1 Introduction
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Materials
Sieve size (mm) | Passing (%) |
---|---|
2.5 | 0 |
5 | 0.3 |
10 | 29.5 |
20 | 99.0 |
25 | 100.0 |
2.2 Mixing
Polymer paste content (wt.%) | Target porosity (%) | Polymeric binder (kg/m3) | Fly ash (kg/m3) | Coarse aggregate (kg/m3) | Unit weight (kg/m3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.0 | 35 | 48 | 72 | 1,600 | 1,720 |
9.5 | 30 | 67 | 101 | 1,600 | 1,768 |
12.0 | 25 | 88 | 132 | 1,600 | 1,820 |
14.5 | 20 | 108 | 162 | 1,600 | 1,870 |
16.0 | 15 | 132 | 198 | 1,600 | 1,930 |
19.5 | 10 | 156 | 234 | 1,600 | 1,990 |
2.3 Specimen Preparation
2.4 Methods
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Porosity
3.2 Strength
3.3 Porosity vs. Strength
4 Conclusions
-
As the polymer paste content increased, the total and connected porosity substantially decreased. The connected porosity was approximately 81.8–91.2% of the total porosity.
-
The porosity appears to be closely related to the type and content of paste/mortar and the maximum size and gradation of coarse aggregate used.
-
The strength of the previous polymer concrete was found to be much higher than that of conventional pervious cement concrete. The strength tended to increase as the polymer paste content increased. The flexural strength was about 29.6–38.7% of the compressive strength.
-
The strengths of porous polymer concrete were much superior to those of conventional pervious cement concrete because the polymeric binder and cross-linking agent enhanced the bond between the polymer matrix and aggregate.
-
A strong exponential relationship existed between the porosity and strength with a high coefficient of determination.