Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hydrogeology Journal 5/2012

01-08-2012 | Essay

Economic and spatial modelling of groundwater extraction

Authors: Pamela G. Katic, R. Quentin Grafton

Published in: Hydrogeology Journal | Issue 5/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

This essay examines the underlying spatial assumptions prevalent in economic models of groundwater extraction. Due to the common pool nature (see Glossary at the end) of aquifers, economists have long claimed that when groundwater is extracted under competition—in the absence of regulations in terms of the location and rates of extraction—a series of externalities prevent the efficient exploitation of the resource (Provencher and Burt 1994). Specifically, extraction of an additional unit of groundwater reduces the total stock, which creates two consequences. First, a lower stock reduces future availability and extraction alternatives; thus, a stock externality arises whenever the stock constraint is binding. Second, a pumping cost externality arises because a lower stock increases the depth to groundwater and, consequently, the extraction costs of other users. Other types of externalities including third-party effects in the form of groundwater quality deterioration and greater income risk may also arise with extraction. Given the spatial-dynamic nature of groundwater flow, the extent of all these externalities depends on the quantity, location and time of extraction and on the type of strategic behaviour under competition (Negri 1989). …

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Glossary
Common-pool resource
A natural resource such as an aquifer where use is rivalrous and it is costly to exclude users from undertaking withdrawals from the resource.
Competitive extraction
Extraction of natural resources which is unregulated such that there are no institutional limits placed on the rate of withdrawal by an individual resource user.
Gisser-Sanchez effect (GSE)
The view that there is little difference between the optimal rate of groundwater extraction when it is undertaken optimally and when it occurs under competitive/unregulated extraction.
Pumping cost externality
Additional costs imposed on other extractors from a given decision by an extractor to pump water from a well, and that are not accounted for in the pumping decision of an individual.
Stock externality
Reduction in the water available for use by others from a given extractor’s decision to pump water from a well, and that are not accounted for in the pumping decision of an individual.
Sunk cost
An expenditure or cost that has already been incurred (such as the purchase of capital equipment) but which has no impact on current or future returns.
Literature
go back to reference Allen RC, Gisser M (1984) Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping when demand is nonlinear. Water Resour Res 20:752–756CrossRef Allen RC, Gisser M (1984) Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping when demand is nonlinear. Water Resour Res 20:752–756CrossRef
go back to reference Bredehoeft JD, Young RA (1970) The temporal allocation of groundwater: a simulation approach. Water Resour Res 6:3–21CrossRef Bredehoeft JD, Young RA (1970) The temporal allocation of groundwater: a simulation approach. Water Resour Res 6:3–21CrossRef
go back to reference Brill TC, Burness HS (1994) Planning versus competitive rates of groundwater pumping. Water Resour Res 30:1873–1880CrossRef Brill TC, Burness HS (1994) Planning versus competitive rates of groundwater pumping. Water Resour Res 30:1873–1880CrossRef
go back to reference Brozovic N, Sunding DL, Zilberman D (2006) Optimal management of groundwater over space and time. In: Goetz RU, Berga D (eds) Frontiers in water resource economics. Springer, New York Brozovic N, Sunding DL, Zilberman D (2006) Optimal management of groundwater over space and time. In: Goetz RU, Berga D (eds) Frontiers in water resource economics. Springer, New York
go back to reference Brozovic N, Sunding DL, Zilberman D (2010) On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality. Resour Energy Econ 32:154–164CrossRef Brozovic N, Sunding DL, Zilberman D (2010) On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality. Resour Energy Econ 32:154–164CrossRef
go back to reference Chakravorty U, Umetsu C (2003) Basinwide water management: a spatial model. J Environ Econ Manage 45:1–23CrossRef Chakravorty U, Umetsu C (2003) Basinwide water management: a spatial model. J Environ Econ Manage 45:1–23CrossRef
go back to reference Faisal IM, Young RA, Warner JW (1997) Integrated economic-hydrologic modelling for groundwater basin management. Water Resour Dev 13:21–34CrossRef Faisal IM, Young RA, Warner JW (1997) Integrated economic-hydrologic modelling for groundwater basin management. Water Resour Dev 13:21–34CrossRef
go back to reference Feinerman E, Knapp KC (1983) Benefits from groundwater management: magnitude, sensitivity and distribution. Am J Agr Econ 65:703–710CrossRef Feinerman E, Knapp KC (1983) Benefits from groundwater management: magnitude, sensitivity and distribution. Am J Agr Econ 65:703–710CrossRef
go back to reference Gisser M, Sanchez DA (1980) Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping. Water Resour Res 16:638–642CrossRef Gisser M, Sanchez DA (1980) Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping. Water Resour Res 16:638–642CrossRef
go back to reference Katic PG (2011) Three essays on the economics of groundwater extraction. PhD Thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Katic PG (2011) Three essays on the economics of groundwater extraction. PhD Thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
go back to reference Kim CS, Moore MR, Hanchar JJ et al (1989) A dynamic model of adaptation to resource depletion: theory and an application to groundwater mining. J Environ Econ Manage 17:66–82CrossRef Kim CS, Moore MR, Hanchar JJ et al (1989) A dynamic model of adaptation to resource depletion: theory and an application to groundwater mining. J Environ Econ Manage 17:66–82CrossRef
go back to reference Knapp KC, Olson LJ (1995) The economics of conjunctive groundwater management with stochastic surface supplies. J Environ Econ Manage 28:340–356CrossRef Knapp KC, Olson LJ (1995) The economics of conjunctive groundwater management with stochastic surface supplies. J Environ Econ Manage 28:340–356CrossRef
go back to reference Koundouri P (2004) Current issues in the economics of groundwater resource management. J Econ Surveys 18:703–740CrossRef Koundouri P (2004) Current issues in the economics of groundwater resource management. J Econ Surveys 18:703–740CrossRef
go back to reference Negri DH (1989) The common property aquifer as a differential game. Water Resour Res 25:9–15CrossRef Negri DH (1989) The common property aquifer as a differential game. Water Resour Res 25:9–15CrossRef
go back to reference Nieswiadomy M (1985) The demand for irrigation water in the high plains of Texas: 1957–80. Am J Agr Econ 67:619–626CrossRef Nieswiadomy M (1985) The demand for irrigation water in the high plains of Texas: 1957–80. Am J Agr Econ 67:619–626CrossRef
go back to reference Noel JA, Gardner BD, Moore CV (1980) Optimal regional conjunctive water management. Am J Agr Econ 62:489–498CrossRef Noel JA, Gardner BD, Moore CV (1980) Optimal regional conjunctive water management. Am J Agr Econ 62:489–498CrossRef
go back to reference Noel JA, Howitt RE (1982) Conjunctive multibasin management: an optimal approach. Water Resour Res 18:753–763CrossRef Noel JA, Howitt RE (1982) Conjunctive multibasin management: an optimal approach. Water Resour Res 18:753–763CrossRef
go back to reference Provencher B, Burt OR (1994) A private property rights regime for the commons: the case for groundwater. Am J Agr Econ 76:875–888CrossRef Provencher B, Burt OR (1994) A private property rights regime for the commons: the case for groundwater. Am J Agr Econ 76:875–888CrossRef
go back to reference Saak AE, Peterson JM (2007) Groundwater use under incomplete information. J Environ Econ Manage 54:214–228CrossRef Saak AE, Peterson JM (2007) Groundwater use under incomplete information. J Environ Econ Manage 54:214–228CrossRef
go back to reference Shah FA, Zilberman D, Chakravorty U (1995) Technology adoption in the presence of an exhaustible resource: the case of groundwater extraction. Am J Agr Econ 77:291–299CrossRef Shah FA, Zilberman D, Chakravorty U (1995) Technology adoption in the presence of an exhaustible resource: the case of groundwater extraction. Am J Agr Econ 77:291–299CrossRef
go back to reference Worthington VE, Burt OR, Brustkern RL (1985) Optimal management of a confined groundwater system. J Environ Econ Manage 12:229–245CrossRef Worthington VE, Burt OR, Brustkern RL (1985) Optimal management of a confined groundwater system. J Environ Econ Manage 12:229–245CrossRef
go back to reference Young RA, Daubert JT, Morel-Seytoux HJ (1986) Evaluating institutional alternatives for managing an interrelated stream-aquifer system. Am J Agr Econ 68:787–797CrossRef Young RA, Daubert JT, Morel-Seytoux HJ (1986) Evaluating institutional alternatives for managing an interrelated stream-aquifer system. Am J Agr Econ 68:787–797CrossRef
go back to reference Zeitouni N, Dinar A (1997) Mitigating negative qualitative and quantitative externalities by joint management of adjacent aquifers. Environ Resour Econ 9:1–20 Zeitouni N, Dinar A (1997) Mitigating negative qualitative and quantitative externalities by joint management of adjacent aquifers. Environ Resour Econ 9:1–20
Metadata
Title
Economic and spatial modelling of groundwater extraction
Authors
Pamela G. Katic
R. Quentin Grafton
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0817-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Hydrogeology Journal 5/2012 Go to the issue