Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2/2020

19-12-2019 | Original Paper

Evaluation of Geofoam Effects on Seismic Response in Cantilever Retaining Wall

Authors: Rouzbeh Dabiri, Navid Hasanpouri Notash

Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | Issue 2/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the present numerical study, using the finite difference software FLAC (version 7), the effect of EPS geofoam inclusions was investigated on the improvement of the retaining walls response in static and dynamic conditions. In order to evaluate the performance of geofoam inclusions, parameters such as wall height, type of retaining wall (yielding and non-yielding types), density and thickness of geofoam inclusion were studied. Two earthquake records were selected for present research: far-field and near-field. Retaining walls at the heights of 6 and 9 m and two types of EPS geofoam, EPS15 (γ = 0.15 kN/m3) and EPS20 (γ = 0.2 kN/m3), were modeled at relative thicknesses (t/H) of 0.1 and 0.2. According to the results, the isolation efficiency of geofoam inclusion against the forces imposed to the retaining wall, AP, was achieved in static condition more than dynamic condition. In the present study at seismic record of the near-field, EPS geofoam showed a better performance than the far-field record in reduction of lateral forces. Also, the isolation efficiency of geofoam inclusion against the permanent displacement, Ad, and application point of the seismic force to the yielding retaining wall were investigated. The results of the analyses indicate that, geofoam inclusion can reduce seismic lateral forces acting on yielding and non-yielding retaining walls by 40% and 50%, respectively. In addition, isolation efficiency of geofoam inclusion, Ad, for yielding wall may reach values in excess of 40%, depending on peak acceleration amplitude (amax), excitation frequency (f), relative frequency (f/fn), geofoam relative thickness (t/H), and wall height (H).

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference AbdelSalam SS, Azzam SA (2016) Reduction of lateral pressures on retaining walls using geofoam inclusion. Geosynth Int 23(6):395–407CrossRef AbdelSalam SS, Azzam SA (2016) Reduction of lateral pressures on retaining walls using geofoam inclusion. Geosynth Int 23(6):395–407CrossRef
go back to reference Athanasopoulos GA, Pelekis PC, Xenaki VC (1999) Dynamic properties of EPS geofoam: an experimental investigation. Geosynth Int 6(3):171–194CrossRef Athanasopoulos GA, Pelekis PC, Xenaki VC (1999) Dynamic properties of EPS geofoam: an experimental investigation. Geosynth Int 6(3):171–194CrossRef
go back to reference Athanasopoulos Zekkos A, Lamote K, Athanasopoulos GA (2012) Use of EPS geofoam compressible inclusions for reducing the earthquake effects on yielding earth retaining structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 41:59–71CrossRef Athanasopoulos Zekkos A, Lamote K, Athanasopoulos GA (2012) Use of EPS geofoam compressible inclusions for reducing the earthquake effects on yielding earth retaining structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 41:59–71CrossRef
go back to reference Azzam SA, AbdelSalam SS (2015) EPS geofoam to reduce lateral earth pressure on rigid walls. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in structural and geotechnical engineering, Hurghada, Egypt Azzam SA, AbdelSalam SS (2015) EPS geofoam to reduce lateral earth pressure on rigid walls. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in structural and geotechnical engineering, Hurghada, Egypt
go back to reference Bhattacharjee A, Murali Krishna A (2009) Study of seismically induced permanent displacement of gravity retaining wall. In: Indian geotechnical society, pp 627–631 Bhattacharjee A, Murali Krishna A (2009) Study of seismically induced permanent displacement of gravity retaining wall. In: Indian geotechnical society, pp 627–631
go back to reference Cai Z, Bathurst RJ (1996) Deterministic sliding block methods for estimating seismic displacements of earth structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15:255–268CrossRef Cai Z, Bathurst RJ (1996) Deterministic sliding block methods for estimating seismic displacements of earth structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15:255–268CrossRef
go back to reference Chugh A, Labuz J (2011) Numerical simulation of an instrumented cantilever retaining wall. Can Geotech J 48(9):1303–1313CrossRef Chugh A, Labuz J (2011) Numerical simulation of an instrumented cantilever retaining wall. Can Geotech J 48(9):1303–1313CrossRef
go back to reference Clayton CH, Woods R, Bond A, Milititsky J (2013) Earth pressure and earth-retaining structures, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton Clayton CH, Woods R, Bond A, Milititsky J (2013) Earth pressure and earth-retaining structures, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
go back to reference Deyanova M, Lai C, Martinelli M (2016) Displacement-based parametric study on the seismic response of gravity earth-retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 80:210–224CrossRef Deyanova M, Lai C, Martinelli M (2016) Displacement-based parametric study on the seismic response of gravity earth-retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 80:210–224CrossRef
go back to reference Ertugrul O, Trandafir A, Ozkan M (2017) Reduction of dynamic earth loads on flexible cantilever retaining walls by deformable geofoam panels. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 92:462–471CrossRef Ertugrul O, Trandafir A, Ozkan M (2017) Reduction of dynamic earth loads on flexible cantilever retaining walls by deformable geofoam panels. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 92:462–471CrossRef
go back to reference FHWA (2005) Seismic analysis of retaining walls, buried structures, embankments, and integral abutments, FHWA-NJ-2005-002 Washington, D.C, USA FHWA (2005) Seismic analysis of retaining walls, buried structures, embankments, and integral abutments, FHWA-NJ-2005-002 Washington, D.C, USA
go back to reference Green RA, Ebeling RM (2003) Modeling the dynamic response of cantilever earth-retaining walls using FLAC. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on FLAC and FLAC3D: numerical modeling in geomechanics, Sudbury Green RA, Ebeling RM (2003) Modeling the dynamic response of cantilever earth-retaining walls using FLAC. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on FLAC and FLAC3D: numerical modeling in geomechanics, Sudbury
go back to reference Green RA, Guney Olgun C (2008) Response and modelling of cantilever retaining walls subjected to seismic motions. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 23:309–322CrossRef Green RA, Guney Olgun C (2008) Response and modelling of cantilever retaining walls subjected to seismic motions. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 23:309–322CrossRef
go back to reference Hasanpouri Notash N, Dabiri R (2018) Effects of geofoam panels on static behavior of cantilever retaining wall. Adv Civ Eng 2018(6):1–16 Hasanpouri Notash N, Dabiri R (2018) Effects of geofoam panels on static behavior of cantilever retaining wall. Adv Civ Eng 2018(6):1–16
go back to reference Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2016) DEEPSOIL 6.1, User Manual. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2016) DEEPSOIL 6.1, User Manual. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
go back to reference Horvath JS (1997) The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 15(1–3):77–120CrossRef Horvath JS (1997) The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 15(1–3):77–120CrossRef
go back to reference Ishibashi I, Zhang X (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Found 33(1):182–191CrossRef Ishibashi I, Zhang X (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Found 33(1):182–191CrossRef
go back to reference Karpurapu R, Bathurst RJ (1992) Numerical investigation of controlled yielding of soil-retaining wall structures. Geotext Geomembr 11(2):115–131CrossRef Karpurapu R, Bathurst RJ (1992) Numerical investigation of controlled yielding of soil-retaining wall structures. Geotext Geomembr 11(2):115–131CrossRef
go back to reference Koerner RM (2005) Designing with geosynthetics, 5th edn. Pearson Education, London Koerner RM (2005) Designing with geosynthetics, 5th edn. Pearson Education, London
go back to reference Lal BRR, Padade AH, Mandal JN (2014) Numerical simulation of EPS Geofoam as compressible inclusions in fly ash backfill retaining walls. In: Proceedings of ground improvement and geosynthetics, pp 526–535 Lal BRR, Padade AH, Mandal JN (2014) Numerical simulation of EPS Geofoam as compressible inclusions in fly ash backfill retaining walls. In: Proceedings of ground improvement and geosynthetics, pp 526–535
go back to reference Negussey DN (1997) Properties and applications of geofoam. Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc., Washington D.C Negussey DN (1997) Properties and applications of geofoam. Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc., Washington D.C
go back to reference Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Géotechnique 15(2):139–159CrossRef Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Géotechnique 15(2):139–159CrossRef
go back to reference Ni P, Mei G, Zhao Y (2016) Displacement-dependent earth pressures on rigid retaining walls with compressible geofoam inclusions: physical modeling and analytical solutions. Int J Geomech 17(6):1–13 Ni P, Mei G, Zhao Y (2016) Displacement-dependent earth pressures on rigid retaining walls with compressible geofoam inclusions: physical modeling and analytical solutions. Int J Geomech 17(6):1–13
go back to reference Oztoprak S, Bolton MD (2013) Stiffness of sands through a laboratory test database. Géotechnique 63(1):54–70CrossRef Oztoprak S, Bolton MD (2013) Stiffness of sands through a laboratory test database. Géotechnique 63(1):54–70CrossRef
go back to reference Padade AH, Mandal JN (2012) Behavior of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial loading conditions. Electron J Geotech Eng 17:2543–2553 Padade AH, Mandal JN (2012) Behavior of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial loading conditions. Electron J Geotech Eng 17:2543–2553
go back to reference Partos AM, Kazaniwsky PM (1987) Geoboard reduces lateral earth pressures. In: Proceedings of Geosynthetics 87, Industrial Fabrics Association International, pp 628–639 Partos AM, Kazaniwsky PM (1987) Geoboard reduces lateral earth pressures. In: Proceedings of Geosynthetics 87, Industrial Fabrics Association International, pp 628–639
go back to reference Rayhani MHT, El Naggar MH, Tabatabaei SH (2008) Nonlinear analysis of local site effects on seismic ground response in the bam earthquake. Geotech Geol Eng 26:91–100CrossRef Rayhani MHT, El Naggar MH, Tabatabaei SH (2008) Nonlinear analysis of local site effects on seismic ground response in the bam earthquake. Geotech Geol Eng 26:91–100CrossRef
go back to reference Seed HB, Whitman RV (1969) Design of Earth retaining structures for dynamic loads. In: ASCE specialty conference, lateral stresses in the ground and design of Earth retaining structures. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, pp 103–147 Seed HB, Whitman RV (1969) Design of Earth retaining structures for dynamic loads. In: ASCE specialty conference, lateral stresses in the ground and design of Earth retaining structures. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, pp 103–147
go back to reference SeismoSoft (2011) SeismoSignal Version 4.3.0. Seismosoft Ltd., Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions SeismoSoft (2011) SeismoSignal Version 4.3.0. Seismosoft Ltd., Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions
go back to reference Sherif MA, Ishibashi I, Lee CD (1982) Earth pressure against rigid retaining walls. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 108(GT5):679–696 Sherif MA, Ishibashi I, Lee CD (1982) Earth pressure against rigid retaining walls. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 108(GT5):679–696
go back to reference Trandafir AC, Bartlett SF (2010) Seismic performance of double EPS geofoam buffer systems. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics and symposium in Honor of Professor I. M. Idriss, San Diego, California Trandafir AC, Bartlett SF (2010) Seismic performance of double EPS geofoam buffer systems. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics and symposium in Honor of Professor I. M. Idriss, San Diego, California
go back to reference Trandafir AC, Ertugrul OL (2011) Earthquake response of a gravity retaining wall with geofoam inclusion. In: Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011, Dallas, Texas Trandafir AC, Ertugrul OL (2011) Earthquake response of a gravity retaining wall with geofoam inclusion. In: Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011, Dallas, Texas
go back to reference Xie Q, Gama CD, Yu X, Chen Y (2013) A parametric study of interface characteristics in a buttress retaining wall. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:1477–1492 Xie Q, Gama CD, Yu X, Chen Y (2013) A parametric study of interface characteristics in a buttress retaining wall. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:1477–1492
go back to reference Yu ZW, Mao JF (2018) A stochastic dynamic model of train-track-bridge coupled system based on probability density evolution method. Appl Math Model 59:205–232CrossRef Yu ZW, Mao JF (2018) A stochastic dynamic model of train-track-bridge coupled system based on probability density evolution method. Appl Math Model 59:205–232CrossRef
go back to reference Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2009a) Influence of constitutive model on numerical simulation of EPS seismic buffer shaking table tests. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):308–312CrossRef Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2009a) Influence of constitutive model on numerical simulation of EPS seismic buffer shaking table tests. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):308–312CrossRef
go back to reference Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2009b) Numerical parametric study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam seismic buffers. Can Geotech J 46(3):318–338CrossRef Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2009b) Numerical parametric study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam seismic buffers. Can Geotech J 46(3):318–338CrossRef
go back to reference Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2010) Numerical parametric study of geofoam seismic buffers with different constitutive models. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on geosynthetics, Guaruja Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2010) Numerical parametric study of geofoam seismic buffers with different constitutive models. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on geosynthetics, Guaruja
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of Geofoam Effects on Seismic Response in Cantilever Retaining Wall
Authors
Rouzbeh Dabiri
Navid Hasanpouri Notash
Publication date
19-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-3182
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01151-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2/2020 Go to the issue