Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 9/2020

Open Access 22-06-2020

Effect of Yttrium Additions in Relation to Oxygen Content on Glass Formation in the Zr50Cu40Al10 Alloy

Authors: Krzysztof Pajor, Tomasz Kozieł, Bogdan Rutkowski, Grzegorz Cios, Piotr Błyskun, Dorota Tyrała, Piotr Bała, Anna Zielińska-Lipiec

Published in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A | Issue 9/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The effect of yttrium additions on the glass formation of the Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy with high oxygen content was investigated. Unlike other reports showing the positive effect of alloying Zr-based alloys with a few percent of rare earth elements, we examined the Y-to-oxygen ratios. As calculated, a stoichiometric amount of yttrium (2808 at ppm) is required to bind all the oxygen (4212 at ppm) to form the Y2O3. Additionally, the influence of half (1404 at ppm) and double stoichiometric (5616 at ppm) levels of yttrium, with respect to the measured oxygen content to be bound was evaluated. The Y-doped alloys were synthesized by arc melting, followed by suction casting into copper molds with conical and rod cavities. The critical diameter of the undoped alloy was below 3 mm, while stoichiometric and double stoichiometric yttrium concentrations allowed to obtain 5 and 7 mm diameter glassy samples, respectively. Microstructure observations confirmed the scavenging effect of yttrium, leading to the formation of a cubic (\( Ia\bar{3} \) space group) yttrium sesquioxide. The glass forming ability of the alloys was additionally determined based on differential thermal analysis, allowing to propose the best indicator for the studied Zr-Cu-Al alloys.
Notes
Manuscript submitted January 31, 2020.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

Zr-based bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) belong to the group of modern metallic materials. The fabrication of such materials, i.e., obtaining an amorphous structure, requires sufficiently fast cooling rates during solidification to bypass the crystallization process. In comparison to their crystalline counterparts, BMGs are characterized by superior mechanical, physical and chemical properties.[1] These characteristics make them a promising structural and functional material for many engineering applications, e.g., sport goods, high-performance springs, micro-geared motor parts, pressure sensors, biomedical application, etc.[2,3]
Unfortunately, the fabrication of Zr-based BMGs is very expensive, due to the necessity of using high purity constituent elements and strict processing conditions. Special attention must be paid to oxygen content, as this element dramatically reduces the alloy’s glass forming ability (GFA) and deteriorates its mechanical properties.[48] Such a dramatic drop in the GFA is caused by the formation of oxides or other oxygen-induced inclusions, acting as perfect heterogeneous nucleation sites during solidification.[912] The ZrO2 oxide is regarded as a nucleation catalyst in Zr-based alloys. This oxide exists in three crystallographic forms: monoclinic α ZrO2, which is thermodynamically stable up to 1478 K, tetragonal β ZrO2 stable between 1475 K and 2650 K, and finally cubic γ ZrO2 (CaF2—type) phase, which is stable up to the melting point, 2983 K.[13]
In our previous work, we studied the Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy with two oxygen levels, 194 ± 26 wt ppm and 918 ± 72 wt ppm.[4] The critical diameter Dc (the maximum amorphous thickness) of this alloy was determined to be 8 mm and below 3 mm for the alloy with low and high oxygen contents, respectively. If the sample diameter exceeded the critical size, the metastable CuZr phase, with a small amount of the τ3 (Zr51Cu28Al21) phase, were observed for the low oxygen variant. In comparison, only the τ3 phase was present in the high oxygen level sample. According to the ternary phase diagram,[14] τ3 is the first solidifying phase for this chemical composition. This shows that oxygen impurities facilitate the τ3 phase formation by providing heterogeneous nucleation sites during solidification.
It is not possible to completely eliminate oxygen from raw elements, due to the high chemical affinity of zirconium and oxygen. Moreover, high purity and Hf-free zirconium is not commercially available, as it exhibits a very low neutron capture cross-section, which made it a strategic material for nuclear power plant applications.[15] Commercially available Zr-sponge can contain more than 1000 wt ppm of oxygen.
Therefore, an idea of doping low-purity (high oxygen) alloys with rare-earth elements (REEs) was proposed by Zhang et al.[16] Such elements, with higher affinities to oxygen than zirconium, can act as an oxygen scavenger and form a less harmful oxide. So far, various glass forming systems doped with different rare-earth elements have been investigated.[1624] Significant attention was paid to yttrium, which increases the GFA of Zr-Al-Ni-Cu,[20] Zr-Co-Al,[21] Zr-Ti-Cu-Ni-Be,[16] Cu-Zr-Al[22] alloys. However, yttrium additions and oxygen concentrations were not correlated. Additionally, yttrium was changed monotonically (1, 2, 3 pct, etc.), meaning that the total effect of yttrium is a sum of scavenging and alloying effects. As REEs exhibit strong affinities with oxygen, their scavenging effect should be studied with respect to the known, to be bound, oxygen content in the alloy. More detailed investigations were carried out by Kündig et al. [19] where the effects of Sc and La additions on the GFA were studied in the Zr52.5Cu17.9Ni14.6Al10Ti5 alloy that could be cast into 4 mm glassy sample without the necessity of doping. Small Sc additions, preceded by careful oxygen measurements, to the undoped alloy significantly increased the Dc. The highest GFA was obtained for 0.03 to 0.06  pct of Sc, reaching Dc of almost 12 mm. This Sc contents range corresponds to the stoichiometric and double stoichiometric level required to form the Sc2O3 oxide.
In this paper, we systematically studied the effect of yttrium additions to the Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy, with high oxygen content, on its glass-forming ability. Yttrium is generally considered a heavy REE, due to its similar ionic radius to Dy.[25] Similarly to other REEs, the Y2O3 sesquioxide is the most stable type of oxide. The Gibbs-free energy of yttrium oxide formation is significantly lower in comparison to zirconium oxide within the entire temperature range: Y2O3: − 1816.6 kJ/mol and ZrO2: − 1042.8 kJ/mol at 298 K; Y2O3: − 1392.3 kJ/mol and − 763.7 kJ/mol at 1800 K.[26] The crystallographic structure of Y2O3 will play a key role in the formation of undesirable phases during solidification. During heating, these sesquioxides polymorphically transform from a cubic (\( Ia\bar{3} \) space group) to a high-temperature hexagonal (P63/mmc space group) structure at 2600 ± 30 K, becoming stable until reaching its melting point (2712 K).[27] Two other forms of Y2O3 can be found at higher pressures: monoclinic above 13 GPa and hexagonal above 24.5 GPa.[28] As these two phases do not occur at ambient pressure, they are not considered in the present study.

2 Material and Methods

Based on our previous work,[4] the oxygen level in the undoped Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy (918 ± 72 wt ppm) was recalculated into atomic percentage (4213 at ppm) and this amount of oxygen is intended to be bound by yttrium. The stoichiometric yttrium concentration to bind all oxygen into the Y2O3 oxide (herein referred to as B2/3) was calculated to be 0.281 at.  pct. Moreover, half (B1/3) and double stoichiometric (B4/3) levels of yttrium with respect to oxygen content were studied. The chemical compositions of the investigated alloys and sample designations with respect to the Y-to-oxygen ratios are presented in Table I. The alloys were synthesized by means of arc melting and suction-casting into copper mold cavities in a Ti-gettered argon atmosphere (6 N) using low-purity Zr (99.8 pct) and high purity Cu (99.99 pct), Al (99.999 pct) and Y (99.9 pct). First, cone-shaped samples were produced to find the approximate Dc, which was determined using a threshold of 5 pct crystalline material.[19] As the critical diameter obtained from the parallel-edge molds may differ from the conical ones,[4,29] a series of rod samples with a gradually increasing diameter were cast and characterized by microstructure observations and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer) with Cu Kα radiation. The rod sample with the highest diameter, in the absence of sharp Bragg peaks on XRD, was assumed to be amorphous, and this diameter was taken as the critical value. Critical diameter values determined on conical and rod samples are designated as \( D_{c}^{c} \) and \( D_{c}^{r} \), respectively.
Table I
Chemical Composition of Investigated Alloys
Alloy Designation
Y-to-Oxygen Atomic Ratio
Chemical Composition (At. Pct)
Zr
Cu
Al
Y
B
50
40
10
B1/3
1:3
49.930
39.944
9.986
0.140
B2/3
2:3
49.860
39.888
9.972
0.281
B4/3
4:3
49.719
39.775
9.944
0.562
All prepared samples were cut (cones—longitudinally, rods—crosswise), grinded (SiC paper up to 7000-grit), polished (mixture of colloidal silica and hydrogen peroxide), etched (25 ml H2O + 22.5 ml HNO3 + 5 drops HF), and then studied using optical microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE LV150N). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations were carried out using Versa 3D (FEI) microscope equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). A high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscope (FEI, Titan Cubed G2 60-300) equipped with EDX ChemiSTEM was used for detailed observations of small precipitates. Lamella for STEM study was extracted using the SEM-FIB technique (ZEISS NEON CrossBeam 40EsB).
The GFA indicators were determined based on differential thermal analysis (DTA, Setaram Labsys). The calorimeter was carefully calibrated before measurements. After resetting the correction coefficients in the DTA software, new melting measurements of the reference elements (Sn, Zn, Al, Cu, and Ni) were performed at different heating rates (10, 20, and 40 K/min). Based on the registered onset melting points and thermal effects, new correction coefficients were entered in the analyzer software. DTA measurements were conducted on thin slices cut from the middle of the as-cast samples using 100 µl alumina pans at a constant heating rate of 20 K/min and protective argon (5 N purity) gas flow with 20 ml/min.
All characteristic temperatures (Tg-glass transition, Tx-onset of crystallization, Tp-peak of crystallization, Ts and Tf-start and finish of the eutectoid transformation, Tm-solidus, Tl-liquidus) were determined by the DTA software. Tg temperatures were estimated as the inflection points on the DTA curves. Based on these values, several GFA indicators were evaluated: ΔTxg = Tx − Tg,[30] Trg = Tg/Tl,[31] γ = Tx/(Tg + Tl),[32] γm = (2Tx − Tg)/Tl,[33] ω4 = (2Tx − Tg)/(Tl + Tx) [34] and the χ = [(Tx − Tg)/(Tl − Tx)]·[Tx/(Tl − Tx)]1.47.[35]

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Critical Diameter Determination

Microstructures of the doped alloys cast in the form of cones are presented in Figure 1. In the case of B1/3 and B2/3 alloys (Figure 1(a)), crystalline inclusions were observed across their entire longitudinal section, similarly to the reference (undoped) alloy.[4] SEM observation revealed uniform distribution of crystalline inclusions and yttrium oxides, even at the bottom part of the cones (Figures 1(b), (c)). This effect can be observed, as the lateral surface of the cone is not parallel to suction direction (taper angle of 10 deg), which causes intense convection in the melt and spreading of crystalline inclusions in the whole volume. Therefore, it was not possible to accurately determine the \( D_{c}^{c} \) for these variants. Similar oxides were also observed in the case of double stoichiometric amount of yttrium with respect to the measured oxygen content to be bound (B4/3). However, their volume fraction was significantly lower (Figure 1(d), (e)) and the critical diameter was estimated as \( D_{c}^{c} \) = 5 mm.
Critical diameters of the doped alloys were determined on rod samples. Figure 2 shows XRD patterns of the reference Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy (3 mm diameter rod) and a series of doped alloys cast in the form of 4 mm and 5 mm (B1/3), 5 mm and 6 mm (B2/3), as well as 7 mm and 8 mm (B4/3) diameter rods. A characteristic amorphous halo was observed in all samples, however, in the case of sample diameter \( D = D_{c}^{r} \), no crystalline peaks could be detected. The positive effect of yttrium additions on the amorphous thickness of the Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy is evident even in the case of insufficient amounts to bind all oxygen. The addition of only 0.140 at. pct yttrium (B1/3—half stoichiometric level required to bind all oxygen) to the alloy containing 918  ±  72 wt ppm of oxygen allowed to obtain a 4 mm diameter glassy sample. A lower cooling rate in the higher diameter sample (5 mm) did not allow to bypass the crystallization process and partial crystallization of the τ3 phase was confirmed. This phase was identified by comparison of 2θ positions with the one in Reference.[12] As there are no crystallographic data of this phase, Yokoyama et at. synthesized a sample with a composition corresponding to this phase and compared diffraction peaks of a homogenized sample with the peaks coming from the partially crystallized sample.
A slightly higher critical diameter (\( D_{c}^{r} \) = 5 mm) was obtained using the stoichiometric level of yttrium addition (0.281 at. pct) required to bind all oxygen. The further increase in yttrium concentration to the double stoichiometric level, allowed to obtain a similar value of critical diameter (\( D_{c}^{r} \) = 7 mm) to that value determined in the low oxygen alloy (8 mm [4]). Moreover, in the case of \( D_{c}^{r} + 1 \) mm sample, the CuZr phase was detected instead of the τ3 phase. The presence of a cubic primitive CuZr phase (\( Pm\bar{3}m \) space group) dispersed in the glassy matrix is known to be an effective method of enhancing plasticity of CuZr-based alloys.[36,37]
Our results show that the stoichiometric amount of yttrium addition in relation the measured oxygen content is not sufficient to bind all oxygen. This is most probably related to the partial dissolution of yttrium in the matrix and/or additional oxidizing coming from yttrium itself. To prevent oxygen-induced formation of the τ3 phase, excess yttrium is required. The formation of the τ3 phase during solidification depletes the remaining melt in Zr and reduced GFA. If the amount of yttrium was sufficient to bind all oxygen, the critical diameter would be close to the value determined in the high purity (low oxygen) alloy.

3.2 Microstructure Observations of Doped Alloys

SEM observations of B2/3 and B4/3 alloys cast in the form of rods with sizes corresponding to \( D_{c}^{r} \) and \( D_{c}^{r} \)+1 mm showed the presence of yttrium oxides in all samples (dark contrast in Figure 3), as confirmed by the EDS spectrum in Figure 3(b). It should be noted, that the absence of sharp Bragg peaks on the XRD pattern was taken as the amorphicity criterion. In fact, the oxides were observed in the rod samples corresponding to \( D_{c}^{r} \), however, their volume fraction was below XRD detection limit. For the \( D_{c}^{r} \)+1 mm variants, an additional τ3 phase (grey contrast) was identified for the stoichiometric concentration of yttrium (Figure 3(b)), whereas for the B4/3 alloy, CuZr crystallites embedded in the amorphous matrix were observed (Figure 3(d)). It is worth noting that the CuZr phase crystallized on the oxide array, which indicates that the yttrium oxide can also act as a nucleation site. In contrary to the τ3 phase, which was uniformly distributed in the whole sample, the CuZr was observed only in the central part of the rods.
The B2/3 alloy in the form of 6 mm diameter rod was submitted to detailed (S)TEM observations. Figure 4 shows high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) image and EDS elemental distribution maps. It is clear that the precipitate is composed of yttrium and oxygen. Figure 5(a) shows a high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HRSTEM) image of this phase in HAADF contrast. The electron diffraction investigation (Figure 5(b)) proved that this particle is the Y2O3 oxide with a cubic \( Ia\bar{3} \)—space group and a lattice parameter of 10.6(0) Å. This type of Y2O3 is thermodynamically stable below 2600 K.[27] The EDS analysis of the area near the oxide showed slightly increased oxygen contents, as well as enrichment of Al at the expense of copper compared to the matrix. Such composition corresponds to the τ3 phase (Zr51Cu28Al21). Figures 5(c) and (d) show HRSTEM-HAADF images and corresponding electron diffraction patterns of this phase. As there is no reference pattern of the τ3 phase in the database, the diffraction spots are not indexed. Figures 5(e) and (f) show HRSTEM-HAADF images of the interface between τ3 and Y2O3 phases, with corresponding electron diffraction patterns. These investigations proved that there is no coherence between these phases, which is favorable if nucleation is expected to be avoided during solidification. A typical “salt and pepper” contrast for the amorphous structure is shown in Figure 5(g). Some medium-range order (MRO) zones form a network of dark regions in the bright matrix, with an area of approx. 8 nm2. The electron diffraction pattern (Figure 5(h)) of the amorphous region shown in Figure 5(g) consists of a typical amorphous halo. TEM studies and EDS analysis clearly prove that the observed oxides are the low-temperature cubic Y2O3 phase. If yttrium is added to the alloy, it binds with oxygen and forms yttrium oxide in the melt, due to the Gibbs free energy of Y2O3 formation being significantly lower than that of ZrO2 (− 1392.3 vs. −763.7 kJ/mol at 1800 K [26]). As the solidification range of Zr-based alloys is between 1200 K and 700 K, the crystallographic type of inclusions dispersed in the undercooled melt within this temperature range plays a key role. Apart from rare-earth elements being considered as oxygen scavengers,[17] it is also clear that any crystalline phase dispersed in the melt promotes heterogeneous nucleation during solidification. As shown in Figure 3(d), the Y2O3 dispersed in the melt facilitates CuZr phase crystallization. However, this phase was only observed in a higher diameter sample, and a relatively low-cooling rate is sufficient to avoid its formation. In turn, the τ3 phase was observed even in the lower diameter (rapidly solidified) samples with high oxygen, especially if the yttrium content was insufficient to bind the oxygen. Therefore, it should be noted that yttrium acts as an oxygen scavenger, leading to stabilization of the supercooled liquid and enhancement of the GFA, as well as the formation of yttrium oxides do not facilitate heterogeneous nucleation during solidification.

3.3 Glass Forming Ability

As the determination of the critical diameter is a time-consuming process, thermal analysis during heating is commonly used to describe the glass forming ability of a given alloy. Despite characteristic temperatures being higher in comparison to the applied cooling conditions (during solidification), they allow to easily estimate GFA. The DTA curves recorded during heating of the undoped Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy (B; 3 mm diameter rod) and its doped variants, with sizes corresponding to their \( D_{c}^{r} \) values, are plotted in Figure 6. All samples exhibit a distinct glass transition temperature, followed by a supercooled liquid region and two-stage crystallization. According to our previous work,[4] increased oxygen levels lower the temperature of the first crystallization peak (Tp1) from 781 K to 764 K, and increase the second one (Tp2) from 934 K to 967 K. In the case of the doped alloys, the increase in yttrium concentration shifted the crystallization events to higher temperatures, while the glass transition temperature is almost unchanged. A distance between these two temperatures (ΔTxg = Tx − Tg) is referred to as the supercooled liquid region and is one of the GFA indicators (the wider ΔTxg the higher the GFA). The temperature of the first crystallization peak increases from 764 K (curve B) to 775 K, 777 K, and 792 K for B1/3, B2/3 and B4/3, respectively. The second crystallization peak did not change for B1/3 and B2/3 (approx. 967 K), however, in the case of B4/3, it is too smooth to be accurately determined. Further heating leads to an eutectoid transformation of the crystallization products into the CuZr phase, accompanied by an endothermic event. The start (Ts) and finish (Tf) temperatures of this transformation are the same in all cases (1047 K and 1078 K, respectively), both in the reference alloys (with high and low oxygen levels) and doped alloys. The last endothermic peaks correspond to the melting process, where Tl stand for the end of this event and this value is included in most GFA indicators. In our previous study,[4] we showed that a high oxygen level in the alloy causes broadening and splitting of the melting event into two peaks, due to the shifting the alloy to the off-eutectic composition. Here, we may conclude that that increase in yttrium addition decreases the liquidus temperature and narrows the melting range, thereby improving GFA.
Summarized data of Tg, Tx, Tp1, Tl temperatures and calculated GFA indicators, including data of the low oxygen (A) and high oxygen (B) undoped Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy,[4] are presented in Table II. Alloy B is characterized by the lowest values for almost all indicators, the highest value (the best GFA) was found for the low oxygen variant, whereas intermediate values were calculated for the B1/3, B2/3 and B4/3 alloys. The Trg parameter, which includes only Tg and Tl temperatures, does not correlate with the critical diameter values. The most sensitive indicators are ΔTxg (it varies between 40 K and 68 K) and χ (0.252 to 0.521) parameters. The GFA is strongly associated with the stability of the liquid phase and its crystallization resistance. On the one hand, although consisting of only two characteristic temperatures (Tx − Tg), ΔTxg- was confirmed to be in good agreement with the critical cooling rate for glass formation.[38] On the other hand, the χ parameter was confirmed to best correlate the GFA with Dc.[35] Figure 7 shows a good linear relationship between these parameters. The χ value of the undoped Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy containing 918 ± 72 wt ppm of oxygen (B) was calculated as 0.252, which corresponds to the critical diameter of ~ 2.5 mm. Assuming that the critical diameter should be an integer value, we may conclude that \( D_{c}^{r} \) = 2 mm.
Table II
Characteristic Temperatures, Critical Diameters (in Brackets Predicted Value for Alloy B) and GFA Indicators of Reference (A—Low Oxygen Content, B—High Oygen Content, Reprinted with Permission from Ref. [4] © Elsevier) and Doped Alloys. A and B Correspond to the Zr50Cu40Al10 with Low Oxygen (194 ± 26 wt ppm) and High Oxygen (918 ± 72 wt ppm), Respectively
Alloy
\( D_{c}^{r} \) (mm)
Characteristic Temperatures
Glass Forming Ability Indicators
Tg (K)
Tx (K)
Tp1 (K)
Tl (K)
ΔTxg (K)
Trg
γ
γm
ω4
χ
A [4]
8
< 3 (2)
711
779
781
1157
68
0.614
0.417
0.732
0.438
0.521
B [4]
720
760
764
1163
40
0.619
0.404
0.688
0.416
0.252
B1/3
4
5
7
723
770
775
1158
47
0.624
0.409
0.706
0.424
0.332
B2/3
723
773
777
1157
50
0.625
0.411
0.711
0.426
0.364
B4/3
723
783
792
1154
60
0.627
0.417
0.731
0.435
0.485
ΔTxg = Tx − Tg,[30] Trg = Tg/Tl,[31] γ = Tx/(Tg + Tl),[32] γm = (2Tx − Tg)/Tl,[33] ω4 = (2Tx − Tg)/(Tl + Tx),[34] χ = [(Tx − Tg)/(Tl − Tx)]·[Tx/(Tl − Tx)]1.47 [35]

4 Conclusions

The effect of controlled yttrium addition to the Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy, containing 918 ± 72 wt ppm of oxygen, on glass formation was studied and the following conclusions were drawn:
1.
The harmful effect of high oxygen content in Zr-based alloys coming from the low purity of raw materials can be minimized by controlled yttrium doping. The yttrium addition resulted in the formation of a cubic Y2O3 (\( Ia\bar{3} \) space group) instead of a ZrO2 phase, which inhibited the formation of the intermetallic τ3 phase that had previously been observed in the undoped alloy.
 
2.
The stoichiometric addition of yttrium, with respect to the measured oxygen content in the undoped alloy, required to bind all of the oxygen to the Y2O3 oxide is not sufficient to fully utilize its scavenging effect.
 
3.
The double stoichiometric level of yttrium (0.562 at. pct) allowed to obtain a 7 mm diameter glassy sample, which is only 1 mm below the critical diameter obtained for the undoped Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy produced from elements with low oxygen contents.
 
4.
The increase in yttrium concentration did not influence the glass transition temperature, however, it significantly increased the crystallization temperature and lowered the liquidus temperature. Good agreement between the χ parameter and \( D_{c}^{r} \) allowed to determine the critical diameter of the undoped Zr50Cu40Al10 alloy containing 918 ± 72 wt ppm, which was predicted to be 2 mm.
 

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education Republic of Poland under contract No. 16.16.110.663. To Elsevier Ltd. for copyright and permissions provided by Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) - www.​rightslink.​com.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference [3] J. Schroers, G. Kumar, T.M. Hodges, S. Chan and T.R. Kyriakides: JOM., 2009, vol 61, pp. 21–29.CrossRef [3] J. Schroers, G. Kumar, T.M. Hodges, S. Chan and T.R. Kyriakides: JOM., 2009, vol 61, pp. 21–29.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference [4] K. Pajor, T. Kozieł, G. Cios, P. Błyskun, P. Bała and A. Zielińska-Lipiec: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2018, vol 496, pp. 42–47.CrossRef [4] K. Pajor, T. Kozieł, G. Cios, P. Błyskun, P. Bała and A. Zielińska-Lipiec: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2018, vol 496, pp. 42–47.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference [5] X.H. Lin, W.L. Johnson and W.K. Rhim: Mater. Trans. JIM., 1997, vol 38, pp. 473–77.CrossRef [5] X.H. Lin, W.L. Johnson and W.K. Rhim: Mater. Trans. JIM., 1997, vol 38, pp. 473–77.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference [6] P. Błyskun, T. Kozieł, K. Pajor, P. Maj and T. Kulik: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2019, vol 509, pp. 80–87.CrossRef [6] P. Błyskun, T. Kozieł, K. Pajor, P. Maj and T. Kulik: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2019, vol 509, pp. 80–87.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference N.D. De Campos Neto, F.S. Pereira, S.G. Antonio, Y. Guo, A.J. Clarke, M.J. Kaufman and M.F. De Oliveira (2019) Mater. Charact., vol 158, pp. 1-7.CrossRef N.D. De Campos Neto, F.S. Pereira, S.G. Antonio, Y. Guo, A.J. Clarke, M.J. Kaufman and M.F. De Oliveira (2019) Mater. Charact., vol 158, pp. 1-7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference [8] C.A. Teixeira, R.V. da Silva, L.T. Pereira, M.F. de Oliveira: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2020, vol 535, art. no. 119966.CrossRef [8] C.A. Teixeira, R.V. da Silva, L.T. Pereira, M.F. de Oliveira: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2020, vol 535, art. no. 119966.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference [9] C.T. Liu, M.F. Chisholm and M.K. Miller: Intermetallics, 2002, vol 10, pp. 1105–12.CrossRef [9] C.T. Liu, M.F. Chisholm and M.K. Miller: Intermetallics, 2002, vol 10, pp. 1105–12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference [10] Z.H. Han, L. He, Y.L. Hou, J. Feng and J. Sun: Intermetallics, 2009, vol 17, pp. 553–61.CrossRef [10] Z.H. Han, L. He, Y.L. Hou, J. Feng and J. Sun: Intermetallics, 2009, vol 17, pp. 553–61.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference [11] J.L. Cheng, G. Chen, Z.W. Zhang, Z.Z. Wang, Z.Y. Wang and X.Q. Li: Intermetallics, 2014, vol 49, pp. 149-53.CrossRef [11] J.L. Cheng, G. Chen, Z.W. Zhang, Z.Z. Wang, Z.Y. Wang and X.Q. Li: Intermetallics, 2014, vol 49, pp. 149-53.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference [12] Y. Yokoyama, T. Shinohara, K. Fukaura and A. Inoue: Mater. Trans., 2004, vol 45, pp. 1819–23.CrossRef [12] Y. Yokoyama, T. Shinohara, K. Fukaura and A. Inoue: Mater. Trans., 2004, vol 45, pp. 1819–23.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference [13] J.P. Abriata, J. Garces and R. Versaci: Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams, 1986, vol 7, pp. 116–24.CrossRef [13] J.P. Abriata, J. Garces and R. Versaci: Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams, 1986, vol 7, pp. 116–24.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference [14] H. Bo, J. Wang, S. Jin, H.Y. Qi, X.L. Yuan, L.B. Liu and Z.P. Jin: Intermetallics, 2010, vol 18, pp. 2322–27.CrossRef [14] H. Bo, J. Wang, S. Jin, H.Y. Qi, X.L. Yuan, L.B. Liu and Z.P. Jin: Intermetallics, 2010, vol 18, pp. 2322–27.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference [15] K.T. Park, T.H. Lee, N.C. Jo, H.H. Nersisyan, B.S. Chun, H.H. Lee and J.H. Lee: J. Nucl. Mater., 2013, vol 436, pp. 130–38.CrossRef [15] K.T. Park, T.H. Lee, N.C. Jo, H.H. Nersisyan, B.S. Chun, H.H. Lee and J.H. Lee: J. Nucl. Mater., 2013, vol 436, pp. 130–38.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference [16] Y. Zhang, M.X. Pan, D.Q. Zhao, R.J. Wang and W.H. Wang: Mater. Trans. JIM., 2000, vol 41, pp. 1410–14.CrossRef [16] Y. Zhang, M.X. Pan, D.Q. Zhao, R.J. Wang and W.H. Wang: Mater. Trans. JIM., 2000, vol 41, pp. 1410–14.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference [18] X.I.E. Zhiwei, Z. Yongzhang, Y. Yuanzheng, C. Xianzhao, T.A.O. Pingjun, Z. Xie, Y. Zhang, Y. Yang, X. Chen and P. Tao: Rare Met., 2010, vol 29, pp. 444–50.CrossRef [18] X.I.E. Zhiwei, Z. Yongzhang, Y. Yuanzheng, C. Xianzhao, T.A.O. Pingjun, Z. Xie, Y. Zhang, Y. Yang, X. Chen and P. Tao: Rare Met., 2010, vol 29, pp. 444–50.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference [19] A.A. Kündig, D. Lepori, A.J. Perry, S. Rossmann, A. Blatter, A. Dommann and P.J. Uggowitzer: Mater. Trans., 2002, vol 43, pp. 3206–10.CrossRef [19] A.A. Kündig, D. Lepori, A.J. Perry, S. Rossmann, A. Blatter, A. Dommann and P.J. Uggowitzer: Mater. Trans., 2002, vol 43, pp. 3206–10.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference [20] J. Luo, H. Duan, C. Ma, S. Pang and T. Zhang: Mater. Trans., 2006, vol 47, pp. 450–53.CrossRef [20] J. Luo, H. Duan, C. Ma, S. Pang and T. Zhang: Mater. Trans., 2006, vol 47, pp. 450–53.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference [21] J. Zhu, C. Wang, J. Han, S. Yang, G. Xie, H. Jiang, Y. Chen and X. Liu: Intermetallics, 2018, vol 92, pp. 55–61.CrossRef [21] J. Zhu, C. Wang, J. Han, S. Yang, G. Xie, H. Jiang, Y. Chen and X. Liu: Intermetallics, 2018, vol 92, pp. 55–61.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference [22] J. Chen, Y. Zhang, J.P. He, K.F. Yao, B.C. Wei and G.L. Chen: Scr. Mater., 2006, vol 54, pp. 1351–55.CrossRef [22] J. Chen, Y. Zhang, J.P. He, K.F. Yao, B.C. Wei and G.L. Chen: Scr. Mater., 2006, vol 54, pp. 1351–55.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference F. Sikan, B. Yasar and I. Kalay: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2018, vol 49A, pp. 1328-35.CrossRef F. Sikan, B. Yasar and I. Kalay: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2018, vol 49A, pp. 1328-35.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference [24] M. Malekan, R. Rashidi and S.G. Shabestari: Vacuum, 2020, vol 174, art. no. 109223.CrossRef [24] M. Malekan, R. Rashidi and S.G. Shabestari: Vacuum, 2020, vol 174, art. no. 109223.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference [25] S.W. Neale, R. Neelameggham, S. Alam, H. Oosterhof, A.A. Jha and D. Dreisinger, Rare Metal Technology, Wiley, Hoboken, 2014. [25] S.W. Neale, R. Neelameggham, S. Alam, H. Oosterhof, A.A. Jha and D. Dreisinger, Rare Metal Technology, Wiley, Hoboken, 2014.
26.
go back to reference R.A. Robie, B.S. Hemingway, and J.R. Fisher: Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 Bar pressure and at higher temperatures, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 1978. R.A. Robie, B.S. Hemingway, and J.R. Fisher: Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 Bar pressure and at higher temperatures, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 1978.
27.
28.
go back to reference [28] I. Halevy, R. Carmon, M.L. Winterrose, O. Yeheskel, E. Tiferet and S. Ghose: J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2010, vol 215, pp. 1–8. [28] I. Halevy, R. Carmon, M.L. Winterrose, O. Yeheskel, E. Tiferet and S. Ghose: J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2010, vol 215, pp. 1–8.
29.
go back to reference K.J. Laws, B. Gun and M. Ferry: Metall. Mater. Trans. A , 2009, vol 40, pp. 2377–87.CrossRef K.J. Laws, B. Gun and M. Ferry: Metall. Mater. Trans. A , 2009, vol 40, pp. 2377–87.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference [30] A. Inoue, T. Zhang and T. Masumoto: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 1993, vol 156–158, pp. 473–80.CrossRef [30] A. Inoue, T. Zhang and T. Masumoto: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 1993, vol 156–158, pp. 473–80.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference [31] Z.P. Lu, Y. Li and S.C. Ng: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2000, vol 270, pp. 103–14.CrossRef [31] Z.P. Lu, Y. Li and S.C. Ng: J. Non. Cryst. Solids., 2000, vol 270, pp. 103–14.CrossRef
32.
33.
go back to reference [33] X.H. Du, J.C. Huang, C.T. Liu and Z.P. Lu: J. Appl. Phys., 2007, vol 101, pp. 23–25. [33] X.H. Du, J.C. Huang, C.T. Liu and Z.P. Lu: J. Appl. Phys., 2007, vol 101, pp. 23–25.
34.
go back to reference [34] P. Błyskun, P. Maj, M. Kowalczyk, J. Latuch and T. Kulik: J. Alloys Compd., 2014, vol 625, pp. 13–17.CrossRef [34] P. Błyskun, P. Maj, M. Kowalczyk, J. Latuch and T. Kulik: J. Alloys Compd., 2014, vol 625, pp. 13–17.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference [35] Z. Long, W. Liu, M. Zhong, Y. Zhang, M. Zhao, G. Liao and Z. Chen: J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2018, vol 132, pp. 1645–60.CrossRef [35] Z. Long, W. Liu, M. Zhong, Y. Zhang, M. Zhao, G. Liao and Z. Chen: J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2018, vol 132, pp. 1645–60.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference [36] K.K. Song, S. Pauly, Y. Zhang, P. Gargarella, R. Li, N.S. Barekar, U. Kühn, M. Stoica and J. Eckert: Acta Mater., 2011, vol 59, pp. 6620–30.CrossRef [36] K.K. Song, S. Pauly, Y. Zhang, P. Gargarella, R. Li, N.S. Barekar, U. Kühn, M. Stoica and J. Eckert: Acta Mater., 2011, vol 59, pp. 6620–30.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference [37] B. Escher, U. Kühn, J. Eckert, C. Rentenberger and S. Pauly: Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2016, vol 673, pp. 90–98.CrossRef [37] B. Escher, U. Kühn, J. Eckert, C. Rentenberger and S. Pauly: Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2016, vol 673, pp. 90–98.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference [38] J. Perepezko, C. Santhaweesuk, J. Wang, S.D. Imhoff: J. Alloys Compd., 2014, vol 615, pp. S192-97CrossRef [38] J. Perepezko, C. Santhaweesuk, J. Wang, S.D. Imhoff: J. Alloys Compd., 2014, vol 615, pp. S192-97CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of Yttrium Additions in Relation to Oxygen Content on Glass Formation in the Zr50Cu40Al10 Alloy
Authors
Krzysztof Pajor
Tomasz Kozieł
Bogdan Rutkowski
Grzegorz Cios
Piotr Błyskun
Dorota Tyrała
Piotr Bała
Anna Zielińska-Lipiec
Publication date
22-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 1073-5623
Electronic ISSN: 1543-1940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-05875-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 9/2020 Go to the issue

Topical Collection: Biodegradable Materials for Medical Applications II

Highly Ductile Zn-2Fe-WC Nanocomposite as Biodegradable Material

Premium Partners