Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 1/2020

02-11-2019 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making methods for sanitary landfill site selection: the case of Sivas city, Turkey

Authors: Can Bülent Karakuş, Demet Demiroğlu, Ayşen Çoban, Alptekin Ulutaş

Published in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Issue 1/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Landfill is the most common method used to eliminate municipal solid waste in developing countries. As in all developing residential units, Sivas city is also encountering a major solid waste problem menacing both public health and environment. This study analyzes the 7 criteria (geological structure, land ability class, transportation, groundwater, surface water, residential areas, and existing land use) utilized for solid waste landfill area preference reasons by employing some Geographical Information System (GIS) based, multi-criteria decision-making methods such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Evaluation of alternative areas defined by AHP and SAW methods is conducted with the help of Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS). The study area was classified as “most suitable”, “suitable”, “averagely suitable”, “too little suitable” and “not suitable” in terms of their sanitary landfill properties. According to AHP and SAW analyses results, it was determined that a large part of the study area (respectively, 46.82% and 27.81%) is within the category of “averagely suitable”. After the application based on GIS oriented multi-criteria decision-making analysis, 4 alternative places as solid waste disposal areas were recommended by taking environmental and physical factors into consideration. AHP–CODAS and SAW–CODAS methods were mutually utilized to rank these 4 areas according to their suitability. As a result, “Area1” in integrated weights (AHP and SAW)–CODAS was selected as the most appropriate place for sanitary permanent landfill.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Santhosh LG, Sivakumar Babu GL (2018) Landfill site selection based on reliability concepts using the Drastic method and AHP integrated with GIS—a case study of Bengaluru city, India. Georisk Asses and Manag Risk Eng Sys Geohaz 12(3):234–252 Santhosh LG, Sivakumar Babu GL (2018) Landfill site selection based on reliability concepts using the Drastic method and AHP integrated with GIS—a case study of Bengaluru city, India. Georisk Asses and Manag Risk Eng Sys Geohaz 12(3):234–252
4.
go back to reference Reinhart DR, Basel Al-Yousfi A (1996) The impact of leachate recirculation on municipal solid waste landfill operating characteristics. Waste Manag Res 14(4):337–346CrossRef Reinhart DR, Basel Al-Yousfi A (1996) The impact of leachate recirculation on municipal solid waste landfill operating characteristics. Waste Manag Res 14(4):337–346CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elahi A, Samadyar H (2014) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process method for Tafresh Town. Mid East J Sci Res 22(9):1294–1307 Elahi A, Samadyar H (2014) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process method for Tafresh Town. Mid East J Sci Res 22(9):1294–1307
6.
go back to reference Soltani A, Hewage K, Reza B, Sadiq R (2015) Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: a review. Waste Manag 35:318–328CrossRef Soltani A, Hewage K, Reza B, Sadiq R (2015) Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: a review. Waste Manag 35:318–328CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yunus MZM, Mohamad II, Omar CM, Yusof MBM (2015) Integrating and utilizing AHP and GIS for landfill site selection. Appl Mech Mater 773:100–104CrossRef Yunus MZM, Mohamad II, Omar CM, Yusof MBM (2015) Integrating and utilizing AHP and GIS for landfill site selection. Appl Mech Mater 773:100–104CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ersoy H, Bulut F, Berkun M (2013) Landfill site requirements on the rock environment: a case study. Eng Geol 154:20–35CrossRef Ersoy H, Bulut F, Berkun M (2013) Landfill site requirements on the rock environment: a case study. Eng Geol 154:20–35CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kontos TD, Komilis DP, Halvadakis CP (2005) Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Manag 25(8):818–832CrossRef Kontos TD, Komilis DP, Halvadakis CP (2005) Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Manag 25(8):818–832CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vasiljevic TZ, Srdjevic Z, Bajcetic R, Miloradov MV (2011) GIS and the analytic hierarchy process for regional landfill site selection in transitional countries: a case study from Serbia. Environ Manag 49:445–458CrossRef Vasiljevic TZ, Srdjevic Z, Bajcetic R, Miloradov MV (2011) GIS and the analytic hierarchy process for regional landfill site selection in transitional countries: a case study from Serbia. Environ Manag 49:445–458CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Şener S, Şener E, Nas B, Karaguzel R (2010) Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Manag 30:2037–2046CrossRef Şener S, Şener E, Nas B, Karaguzel R (2010) Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Manag 30:2037–2046CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bagchi A (2004) Design of landfills and integrated solid waste management, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Bagchi A (2004) Design of landfills and integrated solid waste management, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
13.
go back to reference Allen BG, Caetano P, Costa C, Cummins V, Donnelly J, Koukoulas S, Vendas D (2003) A landfill site selection process incorporating GIS modelling. In: Proceedings of Sardinia Allen BG, Caetano P, Costa C, Cummins V, Donnelly J, Koukoulas S, Vendas D (2003) A landfill site selection process incorporating GIS modelling. In: Proceedings of Sardinia
14.
go back to reference Şener B, Suzen LM, Doyuran V (2006) Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environ Geol 49:376–388CrossRef Şener B, Suzen LM, Doyuran V (2006) Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environ Geol 49:376–388CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yeşilnacar Mİ, Süzen ML, Şener B, Doyuran V (2012) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection for the city of Sanliurfa-Turkey: an example using MCDA integrated with GIS. Int J Dig Earth 5(2):147–164CrossRef Yeşilnacar Mİ, Süzen ML, Şener B, Doyuran V (2012) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection for the city of Sanliurfa-Turkey: an example using MCDA integrated with GIS. Int J Dig Earth 5(2):147–164CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chabuk AJ, Al-Ansari N, Hussain HM, Knutsson S, Pusch R (2017) GIS-based assessment of combined AHP and SAW methods for selecting suitable sites for landfill in Al-Musayiab Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 76(5):209CrossRef Chabuk AJ, Al-Ansari N, Hussain HM, Knutsson S, Pusch R (2017) GIS-based assessment of combined AHP and SAW methods for selecting suitable sites for landfill in Al-Musayiab Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 76(5):209CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bagdanavičiūtė I, Valiūnas J (2013) GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources. Environ Earth Sci 68(6):1797–1812CrossRef Bagdanavičiūtė I, Valiūnas J (2013) GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources. Environ Earth Sci 68(6):1797–1812CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chang NB, Parvathinathan G, Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87(1):139–153CrossRef Chang NB, Parvathinathan G, Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87(1):139–153CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Akbari V, Rajabi MA, Chavoshi SH, Shams R (2008) Landfill site selection by combining GIS and fuzzy multi criteria decision analysis, case study: Bandar Abbas, Iran. World Appl Sci J 3:39–47 Akbari V, Rajabi MA, Chavoshi SH, Shams R (2008) Landfill site selection by combining GIS and fuzzy multi criteria decision analysis, case study: Bandar Abbas, Iran. World Appl Sci J 3:39–47
20.
go back to reference Mahini AS, Gholamalifard M (2006) Siting MSW landfills with a weighted linear combination methodology in a GIS environment. Int J Environ Sci Tech 3(4):435–445CrossRef Mahini AS, Gholamalifard M (2006) Siting MSW landfills with a weighted linear combination methodology in a GIS environment. Int J Environ Sci Tech 3(4):435–445CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shahabi H, Keihanfard S, Ahmad BB, Amiri MJT (2014) Evaluating Boolean, AHP and WLC methods for the selection of waste landfill sites using GIS and satellite figures. Environ Earth Sci 71(9):4221–4233CrossRef Shahabi H, Keihanfard S, Ahmad BB, Amiri MJT (2014) Evaluating Boolean, AHP and WLC methods for the selection of waste landfill sites using GIS and satellite figures. Environ Earth Sci 71(9):4221–4233CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rahmat ZG, Niri MV, Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Baboli Z, Hosseinzadeh M (2017) Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(1):111–118CrossRef Rahmat ZG, Niri MV, Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Baboli Z, Hosseinzadeh M (2017) Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(1):111–118CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Saatsaz M, Monsef I, Rahmani M, Ghods A (2018) Site suitability evaluation of an old operating landfill using AHP and GIS techniques and integrated hydrogeological and geophysical surveys. Environ Monit Assess 190(3):144CrossRef Saatsaz M, Monsef I, Rahmani M, Ghods A (2018) Site suitability evaluation of an old operating landfill using AHP and GIS techniques and integrated hydrogeological and geophysical surveys. Environ Monit Assess 190(3):144CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Eskandari M, Homaee M, Mahmoodi S, Pazira E, Van Genuchten MT (2015) Optimizing landfill site selection by using land classification maps. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(10):7754–7765CrossRef Eskandari M, Homaee M, Mahmoodi S, Pazira E, Van Genuchten MT (2015) Optimizing landfill site selection by using land classification maps. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(10):7754–7765CrossRef
25.
go back to reference GDM (2005) 1/25.000 scaled digital topographic map of the study area, Ministry of National Defense Map General Directorate, Ankara GDM (2005) 1/25.000 scaled digital topographic map of the study area, Ministry of National Defense Map General Directorate, Ankara
26.
go back to reference GDRA (2001) 1/25.000 scaled digital soil map of the study area, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General Directorate of Rural Affairs, Ankara GDRA (2001) 1/25.000 scaled digital soil map of the study area, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General Directorate of Rural Affairs, Ankara
27.
go back to reference GDMRE (2005) 1/25.000 scaled numerical geology map of the study area, General Directorate of Mining and Exploration, Ankara GDMRE (2005) 1/25.000 scaled numerical geology map of the study area, General Directorate of Mining and Exploration, Ankara
28.
go back to reference MEUPGDS (2015) 1/100.000 scale environmental plan map, Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning General Directorate of Spatial Planning, Ankara MEUPGDS (2015) 1/100.000 scale environmental plan map, Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning General Directorate of Spatial Planning, Ankara
29.
go back to reference GDMRE (1996) Environmental geology and natural resources of the city of Sivas, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Central Anatolia 1st Region Directorate Geological Studies Department, Sivas, 168s GDMRE (1996) Environmental geology and natural resources of the city of Sivas, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Central Anatolia 1st Region Directorate Geological Studies Department, Sivas, 168s
30.
go back to reference Beskese A, Demir HH, Ozcan HK, Okten HE (2015) Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3513–3521CrossRef Beskese A, Demir HH, Ozcan HK, Okten HE (2015) Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3513–3521CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bhushan N, Rai K (2004) Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, New York, p 172MATH Bhushan N, Rai K (2004) Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, New York, p 172MATH
32.
go back to reference Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGrawHill, New YorkMATH Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGrawHill, New YorkMATH
33.
go back to reference Yal G, Akgün H (2013) Landfill site selection and landfill liner design for Ankara, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 70:2729–2752CrossRef Yal G, Akgün H (2013) Landfill site selection and landfill liner design for Ankara, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 70:2729–2752CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Eastman JR (2003) IDRISI Kilimanjaro: guide to GIS and figure processing. manual version 14.00. Clark University Worcester Eastman JR (2003) IDRISI Kilimanjaro: guide to GIS and figure processing. manual version 14.00. Clark University Worcester
35.
go back to reference Eastman JR (1993) IDRISI: a grid based geographic analysis system, version 4.1. Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester Eastman JR (1993) IDRISI: a grid based geographic analysis system, version 4.1. Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester
36.
go back to reference Afshari A, Mojahed M, Yusuff RM (2010) Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. Int J Innov Manag Technol 1:511–515 Afshari A, Mojahed M, Yusuff RM (2010) Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. Int J Innov Manag Technol 1:511–515
37.
go back to reference Yeşilnacar Mİ, Süzen ML, Doyuran V, Şener B (2008) Generation of GIS based algorithms for site selection in landfill. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. Project number: 106Y305 Yeşilnacar Mİ, Süzen ML, Doyuran V, Şener B (2008) Generation of GIS based algorithms for site selection in landfill. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. Project number: 106Y305
38.
go back to reference Barakat A, Hilali A, El Baghdadi M, Touhami F (2017) Landfill site selection with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation technique—a case study in Béni Mellal-Khouribga region, Morocco. Environ Earth Sci 76(12):413CrossRef Barakat A, Hilali A, El Baghdadi M, Touhami F (2017) Landfill site selection with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation technique—a case study in Béni Mellal-Khouribga region, Morocco. Environ Earth Sci 76(12):413CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2016) A new combinative distance-based assessment (codas) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 50(3):25–44 Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2016) A new combinative distance-based assessment (codas) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 50(3):25–44
40.
go back to reference Zavadskas EK, Podvezko V (2016) Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. Int J Inf Tech Dec Making 15(02):267–283CrossRef Zavadskas EK, Podvezko V (2016) Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. Int J Inf Tech Dec Making 15(02):267–283CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Malczewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Prog Plan 62:3–65CrossRef Malczewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Prog Plan 62:3–65CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Hansen HS (2005) GIS-based multi-criteria analysis of wind farm development. In: Proceedings of the 10th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, ScanGIS, Denmark p 75–87 Hansen HS (2005) GIS-based multi-criteria analysis of wind farm development. In: Proceedings of the 10th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, ScanGIS, Denmark p 75–87
43.
go back to reference Liu R, Zhang K, Zhang Z, Borthwick AG (2014) Land-use suitability analysis for urban development in Beijing. J Environ Manage 145:170–179CrossRef Liu R, Zhang K, Zhang Z, Borthwick AG (2014) Land-use suitability analysis for urban development in Beijing. J Environ Manage 145:170–179CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Güler D, Yomralıoğlu T (2017) Alternative suitable landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems: a case study in Istanbul. Environ Earth Sci 76(20):678CrossRef Güler D, Yomralıoğlu T (2017) Alternative suitable landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems: a case study in Istanbul. Environ Earth Sci 76(20):678CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Guiqin W, Li Q, Guoxue L, Lijun C (2009) Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China. J Environ Eng 90:2414–2421 Guiqin W, Li Q, Guoxue L, Lijun C (2009) Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China. J Environ Eng 90:2414–2421
46.
go back to reference Ezzouaq M, Chouaouta H (2002) Guide de pre´se´lection de site de de´charge controˆle´e des de´chets me´nagers. Coope´ration Maroco-Allemande GTZ–PGPE (Programme de Gestion et de Protection de l’Environment) p 84 Ezzouaq M, Chouaouta H (2002) Guide de pre´se´lection de site de de´charge controˆle´e des de´chets me´nagers. Coope´ration Maroco-Allemande GTZ–PGPE (Programme de Gestion et de Protection de l’Environment) p 84
47.
go back to reference Sharifi M, Hadidi M, Vessali E et al (2009) Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis for a GIS-based hazardous waste landfill siting in Kurdistan Province, western Iran. Waste Manag 29:2740–2758CrossRef Sharifi M, Hadidi M, Vessali E et al (2009) Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis for a GIS-based hazardous waste landfill siting in Kurdistan Province, western Iran. Waste Manag 29:2740–2758CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Yeşilnacar Mİ, Çetin H (2005) Site selection for hazardous wastes: a case study from the GAP area, Turkey. Eng Geol 81(4):371–388CrossRef Yeşilnacar Mİ, Çetin H (2005) Site selection for hazardous wastes: a case study from the GAP area, Turkey. Eng Geol 81(4):371–388CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Donevska KR, Gorsevski PV, Jovanovski M, Peševski I (2012) Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci 67(1):121–131CrossRef Donevska KR, Gorsevski PV, Jovanovski M, Peševski I (2012) Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci 67(1):121–131CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Kumar S, Hassan MI (2013) Selection of a landfill site for solid waste management: an application of AHP and spatial analyst tool. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 41(1):45–56CrossRef Kumar S, Hassan MI (2013) Selection of a landfill site for solid waste management: an application of AHP and spatial analyst tool. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 41(1):45–56CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Khanlari G, Abdilor Y, Babazadeh R, Mohebi Y (2012) Landfill site selection for municipal solid waste management using GSI method, Malayer, Iran. Adv. Environ Biol 6(2):886–894 Khanlari G, Abdilor Y, Babazadeh R, Mohebi Y (2012) Landfill site selection for municipal solid waste management using GSI method, Malayer, Iran. Adv. Environ Biol 6(2):886–894
52.
go back to reference Wang G, Qin L, Li G, Chen L (2009) Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China. J Environ Manage 90(8):2414–2421CrossRef Wang G, Qin L, Li G, Chen L (2009) Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China. J Environ Manage 90(8):2414–2421CrossRef
53.
go back to reference ME (1991) Regulation on Control of Solid Wastes, Turkey Republic Ministry of Environment, Official Gazette No: 20814, 14 Mar 1991 ME (1991) Regulation on Control of Solid Wastes, Turkey Republic Ministry of Environment, Official Gazette No: 20814, 14 Mar 1991
54.
go back to reference Şener B (2004) Landfill site selection by using geography information System. MSc Dissertation, Middle East Technical University Şener B (2004) Landfill site selection by using geography information System. MSc Dissertation, Middle East Technical University
55.
go back to reference Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122(6):515–523CrossRef Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122(6):515–523CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Jaafarzadeh N, Hosseinzadeh M (2013) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection with geographic information systems and analytical hierarchy process: a case study in Mahshahr County, Iran. Waste Manag Res 31(1):98–105CrossRef Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Jaafarzadeh N, Hosseinzadeh M (2013) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection with geographic information systems and analytical hierarchy process: a case study in Mahshahr County, Iran. Waste Manag Res 31(1):98–105CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Ghobadi MH, Babazadeh R, Bagheri V (2013) Siting MSW landfills by combining AHP with GIS in Hamedan province, western Iran. Environ Earth Sci 70(4):1823–1840CrossRef Ghobadi MH, Babazadeh R, Bagheri V (2013) Siting MSW landfills by combining AHP with GIS in Hamedan province, western Iran. Environ Earth Sci 70(4):1823–1840CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Demesouka OE, Vavatsikos AP, Anagnostopoulos KP (2013) Suitability analysis for siting MSW landfills and its multicriteria spatial decision support system: method, implementation and case study. Waste Manag 33(5):1190–1206CrossRef Demesouka OE, Vavatsikos AP, Anagnostopoulos KP (2013) Suitability analysis for siting MSW landfills and its multicriteria spatial decision support system: method, implementation and case study. Waste Manag 33(5):1190–1206CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Djokanović S, Abolmasov B, Jevremović D (2016) GIS application for landfill site selection: a case study in Pančevo, Serbia. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(3):1273–1299CrossRef Djokanović S, Abolmasov B, Jevremović D (2016) GIS application for landfill site selection: a case study in Pančevo, Serbia. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(3):1273–1299CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Jamshidi-Zanjani A, Rezaei M (2017) Landfill site selection using combination of fuzzy logic and multi-attribute decision-making approach. Environ Earth Sci 76(13):448CrossRef Jamshidi-Zanjani A, Rezaei M (2017) Landfill site selection using combination of fuzzy logic and multi-attribute decision-making approach. Environ Earth Sci 76(13):448CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Uyan M (2014) MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 71(4):1629–1639CrossRef Uyan M (2014) MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 71(4):1629–1639CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Motlagh ZK, Sayadi MH (2015) Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (case study: Birjand plain, Iran). Waste Manag 46:322–337CrossRef Motlagh ZK, Sayadi MH (2015) Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (case study: Birjand plain, Iran). Waste Manag 46:322–337CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Atmaca E (2004) Investigation and re-planning of central solid waste management in Sivas, PhD Thesis, Cumhuriyet University, Institute of Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering Department, Sivas, 136s Atmaca E (2004) Investigation and re-planning of central solid waste management in Sivas, PhD Thesis, Cumhuriyet University, Institute of Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering Department, Sivas, 136s
64.
go back to reference Chabuk AJ, Al-Ansari N, Hussain HM, Knutsson S, Pusch R, Laue J (2017) Combining GIS applications and method of multi-criteria decision-making (AHP) for landfill siting in Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Sustainability 9(11):1932CrossRef Chabuk AJ, Al-Ansari N, Hussain HM, Knutsson S, Pusch R, Laue J (2017) Combining GIS applications and method of multi-criteria decision-making (AHP) for landfill siting in Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Sustainability 9(11):1932CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Majumdar A, Hazra T, Dutta A (2017) Landfill site selection by AHP based multi-criteria decision making tool: a case study in Kolkata, India. J Ins Eng 98(3):277–283 Majumdar A, Hazra T, Dutta A (2017) Landfill site selection by AHP based multi-criteria decision making tool: a case study in Kolkata, India. J Ins Eng 98(3):277–283
66.
go back to reference Wang Y, Li J, An D, Xi B, Tang J, Wang Y, Yang Y (2018) Site selection for municipal solid waste landfill considering environmental health risks. Resour Conserv Recycl 138:40–46CrossRef Wang Y, Li J, An D, Xi B, Tang J, Wang Y, Yang Y (2018) Site selection for municipal solid waste landfill considering environmental health risks. Resour Conserv Recycl 138:40–46CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Makropoulos CK, Butler D (2006) Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. J Environ Model Soft 21:69–84CrossRef Makropoulos CK, Butler D (2006) Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. J Environ Model Soft 21:69–84CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Kara C, Doratli N (2012) Application of GIS/AHP in siting sanitary landfill: a case study in Northern Cyprus. J Waste Manag Res 30:966–980CrossRef Kara C, Doratli N (2012) Application of GIS/AHP in siting sanitary landfill: a case study in Northern Cyprus. J Waste Manag Res 30:966–980CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Alexakis DD, Sarris A (2014) Integrated GIS and remote sensing analysis for landfill sitting in Western Crete, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 72(2):467–482CrossRef Alexakis DD, Sarris A (2014) Integrated GIS and remote sensing analysis for landfill sitting in Western Crete, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 72(2):467–482CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Paul K, Dutta A, Krishna AP (2014) A comprehensive study on landfill site selection for Kolkata City, India. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 64(7):846–861CrossRef Paul K, Dutta A, Krishna AP (2014) A comprehensive study on landfill site selection for Kolkata City, India. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 64(7):846–861CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making methods for sanitary landfill site selection: the case of Sivas city, Turkey
Authors
Can Bülent Karakuş
Demet Demiroğlu
Ayşen Çoban
Alptekin Ulutaş
Publication date
02-11-2019
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Electronic ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00935-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 1/2020 Go to the issue