Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Expected Utility Theory and Economic Behavior: Predicting Decision Making Based on the Expected Value of Utility

Author : Kazuhisa Takemura

Published in: Foundations of Economic Psychology

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although economic behavior is often exhibited under conditions of uncertainty, we can decide future behavior to a certain extent by assigning a probability value to the uncertainty of the future.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ ecole americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.CrossRef Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ ecole americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.CrossRef
go back to reference Curley, S. P., & Yates, J. F. (1985). The center and range of the probability interval as factors affecting ambiguity preference. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 273–287.CrossRef Curley, S. P., & Yates, J. F. (1985). The center and range of the probability interval as factors affecting ambiguity preference. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 273–287.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axiom. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.CrossRef Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axiom. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.CrossRef
go back to reference Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603.CrossRef Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603.CrossRef
go back to reference Gilboa, I. (2009). Theory of decision under uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Gilboa, I. (2009). Theory of decision under uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 5–28.CrossRef Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 5–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, N. E. (1967). An introduction to Bernoullian utility theory. I. Utility functions. Swedish Journal of Economics, 69, 163–183.CrossRef Jensen, N. E. (1967). An introduction to Bernoullian utility theory. I. Utility functions. Swedish Journal of Economics, 69, 163–183.CrossRef
go back to reference Keren, G., & Gerritsen, L. E. M. (1999). On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica, 103, 149–172.CrossRef Keren, G., & Gerritsen, L. E. M. (1999). On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica, 103, 149–172.CrossRef
go back to reference Masuda, S. (2010). Aimai na jōhō to seigyo gensō ga wariai no suitei ni oyobosu eikyō [Effects of ambiguous information and illusion of control on making proportion estimates]. Nihon Kansei Kougakukai Ronbunshi [Transactions of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering], 9(4), 232–240. Masuda, S. (2010). Aimai na jōhō to seigyo gensō ga wariai no suitei ni oyobosu eikyō [Effects of ambiguous information and illusion of control on making proportion estimates]. Nihon Kansei Kougakukai Ronbunshi [Transactions of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering], 9(4), 232–240.
go back to reference Masuda, S., Sakagami, T., & Hirota, S. (2002). Sentaku no kikai ga aimaisei kihi ni ataeru eikyō: Kotonaru shurui no aimaisei deno kentō [The effect of available choices on ambiguity aversion; An examination of different types of ambiguity]. Shinrigaku Kenkyū [The Japanese Journal of Psychology], 73(1), 34–41.CrossRef Masuda, S., Sakagami, T., & Hirota, S. (2002). Sentaku no kikai ga aimaisei kihi ni ataeru eikyō: Kotonaru shurui no aimaisei deno kentō [The effect of available choices on ambiguity aversion; An examination of different types of ambiguity]. Shinrigaku Kenkyū [The Japanese Journal of Psychology], 73(1), 34–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605–628.CrossRef Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605–628.CrossRef
go back to reference Shigemasu, K. (1988). Aimaisa no ninchi ni okeru gōrisei [Rationality in probability judgement]. Kōdō keiryōgaku [The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics], 16(1), 39–48.CrossRef Shigemasu, K. (1988). Aimaisa no ninchi ni okeru gōrisei [Rationality in probability judgement]. Kōdō keiryōgaku [The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics], 16(1), 39–48.CrossRef
go back to reference Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts savage’s axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368–373. Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts savage’s axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368–373.
go back to reference Takemura, K. (1996). Ishikettei to Sono Shien [Decision-making and support for decision-making]. In S. Ichikawa (Ed.), Ninchi Shinrigaku 4kan Shiko [Cognitive psychology vol. 4 thoughts] (pp. 81–105). Tokyo, JP: University of Tokyo Press. Takemura, K. (1996). Ishikettei to Sono Shien [Decision-making and support for decision-making]. In S. Ichikawa (Ed.), Ninchi Shinrigaku 4kan Shiko [Cognitive psychology vol. 4 thoughts] (pp. 81–105). Tokyo, JP: University of Tokyo Press.
go back to reference Takemura, K. (2014). Behavioral decision theory: Psychological and mathematical representations of human choice behavior. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef Takemura, K. (2014). Behavioral decision theory: Psychological and mathematical representations of human choice behavior. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Tamura, H., Nakamura, Y., & Fujita, S. (1997). Kōyō bunseki no sūri to ōyō [Mathematical principles and application of utility analysis]. Tokyo, JP: Corona Publishing. Tamura, H., Nakamura, Y., & Fujita, S. (1997). Kōyō bunseki no sūri to ōyō [Mathematical principles and application of utility analysis]. Tokyo, JP: Corona Publishing.
go back to reference Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
go back to reference von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944/1947). Theory and games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944/1947). Theory and games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Yates, J. F., & Zukowski, L. G. (1976). Characterization of ambiguity in decision making. Behavioral Science, 21, 19–25.CrossRef Yates, J. F., & Zukowski, L. G. (1976). Characterization of ambiguity in decision making. Behavioral Science, 21, 19–25.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Expected Utility Theory and Economic Behavior: Predicting Decision Making Based on the Expected Value of Utility
Author
Kazuhisa Takemura
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9049-4_3