Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Water Resources Management 8/2020

03-06-2020

Effects of Digital Elevation Model Resolution on Watershed-Based Hydrologic Simulation

Authors: Maryam Roostaee, Zhiqiang Deng

Published in: Water Resources Management | Issue 8/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper investigated effects of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) resolution on flow simulation by applying the HSPF watershed model to three U.S. watersheds with different topographic conditions. Each watershed was delineated automatically and manually with four DEMs of the resolution ranging from 3.5 to 100 m. Results indicated that the simulated flow decreased with lowering DEM resolutions due to the reduction in the delineated drainage area particularly in low gradient watersheds. The DEM resolution impact was minimal when the manual method for watershed delineation was applied. The parameter uncertainty was found to be substantially greater than the resolution uncertainty in two out of three tested watersheds, indicating that the calibration of water balance parameters can alleviate the adverse effects of coarse DEM resolution for watersheds with high to moderate gradients. The findings are important to reducing the uncertainty, caused by DEM resolutions, in watershed modelling results, serving as guidelines for watershed modelling-based water resources management.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The drainage area to the gage station (Bayou Des Cannes near Eunice) is 339 km2.
 
2
INFILT = infiltration, LZSN = lower zone storage nominal, AGWRC = groundwater recession rate, UZSN = upper zone storage nominal, DEEPER = fraction of groundwater inflow to deep recharge
 
Literature
go back to reference Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2007) A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices. J Hydrol 333(2–4):459–471CrossRef Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2007) A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices. J Hydrol 333(2–4):459–471CrossRef
go back to reference Beven K, Binely M (1992) The future of distributed model: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298CrossRef Beven K, Binely M (1992) The future of distributed model: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298CrossRef
go back to reference Bicknell BR (2000) Basins technical note 6: estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF. Environmental Protection Agency, US Bicknell BR (2000) Basins technical note 6: estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF. Environmental Protection Agency, US
go back to reference Chaplot V (2005) Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO 3–N loads predictions. J Hydrol 312:207–222CrossRef Chaplot V (2005) Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO 3–N loads predictions. J Hydrol 312:207–222CrossRef
go back to reference Chaubey I, Cotter AS, Costello TA, Soerens TS (2005) Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrol Process 19(3):621–628CrossRef Chaubey I, Cotter AS, Costello TA, Soerens TS (2005) Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrol Process 19(3):621–628CrossRef
go back to reference Cotter AS, Chaubey I, Costello TA, Soerens TS, Nelson MA (2003) Water quality model output uncertainty as affected by spatial resolution of input data. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:977–986CrossRef Cotter AS, Chaubey I, Costello TA, Soerens TS, Nelson MA (2003) Water quality model output uncertainty as affected by spatial resolution of input data. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:977–986CrossRef
go back to reference Dixon B, Earls J (2009) Resample or not?! Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 23(12):1714–1724CrossRef Dixon B, Earls J (2009) Resample or not?! Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 23(12):1714–1724CrossRef
go back to reference Fonseca A, Ames DP, Yang P, Botelho C, Boaventura R, Vilar V (2014) Watershed model parameter estimation and uncertainty in data-limited environments. Environ Model Softw 51:84–93CrossRef Fonseca A, Ames DP, Yang P, Botelho C, Boaventura R, Vilar V (2014) Watershed model parameter estimation and uncertainty in data-limited environments. Environ Model Softw 51:84–93CrossRef
go back to reference Freer J, Beven K, Ambroise B (1996) Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resour Res 32:2161–2173CrossRef Freer J, Beven K, Ambroise B (1996) Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resour Res 32:2161–2173CrossRef
go back to reference Gallagher M, Doherty J (2007) Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model. Environ Model Softw 22:1000–1020CrossRef Gallagher M, Doherty J (2007) Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model. Environ Model Softw 22:1000–1020CrossRef
go back to reference Gong Y, Shen Z, Hong Q, Liu R, Liao Q (2011) Parameter uncertainty analysis in watershed total phosphorus modeling using the GLUE methodology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142:246–255CrossRef Gong Y, Shen Z, Hong Q, Liu R, Liao Q (2011) Parameter uncertainty analysis in watershed total phosphorus modeling using the GLUE methodology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142:246–255CrossRef
go back to reference Hope A, Stein A, McMichael C (2004) Uncertainty in monthly river discharge predictions in a semi-arid Shrubland catchment. BHS 284–290 Hope A, Stein A, McMichael C (2004) Uncertainty in monthly river discharge predictions in a semi-arid Shrubland catchment. BHS 284–290
go back to reference Jenson SK, Domingue JO (1988) Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54:1593–1600 Jenson SK, Domingue JO (1988) Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54:1593–1600
go back to reference Kalin L, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2003) Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds. J Hydrol 276:89–111CrossRef Kalin L, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2003) Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds. J Hydrol 276:89–111CrossRef
go back to reference Kienzle S (2004) The effect of DEM raster resolution on first order, second order and compound terrain derivatives. Trans GIS 8:83–111CrossRef Kienzle S (2004) The effect of DEM raster resolution on first order, second order and compound terrain derivatives. Trans GIS 8:83–111CrossRef
go back to reference Moriasi D et al (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900CrossRef Moriasi D et al (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900CrossRef
go back to reference Moriasi D et al (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans ASABE 58:1763–1785CrossRef Moriasi D et al (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans ASABE 58:1763–1785CrossRef
go back to reference Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRef Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRef
go back to reference Oksanen J, Sarjakoski T (2005) Error propagation analysis of DEM-based drainage basin delineation. Int J Remote Sens 26:3085–3102CrossRef Oksanen J, Sarjakoski T (2005) Error propagation analysis of DEM-based drainage basin delineation. Int J Remote Sens 26:3085–3102CrossRef
go back to reference Patil A, Deng Z, Malone RF (2011) Input data resolution-induced uncertainty in watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 25:2302–2312CrossRef Patil A, Deng Z, Malone RF (2011) Input data resolution-induced uncertainty in watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 25:2302–2312CrossRef
go back to reference Roostaee M, Deng Z (2018) Uncertainty analysis of watershed-based flow and water quality modelling with different DEM data sources. Ed HIC 2018. 13th international conference on hydroinformatics, 1778–1786 Roostaee M, Deng Z (2018) Uncertainty analysis of watershed-based flow and water quality modelling with different DEM data sources. Ed HIC 2018. 13th international conference on hydroinformatics, 1778–1786
go back to reference USEPA 2007. BASINS technical note 1: creating hydraulic function tables (FTABLES) for reservoirs in BASINS USEPA 2007. BASINS technical note 1: creating hydraulic function tables (FTABLES) for reservoirs in BASINS
go back to reference USGS (2013) Federal standards and procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). Ed 2013 USGS (2013) Federal standards and procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). Ed 2013
go back to reference Wang H, Wu Z, Hu C (2015) A comprehensive study of the effect of input data on hydrology and non-point source pollution modeling. Water Resour Manag 29:1505–1521CrossRef Wang H, Wu Z, Hu C (2015) A comprehensive study of the effect of input data on hydrology and non-point source pollution modeling. Water Resour Manag 29:1505–1521CrossRef
go back to reference Yang P, Ames DP, Fonseca A, Anderson D, Shrestha R, Glenn NF, Cao Y (2014) What is the effect of LiDAR-derived DEM resolution on large-scale watershed model results? Environ Model Softw 58:48–57CrossRef Yang P, Ames DP, Fonseca A, Anderson D, Shrestha R, Glenn NF, Cao Y (2014) What is the effect of LiDAR-derived DEM resolution on large-scale watershed model results? Environ Model Softw 58:48–57CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang P, Liu R, Bao Y, Wang J, Yu W, Shen Z (2014) Uncertainty of SWAT model at different DEM resolutions in a large mountainous watershed. Water Res 53:132–144CrossRef Zhang P, Liu R, Bao Y, Wang J, Yu W, Shen Z (2014) Uncertainty of SWAT model at different DEM resolutions in a large mountainous watershed. Water Res 53:132–144CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of Digital Elevation Model Resolution on Watershed-Based Hydrologic Simulation
Authors
Maryam Roostaee
Zhiqiang Deng
Publication date
03-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Water Resources Management / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02561-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Water Resources Management 8/2020 Go to the issue