Top

Social Indicators Research

Published in:

09-08-2015

Education Capability: A Focus on Gender and Science

Authors: Tindara Addabbo, Maria Laura Di Tommaso, Anna Maccagnan

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2016

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The focus of the paper is on the measurement of science education capability with a gender perspective and in the capability approach framework. Measuring science education capability implies going beyond the measurement of children test scores. In the capability approach, we aim at the real opportunities that children can develop later in life and therefore it is important to include some measures of non-cognitive skills. We utilize, therefore, different indicators in addition to test scores in science: enjoyment in science, interest in science, general and personal values of science, self-confidence in performing science related tasks, awareness and perception of environmental issues, and responsibility for sustainable development. We utilize the 2006 PISA survey for Italian 15 years old children because it contains a particular focus on science and we estimate a Structural Equation Model to take into account that capabilities are latent constructs of which we only observe some indicators. We also investigate the determinants of children’s science education capability in Italy taking into account household, individual and school factors. Results confirm that boys outperform girls in science education capability. Our theoretical construct for the science education capability confirms that all the indicators are relevant to measure this capability. School activities to promote sciences improve girls’ capability and interactive methods of teaching improve both girls and boys capability. The household educational resources and the household educational possession are also positively correlated with girls’ and boys’ science education capability.

previous article The Effect of Employment on the Mental Health of Lone Mothers in the UK Before and After New Labour’s Welfare Reforms

next article Could the EQ-5D be Used to Predict Mortality and Hospitalization Over a Long Term Period?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

The program provided 6 years of educational and family-support services to socioeconomic disadvantaged children from age 3 in Chicago Public Schools since 1967.

This program has been experimented in Michigan in the mid-1960s and was devoted to low IQ and socioeconomic status African American aged 3–4 children including also activities with their parents.

OECD inverts the items if appropriate, such that the higher the index, the better the performance of the child in a particular dimension. Each index is computed by OECD by running a Confirmatory Factor Analysis using Weighted Likelihood Estimator on the corresponding set of items. The (latent) index scale is then set with mean equal to zero and standard deviation equal to 1 at the OECD level. A positive or a negative index score of a child or of a group of children has therefore no meaning per se: it is interpretable only in comparison with the scores of another peer or of a group of peers (see OECD 2009 for details).

These differences are highly statistically significant: t test = 21.53 for interactive teaching methods and t test = 4.37 for promotion of science.

We ran an Exploratory Factor Analysis on the chosen ten indicators that confirms that there is only one single latent variable. Results are available from the Authors upon request.

Addabbo, T., & Di Tommaso, M. L. (2011). Children’s capabilities and family characteristics in Italy: Measuring imagination and play. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, & F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the capability approach (pp. 222–244). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Addabbo, T., Di Tommaso, M. L., & Maccagnan, A. (2014). Gender differences in Italian children capabilities. Feminist Economics, 20(2), 90–121. doi:10.1080/13545701.2013.844846.

Aka, Eİ., Güven, E., & Aydoğdu, M. (2010). Effect of problem solving method on science process skills and academic achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 7(4), 13–25.

Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2013). A multidimensional approach: Poverty measurement and beyond. Social Indicators Research, 112, 239–257.CrossRef

Anand, P., Krishnakumar, J., & Tran, N. B. (2011). Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(3-4), 205–215.CrossRef

Azzolini, D., Schnell, P., & Palmer, J. (2012). Educational achievement gaps between immigrant and native students in two “new” immigration countries: Italy and Spain in comparison. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 643(1), 46–77.CrossRef

Bacharach, V. R., Baumeister, A. A., & Furr, R. M. (2003). Racial and gender science achievement gaps in secondary education. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 164(1), 115–126.CrossRef

Beaumont-Walters, Y., & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students’ performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2), 133–145.CrossRef

Bhanot, R. T., & Jovanovic, J. (2009). The links between parent behaviors and boys’ and girls’ science achievement beliefs. Applied Developmental Science, 13(1), 42–59.CrossRef

Biggeri, M. (2014). Education policy for agency and participation. In C. Hart, M. Biggeri, & B. Babic (Eds.), Agency and participation in childhood and youth. International applications of the capability approach in schools and beyond (pp. 44–62). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (2010). Capability approach and research on children: Capability approach and children’s issues. In S. Andresen, I. Diehm, U. Sander, & H. Ziegler (Eds.), Children and the good life: New challenges for research on children. Children’s well-being: Indicators and research (Vol. 4, pp. 75–90). New York: Springer.

Biggeri, M., & Libanora, R. (2011). From valuing to evaluating: Tools and procedures to operationalize the capability approach. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, & F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the capability approach (pp. 76–106). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L. (2006). Children conceptualizing their capabilities: Results of the survey during the first Children’s World Congress on Child Labour. Journal of Human Development, 7(1), 59–83.CrossRef

Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109.CrossRef

Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the price for ‘sugar and spice’: Shifting the analytical lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 127–144.CrossRef

Boaler, J., Altendorff, L., & Kent, G. (2011). Mathematics and science inequalities in the United Kingdom: When elitism, sexism and culture collide. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 457–484.CrossRef

Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and cultural change (pp. 71–112). London: Tavistock.

Brownlow, S., & Durham, S. (1997). Sex differences in the use of science and technology in children’s cartoons. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(2), 103–110.CrossRef

Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2005). School quality and family background in Italy. Economics of Education Review, 24(5), 563–577.CrossRef

Cameron, S. V., & Heckman, J. (2001). The dynamics of educational attainment for black, hispanic, and white males. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 455–499.CrossRef

Chevalier, A., & Lanot, G. (2002). The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational achievement. Education Economics, 10(2), 165–181.CrossRef

Cornwell, C., Mustard, D. B., & Van Parys, J. (2013). Noncognitive skills and the gender disparities in test scores and teacher assessments evidence from primary school. Journal Human Resources, 48(1), 236–264.

Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J., & Schennach, S. M. (2010). Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica, 78(3), 883–931.CrossRef

Dai, X., & Heckman, J. J. (2013). Older siblings’ contributions to young child’s cognitive skills. Economic Modelling, 35, 235–248.CrossRef

De Graaf, N. D., De Graaf, P. M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92–111.CrossRef

de San Román, A. G, & de La Rica Goiricelaya, S. (2012). Gender gaps in PISA test scores: The impact of social norms and the mother’s transmission of role attitudes. In IZA discussion paper 6338.

Del Boca, D., Flinn, C., & Wiswall, M. (2014). Household choices and child development. Review of Economic Studies, 81(1), 137–185.CrossRef

Di Tommaso, M. L. (2007). Children capabilities: A structural equation model for India. Journal of Socio Economics, 36, 436–450.CrossRef

Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (1994). Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Development, 65, 296–318.CrossRef

Edgerton, J. D., & Roberts, L. W. (2014). Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in the explanation of enduring educational inequality. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 193–220.CrossRef

EIGE (European Institute for Gender Equality). (2013). Gender equality index. Report. EIGE Publication.

Fernandes, L., Mendes, A., & Teixeira, A. (2012). A review essay on the measurement of child well-being. Social Indicators Research, 106, 239–257.CrossRef

Fernandes, L., Mendes, A., & Teixeira, A. (2013). A weighted multidimensional index of child well-being which incorporates children’s individual perceptions. Social Indicators Research, 114, 803–829.CrossRef

Fullin, G., & Reyneri, E. (2011). Low unemployment and bad jobs for new immigrants in Italy. International Migration, 49(1), 118–147.CrossRef

Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56.CrossRef

Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A., & Wingfield, L. C. (2010). The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 150(2), 132–147.CrossRef

Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165.CrossRef

Gutman, L. M., & Schoon, I. (2013). Non-cognitive skills: Evidence and intervention. London: Education Endowment Foundation.

Hansen, K. T., Heckman, J. J., & Mullen, K. J. (2004). The effect of schooling and ability on achievement test scores. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 39–98.CrossRef

Hart, C. (2014). The capability approach and educational research. In C. Hart, M. Biggeri, & B. Babic (Eds.), Agency and participation in childhood and youth. International applications of the capability approach in schools and beyond (pp. 17–43). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1995). The determinants of children’s attainments: A review of methods and findings. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1829–1878.

Heckman, J. J. (2008). Schools, skills, and synapses. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 289–324.CrossRef

Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19, 451–464.CrossRef

Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills interventions that improve character and cognition. In J. J. Heckman, J. E. Humphries, & T. Kautz (Eds.), The GED Myth: Education, achievement tests, and the role of character in american life, chapter 9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Heckman, J. J., Moon, S. H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P. A., & Yavitz, A. (2010a). The rate of return to the Highscope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 114–128.CrossRef

Heckman, J., Moon, S. H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P., & Yavitz, A. (2010b). Analyzing social experiments as implemented: A reexamination of the evidence from the Highscope Perry Preschool Program. Quantitative Economics, 1(1), 1–46.CrossRef

Heckman, J. J., & Mosso, S. 2014. The economics of human development and social mobility. In NBER working paper no. 19925.

Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2052–2086.CrossRef

Jacobs, J. E. (1991). Influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child mathematics attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 518–527.CrossRef

Jacobs, J. E., & Bleeker, M. M. (2004). Girls’ and boys’ developing interests in math and science: Do parents matter? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 106, 5–21.CrossRef

Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 932–944.CrossRef

Kelly, A. (2012). Sen and the art of educational maintenance: Evidencing a capability, as opposed to an effectiveness, approach to schooling. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(3), 283–296.CrossRef

Kleinjans, K. J. (2010). Family background and gender differences in educational expectations. Economics Letters, 107(2), 125–127.CrossRef

Krishnakumar, J. (2007). Going beyond functionings to capabilities: An econometric model to explain and estimate capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 8(1), 39–63.CrossRef

Krishnakumar, J., & Ballon, P. (2008). Estimating basic capabilities: A Structural Equation Model applied to Bolivia. World Development, 36(6), 992–1010.CrossRef

Krishnakumar, J., & Nagar, A. L. (2008). On exact statistical properties of multidimensional indices based on principal components, factor analysis, MIMIC and Structural Equation Models. Social Indicator Research, 86, 481–496.CrossRef

Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach, theoretical insights and empirical applications. Berlin: Springer.

Madonia, G., Cracolici, M. F., & Cuffaro, M. (2013). Exploring wider well-being in the EU-15 countries: An empirical application of the Stiglitz Report. Social Indicators Research, 111, 117–140.CrossRef

Martins, L., & Veiga, P. (2010). Do inequalities in parents’ education play an important role in PISA students’ mathematics achievement test score disparities? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 1016–1033.CrossRef

Mason, A. D., & King, E. M. (2001). Engendering development through gender equality in rights, resources, and voice. A World Bank policy research report. Washington DC: World Bank/Oxford University Press.

Muthén, B. (1979). A structural probit model with latent variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368), 807–811.

Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defence of reform in liberal education. London: Harvard University Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2&3), 33–59.CrossRef

OECD. (2006). Women in scientific careers: Unleashing the potential. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2007). PISA 2006—Volume 2: Data. Paris: OECD.CrossRef

OECD. (2009). PISA 2006 Technical Report. Paris: OECD.CrossRef

OECD. (2012). Closing the gender gap: Act now. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.CrossRef

Peraita, C., & Sánchez, M. (1998). The effect of family background on children’s level of schooling attainment in Spain. Applied Economics, 30(10), 1327–1334.CrossRef

Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.CrossRef

Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.

Shapira, M. (2012). An exploration of differences in mathematics attainment among immigrant pupils in 18 OECD countries. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 68–95.CrossRef

Sikora, J., & Pokropek, A. (2012). Gender segregation of adolescent science career plans in 50 countries. Science Education, 96(2), 234–264.CrossRef

Sullivan, A. (2001). Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology, 35(4), 893–912.CrossRef

Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household, and community factors. Economics of Education Review, 21(5), 455–470.CrossRef

Temple, J. A., & Reynolds, A. J. (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child–Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), 126–144.CrossRef

Terzi, L. (2007). The capability to be educated. In M. Walker & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 25–44). Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Trani, J. F., Biggeri, M., & Mauro, V. (2013). The multidimensionality of child poverty: Evidence from Afghanistan. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 391–416.CrossRef

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Age and birth cohort differences in self-esteem: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 735–748.CrossRef

Van Ootegem, L., & Verhofstadt, E. (2012). Using capabilities as an alternative indicator for well-being. Social Indicators Research, 106, 133–152.CrossRef

Vaughan, R. P., & Walker, M. (2012). Capabilities, values and education policy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 495–512.CrossRef

Walker, M. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach and education. Educational Action Research, 13(1), 103–110.CrossRef

Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). The capability approach and its potential for work in education. In M. Walker & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 1–18). Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Wüst, K., & Volkert, J. (2012). Childhood and capability deprivation in Germany: A quantitative analysis using German socio-economic panel data. Social Indicators Research, 106, 439–469.CrossRef

Yeung, W. J., Linver, M. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2002). How money matters for young children’s development: Parental investment and family processes. Child Development, 73(6), 1861–1879.CrossRef

Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 245–268.CrossRef

Title: Education Capability: A Focus on Gender and Science
Authors: Tindara Addabbo
Maria Laura Di Tommaso
Anna Maccagnan
Publication date: 09-08-2015
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1057-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

The Effect of Employment on the Mental Health of Lone Mothers in the UK Before and After New Labour’s Welfare Reforms

Gender or Occupational Status: What Counts More for Well-Being at Work?

Crime Patterns between Tradition and Change: A Territorial Analysis of the Italian Provinces

Multidimensional Poverty in Indonesia: Trend Over the Last Decade (2003–2013)

A Novel Approach for Quality of Life Evaluation: Rule-Based Expert System

Measuring Interstate Variations in the Consequences of Illegal Drugs: A Composite Indicator Approach