Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2/2020

09-10-2019 | Original Article

Developing a persuasive writing model for secondary school

Authors: Farous Izwan Bin Abdul Aziz, Seriaznita Bte Mat Said

Published in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice | Issue 2/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Persuasive writing is one of the main writing genres secondary students are required to master. However, while the students can naturally argue verbally and in an informal setting, they lack the skill to compose a persuasive argument for academic purposes. The main problem is that students can barely construct an argument while composing a persuasive essay. The objectives of this study are to verify the effectiveness of the secondary students’ arguments according to Toulmin’s Model. A sample size of 150 students from three different secondary schools in the Klang area was chosen for this study. The students were instructed to write an essay according to a set of essay prompts provided by the researcher. The Toulmin’s Model was employed as the main tool to analyze the essays to tag and label the persuasive elements that were used by the students while writing the essays. The findings reveal that the students are mostly able to apply the basic persuasive elements (grounds, claims and warrant) but do not take full advantage of the optional elements (qualifier, rebuttal and backing). It is concluded that new strategies and a new model need to be proposed to help train the students to improve their persuasive writing skills.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Allagui, B. (2019). Investigating the quality of argument structure in first-year university writing. In S. Hidri & S. Hidri (Eds.), English language teaching research in the middle East and North Africa (pp. 173–196). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Allagui, B. (2019). Investigating the quality of argument structure in first-year university writing. In S. Hidri & S. Hidri (Eds.), English language teaching research in the middle East and North Africa (pp. 173–196). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Azar, M. (1999). Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of rhetorical structure theory. Argumentation,13(117), 97–114.CrossRef Azar, M. (1999). Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of rhetorical structure theory. Argumentation,13(117), 97–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Aziz, F. I. A., & Ahmad, U. K. (2017). Persuasive writing: How students argue. Sains Humanika, 9(4–2), 19–32. Aziz, F. I. A., & Ahmad, U. K. (2017). Persuasive writing: How students argue. Sains Humanika, 9(4–2), 19–32.
go back to reference Black, K. (1989). Audience analysis and persuasive writing at the college level. Research in the Teaching of English,23(3), 231–253. Black, K. (1989). Audience analysis and persuasive writing at the college level. Research in the Teaching of English,23(3), 231–253.
go back to reference Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English,24(1), 67–87. Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English,24(1), 67–87.
go back to reference Díaz-Hormazabal, R. (2007). Argumentative writing strategies and perceptions of writing in academia by EFL college students. Literatura Y Lingüística,18, 253–282. Díaz-Hormazabal, R. (2007). Argumentative writing strategies and perceptions of writing in academia by EFL college students. Literatura Y Lingüística,18, 253–282.
go back to reference Durst, R., Laine, C., Schultz, L. M., & Vilter, W. (1990). Appealing texts the persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication,7(2), 232–255.CrossRef Durst, R., Laine, C., Schultz, L. M., & Vilter, W. (1990). Appealing texts the persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication,7(2), 232–255.CrossRef
go back to reference El-daly, H. M. (2011). Linguistic aspects of the narrative and persuasive written productions of Arabic and Spanish speakers: Focus on the role of explicit knowledge of grammar. Arab World English Journal,2(1), 77–122. El-daly, H. M. (2011). Linguistic aspects of the narrative and persuasive written productions of Arabic and Spanish speakers: Focus on the role of explicit knowledge of grammar. Arab World English Journal,2(1), 77–122.
go back to reference Ellis, L. M. (2015). A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the USA. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing argumentation in practice (pp. 201–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRef Ellis, L. M. (2015). A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the USA. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing argumentation in practice (pp. 201–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRef
go back to reference Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer. Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference Fei-Wen, C. (2010). A socio-cognitive modeling approach to teaching english argumentation. Asian ESP Journal,6(1), 120–146. Fei-Wen, C. (2010). A socio-cognitive modeling approach to teaching english argumentation. Asian ESP Journal,6(1), 120–146.
go back to reference Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3), 445–476.CrossRef Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3), 445–476.CrossRef
go back to reference Hitchcock, D. (2017). Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. In D. Hitchcock (Ed.), On reasoning and argument (pp. 371–387). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Hitchcock, D. (2017). Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. In D. Hitchcock (Ed.), On reasoning and argument (pp. 371–387). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, T. S., Thompson, L., Smagorinsky, P., & Fry, P. G. (2003). To teach the five-paragraph theme learning. Research in the Teaching of English,38(2), 136–176. Johnson, T. S., Thompson, L., Smagorinsky, P., & Fry, P. G. (2003). To teach the five-paragraph theme learning. Research in the Teaching of English,38(2), 136–176.
go back to reference Juzwik, M. M., VanDerHeide, J., Dunn, M. B., & Goff, B. (2018). Assigning and framing argument writing to foreground significance: Comparing three approaches in secondary English. English in Education,52(3), 186–199.CrossRef Juzwik, M. M., VanDerHeide, J., Dunn, M. B., & Goff, B. (2018). Assigning and framing argument writing to foreground significance: Comparing three approaches in secondary English. English in Education,52(3), 186–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaewpet, C. (2018). Quality of argumentation models. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,8(9), 1105–1113.CrossRef Kaewpet, C. (2018). Quality of argumentation models. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,8(9), 1105–1113.CrossRef
go back to reference Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s Model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing,6(1), 81–91. Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s Model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing,6(1), 81–91.
go back to reference Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 97–118. Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 97–118.
go back to reference Lee, G. I. (2017). Stance and stance-support strategies in English argumentative writing by malaysian undergraduate writers. Seri Kembangan: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Lee, G. I. (2017). Stance and stance-support strategies in English argumentative writing by malaysian undergraduate writers. Seri Kembangan: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
go back to reference Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s Model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written,19, 109–174.CrossRef Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s Model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written,19, 109–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Nimehchisalem, V. (2018). Pyramid of argumentation: Towards an integrated model for teaching and assessing esl writing. Language & Communication,5(2), 185–200. Nimehchisalem, V. (2018). Pyramid of argumentation: Towards an integrated model for teaching and assessing esl writing. Language & Communication,5(2), 185–200.
go back to reference Nimehchisalem, V., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Determining the evaluative criteria of an argumentative writing scale. English Language Teaching,4(1), 58–70.CrossRef Nimehchisalem, V., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Determining the evaluative criteria of an argumentative writing scale. English Language Teaching,4(1), 58–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System,38(3), 444–456.CrossRef Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System,38(3), 444–456.CrossRef
go back to reference Rashid, S., & Chan, S. H. (2017). Exploring the interplay of mode of discourse and proficiency level in ESL writing performance: Implications for testing (pp. 105–122). XXXVII: The English Teacher. Rashid, S., & Chan, S. H. (2017). Exploring the interplay of mode of discourse and proficiency level in ESL writing performance: Implications for testing (pp. 105–122). XXXVII: The English Teacher.
go back to reference Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education,28(2–3), 235–260.CrossRef Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education,28(2–3), 235–260.CrossRef
go back to reference Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of Toulmin’s Model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora,3(2), 143–153. Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of Toulmin’s Model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora,3(2), 143–153.
go back to reference Tan, K. E. (2006). Writing English essays within dominant discourses in Malaysian schools. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education,21(November 2005), 23–45. Tan, K. E. (2006). Writing English essays within dominant discourses in Malaysian schools. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education,21(November 2005), 23–45.
go back to reference Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (1998). Undergraduate arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 287–306.CrossRef Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (1998). Undergraduate arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 287–306.CrossRef
go back to reference Vasu, K., Nimehchisalem, V., Fung, Y. M., & Rashid, S. M. (2018). The usefulness and effectiveness of argumentative writing self-assessment checklist in undergraduate writing classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,8(4), 202–219.CrossRef Vasu, K., Nimehchisalem, V., Fung, Y. M., & Rashid, S. M. (2018). The usefulness and effectiveness of argumentative writing self-assessment checklist in undergraduate writing classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,8(4), 202–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Yunus, M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of mind mapping strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) writing. Creative Education,7, 619–626.CrossRef Yunus, M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of mind mapping strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) writing. Creative Education,7, 619–626.CrossRef
go back to reference Zainuddin, S. Z., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2016). Effects of training in the use of Toulmin’s Model on ESL students’ argumentative writing and critical thinking ability. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics (MJLL),5(2), 114–133.CrossRef Zainuddin, S. Z., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2016). Effects of training in the use of Toulmin’s Model on ESL students’ argumentative writing and critical thinking ability. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics (MJLL),5(2), 114–133.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Developing a persuasive writing model for secondary school
Authors
Farous Izwan Bin Abdul Aziz
Seriaznita Bte Mat Said
Publication date
09-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Educational Research for Policy and Practice / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1570-2081
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1723
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09253-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2/2020 Go to the issue