Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2017 | Supplement | Chapter

Exploration of a Practical Approach for Assessing the Measurement Capability of Software Organizations

Authors : Murat Salmanoğlu, Onur Demirörs, Ahmet Coşkunçay, Ali Yıldız

Published in: Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

share
SHARE

Abstract

Measurement is the foundation for successful software management. However, it is not easy for software organizations to evaluate their measurement practices and to determine what they should do to improve them. There are models to evaluate capability and maturity of measurement processes. However, they frequently focus on the measurement process in relation with a well-defined capability model like CMMI or SPICE. Organizations following recent agile methodologies do not desire to apply these holistic models. We have developed a model to assess measurement capability of software organizations by inspecting individual measures, independent from software development approach and process architecture. The model includes sample of core measures for aspects and defines generic practices for three capability levels. Organizations can use the model to determine and improve their measurement capability. In the paper, an exploratory case study conducted in a large telecommunication company is discussed and the results are evaluated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tarhan, A., Demirors, O.: Apply quantitative management now. IEEE Softw. 29(3), 77–85 (2012) CrossRef Tarhan, A., Demirors, O.: Apply quantitative management now. IEEE Softw. 29(3), 77–85 (2012) CrossRef
2.
go back to reference ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 15504-5:2012 - Information technology – Process assessment – Part 5: An exemplar software life cycle process assessment model (2006) ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 15504-5:2012 - Information technology – Process assessment – Part 5: An exemplar software life cycle process assessment model (2006)
3.
go back to reference CMMI Product Team, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3 CMMI-DEV, V1.3, November 2010 CMMI Product Team, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3 CMMI-DEV, V1.3, November 2010
4.
go back to reference Niessink, F., Van Vliet, H.: Towards mature measurement programs. In: Proceedings of the Second Euromicro Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 82–88 (1998) Niessink, F., Van Vliet, H.: Towards mature measurement programs. In: Proceedings of the Second Euromicro Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 82–88 (1998)
5.
go back to reference Mendonca, M.G., Basili, V.R., Bhandari, I.S., Dawson, J.: An approach to improving existing measurement frameworks. IBM Syst. J. 37(4), 484–501 (1998) CrossRef Mendonca, M.G., Basili, V.R., Bhandari, I.S., Dawson, J.: An approach to improving existing measurement frameworks. IBM Syst. J. 37(4), 484–501 (1998) CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Díaz-Ley, M., García, F., Piattini, M.: MIS-PyME software measurement capability maturity model - Supporting the definition of software measurement programs and capability determination. Adv. Eng. Softw. 41, 1223–1237 (2010) CrossRef Díaz-Ley, M., García, F., Piattini, M.: MIS-PyME software measurement capability maturity model - Supporting the definition of software measurement programs and capability determination. Adv. Eng. Softw. 41, 1223–1237 (2010) CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Staron, M., Meding, W.: MeSRAM – A method for assessing robustness of measurement programs in large software development organizations and its industrial evaluation. J. Syst. Softw. 113, 76–100 (2015) CrossRef Staron, M., Meding, W.: MeSRAM – A method for assessing robustness of measurement programs in large software development organizations and its industrial evaluation. J. Syst. Softw. 113, 76–100 (2015) CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Salmanoglu, M., Öztürk, K., Bağrıyanık, S., Ungan, E., Demirörs, O.: Benefits and challenges of measuring software size: early results in a large organization. In: 25th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 10th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, IWSM-Mensura 2015 (2015) Salmanoglu, M., Öztürk, K., Bağrıyanık, S., Ungan, E., Demirörs, O.: Benefits and challenges of measuring software size: early results in a large organization. In: 25th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 10th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, IWSM-Mensura 2015 (2015)
9.
go back to reference SCAMPI Upgrade Team, Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1.3: Method Definition Document. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2011) SCAMPI Upgrade Team, Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1.3: Method Definition Document. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2011)
10.
go back to reference Daskalantonakis, M.K., Yacobellis, R.H.: A method for assessing software measurement technology. Qual. Eng. 3(1), 27–40 (1990) CrossRef Daskalantonakis, M.K., Yacobellis, R.H.: A method for assessing software measurement technology. Qual. Eng. 3(1), 27–40 (1990) CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Budlong, F., Peterson, J.: Software Metrics Capability Evaluation Guide (1995) Budlong, F., Peterson, J.: Software Metrics Capability Evaluation Guide (1995)
12.
go back to reference Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V.: Capability Maturity Model SM for Software, Version 1.1, Pittsburgh (1993) Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V.: Capability Maturity Model SM for Software, Version 1.1, Pittsburgh (1993)
13.
go back to reference Tarhan, A., Demirors, O.: Assessment of software process and metrics to support quantitative understanding. In: Cuadrado-Gallego, Juan J., Braungarten, R., Dumke, Reiner R., Abran, A. (eds.) IWSM/Mensura -2007. LNCS, vol. 4895, pp. 102–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.​1007/​978-3-540-85553-8_​9 CrossRef Tarhan, A., Demirors, O.: Assessment of software process and metrics to support quantitative understanding. In: Cuadrado-Gallego, Juan J., Braungarten, R., Dumke, Reiner R., Abran, A. (eds.) IWSM/Mensura -2007. LNCS, vol. 4895, pp. 102–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.​1007/​978-3-540-85553-8_​9 CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kırbaş, S.: An Assessment and Analysis Tool for Statistical Process Control of Software Processes. Middle East Technical University (2007) Kırbaş, S.: An Assessment and Analysis Tool for Statistical Process Control of Software Processes. Middle East Technical University (2007)
15.
go back to reference DoD, & US Army. PSM: Practical software and systems measurement – a foundation for objective project management version 4.0c. Department of Defense and US Army (2000) DoD, & US Army. PSM: Practical software and systems measurement – a foundation for objective project management version 4.0c. Department of Defense and US Army (2000)
16.
go back to reference ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 15939:2007 - Systems and software engineering – Measurement process (2007) ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 15939:2007 - Systems and software engineering – Measurement process (2007)
17.
go back to reference Díaz-Ley, M., García, F., Piattini, M.: Implementing a software measurement program in small and medium enterprises: a suitable framework (2008) Díaz-Ley, M., García, F., Piattini, M.: Implementing a software measurement program in small and medium enterprises: a suitable framework (2008)
18.
go back to reference Díaz-Ley, M.: Measurement framework for the definition of software measurement programs in SME’s: MIS-PyME, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (2009) Díaz-Ley, M.: Measurement framework for the definition of software measurement programs in SME’s: MIS-PyME, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (2009)
19.
20.
go back to reference Tarhan, A., Demirörs, O.: Investigating suitability of software process and metrics for statistical process control. In: Richardson, I., Runeson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4257, pp. 88–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi: 10.​1007/​11908562_​9 CrossRef Tarhan, A., Demirörs, O.: Investigating suitability of software process and metrics for statistical process control. In: Richardson, I., Runeson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4257, pp. 88–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi: 10.​1007/​11908562_​9 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploration of a Practical Approach for Assessing the Measurement Capability of Software Organizations
Authors
Murat Salmanoğlu
Onur Demirörs
Ahmet Coşkunçay
Ali Yıldız
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_30

Premium Partner