Top

TechTrends

Published in:

16-12-2023 | Original Paper

Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Outsourced Professional Development for Online Teaching and Learning

Authors: Ling Zhao, Raymond A. Dixon, Tonia A. Dousay, Ali Carr-Chellman

Published in: TechTrends | Issue 2/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore faculty experiences with a professional development (PD) program designed to prepare them for improved online teaching and learning. The primary difference between this PD offering and others similar in content involves using an external vendor. The research question was: how do faculty perceive their experiences in an external PD program designed to prepare them for better online teaching and learning in an intentional community of practice? The researchers selected participants through a purposeful sampling method, collecting narrative data from eight faculty using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. An analysis of collected data revealed four emergent themes: (1) obtaining new knowledge, (2) confirmation of appropriate tools and strategies, (3) mixed learning experience, and (4) community bond. Although the participants’ academic backgrounds varied, most faculty obtained new technological and pedagogical knowledge by participating in the PD program. Some participants reaffirmed their previous knowledge; the PD program reinforced appropriate tools and strategies for these faculty members. Additionally, participants had mixed feelings about their learning experience. Some participants perceived the program as beneficial, while others felt the program repetitive. Furthermore, participants perceived a community bond. The investigation concluded with recommendations for future research.

previous article Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Perceived Effect of Twitter Ban on Learning and Communication

next article ChatGPT in K-12 Education

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Sloan-C.

Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Osborn Popp, S. E. (2012). Peer observations among faculty in a college of education: Investigating the summative and formative uses of the reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP). Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9135-1CrossRef

Anderson, A., Barham, N., & Northcote, M. (2013). Using the TPACK framework to unite disciplines in online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 549–565.CrossRef

Anfara, V., & Mertz, N. (2015). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. SAGE Publications.

Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3), 597–606.CrossRef

Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2013). The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(133), 85–97.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Baume, D., & Yorke, M. (2002). The reliability of assessment by portfolio on a course to develop and accredit teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 7–25.CrossRef

Brookfield, S. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (Third ed., Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bryant-Shanklin, M., & Brumage, N. W. (2011). Collaborative responsive education mentoring: Mentoring for professional development in higher education. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 5, 42–53.

Butcher, K., Leary, H., Foster, J., & Devaul, H. (2014). Adopting an online curriculum planning tool: Facilitation for teachers’ thinking about student-centered pedagogy and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 423–447.

Carr-Chellman, A. A., & Dyer, D. (2000). The pain and ecstasy: Pre-service teacher perceptions on changing teacher roles and technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 96–105.

Chamberlain, J. M., D’Artrey, M., & Rowe, D. A. (2011). Peer observation of teaching: A decoupled process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411415083CrossRef

Couros, A. (2003). Communities of practice: A literature review. Retrieved from http://www.tcd.ie/CAPSL/_academic_practice/pdfdocs/Couros_2003.pdf

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Deni, A. R. M., & Malakolunthu, S. (2013). Teacher collaborative inquiry as a professional development intervention: Benefits and challenges. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(4), 559–568.CrossRef

Donnelly, R., & McSweeney, F. (2011). From humble beginnings: Evolving mentoring within professional development for academic staff. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 259–274.CrossRef

Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 6–25.CrossRef

Fitzpatrick, M., & Moore, S. (2013). Exploring both positive and negative experiences associated with engaging in teaching awards in a higher education context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866050CrossRef

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915CrossRef

Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & Van Der Veen, J. (2017). Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 736–767.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Golden, J. E. (2016). Supporting online faculty through communities of practice: Finding the faculty voice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(1), 84–93.CrossRef

Hahn, T. B., & Lester, J. (2012). Faculty needs and preferences for professional development. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(2), 82–97.

Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Figg, C. (2015). A case study of a TPACK-based approach to teacher professional development: Teaching science with blogs. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 15(2), 161–200.

Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 248–267.CrossRef

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29.CrossRef

Kennedy, A. (2015). Faculty perceptions of the usefulness of and participation in professional development for online teaching: An analysis of faculty development and online teaching satisfaction. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.CrossRef

Koepke, K., & O’Brien, A. (2012). Advancing pedagogy: Evidence for the role of online instructor training in improved pedagogical practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 73.

Krippendorff, K., & Bock, M. A. (2009). The content analysis reader. Sage.

Lieberman, M. (2018). Centers of the pedagogical universe. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/02/28/centers-teaching-and-learning-serve-hub-improving-teaching

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.CrossRef

McCammon, L. A., Saldaña, J., Hines, A., & Omasta, M. (2012). Lifelong impact: Adult perceptions of their high school speech and/or theatre participation. Youth Theatre Journal, 26(1), 2–25.CrossRef

Mishra, P. (2018). Revised version of TPACK image. Retrieved from https://punyamishra.com/2018/09/10/the-tpack-diagram-gets-an-upgrade/

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.CrossRef

Orozco, M., Fowlkes, J., Jerzak, P., & Musgrove, A. (2012). Zero to sixty plus in 108 days: Launching a central eLearning unit and its first faculty development program. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16(2), 177–192.

Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item radio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessments, Research & Evaluation, 9(11), 8.

Poyas, Y., & Smith, K. (2007). Becoming a community of practice: The blurred identity of clinical faculty teacher educators. Teacher Development, 11, 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530701644607CrossRef

Quiroz, R. E., Ritter, N. L., Li, Y., Newton, R. C., & Palkar, T. (2016). Standards based design: Teaching K-12 educators to build quality online courses. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(2), 123–144.

Research and Markets. (2022). Online education market, size, global Forecast 2022–2027, industry trends, share, growth, impact of COVID-19, opportunity company analysis. Professional Development and Training Reports. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5521683/online-education-market-size-global-forecast

Roberts, A., & Weston, K. (2013). Releasing the hidden academic? Learning from teacher-educators’ responses to a writing support programme. Professional Development in Education, 40, 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.835277CrossRef

Rudestam, K. E., & Newton, R. R. (2015). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process (4th ed.). Sage.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications Limited.

Schiffelbein, K. (2019). Silenced female voices: How institutionalized avoidance condones a culture of workplace aggression and shame in higher education. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.

Skelton, A. (2013). Positively transformational or poisoned chalice? The impact of a course on higher education teaching at a research-intensive institution. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 908–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827640CrossRef

Steinhauser, K., & Barroso, J. (2009). Using qualitative methods to explore key questions in palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 12(8), 725–730.CrossRefPubMed

Stenfors-Hayes, T., Weurlander, M., Dahlgren, L. O., & Hult, H. (2010). Medical teachers’ professional development: Perceived barriers and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.493352CrossRef

Vaill, A. L., & Testori, P. A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 111–119.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.

West, M. A. (2012). Effective teamwork: Practical lessons from organizational research. Wiley.

Title: Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Outsourced Professional Development for Online Teaching and Learning
Authors: Ling Zhao
Raymond A. Dixon
Tonia A. Dousay
Ali Carr-Chellman
Publication date: 16-12-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: TechTrends / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Electronic ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00923-0

Springer Professional

Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Outsourced Professional Development for Online Teaching and Learning

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Generative AI, Teacher Knowledge and Educational Research: Bridging Short- and Long-Term Perspectives

Understanding College Students’ Behavioral Patterns in a Blended Learning Class

Photo-Based Protocols to Support Community of Inquiry in Online Discussions

Predicting Special Educators’ Use of Assistive Technology in Virtual & Hybrid Learning Environments

Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Perceived Effect of Twitter Ban on Learning and Communication

ChatGPT in K-12 Education