Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Exploring Iterative Optimization Methods to Develop a MIMO Control Input

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In general, existing methods to develop an effective input for multiple-input/multiple-output (MIMO) control do not offer flexibility to account for limitations in experimental test setups or tailor the control to specific test objectives. The work presented in this paper introduces a method to leverage global optimization approaches to define a MIMO control input to match a data set representing field data. This contrasts with traditional MIMO input estimation methods which rely on direct inverse methods. Efficacy of the iterative optimization method depends on the objective function and optimization method used as well as the definition of the format of the input cross-power spectral density (CPSD) matrix for the optimization routine. Various objective functions are explored in this work through sampling as well as implementation within the iterative optimization process and their impact on the resulting output CPSD. Performance of iterative optimization is assessed against the traditional, direct pseudoinverse method of obtaining the input CPSD as well as the buzz method and weighted least squares (LS). Constraints can be used within the optimization process to control the magnitude and other aspects of the input CPSD, which allows for shaker limitations to be accounted for, among other considerations. Iterative optimization can provide the best input CPSD possible for a test setup while accounting for any shortcomings the setup may have, including force and voltage constraints, which is not possible with traditional methods.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Daborn, P.M., Ind, P.R., Ewins, D.J.: Enhanced ground-based vibration testing for aerodynamic environments. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 49(1–2), 165–180 (2014)CrossRef Daborn, P.M., Ind, P.R., Ewins, D.J.: Enhanced ground-based vibration testing for aerodynamic environments. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 49(1–2), 165–180 (2014)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Whiteman, W., Berman, M.: Inadequacies in uniaxial stress screen vibration testing. J. IEST. 44(4), 20–23 (2001)CrossRef Whiteman, W., Berman, M.: Inadequacies in uniaxial stress screen vibration testing. J. IEST. 44(4), 20–23 (2001)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Roberts, C., Ewins, D.J.: Multi-axis vibration testing of an aerodynamically excited structure. J. Vib. Control. 24(2), 427–437 (2018)CrossRef Roberts, C., Ewins, D.J.: Multi-axis vibration testing of an aerodynamically excited structure. J. Vib. Control. 24(2), 427–437 (2018)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ross, M., Jacobs, L.D., Tipton, G., Nelson, G., Cross, K., Hunter, N., Harvie, J.: 6-DOF shaker test input derivation from field test. In: Shock & Vibration, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting, Acoustics & Optics, Volume 9, pp. 11–22. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRef Ross, M., Jacobs, L.D., Tipton, G., Nelson, G., Cross, K., Hunter, N., Harvie, J.: 6-DOF shaker test input derivation from field test. In: Shock & Vibration, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting, Acoustics & Optics, Volume 9, pp. 11–22. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Daborn, P.M.: Scaling up of the impedance-matched multi-axis test (IMMAT) technique. In: Shock & Vibration, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting, Acoustics & Optics, Volume 9, pp. 1–10. Springer, Cham (2017) Daborn, P.M.: Scaling up of the impedance-matched multi-axis test (IMMAT) technique. In: Shock & Vibration, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting, Acoustics & Optics, Volume 9, pp. 1–10. Springer, Cham (2017)
7.
go back to reference Schultz, R.: Calibration of shaker electro-mechanical models. In: Special Topics in Structural Dynamics & Experimental Techniques, Volume 5, pp. 133–144. Springer, Cham (2019) Schultz, R.: Calibration of shaker electro-mechanical models. In: Special Topics in Structural Dynamics & Experimental Techniques, Volume 5, pp. 133–144. Springer, Cham (2019)
8.
go back to reference Tiwari, N., Puri, A., Saraswat, A.: Lumped parameter modeling and methodology for extraction of model parameters for an electrodynamic shaker. J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Active Control. 36(2), 99–115 (2017)CrossRef Tiwari, N., Puri, A., Saraswat, A.: Lumped parameter modeling and methodology for extraction of model parameters for an electrodynamic shaker. J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Active Control. 36(2), 99–115 (2017)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring Iterative Optimization Methods to Develop a MIMO Control Input
Authors
J. Justin Wilbanks
Ryan A. Schultz
Brian C. Owens
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75988-9_1

Premium Partner