Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Europe May Be Done with Power, but Power Is Not Done with Europe: Europe During an Era of American Unipolarity and of Relative Decline

Authors : Paul Van Hooft, Annette Freyberg-Inan

Published in: Fear and Uncertainty in Europe

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War, realism has received little serious attention within the European International Relations literature and has been dismissed as insufficient to explain the most important developments and events in Europe and the world. We argue that this treatment has been unfair. In fact, we consider realism a powerful theory that explains broad, long-term patterns of state behavior, as well as systemic outcomes. The key contribution of realism is its understanding of the constraining and enabling role of the international distribution of power, which represents a decisive initial sorting stage for the choices that states can make. However, in line with neoclassical realist authors, we argue that to explain and predict state behaviour more precisely, the domestic distribution of power, ideas, interests, and institutions need to be taken into account. In any case, power disciplines states and other actors when their leaders fail to adequately recognise their place in the international system. Unlike rival theories, the attention of realists to the impact of the disproportionate power of the United States on the international system allows them to explain a series of developments: the end of the Cold War; the transformation of the global order; the lack of major power conflict; and the re-emergence of inter-state competition in Europe and globally. We conclude by emphasizing the importance of considerations of power for policymaking within Europe.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
It should be noted that realism was never out of fashion in Central and Eastern Europe. Yet voices from there were by and large not taken seriously in the rest of the European scholarly or policy communities.
 
2
See Feng (2009) on China’s position in the East Asian order from the 15th to the 19th centuries for a discussion of how globally unique American preeminence was.
 
3
Madeleine K. Albright, “The Right Balance Will Secure NATO’s Future,” Financial Times, December 7, 1998.
 
4
We will return to this point in the second half of the chapter, when we bring on board neoclassical realist insights.
 
5
French foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine referred to the US as a hyperpower in 1999. “To Paris, US Looks Like a ‘Hyperpower’,” New York Times, February 5, 1999.
 
6
Jan Puhl, “Poles React: Warsaw Fears Washington Losing Interest in Eastern Allies,” Spiegel, September 17, 2009.
 
7
“‘Reset’ Sought on Relations with Russia, Biden Says,” Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, February 8, 2009. French President Nicolas Sarkozy was dismissive of attempts by the U.S. government to expand NATO to include Georgia and Ukraine, which have been major irritants to Russia.
 
8
“Six days that broke one country—and reshaped the world order,” Ian Traynor, The Guardian, August 16, 2008. “Don’t ask us who’s good and who’s bad here,” said Bernard Kouchner, the French foreign minister, “We shouldn’t make any moral judgments on this war. Stopping the war, that’s what we’re interested in.”
 
9
“Report: Polish minister calls US ties worthless,” Vanessa Gera and Monika Scislowska, Associated Press, June 23, 2014. Recordings of a private conversation in 2014 caught Polish foreign minister Sikorski describing Poland’s strong alliance with the US as worthless and “even harmful because it creates a false sense of security.”
 
10
Though Jack Snyder might take some issue with being included among the neoclassical realists.
 
11
US embassy in the Netherlands, “Ambassador’s Parting Thoughts on Taking the Dutch to the Next Level,” Date: August 22, 2005 (05THEHAGUE2309, Wikileaks 2011).
 
12
US embassy in the Netherlands, “Netherlands/Afghanistan: Engaging Labor Party Leader Bos—Part of the ‘Getting to Yes’ Strategy for Extending Dutch Deployments in Afghanistan Post-2010,” Date: September 18, 2009 (09THEHAGUE567, Wikileaks 2011).
 
13
Anonymous French Ministry of Defense official, interview with one of the authors, February 2016.
 
Literature
go back to reference Art, Robert J. 1996a. “American Foreign Policy and the Fungibility of Force.” Security Studies 5 (4): 7–42.CrossRef Art, Robert J. 1996a. “American Foreign Policy and the Fungibility of Force.” Security Studies 5 (4): 7–42.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1996b. “Why Western Europe Needs the United States and NATO.” Political Science Quarterly 111 (1): 1–39.CrossRef ———. 1996b. “Why Western Europe Needs the United States and NATO.” Political Science Quarterly 111 (1): 1–39.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2013. A Grand Strategy for America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ———. 2013. A Grand Strategy for America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Berger, Thomas U. 1998. Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Berger, Thomas U. 1998. Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Calleo, David P. 2011. Rethinking Europe’s Future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Calleo, David P. 2011. Rethinking Europe’s Future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Christensen, Thomas J. 1996. Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Christensen, Thomas J. 1996. Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Dueck, Colin. 2008. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Dueck, Colin. 2008. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Duffield, John S. 1999. “Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism.” International Organization 53 (4): 765–803.CrossRef Duffield, John S. 1999. “Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism.” International Organization 53 (4): 765–803.CrossRef
go back to reference Edelstein, David M. 2002. “Managing Uncertainty: Beliefs About Intentions and the Rise of Great Powers.” Security Studies 12 (1): 1–40.CrossRef Edelstein, David M. 2002. “Managing Uncertainty: Beliefs About Intentions and the Rise of Great Powers.” Security Studies 12 (1): 1–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Feng, Zhang. 2009. “Rethinking the ‘Tribute System’: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (4): 545–574.CrossRef Feng, Zhang. 2009. “Rethinking the ‘Tribute System’: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (4): 545–574.CrossRef
go back to reference Freyberg-Inan, Annette. 2018. “Global Governance and the Continuing Relevance of Power.” Forum on Power Politics. International Institutions. Freyberg-Inan, Annette. 2018. “Global Governance and the Continuing Relevance of Power.” Forum on Power Politics. International Institutions.
go back to reference Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Ewan Harrison, and Patrick James. 2009. Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Ewan Harrison, and Patrick James. 2009. Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Howorth, Jolyon, and Anand Menon. 2009. “Still Not Pushing Back: Why the European Union Is Not Balancing the United States.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (5): 727–744.CrossRef Howorth, Jolyon, and Anand Menon. 2009. “Still Not Pushing Back: Why the European Union Is Not Balancing the United States.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (5): 727–744.CrossRef
go back to reference Ikenberry, G. John. 2002. America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Ikenberry, G. John. 2002. America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Jones, Seth G. 2007. The Rise of European Security Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jones, Seth G. 2007. The Rise of European Security Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Judt, Tony. 2006. Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. London: Penguin. Judt, Tony. 2006. Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. London: Penguin.
go back to reference Kier, Elizabeth. 2017. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Kier, Elizabeth. 2017. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1993. “The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik Without Politics.” Review of International Studies 19 (1): 63–80.CrossRef Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1993. “The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik Without Politics.” Review of International Studies 19 (1): 63–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Kydd, Andrew. 1997. “Sheep in Sheep’s Clothing: Why Security Seekers Do Not Fight Each Other.” Security Studies 7 (1): 114–155.CrossRef Kydd, Andrew. 1997. “Sheep in Sheep’s Clothing: Why Security Seekers Do Not Fight Each Other.” Security Studies 7 (1): 114–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Layne, Christopher. 1993. “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise.” International Security 17 (4): 5–51.CrossRef Layne, Christopher. 1993. “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise.” International Security 17 (4): 5–51.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1997. “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America’s Future Grand Strategy.” International Security 22 (1): 86–124.CrossRef ———. 1997. “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America’s Future Grand Strategy.” International Security 22 (1): 86–124.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2006. The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ———. 2006. The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Lebow, Richard Ned. 1994. “The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism.” International Organization 48 (2): 249–277.CrossRef Lebow, Richard Ned. 1994. “The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism.” International Organization 48 (2): 249–277.CrossRef
go back to reference Levy, Jack S., and William R. Thompson. 2010. “Balancing on Land and at Sea: Do States Ally Against the Leading Global Power?” International Security 35 (1): 7–43.CrossRef Levy, Jack S., and William R. Thompson. 2010. “Balancing on Land and at Sea: Do States Ally Against the Leading Global Power?” International Security 35 (1): 7–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Liang, Qiao, and Wang Xiangsui. 1999. Unrestricted Warfare. Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House. Liang, Qiao, and Wang Xiangsui. 1999. Unrestricted Warfare. Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House.
go back to reference Mastanduno, Michael. 1997. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and US Grand Strategy After the Cold War.” International Security 21 (4): 49–88.CrossRef Mastanduno, Michael. 1997. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and US Grand Strategy After the Cold War.” International Security 21 (4): 49–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War.” International Security 15 (1): 5–56.CrossRef Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War.” International Security 15 (1): 5–56.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ———. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
go back to reference Meijer, Hugo, and Marco Wijss, eds. 2018. The Handbook of European Defence Policies and Armed Forces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meijer, Hugo, and Marco Wijss, eds. 2018. The Handbook of European Defence Policies and Armed Forces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Ministry of Defence. 1998. “Strategic Defence Review.” HM Government. Ministry of Defence. 1998. “Strategic Defence Review.” HM Government.
go back to reference Narizny, Kevin. 2017. “On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics: A Critique of the Newest Realism.” International Security 42 (2): 155–190.CrossRef Narizny, Kevin. 2017. “On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics: A Critique of the Newest Realism.” International Security 42 (2): 155–190.CrossRef
go back to reference Posen, Barry R. 1986. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Posen, Barry R. 1986. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference ———. 2003. “Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of US Hegemony.” International Security 28 (1): 5–46.CrossRef ———. 2003. “Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of US Hegemony.” International Security 28 (1): 5–46.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2006. “European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity?” Security Studies 15 (2): 149–186.CrossRef ———. 2006. “European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity?” Security Studies 15 (2): 149–186.CrossRef
go back to reference Rathbun, Brian. 2008. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism.” Security Studies 17 (2): 294–321.CrossRef Rathbun, Brian. 2008. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism.” Security Studies 17 (2): 294–321.CrossRef
go back to reference Ripsman, Norrin M., Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, and Steven E. Lobell. 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Ripsman, Norrin M., Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, and Steven E. Lobell. 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War.” International Organization 48 (2): 185–214.CrossRef Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War.” International Organization 48 (2): 185–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosato, Sebastian. 2015. “The Inscrutable Intentions of Great Powers.” International Security 39 (3): 48–88.CrossRef Rosato, Sebastian. 2015. “The Inscrutable Intentions of Great Powers.” International Security 39 (3): 48–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosecrance, Richard. 2006. “Power and International Relations: The Rise of China and Its Effects.” International Studies Perspectives 7 (1): 31–35.CrossRef Rosecrance, Richard. 2006. “Power and International Relations: The Rise of China and Its Effects.” International Studies Perspectives 7 (1): 31–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Rynning, Sten. 2002. Changing Military Doctrine: Presidents and Military Power in Fifth Republic France, 1958–2000. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. Rynning, Sten. 2002. Changing Military Doctrine: Presidents and Military Power in Fifth Republic France, 1958–2000. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
go back to reference Schweller, Randall L. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Schweller, Randall L. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Schweller, Randall L., and William C. Wohlforth. 2000. “Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War.” Security Studies 9 (3): 60–107.CrossRef Schweller, Randall L., and William C. Wohlforth. 2000. “Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War.” Security Studies 9 (3): 60–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Sheehan, James J. 2009. Where Have All the Soldiers Gone?: The Transformation of Modern Europe. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Sheehan, James J. 2009. Where Have All the Soldiers Gone?: The Transformation of Modern Europe. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
go back to reference Silove, Nina. 2016. “The Pivot Before the Pivot: US Strategy to Preserve the Power Balance in Asia.” International Security 40 (4): 45–88.CrossRef Silove, Nina. 2016. “The Pivot Before the Pivot: US Strategy to Preserve the Power Balance in Asia.” International Security 40 (4): 45–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2013. Making Sense of International Relations Theory. In Neoclassical Realism: Domestic Opportunities for Great Power Intervention, ed. J.W. Taliaferro and R.W. Wishart. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2013. Making Sense of International Relations Theory. In Neoclassical Realism: Domestic Opportunities for Great Power Intervention, ed. J.W. Taliaferro and R.W. Wishart. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
go back to reference Tang, Shiping. 2010. A Theory of Security Strategy for Our Time: Defensive Realism. Basingstoke: Springer.CrossRef Tang, Shiping. 2010. A Theory of Security Strategy for Our Time: Defensive Realism. Basingstoke: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference “The 2011 Defense Policy Guidelines.” n.d. Accessed January 31, 2018. “The 2011 Defense Policy Guidelines.” n.d. Accessed January 31, 2018.
go back to reference Toje, Asle, and Barbara Kunz. 2012. Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Toje, Asle, and Barbara Kunz. 2012. Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Van Hooft, Paul. 2015. “The Future in the Past: Victory, Defeat, and Grand Strategy in the US, UK, France and Germany.” Unpublished, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Van Hooft, Paul. 2015. “The Future in the Past: Victory, Defeat, and Grand Strategy in the US, UK, France and Germany.” Unpublished, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
go back to reference ———. In preparation. The Future in the Past: Victory, Defeat, and Comparative Grand Strategy. ———. In preparation. The Future in the Past: Victory, Defeat, and Comparative Grand Strategy.
go back to reference Volpe, Tristan, and Ulrich Kühn. 2017. “Germany’s Nuclear Education: Why a Few Elites Are Testing a Taboo.” The Washington Quarterly 40 (3): 7–27.CrossRef Volpe, Tristan, and Ulrich Kühn. 2017. “Germany’s Nuclear Education: Why a Few Elites Are Testing a Taboo.” The Washington Quarterly 40 (3): 7–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Waltz, Kenneth N. 1996. “International Politics Is Not Foreign Policy.” Security Studies 6 (1): 54–57.CrossRef Waltz, Kenneth N. 1996. “International Politics Is Not Foreign Policy.” Security Studies 6 (1): 54–57.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2000a. “NATO Expansion: A Realist’s View.” Contemporary Security Policy 21 (2): 23–38.CrossRef ———. 2000a. “NATO Expansion: A Realist’s View.” Contemporary Security Policy 21 (2): 23–38.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2000b. “Structural Realism After the Cold War.” International Security 25 (1): 5–41.CrossRef ———. 2000b. “Structural Realism After the Cold War.” International Security 25 (1): 5–41.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2010. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. ———. 2010. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
go back to reference Wohlforth, William C. 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security 24 (1): 5–41.CrossRef Wohlforth, William C. 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security 24 (1): 5–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Zakaria, Fareed. 1999. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Zakaria, Fareed. 1999. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Metadata
Title
Europe May Be Done with Power, but Power Is Not Done with Europe: Europe During an Era of American Unipolarity and of Relative Decline
Authors
Paul Van Hooft
Annette Freyberg-Inan
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_4