transform to generate a phase-frequency response from the amplitude-frequency response. This study presents experimental results from the facilities of the State Primary Standard of units of acoustic pressure and vibrational velocity in an aqueous medium GET 55-2017. Obtaining the phase-frequency response for an acoustic center of the receiver is not essential for numerous practical applications. Therefore it is sufficient to determine the shape of the phase-frequency response using far less laborious methods.
Literature
1.
go back to reference G. Hayman and S. Robinson, "Phase calibration of hydrophones by the free-field reciprocity method," Proc. 11th Europ. Conf. on Underwater Acoustics, Edinburgh (2012), pp. 1437–1444. G. Hayman and S. Robinson, "Phase calibration of hydrophones by the free-field reciprocity method," Proc. 11th Europ. Conf. on Underwater Acoustics, Edinburgh (2012), pp. 1437–1444.
2.
go back to reference G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. P. Robinson, “A comparison of two methods for phase response calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 10–400 kHz,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013). CrossRefADS G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. P. Robinson, “A comparison of two methods for phase response calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 10–400 kHz,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013). CrossRefADS
3.
go back to reference A. E. Isaev, A. N. Matveev, A. M. Polikarpov, and N. G Shcherblyuk, “Measurement of the phase-frequency response of the hydrophone sensitivity by the field by the reciprocity method,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 56–58 (2013). A. E. Isaev, A. N. Matveev, A. M. Polikarpov, and N. G Shcherblyuk, “Measurement of the phase-frequency response of the hydrophone sensitivity by the field by the reciprocity method,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 56–58 (2013).
4.
go back to reference A. E. Kolesnikov (ed.), Handbook of Hydroacoustics, Sudostroenie, Leningrad (1988), 2nd ed. A. E. Kolesnikov (ed.), Handbook of Hydroacoustics, Sudostroenie, Leningrad (1988), 2nd ed.
5.
go back to reference L. F. Lependin, Acoustics: Manual for Graduate Students, Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1978). L. F. Lependin, Acoustics: Manual for Graduate Students, Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1978).
6.
go back to reference L. A. Bessonov, Theoretical Foundations of Electrical Engineering. Electrical Circuits: Textbook, Yurayt, Moscow (2014), 12th ed. L. A. Bessonov, Theoretical Foundations of Electrical Engineering. Electrical Circuits: Textbook, Yurayt, Moscow (2014), 12th ed.
7.
go back to reference A. E. Isaev and A. N. Matveev, “Two approaches to the calibration of a hydrophone by the field with continuous radiation in a not drowned-out basin,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 12, 47–51 (2008) A. E. Isaev and A. N. Matveev, “Two approaches to the calibration of a hydrophone by the field with continuous radiation in a not drowned-out basin,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 12, 47–51 (2008)
8.
go back to reference G. R. Harris, “Time-delay spectrometry measurement of magnitude and phase of hydrophone response,” IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 58, No. 11, 2325–2333 (2011). CrossRef G. R. Harris, “Time-delay spectrometry measurement of magnitude and phase of hydrophone response,” IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 58, No. 11, 2325–2333 (2011). CrossRef
9.
go back to reference M. P. Cooling and V.F. Humphrey, “A Nonlinear Propagation Model-Based Phase Calibration Technique for Membrane Hydrophones,” IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 55, 84–93 (2008). CrossRef M. P. Cooling and V.F. Humphrey, “A Nonlinear Propagation Model-Based Phase Calibration Technique for Membrane Hydrophones,” IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 55, 84–93 (2008). CrossRef
10.
go back to reference S. Umchid, R. Gopinath, K. Srinivasan, et al., “Development of Calibration Techniques for Ultrasonic Hydrophone Probes in the Frequency Range from 1 to 100 MHz,” Ultrasonics, 49, 306–311 (2009). CrossRef S. Umchid, R. Gopinath, K. Srinivasan, et al., “Development of Calibration Techniques for Ultrasonic Hydrophone Probes in the Frequency Range from 1 to 100 MHz,” Ultrasonics, 49, 306–311 (2009). CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Determination of the Hydrophone Phase-Frequency Response by its Amplitude-Frequency Response
Authors
A. E. Isaev
B. I. Khatamtaev
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Measurement Techniques / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0543-1972
Electronic ISSN: 1573-8906
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-021-01974-6