Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation 9/2018

28-02-2018 | Original Paper

Dynamic effects of ground-layer plant communities on beetles in a fragmented farming landscape

Authors: Katherina Ng, Sue McIntyre, Sarina Macfadyen, Philip S. Barton, Don A. Driscoll, David B. Lindenmayer

Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Issue 9/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Vegetation effects on arthropods are well recognized, but it is unclear how different vegetation attributes might influence arthropod assemblages across mixed-agricultural landscapes. Understanding how plant communities influence arthropods under different habitat and seasonal contexts can identify vegetation management options for arthropod biodiversity. We examined relationships between vegetation structure, plant species richness and plant species composition, and the diversity and composition of beetles in different habitats and time periods. We asked: (1) What is the relative importance of plant species richness, vegetation structure and plant composition in explaining beetle species richness, activity-density and composition? (2) How do plant-beetle relationships vary between different habitats over time? We sampled beetles using pitfall traps and surveyed vegetation in three habitats (woodland, farmland, their edges) during peak crop growth in spring and post-harvest in summer. Plant composition better predicted beetle composition than vegetation structure. Both plant richness and vegetation structure significantly and positively affected beetle activity-density. The influence of all vegetation attributes often varied in strength and direction between habitats and seasons for all trophic groups. The variable nature of plant-beetle relationships suggests that vegetation management could be targeted at specific habitats and time periods to maximize positive outcomes for beetle diversity. In particular, management that promotes plant richness at edges, and promotes herbaceous cover during summer, can support beetle diversity. Conserving ground cover in all habitats may improve activity-density of all beetle trophic groups. The impacts of existing weed control strategies in Australian crop margins on arthropod biodiversity require further study.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Agrawal AA, Lau Jennifer A, Hambäck Peter A (2006) Community heterogeneity and the evolution of interactions between plants and insect herbivores. Q Rev Biol 81:349–376CrossRefPubMed Agrawal AA, Lau Jennifer A, Hambäck Peter A (2006) Community heterogeneity and the evolution of interactions between plants and insect herbivores. Q Rev Biol 81:349–376CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Barton PS, Manning AD, Gibb H, Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham SA (2009) Conserving ground-dwelling beetles in an endangered woodland community: multi-scale habitat effects on assemblage diversity. Biol Conserv 142:1701–1709CrossRef Barton PS, Manning AD, Gibb H, Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham SA (2009) Conserving ground-dwelling beetles in an endangered woodland community: multi-scale habitat effects on assemblage diversity. Biol Conserv 142:1701–1709CrossRef
go back to reference Bell L, Moore A (2012) Integrated crop-livestock systems in Australian agriculture: trends, drivers and implications. Agric Syst 111:1–12CrossRef Bell L, Moore A (2012) Integrated crop-livestock systems in Australian agriculture: trends, drivers and implications. Agric Syst 111:1–12CrossRef
go back to reference Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135CrossRefPubMed Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brose U (2003) Bottom-up control of carabid beetle communities in early successional wetlands: mediated by vegetation structure or plant diversity? Oecologia 135:407–413CrossRefPubMed Brose U (2003) Bottom-up control of carabid beetle communities in early successional wetlands: mediated by vegetation structure or plant diversity? Oecologia 135:407–413CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Model inference and multimodel selection. Academic Press, New York Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Model inference and multimodel selection. Academic Press, New York
go back to reference Buse A (1988) Habitat selection and grouping of beetles (Coleoptera). Ecography 11:241–247CrossRef Buse A (1988) Habitat selection and grouping of beetles (Coleoptera). Ecography 11:241–247CrossRef
go back to reference Dennis P, Young MR, Gordon IJ (1998) Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands. Ecol Entomol 23:253–264CrossRef Dennis P, Young MR, Gordon IJ (1998) Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands. Ecol Entomol 23:253–264CrossRef
go back to reference Driscoll DA, Kirkpatrick JB, McQuillan PB, Bonham KJ (2010) Classic metapopulations are rare among common beetle species from a naturally fragmented landscape. J Anim Ecol 79:294–303CrossRefPubMed Driscoll DA, Kirkpatrick JB, McQuillan PB, Bonham KJ (2010) Classic metapopulations are rare among common beetle species from a naturally fragmented landscape. J Anim Ecol 79:294–303CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Duelli P (1997) Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:81–91CrossRef Duelli P (1997) Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:81–91CrossRef
go back to reference Duflot R, Ernoult A, Burel F, Aviron S (2016) Landscape level processes driving carabid crop assemblage in dynamic farmlands. Popul Ecol 58:265–275CrossRef Duflot R, Ernoult A, Burel F, Aviron S (2016) Landscape level processes driving carabid crop assemblage in dynamic farmlands. Popul Ecol 58:265–275CrossRef
go back to reference Fox J, Friendly M, Weisberg S (2013) Hypothesis tests for multivariate linear models using the car package. R J 5:39–52 Fox J, Friendly M, Weisberg S (2013) Hypothesis tests for multivariate linear models using the car package. R J 5:39–52
go back to reference Gibb H, Cunningham SA (2010) Revegetation of farmland restores function and composition of epigaeic beetle assemblages. Biol Conserv 143:677–687CrossRef Gibb H, Cunningham SA (2010) Revegetation of farmland restores function and composition of epigaeic beetle assemblages. Biol Conserv 143:677–687CrossRef
go back to reference Gibb H, Pettersson RB, Hjältén J, Hilszczański J, Ball JP, Johansson T, Atlegrim O, Danell K (2006) Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates. Biol Conserv 129:437–450CrossRef Gibb H, Pettersson RB, Hjältén J, Hilszczański J, Ball JP, Johansson T, Atlegrim O, Danell K (2006) Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates. Biol Conserv 129:437–450CrossRef
go back to reference Gibb H, Retter B, Cunningham SA, Barton PS (2017) Does wing morphology affect recolonization of restored farmland by ground-dwelling beetles? Restor Ecol 25:234–242CrossRef Gibb H, Retter B, Cunningham SA, Barton PS (2017) Does wing morphology affect recolonization of restored farmland by ground-dwelling beetles? Restor Ecol 25:234–242CrossRef
go back to reference Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19CrossRef Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19CrossRef
go back to reference Greenslade P (1964) Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J Anim Ecol 33(2):301–310 Greenslade P (1964) Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J Anim Ecol 33(2):301–310
go back to reference Grimbacher PS, Catterall CP, Kitching RL (2006) Beetle species’ responses suggest that microclimate mediates fragmentation effects in tropical Australian rainforest. Austral Ecol 31:458–470CrossRef Grimbacher PS, Catterall CP, Kitching RL (2006) Beetle species’ responses suggest that microclimate mediates fragmentation effects in tropical Australian rainforest. Austral Ecol 31:458–470CrossRef
go back to reference Haddad NM, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M, Knops JMH (2001) Contrasting effects of plant richness and composition on insect communities: a field experiment. Am Nat 158:17–35CrossRefPubMed Haddad NM, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M, Knops JMH (2001) Contrasting effects of plant richness and composition on insect communities: a field experiment. Am Nat 158:17–35CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Holland JM, Thomas CFG, Birkett T, Southway S, Oaten H (2005) Farm-scale spatiotemporal dynamics of predatory beetles in arable crops. J Appl Ecol 42:1140–1152CrossRef Holland JM, Thomas CFG, Birkett T, Southway S, Oaten H (2005) Farm-scale spatiotemporal dynamics of predatory beetles in arable crops. J Appl Ecol 42:1140–1152CrossRef
go back to reference Joern A, Laws AN (2013) Ecological mechanisms underlying arthropod species diversity in grasslands. Annu Rev Entomol 58:19–36CrossRefPubMed Joern A, Laws AN (2013) Ecological mechanisms underlying arthropod species diversity in grasslands. Annu Rev Entomol 58:19–36CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koricheva J, Mulder CPH, Schmid B, Joshi J, Huss-Danell K (2000) Numerical responses of different trophic groups of invertebrates to manipulations of plant diversity in grasslands. Oecologia 125:271–282CrossRefPubMed Koricheva J, Mulder CPH, Schmid B, Joshi J, Huss-Danell K (2000) Numerical responses of different trophic groups of invertebrates to manipulations of plant diversity in grasslands. Oecologia 125:271–282CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kromp B, Steinberger K-H (1992) Grassy field margins and arthropod diversity: a case study on ground beetles and spiders in eastern Austria (Coleoptera: Carabidae; Arachnida: Aranei, Opiliones). Agric Ecosyst Environ 40:71–93CrossRef Kromp B, Steinberger K-H (1992) Grassy field margins and arthropod diversity: a case study on ground beetles and spiders in eastern Austria (Coleoptera: Carabidae; Arachnida: Aranei, Opiliones). Agric Ecosyst Environ 40:71–93CrossRef
go back to reference Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201CrossRefPubMed Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Landis DA, Menalled FD, Costamagna AC, Wilkinson TK (2005) Manipulating plant resources to enhance beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Weed Sci 53:902–908CrossRef Landis DA, Menalled FD, Costamagna AC, Wilkinson TK (2005) Manipulating plant resources to enhance beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Weed Sci 53:902–908CrossRef
go back to reference Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82CrossRef Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82CrossRef
go back to reference Lawrence JF, Britton EB (1994) Australian beetles. Melbourne University Press, Carlton Lawrence JF, Britton EB (1994) Australian beetles. Melbourne University Press, Carlton
go back to reference Lichstein JW (2007) Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis tool. Plant Ecol 188:117–131CrossRef Lichstein JW (2007) Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis tool. Plant Ecol 188:117–131CrossRef
go back to reference Magura T (2002) Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manag 157:23–37CrossRef Magura T (2002) Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manag 157:23–37CrossRef
go back to reference McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman-Hall, LondonCrossRef McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman-Hall, LondonCrossRef
go back to reference Müller J, Stadler J, Jarzabek-Müller A, Hacker H, ter Braak C, Brandl R (2011) The predictability of phytophagous insect communities: host specialists as habitat specialists. PLoS ONE 6:e25986CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Müller J, Stadler J, Jarzabek-Müller A, Hacker H, ter Braak C, Brandl R (2011) The predictability of phytophagous insect communities: host specialists as habitat specialists. PLoS ONE 6:e25986CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Ng K, Driscoll DA, Macfadyen S, Barton PS, McIntyre S, Lindenmayer DB (2017) Contrasting beetle assemblage responses to cultivated farmlands and native woodlands in a dynamic agricultural landscape. Ecosphere 8:e02042CrossRef Ng K, Driscoll DA, Macfadyen S, Barton PS, McIntyre S, Lindenmayer DB (2017) Contrasting beetle assemblage responses to cultivated farmlands and native woodlands in a dynamic agricultural landscape. Ecosphere 8:e02042CrossRef
go back to reference Ng K, Barton PS, Macfadyen S, Lindenmayer DB, Driscoll DA (2018) Beetle’s responses to edges in fragmented landscapes are driven by adjacent farmland use, season and cross-habitat movement. Landscape Ecol 33:109–125CrossRef Ng K, Barton PS, Macfadyen S, Lindenmayer DB, Driscoll DA (2018) Beetle’s responses to edges in fragmented landscapes are driven by adjacent farmland use, season and cross-habitat movement. Landscape Ecol 33:109–125CrossRef
go back to reference Niemelä JK, Spence JR (1994) Distribution of forest dwelling carabids (Coleoptera): spatial scale and the concept of communities. Ecography 17:166–175CrossRef Niemelä JK, Spence JR (1994) Distribution of forest dwelling carabids (Coleoptera): spatial scale and the concept of communities. Ecography 17:166–175CrossRef
go back to reference Norris E, Thomas J (1991) Vegetation on rocky outcrops and ranges in central and south-western New South Wales. Cunninghamia 2:411–441 Norris E, Thomas J (1991) Vegetation on rocky outcrops and ranges in central and south-western New South Wales. Cunninghamia 2:411–441
go back to reference Nyafwono M, Valtonen A, Nyeko P, Owiny AA, Roininen H (2015) Tree community composition and vegetation structure predict butterfly community recovery in a restored Afrotropical rain forest. Biodivers Conserv 24:1473–1485CrossRef Nyafwono M, Valtonen A, Nyeko P, Owiny AA, Roininen H (2015) Tree community composition and vegetation structure predict butterfly community recovery in a restored Afrotropical rain forest. Biodivers Conserv 24:1473–1485CrossRef
go back to reference Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10:99–109CrossRef Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10:99–109CrossRef
go back to reference Parry HR, Macfadyen S, Hopkinson JE, Bianchi FJJA, Zalucki MP, Bourne A, Schellhorn NA (2015) Plant composition modulates arthropod pest and predator abundance: evidence for culling exotics and planting natives. Basic Appl Ecol 16:531–543CrossRef Parry HR, Macfadyen S, Hopkinson JE, Bianchi FJJA, Zalucki MP, Bourne A, Schellhorn NA (2015) Plant composition modulates arthropod pest and predator abundance: evidence for culling exotics and planting natives. Basic Appl Ecol 16:531–543CrossRef
go back to reference Perner J, Voigt W, Bährmann R, Heinrich W, Marstaller R, Fabian B, Gregor K, Lichter D, Sander FW, Jones TH (2003) Responses of arthropods to plant diversity: changes after pollution cessation. Ecography 26:788–800CrossRef Perner J, Voigt W, Bährmann R, Heinrich W, Marstaller R, Fabian B, Gregor K, Lichter D, Sander FW, Jones TH (2003) Responses of arthropods to plant diversity: changes after pollution cessation. Ecography 26:788–800CrossRef
go back to reference Perner J, Wytrykush C, Kahmen A, Buchmann N, Egerer I, Creutzburg S, Odat N, Audorff V, Weisser WW (2005) Effects of plant diversity, plant productivity and habitat parameters on arthropod abundance in montane European grasslands. Ecography 28:429–442CrossRef Perner J, Wytrykush C, Kahmen A, Buchmann N, Egerer I, Creutzburg S, Odat N, Audorff V, Weisser WW (2005) Effects of plant diversity, plant productivity and habitat parameters on arthropod abundance in montane European grasslands. Ecography 28:429–442CrossRef
go back to reference Preston C (2010) Managing glyphosate resistant weeds in Australia. In: Zydenbos SM (ed) Proceedings of the 17th Australasian weeds conference, pp 250–253 Preston C (2010) Managing glyphosate resistant weeds in Australia. In: Zydenbos SM (ed) Proceedings of the 17th Australasian weeds conference, pp 250–253
go back to reference R Development Core Team (2015) R 3.2.0. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria R Development Core Team (2015) R 3.2.0. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
go back to reference Ramsden MW, Menéndez R, Leather SR, Wäckers F (2015) Optimizing field margins for biocontrol services: the relative role of aphid abundance, annual floral resources, and overwinter habitat in enhancing aphid natural enemies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 199:94–104CrossRef Ramsden MW, Menéndez R, Leather SR, Wäckers F (2015) Optimizing field margins for biocontrol services: the relative role of aphid abundance, annual floral resources, and overwinter habitat in enhancing aphid natural enemies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 199:94–104CrossRef
go back to reference Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124CrossRef Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124CrossRef
go back to reference Rouabah A, Villerd J, Amiaud B, Plantureux S, Lasserre-Joulin F (2015) Response of carabid beetles diversity and size distribution to the vegetation structure within differently managed field margins. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:21–32CrossRef Rouabah A, Villerd J, Amiaud B, Plantureux S, Lasserre-Joulin F (2015) Response of carabid beetles diversity and size distribution to the vegetation structure within differently managed field margins. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:21–32CrossRef
go back to reference Schaffers AP, Raemakers IP, Sýkora KV, ter Braak CJF (2008) Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology 89:782–794CrossRefPubMed Schaffers AP, Raemakers IP, Sýkora KV, ter Braak CJF (2008) Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology 89:782–794CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Siemann E (1998) Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 79:2057–2070CrossRef Siemann E (1998) Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 79:2057–2070CrossRef
go back to reference Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M (1998) Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am Nat 152:738–750CrossRefPubMed Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M (1998) Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am Nat 152:738–750CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Siemann E, Haarstad J, Tilman D (1999) Dynamics of plant and arthropod diversity during old field succession. Ecography 22:406–414CrossRef Siemann E, Haarstad J, Tilman D (1999) Dynamics of plant and arthropod diversity during old field succession. Ecography 22:406–414CrossRef
go back to reference Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12CrossRef Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12CrossRef
go back to reference Souza DG, Santos JC, Oliveira MA, Tabarelli M (2016) Shifts in plant assemblages reduce the richness of galling insects across edge-affected habitats in the Atlantic forest. Environ Entomol 45:1161–1169CrossRefPubMed Souza DG, Santos JC, Oliveira MA, Tabarelli M (2016) Shifts in plant assemblages reduce the richness of galling insects across edge-affected habitats in the Atlantic forest. Environ Entomol 45:1161–1169CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sutcliffe LME, Batáry P, Kormann U, Báldi A, Dicks LV, Herzon I, Kleijn D, Tryjanowski P, Apostolova I, Arlettaz R, Aunins A, Aviron S, Baležentienė L, Fischer C, Halada L, Hartel T, Helm A, Hristov I, Jelaska SD, Kaligarič M, Kamp J, Klimek S, Koorberg P, Kostiuková J, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Kuemmerle T, Leuschner C, Lindborg R, Loos J, Maccherini S, Marja R, Máthé O, Paulini I, Proença V, Rey-Benayas J, Sans FX, Seifert C, Stalenga J, Timaeus J, Török P, van Swaay C, Viik E, Tscharntke T (2015) Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland. Divers Distrib 21:722–730CrossRef Sutcliffe LME, Batáry P, Kormann U, Báldi A, Dicks LV, Herzon I, Kleijn D, Tryjanowski P, Apostolova I, Arlettaz R, Aunins A, Aviron S, Baležentienė L, Fischer C, Halada L, Hartel T, Helm A, Hristov I, Jelaska SD, Kaligarič M, Kamp J, Klimek S, Koorberg P, Kostiuková J, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Kuemmerle T, Leuschner C, Lindborg R, Loos J, Maccherini S, Marja R, Máthé O, Paulini I, Proença V, Rey-Benayas J, Sans FX, Seifert C, Stalenga J, Timaeus J, Török P, van Swaay C, Viik E, Tscharntke T (2015) Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland. Divers Distrib 21:722–730CrossRef
go back to reference ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sci 57:255–289CrossRef ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sci 57:255–289CrossRef
go back to reference Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann M, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92CrossRef Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann M, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92CrossRef
go back to reference Uchida K, Hiraiwa MK, Ushimaru A (2016) Plant and herbivorous insect diversity loss are greater than null model expectations due to land-use changes in agro-ecosystems. Biol Conserv 201:270–276CrossRef Uchida K, Hiraiwa MK, Ushimaru A (2016) Plant and herbivorous insect diversity loss are greater than null model expectations due to land-use changes in agro-ecosystems. Biol Conserv 201:270–276CrossRef
go back to reference Weibull A-C, Östman Ö, Granqvist Å (2003) Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodivers Conserv 12:1335–1355CrossRef Weibull A-C, Östman Ö, Granqvist Å (2003) Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodivers Conserv 12:1335–1355CrossRef
go back to reference Woodcock BA (2007) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies. Insect sampling in forest ecosystems. Blackwell Science Ltd, pp 37–57 Woodcock BA (2007) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies. Insect sampling in forest ecosystems. Blackwell Science Ltd, pp 37–57
go back to reference Woodcock BA, Pywell RF (2010) Effects of vegetation structure and floristic diversity on detritivore, herbivore and predatory invertebrates within calcareous grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 19:81–95CrossRef Woodcock BA, Pywell RF (2010) Effects of vegetation structure and floristic diversity on detritivore, herbivore and predatory invertebrates within calcareous grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 19:81–95CrossRef
go back to reference Woodcock BA, Bullock JM, McCracken M, Chapman RE, Ball SL, Edwards ME, Nowakowski M, Pywell RF (2016) Spill-over of pest control and pollination services into arable crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:15–23CrossRef Woodcock BA, Bullock JM, McCracken M, Chapman RE, Ball SL, Edwards ME, Nowakowski M, Pywell RF (2016) Spill-over of pest control and pollination services into arable crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:15–23CrossRef
go back to reference Ziesche TM, Roth M (2008) Influence of environmental parameters on small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: what makes the difference, tree species or microhabitat? For Ecol Manag 255:738–752CrossRef Ziesche TM, Roth M (2008) Influence of environmental parameters on small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: what makes the difference, tree species or microhabitat? For Ecol Manag 255:738–752CrossRef
go back to reference Zou Y, Sang W, Bai F, Axmacher JC (2013) Relationships between plant diversity and the abundance and α-diversity of predatory ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a mature Asian temperate forest ecosystem. PLoS ONE 8:e82792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zou Y, Sang W, Bai F, Axmacher JC (2013) Relationships between plant diversity and the abundance and α-diversity of predatory ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a mature Asian temperate forest ecosystem. PLoS ONE 8:e82792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Dynamic effects of ground-layer plant communities on beetles in a fragmented farming landscape
Authors
Katherina Ng
Sue McIntyre
Sarina Macfadyen
Philip S. Barton
Don A. Driscoll
David B. Lindenmayer
Publication date
28-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1526-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Biodiversity and Conservation 9/2018 Go to the issue