Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance 4/2020

08-06-2020

Does what happen in Vegas stay in Vegas? Football gambling and stock market activity

Authors: Justin Cox, Adam Schwartz, Robert Van Ness

Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

We examine whether lagged football betting payoffs result in changes in retail investing in lottery-like stocks. We show that lagged, low betting imbalances are associated with increases in retail stock participation, particularly for lottery-like stocks. This finding implies support for the “break-even” hypothesis that following negative sentiment and losses from football gambling, investors use lottery-like stocks to offset losses or break-even. This result holds for lottery-like stocks defined based on high idiosyncratic volatility and skewness as well as stocks that trade in over-the-counter (OTC) markets. Finally, we address whether the reverse relation exists, finding that only OTC market activity leads to increases in football betting activity but not football betting imbalances. Overall, our paper contributes to the literature investigating the relation between gambling sentiment and stock market activity.
Footnotes
1
Scheinkman and Xiong (2003); Hong et al. (2006); Grinblatt and Keloharju (2009); and Dorn and Sengmueller (2009) all demonstrate that lottery-like stocks possess these characteristics.
 
2
Our measure captures transactional bet imbalance as opposed to a volume or dollar imbalance.
 
3
In certain cases, the spread-adjusted score resulted in a push. However, we only have 175 spread-adjusted pushes, accounting for only 1.5% of entire sample of games. Thus, we remove these games from the analysis.
 
4
For example, as part of the 2015–2016 College Football Playoff (CFP), Oklahoma played Clemson. Oklahoma was favored by 3.5 points (thus, Clemson was given 3.5 points). The final score was Oklahoma 17 Clemson 37 and the adjusted score was Oklahoma 17 Clemson 40.5. Thus, the winning bets were those who bet on Clemson. For this game, we have 88,564 bets with 49% placed on Oklahoma and 51% placed on Clemson. Thus, (88,564 × 0.51) = 45,168 winning bets were placed and (88,564 × 0.49) = 43,396 losing bets were placed. The imbalance measure was (0.51–0.49 / 1.00) or (45,168–43,396 / 88,564) = 0.020. The raw imbalance was 45,168–43,396 = 1771.
 
Literature
go back to reference Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J Financ Mark 5(1):31–56 Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J Financ Mark 5(1):31–56
go back to reference Andrade SC, Chang C, Seasholes MS (2008) Trading imbalances, predictable reversals, and cross-stock price pressure. J Financ Econ 88(2):406–423 Andrade SC, Chang C, Seasholes MS (2008) Trading imbalances, predictable reversals, and cross-stock price pressure. J Financ Econ 88(2):406–423
go back to reference Boehmer E, Jones CM, Zhang X (2018) Tracking retail investor activity. Working Paper, Singapore Management University Boehmer E, Jones CM, Zhang X (2018) Tracking retail investor activity. Working Paper, Singapore Management University
go back to reference Campbell JY, Lettau M, Malkiel BG, Xu Y (2001) Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. J Financ 56(1):1–43 Campbell JY, Lettau M, Malkiel BG, Xu Y (2001) Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. J Financ 56(1):1–43
go back to reference Chen Y, Kumar A, Zhang C (2018) Searching for gambles: gambling sentiment and stock market outcomes. Working Paper, Cardiff University Chen Y, Kumar A, Zhang C (2018) Searching for gambles: gambling sentiment and stock market outcomes. Working Paper, Cardiff University
go back to reference Cookson JA (2018) When saving is gambling. J Financ Econ 129(1):24–45 Cookson JA (2018) When saving is gambling. J Financ Econ 129(1):24–45
go back to reference Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. J Financ 66(5):1461–1499 Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. J Financ 66(5):1461–1499
go back to reference Doran JS, Jiang D, Peterson DR (2012) Gambling preference and the new year effect of assets with lottery features. Review of Finance 16(3):685–731 Doran JS, Jiang D, Peterson DR (2012) Gambling preference and the new year effect of assets with lottery features. Review of Finance 16(3):685–731
go back to reference Dorn D, Sengmueller P (2009) Trading as entertainment? Manag Sci 55(4):591–603 Dorn D, Sengmueller P (2009) Trading as entertainment? Manag Sci 55(4):591–603
go back to reference Dorn AJ, Dorn D, Sengmueller P (2014) Trading as gambling. Manag Sci 61(10):2376–2393 Dorn AJ, Dorn D, Sengmueller P (2014) Trading as gambling. Manag Sci 61(10):2376–2393
go back to reference Eraker B, Ready M (2015) Do investors overpay for stocks with lottery-like payoffs? An examination of the returns of OTC stocks. J Financ Econ 115(3):486–504 Eraker B, Ready M (2015) Do investors overpay for stocks with lottery-like payoffs? An examination of the returns of OTC stocks. J Financ Econ 115(3):486–504
go back to reference Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56 Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56
go back to reference Gandar JM, Dare WH, Brown CR, Zuber RA (1998) Informed traders and price variations in the betting market for professional basketball games. J Financ 53(1):385–401 Gandar JM, Dare WH, Brown CR, Zuber RA (1998) Informed traders and price variations in the betting market for professional basketball games. J Financ 53(1):385–401
go back to reference Gao X, Lin TC (2014) Do individual investors treat trading as a fun and exciting gambling activity? Evidence from repeated natural experiments. Rev Financ Stud 28(7):2128–2166 Gao X, Lin TC (2014) Do individual investors treat trading as a fun and exciting gambling activity? Evidence from repeated natural experiments. Rev Financ Stud 28(7):2128–2166
go back to reference Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. J Financ 64(2):549–578 Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. J Financ 64(2):549–578
go back to reference Hong H, Scheinkman J, Xiong W (2006) Asset float and speculative bubbles. J Financ 61(3):1073–1117 Hong H, Scheinkman J, Xiong W (2006) Asset float and speculative bubbles. J Financ 61(3):1073–1117
go back to reference Huang S, Huang Y, Lin TC (2019) Attention allocation and return co-movement: evidence from repeated natural experiments. J Financ Econ 132(2):369–383 Huang S, Huang Y, Lin TC (2019) Attention allocation and return co-movement: evidence from repeated natural experiments. J Financ Econ 132(2):369–383
go back to reference Humphreys BR (2011) The financial consequences of unbalanced betting on NFL games. Int J Sport Financ 6(1):60–71 Humphreys BR (2011) The financial consequences of unbalanced betting on NFL games. Int J Sport Financ 6(1):60–71
go back to reference Kearney MS (2005) State lotteries and consumer behavior. J Public Econ 89(11–12):2269–2299 Kearney MS (2005) State lotteries and consumer behavior. J Public Econ 89(11–12):2269–2299
go back to reference Kuhnen CM, Knutson B (2011) The influence of affect on beliefs, preferences, and financial decisions. J Financ Quant Anal 46(3):605–626 Kuhnen CM, Knutson B (2011) The influence of affect on beliefs, preferences, and financial decisions. J Financ Quant Anal 46(3):605–626
go back to reference Kumar A (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? J Financ 64(4):1889–1933 Kumar A (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? J Financ 64(4):1889–1933
go back to reference Kumar A, Lee CM (2006) Retail investor sentiment and return comovements. J Financ 61(5):2451–2486 Kumar A, Lee CM (2006) Retail investor sentiment and return comovements. J Financ 61(5):2451–2486
go back to reference Kumar A, Page JK, Spalt OG (2011) Religious beliefs, gambling attitudes, and financial market outcomes. J Financ Econ 102(3):671–708 Kumar A, Page JK, Spalt OG (2011) Religious beliefs, gambling attitudes, and financial market outcomes. J Financ Econ 102(3):671–708
go back to reference Kumar A, Page JK, Spalt OG (2016) Gambling and comovement. J Financ Quant Anal 51(1):85–111 Kumar A, Page JK, Spalt OG (2016) Gambling and comovement. J Financ Quant Anal 51(1):85–111
go back to reference Lai S, Teo M (2008) Home-biased analysts in emerging markets. J Financ Quant Anal 43(3):685–716 Lai S, Teo M (2008) Home-biased analysts in emerging markets. J Financ Quant Anal 43(3):685–716
go back to reference Liao C (2017) Risk taking begets risk taking: evidence from casino openings and investor portfolios. Working Paper, University of Manitoba Liao C (2017) Risk taking begets risk taking: evidence from casino openings and investor portfolios. Working Paper, University of Manitoba
go back to reference Malmendier U, Shanthikumar D (2007) Are small investors naive about incentives? J Financ Econ 85(2):457–489 Malmendier U, Shanthikumar D (2007) Are small investors naive about incentives? J Financ Econ 85(2):457–489
go back to reference Meng Y, Pantzalis C (2018) Monthly cyclicality in retail investors’ liquidity and lottery-type stocks at the turn of the month. J Bank Financ 88:176–191 Meng Y, Pantzalis C (2018) Monthly cyclicality in retail investors’ liquidity and lottery-type stocks at the turn of the month. J Bank Financ 88:176–191
go back to reference Park TJ, Lee Y (2014) Informed trading before positive vs. negative earnings surprises. J Bank Financ 49:228–241 Park TJ, Lee Y (2014) Informed trading before positive vs. negative earnings surprises. J Bank Financ 49:228–241
go back to reference Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2009) Sportsbook behavior in the NCAA football betting market: tests of the traditional and Levitt models of sportsbook behavior. Journal of Prediction Markets 3(2):21–37 Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2009) Sportsbook behavior in the NCAA football betting market: tests of the traditional and Levitt models of sportsbook behavior. Journal of Prediction Markets 3(2):21–37
go back to reference Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2011) Investigating allegations of pointshaving in NCAA basketball using actual sportsbook betting percentages. J Sports Econ 12(4):432–447 Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2011) Investigating allegations of pointshaving in NCAA basketball using actual sportsbook betting percentages. J Sports Econ 12(4):432–447
go back to reference Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev Financ Stud 22(1):435–480 Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev Financ Stud 22(1):435–480
go back to reference Scheinkman J, Xiong W (2003) Overconfidence, short-sale constraints, and bubbles. J Polit Econ 111:1183–1219 Scheinkman J, Xiong W (2003) Overconfidence, short-sale constraints, and bubbles. J Polit Econ 111:1183–1219
go back to reference Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Manag Sci 36(6):643–660 Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Manag Sci 36(6):643–660
go back to reference Thompson SB (2011) Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. J Financ Econ 99(1):1–10 Thompson SB (2011) Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. J Financ Econ 99(1):1–10
go back to reference Xuan Z, Shaffer H (2009) How do gamblers end gambling: longitudinal analysis of internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. J Gambl Stud 25(2):239–252 Xuan Z, Shaffer H (2009) How do gamblers end gambling: longitudinal analysis of internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. J Gambl Stud 25(2):239–252
Metadata
Title
Does what happen in Vegas stay in Vegas? Football gambling and stock market activity
Authors
Justin Cox
Adam Schwartz
Robert Van Ness
Publication date
08-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Economics and Finance / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1055-0925
Electronic ISSN: 1938-9744
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-020-09513-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Economics and Finance 4/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partner