Skip to main content
Register
Springer Professional
SEARCH
Menu 1 2 3 4
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

Published in:
NDT-Agile: An Agile, CMMI-Compatible Framework for Web Engineering Read chapter Read first chapter

2017 | Supplement | Chapter

Evaluation Model of PRO2PI-WORK4E Method for Teaching Software Process Improvement

Author : Clenio F. Salviano

Published in: Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

Methods to guide introduction to Software Process Improvement (SPI) courses to potentiate “learning SPI by doing SPI” and their systematic evaluations are relevant to both practice and research. An evaluation model for an educational method to teach SPI was developed. This model is based on a model for the evaluation of educational games. The developed model is composed of model design; evaluation process, objective and questionnaire; documentation model, data compilation and analysis model and spreadsheet; and example of use. The model was used to evaluate a course. Results of this evaluation provide initial validation of this model and also indicate that the evaluated method is effective in potentiate “learning SPI by doing SPI”.
previous chapter Relating Student, Teacher and Third-Party Assessments in a Bachelor Capstone Project
next chapter Towards a Strategy for Process Improvement Education and Training
Literature
1.
Salviano, C.F.: Teaching process improvement by establishing process modeling profile to drive process improvement – the PRO2PI-WORK4E method. In: [20], pp. 63–69 (2015)
2.
Salviano, C.F.: Model-driven process capability engineering for knowledge working intensive organization. In: SPICE 2008, Nuremberg, Germany, pp. 1–9 (2008)
3.
Savi, R., von Wangenheim, C.G., Borgatto, A.F., Buglione, L., Ulbricht, V.R.: MEEGA – a model for the evaluation of games for teaching software engineering. INCoD Technical report, 001/2012 (2012)
4.
Savi, R.: Evaluation of games for knowledge dissemination (in Portuguese “Avaliação de Jogos Voltados para a Disseminação do Conhecimento”). Ph.D. Thesis in Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento at Univ. Fed. Santa Catarina, UFSC, Florianópolis, 236 p. (2011)
5.
Savi, R., von Wangenheim, C.G., Borgatto, A.F.: A model for the evaluation of educational games for teaching software engineering (in Portuguese “Um Modelo de Avaliação de Jogos Educacionais na Engenharia de Software”). In: Proceedings of the 25th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 194–203 (2011)
6.
Petri, G., von Wangenheim, C.G.: How to evaluate educational games: a systematic literature review. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 22(7), 992–1021 (2016)
7.
Kirkpatrick, D.L., Kirkpatrick, J.D.: Evaluating Training Programs. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland (1994)
8.
9.
Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(4) (2002)
10.
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). 236 p., WORK4E CrossRefMATH
11.
Jedlitschka, A., Pfahl, D.: Reporting guidelines for controlled experiments in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Noosa Heads, pp. 95–104 (2005)
12.
Basili, V.R.: Software Modeling and Measurement: The Goal/Question/Metric Paradigm. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, Technical report CS-TR-2956, 24 p. (1992)
13.
Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, vol. 10. SAGE Publications Inc., London (2006)
14.
Salviano, C.F.: EM4E - Evaluation Method of PRO2PI-WORK4E Method (in Portuguese “EM4E - Modelo de Avaliação do Método PRO2PI-WORK4E”). Technical report TRT0040117, CTI Renato Archer/NMPS Research Group, version 1.1 (2017)
15.
Salviano, C.F.: Slides on Introduction to Software Process Improvement with PRO2PI-WORK4E 2017 edition (original in Portuguese, “Slides sobre Introdução à Melhoria de Processo de Software com PRO2PI-WORK4E edição 2017”). Technical report TRT0043117, CTI Renato Archer/ NMPS Research Group, version 1.1, 268 p. (2017)
16.
Salviano, C.F.: Results of PRO2PI-WORK4E Method Evaluation in CET-811 course 2017 edition (original in Portuguese “Resultado da Avaliação do Método PRO2PI-WORK4E na Disciplina CET-811 edição 2017”). Technical report TRT0041117, CTI Renato Archer/ NMPS Research Group, version 1.1 (2017)
17.
Salviano, C.F.: Starting Software Process Improvement with PRO2PI-WORK4E in an Innovative Product VSE (original in Portuguese “Início da Melhoria de Processo de Software com PRO2PI-WORK4E em MPE de Produto Inovador”). Technical report TRT0042117, CTI Renato Archer/ NMPS Research Group, version 1.1, 19 p. (2017)
18.
Petri, G., von Wangenheim, C.G, Borgatto, A.F.: MEEGA+: An Evolution of a Model for the Evaluation of Educational Games. Technical report INCoD/GQS.03.2016.E, Version 1.0, ISSN 2236-5281 (2016)
19.
Kitchenham, B., Madeyski, L., Budgen, D., Keung, J., Brereton, J., Charters, S., Gibbs, S., Pohthong, A.: Robust statistical methods for empirical software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22, 579–630 (2017). doi: 10.​1007/​s10664-016-9437-5 CrossRef
20.
O’Connor, R.V., Mitasiunas, A., Ross, M. (eds.) In: Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Software Process Education, Training and Professionalism. Gothenburg, Sweden (2015). http://​ceur-ws.​org
21.
22.
Salviano, C.F.: Establishing ISO/IEC 15504-Based Process Capability Profile to Process Improvement. In: Presented at 16th EuroSPI Conference on Tutorial Slides, Spain (2009)
23.
Metadata
Title
Evaluation Model of PRO2PI-WORK4E Method for Teaching Software Process Improvement
Author
Clenio F. Salviano
Copyright Year
2017
Book
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67382-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-67383-7

Copyright Year: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_37

Premium Partner

Neuer Inhalt
    Image Credits