Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Management and Governance
Published in: Journal of Management and Governance 4/2022

23-06-2021

Ethics in corporate political action: can lobbying be just?

Authors: Edoardo Mollona, Guglielmo Faldetta

Published in: Journal of Management and Governance | Issue 4/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article takes issue with the potential injustice of political systems in which the possibility of voicing specific interests depends on the availability of financial resources. Previous empirical analysis suggests that the interests of private companies, alone or grouped into associations, are more strongly represented than other interests, such as those of NGOs and unions. Even if ethical analysis of corporate political action is growing, previous studies mainly address this general issue without a specific focus on lobbying activities. This study specifically aims at contributing to the analysis of the ethics of lobbying activities. In particular, we propose the use of justice as a criterion for ethically assessing lobbying activities. To this aim, we provide some definitions of lobbying activity, with particular reference to the contexts of Europe and the USA. Then, we introduce the problem of the legitimacy of lobbying activities, particularly in relation to the opportunities that stakeholders have for influencing political processes. Moreover, we analyze different notions of justice, in order to build a conceptual framework to be used in ethically assessing lobbying activities. Finally, we present four case studies of lobbying to be analyzed through the framework previously developed.
previous article Women’s leadership impact on risks and financial performance in banking: evidence from the Southeast Asian Countries
next article Earnings management in state-owned enterprises: bringing publicness back in

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
3
Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the establishment of a transparency register for organizations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation. L191/29. Official Journal of the European Union, 22/07/2011.
 
4
Honest Leadership and Open Government Act, Title 2 (Chapter 26).
 
7
EU n. 2016/679.
 
11
Amazon, Google and Facebook are members of Digital Europe, whereas only Google and Facebook are members of Amcham EU.
 
12
However, Kantian and Utilitarian principles may produce very different judgment, as the Kantian principle of human dignity suggests that a decision cannot be made on the grounds that a larger group of stakeholders benefits from that decision (Bowie, 2017).
 
Literature
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.CrossRef
Allard, N. W. (2008). Lobbying is an honorable profession: The right to petition and the competition to be right. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 19(1), 23–68.
Alzola, M. (2013). Corporate dystopia: The Ethics of corporate political spending. Business & Society, 52(3), 388–426.CrossRef
Baron, D. P. (2008). Responsible lobbying? Business case P–57. Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
Baysinger, B. D., Keim, G. D., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1985). An empirical evaluation of the potential for including shareholders in corporate constituency programs. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 180–200.CrossRef
Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (2001). Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest groups involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1191–1213.CrossRef
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). JAI Press.
Bonardi, J. P., Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 397–413.CrossRef
Bouwen, P. (2009). The European Commission. In D. Coen & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, actors, and issues (pp. 19–38). Oxford University Press.
Bowie, N. E. (2017). Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Cavanagh, G. F., Moberg, D. J., & Velasquez, M. (1981). The ethics of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 363–374.
Christensen, S. L. (1997). The new federalism: Implications for the legitimacy of corporate political activity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 81–91.CrossRef
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.CrossRef
Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S., & Spence, L. (2019). Business ethics. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48.CrossRef
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 1919–1024.CrossRef
Cropanzano, R., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Organizational justice and behavioral ethics: Promises and prospects. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 193–233.CrossRef
Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2010). The role of nongovernmental organizations in the business–government–society interface. Business & Society, 49(1), 20–34.CrossRef
Dahan, N. M., Hadani, M., & Schuler, D. A. (2013). The governance challenges of corporate political activity. Business & Society, 52(3), 365–387.CrossRef
Dur, A., & De Bièvre, D. (2007). Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 79–101.CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRef
Espach, R. (2006). When is sustainable forestry sustainable? The Forest Stewardship Council in Argentina and Brazil. Global Environmental Politics, 6(2), 55–84.CrossRef
Etzioni, A. (2009). The capture theory of regulations-revisited. Society, 46(4), 319–323.CrossRef
Fortin, M., & Fellenz, M. R. (2008). Hypocrisies of fairness: Towards a more reflexive ethical base in organizational justice research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 415–433.CrossRef
Frederick, W. C., Post, J. E., & Davis, K. (1992). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, Ethics. McGraw–Hill.
Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(4), 371–418.CrossRef
Gao, Y. (2008). An ethical judgment framework for corporate political actions. Journal of Public Affairs., 8(3), 153–163.CrossRef
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine de Gruyter.
Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1997). Reconceptualising PAC formation: It’s not a collective action problem and may be arms race. American Political Quarterly, 25(3), 319–346.CrossRef
Habermas, J. (1994). Three normative models of democracy. Constellations, 1(1), 1–10.CrossRef
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other. MIT Press.
Hamilton, J. B., & Hoch, D. (1997). Ethical standards for business lobbying: Some practical suggestions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 117–129.CrossRef
Heath, J., Moriarty, J., & Norman, W. (2010). Business ethics and (or as) political philosophy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 427–452.CrossRef
Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842.CrossRef
Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (1995). International variation in the business–government interface: Institutional and organizational considerations. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 193–214.CrossRef
Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. A. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857.CrossRef
Kalyanpur, N., & Newman, A. L. (2019). The MNC–Coalition paradox: Issue salience, foreign firms and the General Data Protection Regulation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 448–467.CrossRef
Keffer, J. M., & Hill, R. P. (1997). An ethical approach to lobbying activities of businesses in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12–13), 1371–1379.CrossRef
Keim, G. D., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1986). Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: A review and contingency approach. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 828–843.CrossRef
Key, V. O. (1964). Politics, parties, and pressure groups. Crowell.
Kluver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European Union. Oxford University Press.
Leong, S., Hazelton, J., & Townley, C. (2013). Managing the risks of corporate political donations: A utilitarian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 429–445.CrossRef
Lingane, A., & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for social return on investment. California Management Review, 46(3), 116–135.CrossRef
Maclntyre, A. C. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Mahoney, C. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35–56.CrossRef
Majone, G. (1996). Temporal consistency and policy credibility: Why democracies need non–majoritarian institutions. European University Institute, Working Paper RSC No 96/57.
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRef
Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.CrossRef
Moore, G. (2005). Humanizing business: A modem virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 237–255.CrossRef
Moore, G. (2008). Re–imagining the morality of management: A modem virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 483–511.CrossRef
Néron, P. (2010). Business and the polis: What does it mean to see corporations as political actors? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 333–352.CrossRef
Néron, P. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post–citizens united era: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 715–728.CrossRef
Oberholzer-Gee, F., Cantrill, L., & Wu, P. (2007). Note on lobbying. Harvard Business School Background Note 707-471. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Oberman, W. D. (2004). A framework for the ethical analysis of corporate political activity. Business and Society Review, 109(2), 245–262.CrossRef
Ostas, D. T. (2007). The law and ethics of K street: Lobbying, the First Amendment, and the duty to create just laws. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 33–63.CrossRef
Persson, T. (2007). Democratizing European chemicals policy: Do consultations favour civil society participation? Journal of Civil Society, 3(3), 223–238.CrossRef
Post, J. E., Lawrence, A.T., & Weber, J. (1999). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, ethics, (10th Edn.). McGraw–Hill.
Ramanna, K., & Muthuram, V. (2015). Wal–Mart lobbying in India? Harvard Business School Case 114-023. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Ramanna, K., & Sucker, S. J. (2013). Business and government: Campaign contributions and lobbying in the United States. Module Note 9-113-037. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Belknap Press.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Rose, C. S., & Sesia Jr., A. (2011). Note on lobbying and the Dodd–Frank financial reforms. Harvard Business School Technical Note, 311-094. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C. M. (2010). Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self–regulation in third–party responses to injustice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 89–106.CrossRef
Saurugger, S. (2008). Interest groups and democracy in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(6), 1274–1291.CrossRef
Thompson, A., & Polzer, J. (2012). School based HPV vaccination for girls in Ontario. In Canadian Institute for Health Research—Institute of Population and Public Health, Population and public health ethics: Cases from research, policy and practice (pp. 103–106). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto—Joint Centre for Bioethics.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Schepers, D. H. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–290.CrossRef
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef
Schuler, D. A., Rehbein, K., & Cramer, R. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 659–672.CrossRef
Shaffer, M. B. (1995). The internal dynamics of environmental organizations: Movement interest groups, communal advocacy groups, and the policy process. Review of Policy Research, 14(1–2), 183–194.CrossRef
Stark, A. (2010). Business in politics: Lobbying and corporate campaign contributions. In G. G. Brenkert & T. L. Beauchamp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics (pp. 501–534). Oxford University Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRef
Svendsen, G. T. (2010). Lobbies, professional. In G. T. Kurian (Ed.), The encyclopedia of political sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 970–971). Congressional Quarterly Press.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Truman, D. B. (1951). The governmental process. Political interests and public opinion. Knopf.
Walker, T. Y, Elam–Evans, L.D., Singleton, J.A., Yankey, D., Markowitz, L.E., Fredua, B., Williams, C.L., Meyer, S.A., & Stokley, S. (2017). National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Report 2017, 66(33), 874–882.
Weber, L. J. (1996). Citizenship and democracy: The ethics of corporate lobbying. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 253–259.CrossRef
Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Sage.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
Metadata
Title
Ethics in corporate political action: can lobbying be just?
Authors
Edoardo Mollona
Guglielmo Faldetta
Publication date
23-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Management and Governance / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1385-3457
Electronic ISSN: 1572-963X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09583-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Journal of Management and Governance 4/2022 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Corporate governance and dividend policy of the US and Indian companies

OriginalPaper

Internationalization of family firms: the effect of CEO attributes

OriginalPaper

Managerial biases during a merger process in a government-controlled organization

OriginalPaper

Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature

OriginalPaper

Governmental goals and the international strategies of state-owned multinational enterprises: a conceptual discussion

OriginalPaper

What do audit committees do? Transparency and impression management