Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Equality of Participation Online Versus Face to Face: Condensed Analysis of the Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration

Authors : Eric Showers, Nathan Tindall, Todd Davies

Published in: Electronic Participation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Online deliberation may provide a more cost-effective and/or less inhibiting environment for public participation than face to face (F2F). But do online methods bias participation toward certain individuals or groups? We compare F2F versus online participation in an experiment affording within-participants and cross-modal comparisons. For English speakers required to have Internet access as a condition of participation, we find no negative effects of online modes on equality of participation (EoP) related to gender, age, or educational level. Asynchronous online discussion appears to improve EoP for gender relative to F2F. Data suggest a dampening effect of online environments on black participants, as well as amplification for whites. Synchronous online voice communication EoP is on par with F2F across individuals. But individual-level EoP is much lower in the online forum, and greater online forum participation predicts greater F2F participation for individuals. Measured rates of participation are compared to self-reported experiences, and other findings are discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Abdel-Monem, T., Bingham, S., Marincic, J., Tomkins, A.: Deliberation and diversity: perceptions of small group discussions by race and ethnicity. Small Group Res. 41(6), 746–776 (2010)CrossRef Abdel-Monem, T., Bingham, S., Marincic, J., Tomkins, A.: Deliberation and diversity: perceptions of small group discussions by race and ethnicity. Small Group Res. 41(6), 746–776 (2010)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Albrecht, S.: Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: a study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9(1), 62–82 (2006)CrossRef Albrecht, S.: Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: a study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9(1), 62–82 (2006)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baek, Y.M., Wojcieszak, M., Carpini, M.X.D.: Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? why? what? with what effects? New Media Soc. 14(3), 363–383 (2012)CrossRef Baek, Y.M., Wojcieszak, M., Carpini, M.X.D.: Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? why? what? with what effects? New Media Soc. 14(3), 363–383 (2012)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Carman, K.L., Mallery, C., Maurer, M., Wang, G., Garfinkel, S., Yang, M., Gilmore, D., Windham, A., Ginsburg, M., Sofaer, S., et al.: Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial. Soc. Sci. Med. 133, 11–20 (2015)CrossRef Carman, K.L., Mallery, C., Maurer, M., Wang, G., Garfinkel, S., Yang, M., Gilmore, D., Windham, A., Ginsburg, M., Sofaer, S., et al.: Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial. Soc. Sci. Med. 133, 11–20 (2015)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carman, K.L., Maurer, M., Mallery, C., Wang, G., Garfinkel, S., Richmond, J., Gilmore, D., Windham, A., Yang, M., Mangrum, R., et al.: Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration: Evaluating Effectiveness and Eliciting Public Views on Use of Evidence. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2014) Carman, K.L., Maurer, M., Mallery, C., Wang, G., Garfinkel, S., Richmond, J., Gilmore, D., Windham, A., Yang, M., Mangrum, R., et al.: Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration: Evaluating Effectiveness and Eliciting Public Views on Use of Evidence. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2014)
6.
go back to reference Christiano, T.: The significance of public deliberation. In: Bohman, J., Rehg, W. (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 243–278. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997) Christiano, T.: The significance of public deliberation. In: Bohman, J., Rehg, W. (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 243–278. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
7.
go back to reference Dahlberg, L.: Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: a critical analysis. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 7(1) (2001) Dahlberg, L.: Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: a critical analysis. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 7(1) (2001)
8.
go back to reference Davies, T., Chandler, R.: Online deliberation design: Choices, criteria, and evidence. In: Nabatchi, T., Weiksner, M., Gastil, J., Leighninger, M. (eds.) Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, pp. 103–131. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)CrossRef Davies, T., Chandler, R.: Online deliberation design: Choices, criteria, and evidence. In: Nabatchi, T., Weiksner, M., Gastil, J., Leighninger, M. (eds.) Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, pp. 103–131. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Davies, T., Mintz, M.D., Tobin, J., Ben-Avi, N.: Document-centered discussion and decision making in the deme platform. In: 2012 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), pp. lxv-lxviii. IEEE (2012) Davies, T., Mintz, M.D., Tobin, J., Ben-Avi, N.: Document-centered discussion and decision making in the deme platform. In: 2012 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), pp. lxv-lxviii. IEEE (2012)
10.
go back to reference Davis, R.: Politics Online: Blogs, Chatrooms, and Discussion Groups in American Democracy. Routledge, New York (2005) Davis, R.: Politics Online: Blogs, Chatrooms, and Discussion Groups in American Democracy. Routledge, New York (2005)
11.
go back to reference Dutwin, D.: The character of deliberation: equality, argument, and the formation of public opinion. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 15(3), 239–264 (2003)CrossRef Dutwin, D.: The character of deliberation: equality, argument, and the formation of public opinion. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 15(3), 239–264 (2003)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fishkin, J.S.: Virtual public consultation: Prospects for internet deliberative democracy. In: Davies, T., Gangadharan, S.P. (eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, pp. 23–35. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009) Fishkin, J.S.: Virtual public consultation: Prospects for internet deliberative democracy. In: Davies, T., Gangadharan, S.P. (eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, pp. 23–35. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009)
13.
go back to reference Fraser, N.: Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25, 56–80 (1990)CrossRef Fraser, N.: Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25, 56–80 (1990)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gerber, M.: Equal partners in dialogue? participation equality in a transnational deliberative poll (europolis). Polit. Stud, 63, 110–130 (2015)CrossRef Gerber, M.: Equal partners in dialogue? participation equality in a transnational deliberative poll (europolis). Polit. Stud, 63, 110–130 (2015)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Graham, T., Wright, S.: Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of superparticipants. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 19(3), 625–642 (2014)CrossRef Graham, T., Wright, S.: Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of superparticipants. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 19(3), 625–642 (2014)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hargittai, E., Walejko, G.: The participation divide: content creation and sharing in the digital age 1. Inf. Commun. Soc. 11(2), 239–256 (2008)CrossRef Hargittai, E., Walejko, G.: The participation divide: content creation and sharing in the digital age 1. Inf. Commun. Soc. 11(2), 239–256 (2008)CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harp, D., Tremayne, M.: The gendered blogosphere: examining inequality using network and feminist theory. Journalism Mass Commun. Q. 83(2), 247–264 (2006)CrossRef Harp, D., Tremayne, M.: The gendered blogosphere: examining inequality using network and feminist theory. Journalism Mass Commun. Q. 83(2), 247–264 (2006)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Herring, S.: Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier. American Library Association Annual Convention (1994) Herring, S.: Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier. American Library Association Annual Convention (1994)
19.
go back to reference Jasso, G.: On gini’s mean difference and gini’s index of concentration. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44, 867–870 (1979)CrossRef Jasso, G.: On gini’s mean difference and gini’s index of concentration. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44, 867–870 (1979)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Johnson, T.J., Kaye, B.K., Bichard, S.L., Wong, W.J.: Every blog has its day: politically-interested internet users perceptions of blog credibility. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 13(1), 100–122 (2007)CrossRef Johnson, T.J., Kaye, B.K., Bichard, S.L., Wong, W.J.: Every blog has its day: politically-interested internet users perceptions of blog credibility. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 13(1), 100–122 (2007)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Karpowitz, C.F., Mendelberg, T., Shaker, L.: Gender inequality in deliberative participation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106(03), 533–547 (2012)CrossRef Karpowitz, C.F., Mendelberg, T., Shaker, L.: Gender inequality in deliberative participation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106(03), 533–547 (2012)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Marder, N.S.: Gender dynamics and jury deliberations. Yale Law J. 96, 593–612 (1987)CrossRef Marder, N.S.: Gender dynamics and jury deliberations. Yale Law J. 96, 593–612 (1987)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Monnoyer-Smith, L.: The technological dimension of deliberation: a comparison between on and offline participation. In: Coleman, S., Shane, P. (eds.) Connecting Democracy: Online Consultation and the Future of Democratic Discourse, pp. 191–207. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011) Monnoyer-Smith, L.: The technological dimension of deliberation: a comparison between on and offline participation. In: Coleman, S., Shane, P. (eds.) Connecting Democracy: Online Consultation and the Future of Democratic Discourse, pp. 191–207. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
24.
go back to reference Price, V.: Citizens deliberating online: theory and some evidence. In: Davies, T., Gangadharan, S. (eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, pp. 37–58. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009) Price, V.: Citizens deliberating online: theory and some evidence. In: Davies, T., Gangadharan, S. (eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, pp. 37–58. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009)
25.
26.
go back to reference Shane, P.: Turning gold into epg: Lessons from low-tech democratic experimentalism for electronic rulemaking and other ventures in cyberdemocracy. Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, pp. 149–162 (2009) Shane, P.: Turning gold into epg: Lessons from low-tech democratic experimentalism for electronic rulemaking and other ventures in cyberdemocracy. Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, pp. 149–162 (2009)
28.
go back to reference Siu, A.: Look who’s talking: Examining social influence, opinion change, and argument quality in deliberation. ProQuest (2009) Siu, A.: Look who’s talking: Examining social influence, opinion change, and argument quality in deliberation. ProQuest (2009)
29.
go back to reference Squires, J.: Deliberation, domination and decision-making. Theoria J. Soc. Polit. Theory 55, 104–133 (2008) Squires, J.: Deliberation, domination and decision-making. Theoria J. Soc. Polit. Theory 55, 104–133 (2008)
30.
go back to reference Stromer-Galley, J., Wichowski, A.: Political discussion online. In: Consalvo, M., Ess, C. (eds.) The Handbook of Internet Studies, pp. 168–187. Wiley, New York (2011)CrossRef Stromer-Galley, J., Wichowski, A.: Political discussion online. In: Consalvo, M., Ess, C. (eds.) The Handbook of Internet Studies, pp. 168–187. Wiley, New York (2011)CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Trénel, M.: Facilitation and inclusive deliberation. In: Davies, T., Gangadharan, S.P. (eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research and Practice, pp. 253–257. CSLI Publications/University of Chicago Press, San Francisco (2009) Trénel, M.: Facilitation and inclusive deliberation. In: Davies, T., Gangadharan, S.P. (eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research and Practice, pp. 253–257. CSLI Publications/University of Chicago Press, San Francisco (2009)
32.
go back to reference Wilson, P.A.: Deliberative planning for disaster recovery: re-membering new orleans. J. Public Deliberation 5(1) (2008) Wilson, P.A.: Deliberative planning for disaster recovery: re-membering new orleans. J. Public Deliberation 5(1) (2008)
33.
go back to reference Witschge, T.: Online deliberation: Possibilities of the internet for deliberative democracy. In: Shane, P. (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet, pp. 109–122. Routledg, New York (2004) Witschge, T.: Online deliberation: Possibilities of the internet for deliberative democracy. In: Shane, P. (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet, pp. 109–122. Routledg, New York (2004)
34.
go back to reference Zhang, W.: Deliberation and the Disempowered: Attendance, Experience, and Influence. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (2008) Zhang, W.: Deliberation and the Disempowered: Attendance, Experience, and Influence. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (2008)
Metadata
Title
Equality of Participation Online Versus Face to Face: Condensed Analysis of the Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration
Authors
Eric Showers
Nathan Tindall
Todd Davies
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22500-5_5

Premium Partner