Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Small Business Economics 4/2020

14-05-2019

Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs?

Authors: Simona Gentile-Lüdecke, Rui Torres de Oliveira, Justin Paul

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 4/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Based on the evolutionary theory of the firm, this paper examines how traditional variables that describe a firm’s organizational structure—formalization, specialization, and centralization—affect the adoption of inbound and outbound open innovation. Using a cross-sectional survey of Chinese small and medium enterprises, our study shows that organizational structure matters for open innovation and that formalization, specialization, and centralization have diverse effects on the OI practices implemented by SMEs. Results indicate that specialization and centralization have a critical role in open innovation practices as they both foster the use of inbound and outbound open innovation. Formalization negatively affects outbound, but it is positively associated with inbound open innovation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In this research, we refer to selling and revealing as per Dahlander and Gann’s (2010) definition. Revealing refers to internal resources that are revealed to the external environment, and selling refers to how firms commercialize internal knowledge through licensing or selling.
 
2
According to recent official data (China Statistics Press 2016), in 2015, SMEs made up about 97.9% of all registered companies in China. They also contributed nearly 58% of gross domestic product (GDP) and employed about 82% of the total workforce, being responsible for nearly 75% of the new jobs every year.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: enabling vs. coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89. Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: enabling vs. coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89.
go back to reference Ahn, J.M., Minshall, T. & Mortara, L. (2018) How do entrepreneurial leaders promote innovation adoption in small firms? In In Vahnaverbeke, W., Frattini, F., Roijakkers, N. and Usman, M. (eds.) Researching Open Innovation in SMEs (3-35). London: World Science. https://doi.org/10.1142/10733 Ahn, J.M., Minshall, T. & Mortara, L. (2018) How do entrepreneurial leaders promote innovation adoption in small firms? In In Vahnaverbeke, W., Frattini, F., Roijakkers, N. and Usman, M. (eds.) Researching Open Innovation in SMEs (3-35). London: World Science. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1142/​10733
go back to reference Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology: the economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology: the economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2007). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Chichester: John Wiley. Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2007). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Chichester: John Wiley.
go back to reference Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
go back to reference Brockhoff, K. (1992). R&D cooperation between firms—a perceived transaction cost perspective. Management Science, 38, 514–524. Brockhoff, K. (1992). R&D cooperation between firms—a perceived transaction cost perspective. Management Science, 38, 514–524.
go back to reference Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2002). Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfit. Management Science, 48(11), 1461–1485. Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2002). Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfit. Management Science, 48(11), 1461–1485.
go back to reference Caruana, A., Morris, M., & Vella, A. (1998). The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurship in export firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 16–29. Caruana, A., Morris, M., & Vella, A. (1998). The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurship in export firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 16–29.
go back to reference Castells, M., & Cardoso, G. (2006). The network society: from knowledge to policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations. Castells, M., & Cardoso, G. (2006). The network society: from knowledge to policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.
go back to reference Chen, J. (2006). Development of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(2), 140–147. Chen, J. (2006). Development of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(2), 140–147.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W., Vahnaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chesbrough, H. W., Vahnaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2014). New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford: OUP. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2014). New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford: OUP.
go back to reference Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34-43. Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34-43.
go back to reference China Statistics Press. (2016). China statistical yearbook 2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press. China Statistics Press. (2016). China statistical yearbook 2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
go back to reference Chinese National Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Statistical criteria for the classification of large, medium and small-micro enterprises. Beijing, China: Chinese National Bureau of Statistics. Chinese National Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Statistical criteria for the classification of large, medium and small-micro enterprises. Beijing, China: Chinese National Bureau of Statistics.
go back to reference Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152.
go back to reference Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2008). The economics of organizational design. New York: Pagrave MacMillan. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2008). The economics of organizational design. New York: Pagrave MacMillan.
go back to reference Dufour, J., & Son, P.-E. (2015). Open innovation in SMEs—towards formalization of openness. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(3), 90–117. Dufour, J., & Son, P.-E. (2015). Open innovation in SMEs—towards formalization of openness. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(3), 90–117.
go back to reference EU, European Union Commision. (2016). User guide to the SME definition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. EU, European Union Commision. (2016). User guide to the SME definition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
go back to reference Fiengenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility: a competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 101–114. Fiengenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility: a competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 101–114.
go back to reference Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
go back to reference Fu, X., & Xiong, H. (2011). Open innovation in China: policies and practices. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 2(3), 196–218. Fu, X., & Xiong, H. (2011). Open innovation in China: policies and practices. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 2(3), 196–218.
go back to reference Galbraith, J. R., & Nathanson, D. A. (1978). Strategy implementation: the role of structure and process. St. Paul, MN: West. Galbraith, J. R., & Nathanson, D. A. (1978). Strategy implementation: the role of structure and process. St. Paul, MN: West.
go back to reference Gesing, J., Antons, D., Piening, E. P., Rese, M., & Salge, T. O. (2015). Joining forces or going it alone? On the interplay among external collaboration partner types, interfirm governance modes, and internal R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 424–440. Gesing, J., Antons, D., Piening, E. P., Rese, M., & Salge, T. O. (2015). Joining forces or going it alone? On the interplay among external collaboration partner types, interfirm governance modes, and internal R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 424–440.
go back to reference Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of the organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of the organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
go back to reference Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.
go back to reference Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2009). Strategy and the design of organizational architecture. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 575–576. Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2009). Strategy and the design of organizational architecture. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 575–576.
go back to reference Hobday, M., & Colpan, A. M. (2010). Technological innovation and business groups. In A. M. Colpan, T. Hikino, & J. R. Lincoln (Eds.), Oxford handbook of business groups. Oxford handbooks in business and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hobday, M., & Colpan, A. M. (2010). Technological innovation and business groups. In A. M. Colpan, T. Hikino, & J. R. Lincoln (Eds.), Oxford handbook of business groups. Oxford handbooks in business and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Huang, F., Rice, J., & Martin, N. (2015). Does open innovation apply to China? Exploring the contingent role of external knowledge sources and internal absorptive capacity in Chinese large firms and SMEs. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(5), 594–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/jimo.2014.79.CrossRef Huang, F., Rice, J., & Martin, N. (2015). Does open innovation apply to China? Exploring the contingent role of external knowledge sources and internal absorptive capacity in Chinese large firms and SMEs. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(5), 594–613. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1017/​jimo.​2014.​79.CrossRef
go back to reference Huston, L., & Sakkab, L. (2006). Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84, 58–66. Huston, L., & Sakkab, L. (2006). Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84, 58–66.
go back to reference Inauen, M., & Schenker-Wiki, A. (2012). Fostering radical innovation with open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(2), 212–231. Inauen, M., & Schenker-Wiki, A. (2012). Fostering radical innovation with open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(2), 212–231.
go back to reference Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015. Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015.
go back to reference Jansen, J. J. P., Den Bosch, V., Frans, A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. Jansen, J. J. P., Den Bosch, V., Frans, A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
go back to reference Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461–477. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461–477.
go back to reference Lubatkin, M., Pimpek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672. Lubatkin, M., Pimpek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.
go back to reference Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, J., & Ghoshal, S. (2003). The strategy process: concepts, contexts and cases (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, J., & Ghoshal, S. (2003). The strategy process: concepts, contexts and cases (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Duxbury. Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Duxbury.
go back to reference Nahapiet, Janine, & Ghoshal, Sumantra. (2000). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage Knowledge and Social Capital (pp. 119–157): Elsevier. Nahapiet, Janine, & Ghoshal, Sumantra. (2000). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage Knowledge and Social Capital (pp. 119–157): Elsevier.
go back to reference Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harbard University Press. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harbard University Press.
go back to reference Prakash, Y., & Gupta, M. (2008). Exploring the relationship between organisation structure and perceived innovation in the manufacturing sector of India. Singapore Management Review, 30(1), 55–76. Prakash, Y., & Gupta, M. (2008). Exploring the relationship between organisation structure and perceived innovation in the manufacturing sector of India. Singapore Management Review, 30(1), 55–76.
go back to reference Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65–105. Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65–105.
go back to reference Redding, G., & Witt, M. A. (2009). China’s business system and its future trajectory. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 381–399. Redding, G., & Witt, M. A. (2009). China’s business system and its future trajectory. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 381–399.
go back to reference Rigby, D., & Zook, C. (2002). Open market innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(10), 80–89. Rigby, D., & Zook, C. (2002). Open market innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(10), 80–89.
go back to reference Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: structure, design, and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: structure, design, and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage—how Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420–430. Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage—how Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420–430.
go back to reference Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management Journal, 33(3), 201–213. Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management Journal, 33(3), 201–213.
go back to reference Sahay, Y. P., & Gupta, M. (2011). Role of organization structure in innovation in the bulk-drug industry. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(3), 450–464. Sahay, Y. P., & Gupta, M. (2011). Role of organization structure in innovation in the bulk-drug industry. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(3), 450–464.
go back to reference Singh, J. (2008). Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy, 37(1), 77–96. Singh, J. (2008). Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy, 37(1), 77–96.
go back to reference Souitaris, V. (2001). Strategic influences of technological innovation in Greece. British Journal of Management, 12(2), 131–147. Souitaris, V. (2001). Strategic influences of technological innovation in Greece. British Journal of Management, 12(2), 131–147.
go back to reference Spithoven, A., Vahnaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562. Spithoven, A., Vahnaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562.
go back to reference Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures or organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631–647. Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures or organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631–647.
go back to reference Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing intellectual capital: organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing intellectual capital: organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Torres de Oliveira, R., & Figueira, S. (2018a). The specificities of interviewing in China. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 21(1), 118–134. Torres de Oliveira, R., & Figueira, S. (2018a). The specificities of interviewing in China. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 21(1), 118–134.
go back to reference Torres de Oliveira, R., & Figueira, S. (2018b). How China’s business system works. In M. Books (Ed.), The savvy investors guide to doing business in China. Phoenix, USA. Torres de Oliveira, R., & Figueira, S. (2018b). How China’s business system works. In M. Books (Ed.), The savvy investors guide to doing business in China. Phoenix, USA.
go back to reference United States International Trade Commission. (2010). United States International Trade Commission. United States International Trade Commission. (2010). United States International Trade Commission.
go back to reference Usman, M., Roijakkers, N., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Frattini, F. A systematic review of the literature on open innovation in SMEs. In Researching open innovation in SMEs (pp. 3–35). London: World Science. https://doi.org/10.1142/10733. Usman, M., Roijakkers, N., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Frattini, F. A systematic review of the literature on open innovation in SMEs. In Researching open innovation in SMEs (pp. 3–35). London: World Science. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1142/​10733.
go back to reference Vanhaverbeke, W. (2017). Managing open innovation in SMEs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vanhaverbeke, W. (2017). Managing open innovation in SMEs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Vanhaverbeke, W., Vermeersch, I., & De Zutter, S. (2012). Open innovation in SMEs: how can small companies and start-ups benefit from open innovation strategies? Leuven: Belgium Flanders District of Creativity. Vanhaverbeke, W., Vermeersch, I., & De Zutter, S. (2012). Open innovation in SMEs: how can small companies and start-ups benefit from open innovation strategies? Leuven: Belgium Flanders District of Creativity.
go back to reference Wagner, P. (2013). Open innovation and organizational alignment: a contingency analysis of external search strategies for innovation performance. Aachen, Germany: RWTH Aachen University. Wagner, P. (2013). Open innovation and organizational alignment: a contingency analysis of external search strategies for innovation performance. Aachen, Germany: RWTH Aachen University.
go back to reference Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51.
go back to reference West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: a research agenda. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, 285–307. West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: a research agenda. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, 285–307.
go back to reference West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: the next decade. Elsevier. West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: the next decade. Elsevier.
go back to reference Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: the social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: OUP. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: the social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: OUP.
go back to reference Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science, 28(12), 1421–1431. Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science, 28(12), 1421–1431.
Metadata
Title
Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs?
Authors
Simona Gentile-Lüdecke
Rui Torres de Oliveira
Justin Paul
Publication date
14-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Small Business Economics / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00175-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Small Business Economics 4/2020 Go to the issue