Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Does Internationalisation Matter to Corporate Social Performance? An Empirical Study on Chinese Listed Construction Companies

Authors : Meng Ye, Weisheng Lu, Hui Guo, Roger Flanagan

Published in: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Opportunities in the international markets and Chinese government’s “one belt, one road” initiative drive Chinese construction companies to expand their business across nations’ borders. Operating in a more diversified environment indicates that they are faced with intensified pressures of stakeholders to conduct corporate social responsibility. However, whether internationalisation really matters to corporate social performance (CSP) or not is still a question to explore, especially in the context formed by the Chinese construction companies. The aim of the study is to explore the impacts of internationalisation on CSP and its four dimensions in the construction area. Using a panel data set of 85 Chinese listed construction companies with 499 firm-year observations over the period from 2010 to 2017, the degree of internationalisation is found to have no significant impacts on overall CSP, but has significant positive impacts on the environmental aspect of CSP. The relationship between the degree of internationalisation and the social aspect of CSP is tested to be negative. It is also indicated that a company with better financial performance and larger firm size is likely to perform a better CSP. The findings of the research contribute to the CSR area to further explore the influence of outside environment on the CSR implementation and evaluation from the perspective of internationalisation. With the promotion of “one belt, one road” initiatives, this topic helps understand and interpret the development and CSR strategies of the Chinese construction companies while internationalising.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Lu, W., et al. (2015). Corporate social responsibility disclosures in international construction business: Trends and prospects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2015, 04015053. Lu, W., et al. (2015). Corporate social responsibility disclosures in international construction business: Trends and prospects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2015, 04015053.
2.
go back to reference Myers, D. (2005). A review of construction companies’ attitudes to sustainability. Construction Management and Economics, 23(8), 781–785.CrossRef Myers, D. (2005). A review of construction companies’ attitudes to sustainability. Construction Management and Economics, 23(8), 781–785.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ye, M., et al. (2019). Corporate social responsibility “glocalisation”: Evidence from the international construction business. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Ye, M., et al. (2019). Corporate social responsibility “glocalisation”: Evidence from the international construction business. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
5.
go back to reference Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A. & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor, 1001: 48109-1234. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A. & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor, 1001: 48109-1234.
6.
go back to reference Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values–a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407–424.CrossRef Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values–a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407–424.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lu, W., et al. (2014). A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: A critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195–206.CrossRef Lu, W., et al. (2014). A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: A critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195–206.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Font, X., et al. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: The disclosure–performance gap. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1544–1553.CrossRef Font, X., et al. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: The disclosure–performance gap. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1544–1553.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.
10.
go back to reference Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue, and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 447–482.CrossRef Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue, and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 447–482.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 329–342.CrossRef Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 329–342.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.CrossRef Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 53–72.CrossRef Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 53–72.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341–359.CrossRef McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341–359.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(5–6), 748–789.CrossRef Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(5–6), 748–789.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.
17.
go back to reference Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 108–131.CrossRef Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 108–131.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.CrossRef Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 407–418.CrossRef Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 407–418.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552.
21.
go back to reference Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ye, M., et al. (2017). Diversification in the international construction business. Construction Management and Economics, 2017, 1–14. Ye, M., et al. (2017). Diversification in the international construction business. Construction Management and Economics, 2017, 1–14.
23.
go back to reference Attig, N., et al. (2016). Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 171–197.CrossRef Attig, N., et al. (2016). Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 171–197.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2009). Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 575–596.CrossRef Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2009). Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 575–596.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Symeou, P. C., Zyglidopoulos, S., & Williamson, P. (2018). Internationalization as a driver of the corporate social performance of extractive industry firms. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 27–38.CrossRef Symeou, P. C., Zyglidopoulos, S., & Williamson, P. (2018). Internationalization as a driver of the corporate social performance of extractive industry firms. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 27–38.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
go back to reference Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRef Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 321–334.CrossRef Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 321–334.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lu, W., et al. (2009). Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of Chinese construction companies in the global market. Journal of Management in Engineering, 25(4), 166–176.CrossRef Lu, W., et al. (2009). Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of Chinese construction companies in the global market. Journal of Management in Engineering, 25(4), 166–176.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ye, M., et al. (2017). ‘Local content’ of corporate social responsibility in international construction. In ARCOM 2017 Conference. 2017: Cambridge, UK. Ye, M., et al. (2017). ‘Local content’ of corporate social responsibility in international construction. In ARCOM 2017 Conference. 2017: Cambridge, UK.
31.
go back to reference Hill, C. (2013). International business: Competing in the global marketplace (9th ed.). New York: Irwin, McGraw-Hill. Hill, C. (2013). International business: Competing in the global marketplace (9th ed.). New York: Irwin, McGraw-Hill.
32.
go back to reference Bustamante, S. (2011). Localization versus standardization: Global approaches to CSR management in multinational companies. In 2011, Working Papers of the Institute of Management Berlin at the Berlin School of Economics and Law (HWR Berlin). Bustamante, S. (2011). Localization versus standardization: Global approaches to CSR management in multinational companies. In 2011, Working Papers of the Institute of Management Berlin at the Berlin School of Economics and Law (HWR Berlin).
33.
go back to reference Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 199–215). Sage: London. Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 199–215). Sage: London.
34.
go back to reference Wang, Q., Dou, J. S., & Jia, S. H. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business and Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.CrossRef Wang, Q., Dou, J. S., & Jia, S. H. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business and Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167–180.CrossRef Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167–180.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Xiong, B., et al. (2016) Virtuous nexus between corporate social performance and financial performance: A study of construction enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. Xiong, B., et al. (2016) Virtuous nexus between corporate social performance and financial performance: A study of construction enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016.
38.
go back to reference Lu, W., et al. (2018). The paradoxical nexus between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: Evidence from the international construction business. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018, 9. Lu, W., et al. (2018). The paradoxical nexus between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: Evidence from the international construction business. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018, 9.
39.
go back to reference Wang, H., et al. (2016). The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Evidence from the international construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1313–1322.CrossRef Wang, H., et al. (2016). The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Evidence from the international construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1313–1322.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does Internationalisation Matter to Corporate Social Performance? An Empirical Study on Chinese Listed Construction Companies
Authors
Meng Ye
Weisheng Lu
Hui Guo
Roger Flanagan
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8892-1_69