Top

Environmental Management

Published in:

12-01-2022

Ecosystem Benefits Provision of Green Stormwater Infrastructure in Chinese Sponge Cities

Authors: Rui Wang, Hong Wu, Robert Chiles

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 3/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The Sponge City Development (SCD) concept was initiated in 2012 to address severe urban flooding and water quality challenges in China. Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) such as rain gardens have been adopted as critical stormwater management tools. Existing GSI research has focused primarily on their environmental performance, overlooking the human dimensions. The co-benefits of GSI have been particularly underinvestigated. We used social surveys (n = 607) and expert interviews (n = 11) to explore public perception of SCD and GSI in four pilot sponge cities, examining flood experience, stormwater concerns, GSI familiarity, institutional trust, and GSI benefit perception. The survey found high exposure to flooding, medium GSI familiarity, and strong institutional trust. The public showed greater concern on stormwater impacts on their quality-of-life than the water environment, rating the less-intended aesthetic and health values as the best-perceived benefits. Experience, familiarity, concern, trust, age, and city significantly affected GSI benefit perception. In contrast, the experts spoke more positively about the environmental benefits while indicating the inadequacy of public participation. The case of GSI in SCD offers broad implications for environmental governance and expert-public relationships in an era of rapid social, technological, and environmental change. Refining policies and regulations to incorporate social goals, bringing the public into the SCD process, and building up the GSI industry’s capacity in planning, design, construction, and maintenance are critical to enhancing GSI benefits provision. Adopting the co-benefits approach will be essential to utilizing GSI as a place-making tool to create more sustainable and livable communities.

previous article Social Vulnerability to Irrigation Water Loss: Assessing the Effects of Water Policy Change on Farmers in Idaho, USA

next article Transient Alterations in Streamwater Quality Induced by Pollution Incidents: Interim Losses Calculations and Compensation Alternatives Based on Habitat Equivalency Analysis

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Anguelovski I, Chu E, Carmin J (2014) Variations in approaches to urban climate adaptation: experiences and experimentation from the global South. Glob Environ Change 27:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.010CrossRef

Apostolaki S, Jefferies C, Wild T (2006) The social impacts of stormwater management techniques. Water Pract. Technol. 1(1). https://doi.org/10.2166/WPT.2006009

Asah ST, Guerry AD, Blahna DJ, Lawler JJ (2014) Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: Human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosyst Serv 10:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.003CrossRef

Baptiste AK (2014) “Experience is a great teacher”: Citizens’ reception of a proposal for the implementation of green infrastructure as stormwater management technology. Community Development 45(4):337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2014.934255CrossRef

Baptiste AK, Foley C, Smardon R (2015) Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: a case study of Syracuse, NY. Landsc Urban Plan. 136:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012CrossRef

Barclay N, Klotz L (2019) Role of community participation for green stormwater infrastructure development. J Environ Manag 251:109620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109620CrossRef

Barnhill K, Smardon R (2012) Gaining ground: green infrastructure attitudes and perceptions from stakeholders in Syracuse, New York. Environ Pract 14(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046611000470CrossRef

Benedict M, McMahon ET (2006) Green Infrastructure: linking Landscape and Communities. Island Press, Washington, DC

Byrne JA, Lo AY, Jianjun Y (2015) Residents’ understanding of the role of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in Hangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan 138:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.013CrossRef

Chan FKS, Griffiths JA, Higgitt D, Xu S, Zhu F, Tang YT, Xu Y, Thorne CR (2018) “Sponge City” in China - A breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy 76:772–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005CrossRef

Chizhou Municipal Commission of Housing and Rural and Urban Construction (2017) Constructing Beautiful Chizhou City Based on EcoCity Planning and Sponge City Development. Anhui Architecture 14–15

Choi C, Berry P, Smith A (2021) The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: a systematic literature review. J Environ Manag 291:112583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112583CrossRef

Church SP (2015) Exploring Green Streets and rain gardens as instances of small scale nature and environmental learning tools. Landsc Urban Plan 134:229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.021CrossRef

Corder GW, Foreman DI (2009) Nonparametric Statistics for Non‐Statisticians. Wiley, New York

Cousins JJ (2017) Infrastructure and institutions: stakeholder perspectives of stormwater governance in Chicago. Cities 66:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.005CrossRef

Dai L, van Rijswick HFMW, Driessen PPJ, Keessen AM (2018) Governance of the sponge city programme in China with Wuhan as a case study. Int J Water Resour Dev 34(4):578–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1373637CrossRef

DeMaris A (2004) Regression with social data: Modeling continuous and limited response variables. Wiley, New York

Demuzere M, Orru K, Heidrich O, Olazabal E, Geneletti D, Orru H, Bhave AG, Mittal N, Feliu E, Faehnle M (2014) Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. J Environ Manag 146:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025CrossRef

Derkzen ML, van Teeffelen AJA, Verburg PH (2017) Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? Landsc. Urban Plan. 157:106–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.027CrossRef

Dhakal KP, Chevalier LR (2016) Urban stormwater governance: the need for a paradigm shift. Environ Manag 57(5):1112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0667-5CrossRef

Dietz ME, Clausen JC, Filchak KK (2004) Education and changes in residential nonpoint source pollution. Environ Manag 34(5):684–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0238-4CrossRef

Din Dar MU, Shah AI, Bhat SA, Kumar R, Huisingh D, Kaur R (2021) Blue Green infrastructure as a tool for sustainable urban development. J Clean Prod 318:128474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128474CrossRef

Ding L, Ren X, Gu R, Che Y (2019) Implementation of the “sponge city” development plan in China: an evaluation of public willingness to pay for the life-cycle maintenance of its facilities. Cities 93:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.007CrossRef

Echols S, Pennypacker E (2008) From stormwater management to artful rainwater design. Landsc. J. 27(2):268–290. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.27.2.268CrossRef

Elliott RM, Motzny AE, Majd S, Chavez FJV, Laimer D, Orlove BS, Culligan PJ (2020) Identifying linkages between urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services using an expert opinion methodology. AMBIO 49(2):569–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01223-9CrossRef

Friedman M (1937) The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32(200):675–701. https://doi.org/10.2307/2279372CrossRef

Gao Y, Church SP, Peel S, Prokopy LS (2018) Public perception towards river and water conservation practices: opportunities for implementing urban stormwater management practices. J Environ Manag 223:478–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.059CrossRef

Giacalone K, Mobley C, Sawyer C, Witte J, Eidson G (2010) Survey says: implications of a public perception survey on stormwater education programming. J Contemp Water Res Educ 146(1):92–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2010.00395.xCrossRef

Gong X, Yang S, Zhang M (2017) Not only health: environmental pollution disasters and political trust. Sustainability 9(4):575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040575CrossRef

Gong Y, Fu H, Zhang S, Li J, Zhang A, Chen Y, Yin D, Liu H (2018) Research on public participation in sponge city construction. China Water & Wastewater 34(18):1–5

Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (ed) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 105–117

Hansen R, Pauleit S (2014) From multi-functionality to multiple ecosystem services? a conceptual framework for multi-functionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. AMBIO 43(4):516–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0510-2CrossRef

Hendricks MD, Meyer MA, Gharaibeh NG, Van Zandt S, Masterson J, Cooper JT, Horney JA, Berke P (2018) The development of a participatory assessment technique for infrastructure: Neighborhood-level monitoring towards sustainable infrastructure systems. Sustain Cities Soc 38:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.039CrossRef

Henstra D, Thistlethwaite J, Vanhooren S (2020) The governance of climate change adaptation: stormwater management policy and practice. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 63(6):1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1634015CrossRef

Huang Y (2017) Sponge renovations in old community of Jiaxing City. Construction Sci and Technol 1:35–38. https://doi.org/10.16116/j.cnki.jskj.2017.01.006CrossRef

Hughes S, Giest S, Tozer L (2020) Accountability and data-driven urban climate governance. Nat Clim Change 10(12):1085–1090. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00953-zCrossRef

Jia H, Wang Z, Zhen X, Clar M, Yu SL (2017) China’s sponge city construction: a discussion on technical approaches. Front Environ Sci Eng 11(4):18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0984-9CrossRef

Kati V, Jari N (2016) Bottom-up thinking—Identifying socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in local blue–green infrastructure planning in Helsinki, Finland. Land Use Policy 50:537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.031CrossRef

Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) “Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis.”. J of the Am Stat Assoc 47(260):583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441CrossRef

Li H, Ding L, Ren M, Li C, Wang H (2017) Sponge city construction in china: a survey of the challenges and opportunities. Water 9(9):594. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9090594CrossRef

Li X (2018) Research and practice for sponge city construction: Pingxiang Experience. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing

Li Y, Xia C, Lou J, Jiang Y (2007) Principles and measures for comprehensive water environment management of Jinshan Lake, Zhenjiang. Chinese Hydraulic Engineering Society 2007 Annual Conference Proceedings, 77–80

Liang X (2018) Integrated economic and financial analysis of China’s sponge city program for water-resilient urban development. Sustainability 10(3):669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030669CrossRef

Manning J (2017) In Vivo Coding. In: Matthes J (ed) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Wiley, New York https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0270

MHURD (2014) Ministry of housing and urban-rural development: sponge city technical guideline-low impact development. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201411/t20141102_219465.html

MHURD (2019) “Excellent sponge pilot city” from first batch of sponge pilot cities were released. http://nnhmsc.nanning.gov.cn/xxgk/jcxxgk/wjzl/zyjwj/t3382327.html

Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J, (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, third ed. Sage, Thousand oaks

Miller SM, Montalto FA (2019) Stakeholder perceptions of the ecosystem services provided by Green Infrastructure in New York City. Ecosyst Serv 37:100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100928CrossRef

Mol AP (2006) Environment and modernity in transitional China: frontiers of ecological modernization. Dev Change 37(1):29–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2006.00468.xCrossRef

National Bureau of Statistics (2020) Report of 2019 Personal Income and Expenditure. National Bureau of Statistics. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202001/t20200117_1723396.html

Nguyen TT, Ngo HH, Guo W, Wang XC (2020) A new model framework for sponge city implementation: emerging challenges and future developments. J Environ Manag 253:109689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109689CrossRef

Porse E (2013) Stormwater governance and future cities. Water 5(1):29–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5010029CrossRef

Pradhananga AK, Davenport MA (2017) Community attachment, beliefs and residents’ civic engagement in stormwater management. Landsc Urban Plan 168:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.10.001CrossRef

Prudencio L, Null SE (2018) Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review. Environ Res Lett 13(3):033002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81aCrossRef

Qiao XJ, Liao KH, Randrup TB (2020) Sustainable stormwater management: a qualitative case study of the Sponge Cities initiative in China. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101963CrossRef

Ren N, Wang Q, Wang Q, Huang H, Wang X (2017) Upgrading to urban water system 3.0 through sponge city construction. Front Environ Sci Eng 11(4):9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0960-4CrossRef

Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Robina-Ramírez R (2019) Bringing community perceptions into sustainable urban drainage systems: the experience of Extremadura, Spain. Land Use Policy 89:104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104251CrossRef

Schreier M (2012) Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Scott AB, Frost PC (2017) Monitoring water quality in Toronto’s urban stormwater ponds: assessing participation rates and data quality of water sampling by citizen scientists in the FreshWater Watch. Sci Total Environ 592:738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.201CrossRef

Serra-Llobet A, Conrad E, Schaefer K (2016) Governing for integrated water and flood risk management: comparing top-down and bottom-up approaches in Spain and California. Water 8(10):445. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8100445CrossRef

Shandas V, Matsler AM, Caughman L, Harris A (2020) Towards the implementation of green stormwater infrastructure: Perspectives from municipal managers in the Pacific Northwest. J Environ Plan Manag 63(6):959–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1620708CrossRef

Shen J, Long R, Chen J (2019) The Enlightenment of American Stormwater Management Evaluation Criteria (LEED-ND, SITES, LPS) on Performance Assessment of Sponge Cities in China. Chinese Landscape. Architecture 26(03):81–86. https://doi.org/10.14085/j.fjyl.2019.03.0081.06CrossRef

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA n.d.). What is Green Infrastructure? https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/what-green-infrastructure. Accessed 02 November 2020

Veerkamp CJ, Schipper AM, Hedlund K, Lazarova T, Nordin A, Hanson HI (2021) A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure. Ecosyst Serv 52:101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101367CrossRef

Venkataramanan V, Lopez D, McCuskey DJ, Kiefus D, McDonald RI, Miller WM, Packman AI, Young SL (2020) Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: a systematic literature review. Sci Total Environ 720:137606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137606CrossRef

Wang Y, Liu X, Huang M, Zuo J, Rameezdeen R (2020) Received vs. given: willingness to pay for sponge city program from a perceived value perspective. J Clean Prod 256:120479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120479CrossRef

Wang YT, Sun M, Song B (2017) Public perceptions of and willingness to pay for sponge city initiatives in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 122:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.002CrossRef

Wang Z (2005) Before the emergence of critical citizens: economic development and political trust in China. Int Rev Sociol 15(1):155–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700500038876CrossRef

Williams JB, Jose R, Moobela C, Hutchinson DJ, Wise R, Gaterell M (2019) Residents’ perceptions of sustainable drainage systems as highly functional blue green infrastructure. Landsc Urban Plan 190:103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103610CrossRef

Wong SM, Montalto FA (2020) Exploring the long-term economic and social impact of green infrastructure in New York City. Water Resour Res 56(11):e2019WR027008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR027008CrossRef

Yang B, Li S, Binder C (2016) A research frontier in landscape architecture: landscape performance and assessment of social benefits. Landsc Res 41(3):314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1077944CrossRef

Yang Y, Tang M, Zhou W, Huhe N (2014) The effect of media use on institutional trust in China. Probl Post-Communism 61(3):45–56. https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216610304CrossRef

Zhang S, Zevenbergen C, Rabé P, Jiang Y (2018) The influences of sponge city on property values in Wuhan, China. Water 10(6):766. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060766CrossRef

Zhao J (2015) Exploration on urban flooding prevention based on sponge city development: a case of Zhenjiang City, China. Garden 7:26–31. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0283.2015.07.005CrossRef

Zhong Y (2014) Do Chinese people trust their local government, and why? an empirical study of political trust in urban China. Probl Post-Communism 61(3):31–44. https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216610303CrossRef

Zinda JA, Li Y, Liu JC (2018) China’s summons for environmental sociology. Curr Sociol 66(6):867–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118778098CrossRef

Title: Ecosystem Benefits Provision of Green Stormwater Infrastructure in Chinese Sponge Cities
Authors: Rui Wang
Hong Wu
Robert Chiles
Publication date: 12-01-2022
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Environmental Management / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01565-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

What Causes Harmful Algal Blooms? A Case Study of Causal Attributions and Conflict in a Lakeshore Community

Development, Conservation, Empowerment: The Trilemma of Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Namibia

Reef Metabolism Monitoring Methods and Potential Applications for Coral Restoration

Social Vulnerability to Irrigation Water Loss: Assessing the Effects of Water Policy Change on Farmers in Idaho, USA

Combining Participatory Mapping and Geospatial Analysis Techniques to Assess Wildfire Risk in Rural North Vietnam

Transient Alterations in Streamwater Quality Induced by Pollution Incidents: Interim Losses Calculations and Compensation Alternatives Based on Habitat Equivalency Analysis