Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Teacher Education 8/2016

26-12-2016

Examining the Effectiveness of an Academic Language Planning Organizer as a Tool for Planning Science Academic Language Instruction and Supports

Authors: Karl G. Jung, Julie C. Brown

Published in: Journal of Science Teacher Education | Issue 8/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To engage in the practices of science, students must have a strong command of science academic language. However, content area teachers often make academic language an incidental part of their lesson planning, which leads to missed opportunities to enhance students’ language development. To support pre-service elementary science teachers (PSTs) in making language planning an explicit part of their science lessons, we created the Academic Language Planning Organizer (ALPO). The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the ALPO on two levels: first, by examining participants’ interactions with the ALPO as they identified academic language features, objectives and supports; and second, by exploring the ways that participants translated identified language supports to planned science activities. Findings indicated that, when using the ALPO, PSTs identified clear language functions and relevant vocabulary terms, and also frequently developed clear, observable and measurable language objectives. When lesson planning, PSTs were largely successful in translating previously identified language supports to their lesson plans, and often planned additional language supports beyond what was required. We also found, however, that the ALPO did not meet its intended use in supporting PSTs in identifying discourse and syntax demands associated with specific academic language functions, suggesting that revisions to the ALPO could better support PSTs in identifying these academic language demands. Implications for supporting PSTs’ planning for and scaffolding of science academic language use are presented.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2014). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18, 118–136.CrossRef Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2014). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18, 118–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., LaFramenta, C., & Ong, C. (2004). Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary classrooms. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., LaFramenta, C., & Ong, C. (2004). Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary classrooms. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
go back to reference Bigelow, M. (2010). Learning to plan for a focus on form in CBI: The role of teacher knowledge and teaching context. In J. Davies (Ed.), World language teacher education: Transitions and challenges in the twenty-first century (pp. 35–56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Bigelow, M. (2010). Learning to plan for a focus on form in CBI: The role of teacher knowledge and teaching context. In J. Davies (Ed.), World language teacher education: Transitions and challenges in the twenty-first century (pp. 35–56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
go back to reference Bigelow, M., Ranney, S., & Dahlman, A. (2006). Keeping the language focus in content-based ESL instruction through proactive curriculum-planning. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL Du Canada, 24, 40–58.CrossRef Bigelow, M., Ranney, S., & Dahlman, A. (2006). Keeping the language focus in content-based ESL instruction through proactive curriculum-planning. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL Du Canada, 24, 40–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 529–553.CrossRef Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 529–553.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, B. A., & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92, 708–732.CrossRef Brown, B. A., & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92, 708–732.CrossRef
go back to reference Buxton, C. A., & Lee, O. (2014). English learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 204–222). New York, NY: Routledge. Buxton, C. A., & Lee, O. (2014). English learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 204–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
go back to reference Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Garder, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Report prepared for the Office of Science Education. National Institutes of Health. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Garder, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Report prepared for the Office of Science Education. National Institutes of Health. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
go back to reference Chamot, A. U. (2009). The CALLA handbook (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson. Chamot, A. U. (2009). The CALLA handbook (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson.
go back to reference Dutro, S., & Moran, C. (2003). Rethinking English language instruction: An architectural approach. In G. Garcia (Ed.), English learners: Reaching the highest level of English literacy (pp. 227–258). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association. Dutro, S., & Moran, C. (2003). Rethinking English language instruction: An architectural approach. In G. Garcia (Ed.), English learners: Reaching the highest level of English literacy (pp. 227–258). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
go back to reference Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195–211.CrossRef Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2010). Making content comprehensible to elementary English learners: The SIOP model. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2010). Making content comprehensible to elementary English learners: The SIOP model. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
go back to reference Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–54). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems Co., Inc. Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–54). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems Co., Inc.
go back to reference Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2010). Unpacking the language purpose: Vocabulary, structure, and function. TESOL Journal, 1, 315–337.CrossRef Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2010). Unpacking the language purpose: Vocabulary, structure, and function. TESOL Journal, 1, 315–337.CrossRef
go back to reference Gee, J. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gee, J. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Gee, J. (2008). Essay: What is academic language? In A. S. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths (pp. 57–70). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Gee, J. (2008). Essay: What is academic language? In A. S. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths (pp. 57–70). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
go back to reference Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
go back to reference Jung, K. G. (2015). Examining language expectations and supports during elementary science instruction. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Chicago, IL. Jung, K. G. (2015). Examining language expectations and supports during elementary science instruction. In Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Chicago, IL.
go back to reference Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
go back to reference Lucero, A. (2012). Demands and opportunities: Analyzing academic language in a first grade dual language program. Linguistics and Education, 23, 277–288.CrossRef Lucero, A. (2012). Demands and opportunities: Analyzing academic language in a first grade dual language program. Linguistics and Education, 23, 277–288.CrossRef
go back to reference Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
go back to reference Ranney, S. (2012). Defining and teaching academic language: Developments in K-12 ESL. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6, 560–574.CrossRef Ranney, S. (2012). Defining and teaching academic language: Developments in K-12 ESL. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6, 560–574.CrossRef
go back to reference Regalla, M. (2012). Language objectives: More than just vocabulary. TESOL Journal, 3(2), 210–230.CrossRef Regalla, M. (2012). Language objectives: More than just vocabulary. TESOL Journal, 3(2), 210–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 409–418.CrossRef Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 409–418.CrossRef
go back to reference Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328(5977), 450–452.CrossRef Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328(5977), 450–452.CrossRef
go back to reference Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity [SCALE]. (2015). Elementary mathematics handbook. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity [SCALE]. (2015). Elementary mathematics handbook. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
go back to reference Stoller, F. L. (2008). Content-based instruction. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1163–1174). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Stoller, F. L. (2008). Content-based instruction. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1163–1174). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alceio, R., Guerro, C., Fan, Y., & Huerta, M. (2014). A randomized study of a literacy-integrated science intervention for low-socio-economic status middle school students: Findings from first-year implementation. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2083–2109.CrossRef Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alceio, R., Guerro, C., Fan, Y., & Huerta, M. (2014). A randomized study of a literacy-integrated science intervention for low-socio-economic status middle school students: Findings from first-year implementation. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2083–2109.CrossRef
go back to reference Weinburgh, M., Silva, C., Smith, K. H., Groulx, J., & Nettles, J. (2014). The intersection of inquiry-based science and language: Preparing teachers for ELL classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 519–541.CrossRef Weinburgh, M., Silva, C., Smith, K. H., Groulx, J., & Nettles, J. (2014). The intersection of inquiry-based science and language: Preparing teachers for ELL classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 519–541.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Zwiers, J. (2014). Building academic language: Meeting common core standards across disciplines (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Zwiers, J. (2014). Building academic language: Meeting common core standards across disciplines (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Metadata
Title
Examining the Effectiveness of an Academic Language Planning Organizer as a Tool for Planning Science Academic Language Instruction and Supports
Authors
Karl G. Jung
Julie C. Brown
Publication date
26-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Teacher Education / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1046-560X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1847
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9491-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Journal of Science Teacher Education 8/2016 Go to the issue