Top

Journal of Business Ethics

Published in:

18-07-2018 | Original Paper

Does Ethical Judgment Determine the Decision to Become a Cyborg?

Influence of Ethical Judgment on the Cyborg Market

Authors: Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo, Mario Arias-Oliva, Kiyoshi Murata, Mar Souto-Romero

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 1/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Today, technological implants to increase innate human capabilities are already available on the market. Cyborgs, understood as healthy people who decide to integrate their bodies with insideable technology, are no longer science fiction, but fact. The cyborg market will be a huge new business with important consequences for both industry and society. More specifically, cyborg technologies are a unique product, with a potentially critical impact on the future of humanity. In light of the potential transformations involved in the creation of “superhuman” cyborgs, ethics must be a cornerstone of cyborg marketing decisions. Businesses need to take ethics into account, not only to ensure they behave ethically, as always, but also because ethics will be an important factor in buyers’ decisions in the emerging cyborg market. This is because the decision to become a cyborg is determined, among many other factors, by ethical judgment. Our research focuses on how the dimensions of the Composite Multidimensional Ethics Scale (Composite MES) influence an individual’s decision to become a cyborg. To test our hypotheses, we surveyed a total of 1563 higher-education students in seven different countries. The results of the survey show that ethical judgment will be a keystone in individual cyborgization. Specifically, ethical dimensions explained 48% of the intention to use cyborg technologies. The ethical analysis showed that not all MES dimensions have the same influence on the ethical judgment regarding this decision. Egoism was the most influential dimension, while contractualism was the least. These findings have important implications for both academia and business.

previous article Deepening Methods in Business Ethics

next article Entrepreneurship and Ethics in the Sharing Economy: A Critical Perspective

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adams, J. (2010). Motivational narratives and assessments of the body after cosmetic surgery. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310362984.CrossRef

Berger, F., Gevers, S., Siep, L., & Weltring, K. M. (2008). Ethical, legal and social aspects of brain-implants using nano-scale materials and techniques. NanoEthics, 2(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0044-9.CrossRef

Berger, J. L. (2011). Medical implant device with RFID tag and method of identification of device. Washington, DC: Patent, U. S., & Office, T. U.S. Patent No. 7,932,825. Retrieved April 10, 2017 from https://www.google.com/patents/US7932825.

Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Cruz, A. (2011). Discourses of technology consumption: Ambivalence, fear, and liminality. In R. Ahluwalia, T. L. Chartrand & R. K. Ratner (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (39, pp. 287–291). Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.

Caplan, A. L. (2017). Bueno, mejor o lo mejor? In Bostrom N. & Savulescu J. (Eds.), Mejoramiento humano (pp. 209–220). Zaragoza: Teell Editorial.

Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295e336). Manwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Christie, E., & Bloustien, G. (2010). I-cyborg: Disability, affect and public pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 31(4), 483–498.

Clark, A. J. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cortina, A., & Serra, M. A. (2015). Humanos o posthumanos.? Singularidad tecnológica y mejoramiento humano. Barcelona: Fragmenta editorial.

Duarte, B. N. (2014). Entangled agencies: New individual practices of human-technology hybridism through body hacking. NanoEthics, 8(3), 275–285.

Duarte, B. N., & Park, E. (2014). Body, technology and society: A dance of encounters. NanoEthics, 8(3), 259–261.

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: University of Akron Press.

Fleischman, G. M., Johnson, E. N., Walker, K. B., & Valentine, S. R. (2017). Ethics versus outcomes: Managerial responses to incentive-driven and goal-induced employee behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3695-z.CrossRef

Frame, J. D., Smith, S., & Kamel, D. (2016). A further case report from the United Kingdom of Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and a reason to avoid the subpectoral plane. Journal of Surgery, 4(5), 89–94.

Goel, L., Hart, D., Junglas, I., & Ives, B. (2016). Acceptable IS use: Conceptualization and measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.029.CrossRef

Greiner, S. (2014). Cyborg Bodies-self-reflections on sensory augmentations. NanoEthics, 8(3), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0207-9.CrossRef

Haddow, G., King, E., Kunkler, I., & McLaren, D. (2015). Cyborgs in the everyday: Masculinity and biosensing prostate cancer. Science as Culture, 24(4), 484–506.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better result and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1/2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.016.CrossRef

Heffernan, K. J., Vetere, F., & Chang, S. (2016, May). You put what, where? Hobbyist use of insertable devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. (pp. 1798–1809).

Herrera-Vega, E. (2015). Relevance of N. Luhmann’s theory of social systems to understand the essence of technology today. The case of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill: Para Alberto. Technology in Society, 40, 25–42.

Hill, A. V., & Sawaya Iii, W. J. (2004). Production planning for medical devices with an uncertain regulatory approval date. IIE Transactions, 36(4), 307–317.

Hobbes, T. (2006). Leviathan. London: A&C Black.

Hospital & Healthcare Management. (2018). Medtronic Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Financial Results. Retrived July 17, 2018 from http://www.hhmglobal.com/knowledge-bank/industry-reports/medtronic-reports-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2016-financial-results.

Howe, P. D., & Silva, C. F. (2017). The cyborgification of paralympic sport. Movement & Sport Sciences-Science & Motricité, 97(3), 17–25.

Hyman, M. R. (1996). A critique and revision of the multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 1(1), 1–35.

Ida, R. (2017). Deberíamos mejorar la naturaleza humana? Un interrogante planteado desde una perspectiva asiática. In N. Bostrom & J. Savulescu (Eds.), Mejoramiento humano (pp. 63–74). Zaragoza: TEELL Editorial.

Jarrett, C. (2013). The age of the superhuman. Psychologist, 26(10), 720–723.

Jones, K., & Leonard, L. N. (2016). Applying the multidimensional ethics scale in C2C E-Commerce. Issues in Information Systems, 17(1), 26–36.

Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

Jung, I. (2009). Ethical judgments and behaviors: Applying a multidimensional ethics scale to measuring ICT ethics of college students. Computers & Education, 53(3), 940–949.

Kadić-Maglajlić, S., Arslanagić-Kalajdžić, M., Micevski, M., Michaelidou, N., & Nemkova, E. (2017b). Controversial advert perceptions in SNS advertising: The role of ethical judgement and religious commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2755-5.CrossRef

Kadić-Maglajlić, S., Micevski, M., Lee, N., Boso, N., & Vida, I. (2017a). Three levels of ethical influences on selling behavior and performance: Synergies and tensions. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3588-1.CrossRef

Kara, A., Rojas-Méndez, J. I., & Turan, M. (2016). Ethical evaluations of business students in an emerging market: Effects of ethical sensitivity, cultural values, personality, and religiosity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(4), 297–325.

Kirchhoffer, D. G. (2017). Human dignity and human enhancement: A multidimensional approach. Bioethics, 31(5), 375–383.

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin Group.

Lai, A. L. (2012). Cyborg as commodity: Exploring conception of self-identity, body and citizenship within the context of emerging transplant technologies. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 386–394.

LaTour, M. S., & Henthorne, T. L. (1994). Ethical judgments of sexual appeals in print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 81–90.

Lawton, G. (2004). Extreme surgery. New Scientist, 184(2471), 54–56.

Leonard, L. N., & Jones, K. (2017). Ethical awareness of seller’s behavior in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce: Applying the multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Internet Commerce, 16(2), 202–218.

Leonard, L. N., Riemenschneider, C. K., & Manly, T. S. (2017). Ethical behavioral intention in an academic setting: Models and predictors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(2), 141–166.

Loo, R. (2004). Support for Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) eight-item multidimensional ethics scale. The Social Science Journal, 41(2), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2004.01.020.CrossRef

Manly, T. S., Leonard, L. N., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2015). Academic integrity in the information age: Virtues of respect and responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 57.

Medeiros, J. (2015). How Gadi Amit is putting the future of wearables under your skin, Wired, October 2015. Retrieved February 26, 2017 from http://www.wired.co.uk/article/redesigning-your-body.

MIT Technology Review. (2013). 10 Breakthrough technologies 2013, MIT Technology Review May–June. Retrieved November 21, 2016 from http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/513681/memory-implants/.

Mudrack, P. E., & Mason, E. S. (2013). Ethical judgments: What do we know, where do we go? Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1426-z.CrossRef

Nguyen, N. T., Basuray, M. T., Smith, W. P., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. (2008). Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) multidimensional ethics scale: Implications in teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 417–430.

Nguyen, N. T., & Biderman, M. D. (2008). Studying ethical judgments and behavioral intentions using structural equations: Evidence from the multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 627–640.

Ochsner, B., Spöhrer, M., & Stock, R. (2015). Human, non-human, and beyond: Cochlear implants in socio-technological environments. NanoEthics, 9(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-015-0242-1.CrossRef

Olarte-Pascual, C., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., & Reinares-Lara, E. (2015). Implants to increase innate capacities: Integrated vs. apocalyptic attitudes. Is there a new market? Universia Business Review, 48, 86–117.

Oudshoorn, N. (2015). Sustaining cyborgs: Sensing and tuning agencies of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Social studies of science, 45(1), 56–76.

Park, E. (2014). Ethical issues in cyborg technology: Diversity and inclusion. NanoEthics, 8(3), 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0206-x.CrossRef

Parkhurst, A. (2012). Becoming cyborgian: Procrastinating the singularity. The New Bioethics, 18(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1179/2050287713Z.0000000006.CrossRef

Pelegrín-Borondo, J., Reinares-Lara, E., & Olarte-Pascual, C. (2017). Assessing the acceptance of technological implants (the cyborg): Evidences and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.063.CrossRef

Pelegrín-Borondo, J., Reinares-Lara, E., Olarte-Pascual, C., & Sierra-García, M. (2016). Assessing the moderating effect of the end user in consumer behavior: The acceptance of technological implants to increase innate human capacities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–13. doi:0.3389/fpsyg.2016.00132.

Ram, J., Corkindale, D., & Wu, M.-L. (2014). ERP adoption and value creation: Examining the contributions of antecedents. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.04.001.CrossRef

Rawls, J. (1971/1999). A theory of justice (revised edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1988). Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(11), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383050.CrossRef

Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383391.CrossRef

Reinares-Lara, E., Olarte-Pascual, C., & Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2018). Do you want to be a cyborg? The moderating effect of ethics on neural implant acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.032.CrossRef

Reinares-Lara, E., Olarte-Pascual, C., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., & Pino, G. (2016). Nanoimplants that enhance human capabilities: A cognitive-affective approach to assess individuals’ acceptance of this controversial technology. Psychology & Marketing, 33(9), 704–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20911.CrossRef

Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. Steenkamp & M. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 193–222). Hershey: Raisinghan Information Science Reference.

Rosahl, S. K. (2004). Vanishing senses-restoration of sensory functions by electronic implants. Poiesis Prax, 2, 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-003-0057-y.CrossRef

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007.CrossRef

Schermer, M. (2009). The mind and the machine. On the conceptual and moral implications of brain-machine interaction. NanoEthics, 3(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0076-9.CrossRef

Secchi, D., & Bui, H. T. (2018). Group effects on individual attitudes toward social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3106-x.CrossRef

Selinger, E., & Engström, T. (2008). A moratorium on cyborgs: Computation, cognition, and commerce. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9104-4.CrossRef

Service, R. F. (2017). Bioelectronics herald the rise of the cyborg. Science, 358(6368), 1233–1234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.358.6368.1233.CrossRef

Sevin, A., Sevin, K., Senen, D., Deren, O., Adanali, G., & Erdogan, B. (2006). Augmentation mammaplasty: Retrospective analysis of 210 cases. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 30(6), 651–654.

Shawver, T. J., & Sennetti, J. T. (2009). Measuring ethical sensitivity and evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9973-z.CrossRef

Siclovan, H. R., & Jomah, J. A. (2008). Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: A two-year review of experience. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 32(3), 426–431.

Srivastava, S. K., & Yadav, V. G. (2017). Bionic manufacturing: Towards cyborg cells and sentient microbots. Trends in Biotechnology, 36(5), 483–487.

Titcomb, J. (2016). Researchers create ‘smart tattoos’ that can control your phone. The Telegraph. Technology, (15, 08/2016. Retrieved November 22, 2016 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/15/researchers-create-smart-tattoos-that-are-able-to-control-your-p/.

Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.CrossRef

Warwick, K. (2003). Cyborg morals, cyborg values, cyborg ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETIN.0000006870.65865.cf.CrossRef

Warwick, K. (2014). The cyborg revolution. NanoEthics, 8(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0212-z.CrossRef

Yang, S. C. (2012). Ethical academic judgments and behaviors: Applying a multidimensional ethics scale to measure the ethical academic behavior of graduate students. Ethics & Behavior, 22(4), 281–296.

Zareva, T. (2017). A Bionic Lens Undergoing Clinical Trials Could Give You Superhuman Abilities In Two Years, Gig Think, 31 August 2017.

Title: Does Ethical Judgment Determine the Decision to Become a Cyborg?
Influence of Ethical Judgment on the Cyborg Market
Authors: Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo
Mario Arias-Oliva
Kiyoshi Murata
Mar Souto-Romero
Publication date: 18-07-2018
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3970-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

When Government Contractors May or May Not Spend Money On Political Speech

Narrative Worlds of Frugal Consumers: Unmasking Romanticized Spirituality to Reveal Responsibilization and De-politicization

Deepening Methods in Business Ethics

The Effect of Fairness, Responsible Leadership and Worthy Work on Multiple Dimensions of Meaningful Work

Review of Humans and Machines at Work: Monitoring, Surveillance, and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism by Phoebe V. Moore, Martin Upchurch, and Xanthe Whittaker

Meta-Regulation in Practice: Beyond Normative Views of Morality and Rationality by F.C. Simon