Skip to main content
Register
Springer Professional
SEARCH
Menu 1 2 3 4
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

Published in:
NDT-Agile: An Agile, CMMI-Compatible Framework for Web Engineering Read chapter Read first chapter

2017 | Supplement | Chapter

DevSecOps: A Multivocal Literature Review

Authors : Håvard Myrbakken, Ricardo Colomo-Palacios

Published in: Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

Involving security in DevOps has been a challenge because traditional security methods have been unable to keep up with DevOps’ agility and speed. DevSecOps is the movement that works on developing and integrating modernized security methods that can keep up with DevOps. This study is meant to give an overview of what DevSecOps is, what implementing DevSecOps means, the benefits gained from DevSecOps and the challenges an organization faces when doing so. To that end, we conducted a multivocal literature review, where we reviewed a selection of grey literature. We found that implementing security that can keep up with DevOps is a challenge, but it can gain great benefits if done correctly.
previous chapter NDT-Agile: An Agile, CMMI-Compatible Framework for Web Engineering
next chapter Towards the Development of a Sequential Framework for Agile Adoption
Literature
1.
Mell, P.M., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing. Special Publications (NIST SP)-800-145, 7 P. NIST Definitions on Cloud Computing, September 2011
2.
Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 176–189 (2017) CrossRef
3.
Svensson, R.B., Claps, G.G., Aurum, A.: On the journey to continuous deployment: technical and social challenges along the way. Inf. Softw. Technol. 57, 21–31 (2015) CrossRef
4.
Humble, J., Joanne, M.: Why enterprises must adopt devops to enable continuous delivery. J. Inf. Technol. Manage. 24, 7 (2011)
5.
Hernantes, J., Ebert, C., Gallardo, G., Serrano, N.: Devops. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 94–100 (2016) CrossRef
6.
Yankel, J., Cois, C.A., Connell, A.: Modern devops: optimizing software development through effective system interactions. In: 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), pp. 1–7, October 2014
7.
Callanan, M., Spillane, A.: Devops: making it easy to do the right thing. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 53–59 (2016) CrossRef
8.
9.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise: Application security and devops. Technical report, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (2016)
10.
MacDonald, N., Head, I.: DevSecOps: How to Seamlessly Integrate Security Into DevOps. Technical report, Gartner (2016)
11.
Mohan, V., Othmane, L.B.: Secdevops: is it a marketing buzzword? - mapping research on security in devops. In: 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES), pp. 542–547, August 2016
12.
Ashfaque, A., Rahman, U., Williams, L.: Software security in devops: synthesizing practitioners’ perceptions and practices. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Continuous Software Evolution and Delivery, CSED 2016, pp. 70–76. ACM, New York (2016)
13.
Oivo, M., Karvonen, T., Behutiye, W., Kuvaja, P.: Systematic literature review on the impacts of agile release engineering practices. Inf. Softw. Technol. 86, 87–100 (2017) CrossRef
14.
Lwakatare, L.E., Teppola, S., Suomalainen, T., Eskeli, J., Karvonen, T., Kuvaja, P., Verner, J.M., Rodríguez, P., Haghighatkhah, A., Oivo, M.: Continuous deployment of software intensive products and services: a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 263–291 (2017) CrossRef
15.
Ståhl, D., Bosch, J.: Modeling continuous integration practice differences in industry software development. J. Syst. Softw. 87, 48–59 (2014) CrossRef
16.
Ogawa, R.T., Malen, B.: Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: applying the exploratory case study method. Rev. Educ. Res. 61(3), 265–286 (1991) CrossRef
17.
Garousi, V., Mäntylä, M.V.: When and what to automate in software testing? a multi-vocal literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 76, 92–117 (2016) CrossRef
18.
Junior, H.J., de França, B.B.N., Travassos, G.H.: Characterizing devops by hearing multiple voices. In: Proceedings of the 30th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, SBES 2016, pp. 53–62. ACM, New York (2016)
19.
Felderer, M., Garousi, V., Hacaloğlu, T.: Software test maturity assessment and test process improvement: a multivocal literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 85, 16–42 (2017) CrossRef
20.
Felderer, M., Garousi, V., Mäntylä, M.V.: The need for multivocal literature reviews in software engineering: complementing systematic literature reviews with grey literature. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2016, pp. 26:1–26:6. ACM, New York (2016)
21.
Shackleford, D.: A devsecops playbook. SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room. A DevSecOps Playbook, March 2016
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Shackleford, D.: The devsecops approach to securing your code and your cloud. SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room A DevSecOps Playbook, February 2017
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
Goldschmidt, M., McKinnon, M.: Devsecops - agility with security. Technical report, Sense of Security (2016)
44.
45.
Clarke, P.M., O’Connor, R.V., Elger, P.: Continuous software engineering–a microservices architecture perspective. J. Softw. Evol. Proc. 2017, e1866 (2017)
Metadata
Title
DevSecOps: A Multivocal Literature Review
Authors
Håvard Myrbakken
Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
Copyright Year
2017
Book
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67382-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-67383-7

Copyright Year: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_2

Premium Partner

Neuer Inhalt
    Image Credits